Analyze Diet
American journal of veterinary research2022; 83(10); ajvr.22.04.0074; doi: 10.2460/ajvr.22.04.0074

The use of a hyperosmolar irrigation solution is safe in an equine stifle joint model but does not reduce joint swelling.

Abstract: To determine the following: (1) whether an irrigation solution that is hyperosmolar (HYPER) relative to synovial fluid decreases tissue extravasation during an arthroscopic protocol when compared to a relatively hypoosmolar solution, (2) the safety of a HYPER solution based on viability of joint tissues following joint irrigation, and (3) if the use of a HYPER solution decreases water content in stifle joint tissue. Methods: 8 adult horses. Methods: A prospective, blinded, randomized controlled trial was performed to compare lactated Ringer's solution (LRS; 273 mOsm/L) and a HYPER (600 mOsm/L) irrigation solution for routine medial femorotibial joint (MFTJ) arthroscopy. Primary outcomes included quantification of periarticular fluid retention based on measured changes in defined stifle joint girth and ultrasonographic (US) criteria. Water content of tissue samples was assessed. The viability of articular cartilage was determined using a microscopic fluorescent cell viability staining system. Results: No significant difference in postprocedural joint swelling was observed between LRS and HYPER treatment groups. Percent increments in femorotibial joint dimensions (mean ± SD) were seen in both treatment groups based on US (LRS, 83.9 ± 84.6%; HYPER, 131.2 ± 144.9%) and caliper measurements (LRS 5.5 ± 4.3%; HYPER 7.5 ± 5.8%) (P ≤ .05). Chondrocyte viability and tissue water content were maintained in both treatment groups, and differences were not statistically significant. Conclusions: Doubling the osmolarity of an irrigation solution used routinely for arthroscopy does not result in detrimental effects on chondrocyte viability or tissue water content. However, use of a relatively HYPER irrigation solution did not attenuate procedural tissue swelling of the equine stifle joint.
Publication Date: 2022-08-24 PubMed ID: 35986910DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.22.04.0074Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Veterinary

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research studied whether using a hyperosmolar irrigation solution in equine stifle joint operations could reduce tissue swelling without causing detrimental effects. However, it found that the solution did not lessen swelling more than a hypoosmolar solution, yet it caused no harmful effects to tissue viability or water content.

Methodology

  • A prospective, blinded, and randomized controlled trial was carried out, in which two different irrigation solutions – lactated Ringer’s solution (LRS; 273 mOsm/L) and a hyperosmolar (600 mOsm/L) solution – were used in medial femorotibial joint (MFTJ) arthroscopies on eight adult horses.
  • The primary outcomes were the quantification of periarticular fluid retention, gauged via changes in stifle joint girth and ultrasonographic criteria.
  • Other factors assessed include tissue water content and the viability of articular cartilage, which was determined through a microscopic fluorescent cell viability staining system.

Results

  • Post-procedural joint swelling showed no significant difference between the LRS and hyperosmolar treatment groups.
  • Increases in femorotibial joint dimensions were seen in both groups, based on ultrasonographic and caliper measurements.
  • Chondrocyte viability and tissue water content remained undisturbed in both groups, showing that neither of the solutions had a statistically significant impact.

Conclusions

  • Merely increasing the osmolarity of the irrigation solution did not drastically affect chondrocyte viability or contribute to altering tissue water content.
  • However, using a hyperosmolar irrigation solution did not lessen the tissue swelling for equine stifle joint during the procedures. So, while the hyperosmolar solution was safe, it did not demonstrate the prospective benefit of reducing swelling in equine joint surgery.

Cite This Article

APA
Hayden LR, Stoker AM, Johnson PJ, McCracken MJ. (2022). The use of a hyperosmolar irrigation solution is safe in an equine stifle joint model but does not reduce joint swelling. Am J Vet Res, 83(10), ajvr.22.04.0074. https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.22.04.0074

Publication

ISSN: 1943-5681
NlmUniqueID: 0375011
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 83
Issue: 10
PII: ajvr.22.04.0074

Researcher Affiliations

Hayden, Lyndsey R
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO.
Stoker, Aaron M
  • Department of Orthopaedics, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO.
Johnson, Philip J
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO.
McCracken, Megan J
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Arthroscopy / veterinary
  • Horse Diseases / surgery
  • Horses
  • Joint Diseases / veterinary
  • Prospective Studies
  • Stifle / surgery
  • Water

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.