Analyze Diet
Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita2015; 51(1); 40-51; doi: 10.4415/ANN_15_01_08

The role of associative and non-associative learning in the training of horses and implications for the welfare (a review).

Abstract: Horses were domesticated 6000 years ago and since then different types of approaches have been developed to enhance the horse's wellbeing and the human-horse relationship. Even though horse training is an increasingly important research area and many articles have been published on the subject, equitation is still the sport with the highest rate of human injuries, and a significant percentage of horses are sold or slaughtered due to behavioral problems. One explanation for this data is that the human-horse relationship is complex and the communication between humans and horses has not yet been accurately developed. Thus, this review addresses correct horse training based on scientific knowledge in animal learning and psychology. Specifically, it starts from the basic communication between humans and horses and then focuses on associative and non-associative learning, with many practical outcomes in horse management from the ground and under saddle. Finally, it highlights the common mistakes in the use of negative reinforcement, as well as all the implications that improper training could have on horse welfare. Increased levels of competence in horse training could be useful for equine technicians, owners, breeders, veterinarians, and scientists, in order to safeguard horse welfare, and also to reduce the number of human injuries and economic loss for civil society and the public health system.
Publication Date: 2015-04-11 PubMed ID: 25857383DOI: 10.4415/ANN_15_01_08Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Review

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research article reviews different horse training methods, focusing on associative and non-associative learning, highlighting common mistakes in the use of negative reinforcement, and discussing implications on horse welfare.

Understanding Human-Horse Communication and Training

The research begins from the fundamental aspect of communication between humans and horses. It discusses the complexity in properly establishing communication with horses due to the intricate relationship between man and horses. This complexity is suggested as one of the reasons why horse training is still a challenge, leading to high rates of human injuries and behavioral issues in horses that often result in them being sold or slaughtered.

  • The article posits that a better understanding of horse psychology and learning could lead to more effective and safer training methods.
  • Scientific knowledge in animal learning and psychology is used as a basis for exploring correct horse training methods.

Associative and Non-associative Learning

The study delves into explaining two important concepts in horse training – associative and non-associative learning.

  • Associative learning involves the horse connecting certain behaviors with specific outcomes. For example, a horse may learn to associate responding to a command with receiving a reward.
  • Non-associative learning, on the other hand, is related to changes that occur in a horse’s behavior due to repeated exposure to a stimulus. Over time, the horse eventually learns to ignore or desensitize to it, offering no behavioral response.
  • Both learning methods play crucial roles in horse management, both from the ground and under saddle (when being ridden).

The Impact of Negative Reinforcement

One of the key topics addressed in the research is the misuse of negative reinforcement in horse training. Negative reinforcement refers to the introduction of an unpleasant stimulus when a horse displays unwanted behavior, and removing it once the desired behavior is achieved.

  • The article highlights that if used incorrectly, negative reinforcement can cause confusion, stress, and potential physical damage to the horse.
  • Common mistakes in negative reinforcement are explored, providing useful insights for horse trainers.

Implications on Horse Welfare

Improper training methods can have a significant impact on the welfare of horses.

  • The article underlines that harsh or improper training methods can lead to physical and emotional distress in horses.
  • There are long-term repercussions that negative training can have, which may result in behavioral problems and decrease the quality of life for horses.

Benefits of Efficient Horse Training to Various Parties

The major takeaway from the article suggests that increased competence in horse training could greatly benefit a variety of stakeholders.

  • This includes equine technicians, owners, breeders, and veterinarians, who could improve their handling and care of horses, thus enhancing horse welfare.
  • Researchers can use this as a stepping stone for developing better, more humane training methods.
  • It can also potentially reduce the number of human injuries associated with horse riding and training, leading to public health benefits and economic savings.

Cite This Article

APA
Baragli P, Padalino B, Telatin A. (2015). The role of associative and non-associative learning in the training of horses and implications for the welfare (a review). Ann Ist Super Sanita, 51(1), 40-51. https://doi.org/10.4415/ANN_15_01_08

Publication

ISSN: 2384-8553
NlmUniqueID: 7502520
Country: Italy
Language: English
Volume: 51
Issue: 1
Pages: 40-51

Researcher Affiliations

Baragli, Paolo
    Padalino, Barbara
      Telatin, Angelo

        MeSH Terms

        • Animal Welfare
        • Animals
        • Animals, Domestic
        • Association Learning
        • Conditioning, Psychological
        • Horses / physiology
        • Human-Animal Bond
        • Humans

        Citations

        This article has been cited 11 times.
        1. Nielsen SS, Alvarez J, Bicout DJ, Calistri P, Canali E, Drewe JA, Garin-Bastuji B, Gonzales Rojas JL, Gortázar Schmidt C, Michel V, Miranda Chueca MÁ, Padalino B, Pasquali P, Roberts HC, Spoolder H, Stahl K, Velarde A, Viltrop A, Winckler C, Earley B, Edwards S, Faucitano L, Marti S, Miranda de La Lama GC, Costa LN, Thomsen PT, Ashe S, Mur L, Van der Stede Y, Herskin M. Welfare of equidae during transport.. EFSA J 2022 Sep;20(9):e07444.
          doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7444pubmed: 36092762google scholar: lookup
        2. Rochais C, Stomp M, Sébilleau M, Houdebine M, Henry S, Hausberger M. Horses' attentional characteristics differ according to the type of work.. PLoS One 2022;17(7):e0269974.
          doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269974pubmed: 35877616google scholar: lookup
        3. Brubaker L, Schroeder K, Sherwood D, Stroud D, Udell MAR. Horse Behavior towards Familiar and Unfamiliar Humans: Implications for Equine-Assisted Services.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Aug 11;11(8).
          doi: 10.3390/ani11082369pubmed: 34438825google scholar: lookup
        4. Ragonese G, Baragli P, Mariti C, Gazzano A, Lanatà A, Ferlazzo A, Fazio E, Cravana C. Interspecific two-dimensional visual discrimination of faces in horses (Equus caballus).. PLoS One 2021;16(2):e0247310.
          doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247310pubmed: 33606816google scholar: lookup
        5. Scopa C, Greco A, Contalbrigo L, Fratini E, Lanatà A, Scilingo EP, Baragli P. Inside the Interaction: Contact With Familiar Humans Modulates Heart Rate Variability in Horses.. Front Vet Sci 2020;7:582759.
          doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.582759pubmed: 33330706google scholar: lookup
        6. Aune A, Fenner K, Wilson B, Cameron E, McLean A, McGreevy P. Reported Behavioural Differences between Geldings and Mares Challenge Sex-Driven Stereotypes in Ridden Equine Behaviour.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Mar 2;10(3).
          doi: 10.3390/ani10030414pubmed: 32131444google scholar: lookup
        7. Guinnefollau L, Gee EK, Bolwell CF, Norman EJ, Rogers CW. Benefits of Animal Exposure on Veterinary Students' Understanding of Equine Behaviour and Self-Assessed Equine Handling Skills.. Animals (Basel) 2019 Aug 28;9(9).
          doi: 10.3390/ani9090620pubmed: 31466298google scholar: lookup
        8. Padalino B, Rogers CW, Guiver D, Bridges JP, Riley CB. Risk Factors for Transport-Related Problem Behaviors in Horses: A New Zealand Survey.. Animals (Basel) 2018 Aug 2;8(8).
          doi: 10.3390/ani8080134pubmed: 30072591google scholar: lookup
        9. Rochais C, Henry S, Hausberger M. Spontaneous attention-capture by auditory distractors as predictor of distractibility: a study of domestic horses (Equus caballus).. Sci Rep 2017 Nov 10;7(1):15283.
          doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-15654-5pubmed: 29127367google scholar: lookup
        10. York A, Matusiewicz J, Padalino B. How to minimise the incidence of transport-related problem behaviours in horses: a review.. J Equine Sci 2017;28(3):67-75.
          doi: 10.1294/jes.28.67pubmed: 28955158google scholar: lookup
        11. Rochais C, Sébilleau M, Houdebine M, Bec P, Hausberger M, Henry S. A novel test for evaluating horses' spontaneous visual attention is predictive of attention in operant learning tasks.. Naturwissenschaften 2017 Aug;104(7-8):61.
          doi: 10.1007/s00114-017-1480-6pubmed: 28681089google scholar: lookup