FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 10000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Life (Basel, Switzerland)2025; 15(2); 146; doi: 10.3390/life15020146

The Value of a Modified Posterior Thigh Flap with Z-Plasty for Reconstruction of Ischial Tuberosity Pressure Ulcers: A Retrospective Single Center Analysis.

Abstract: Pressure ulcers are a persistent and growing challenge in modern medicine, with prevalence rates ranging from 3.4% to 32.4% globally. Demographic changes suggest an increasing number of patients at risk, emphasizing the need for effective prevention and advanced treatment strategies. These ulcers, particularly stages III and IV, often require surgical intervention due to severe tissue damage. Among the surgical options, the Posterior Thigh Flap has emerged as a reliable fasciocutaneous flap, frequently referred to as a "work-horse flap", for defect coverage in the ischial region. To improve outcomes and minimize recurrences in weight-bearing areas, our clinic combined this flap technique with a Z-plasty modification to achieve redistribution of scar tissue to reduce localized pressure. In this retrospective study, six patients with seven ischial pressure ulcers were treated between 2003 and 2024 using this approach. Following debridement and wound conditioning with negative pressure therapy, defect coverage was performed. The results show clinically acceptable complication rates (42.9%) and a low recurrence rate (14.3%), with recurrences occurring no earlier than 12 months post-treatment. The Z-plasty effectively shifted scar zones away from high-pressure areas, reducing tension and recurrence risk. This study highlights the potential benefits of combining fasciocutaneous flaps with scar management techniques to improve long-term outcomes for ischial pressure ulcers and provides an innovative approach to treating ischial pressure ulcers.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2025-01-22 PubMed ID: 40003555PubMed Central: PMC11856684DOI: 10.3390/life15020146Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research primarily focuses on investigating the impact of combining the Posterior Thigh Flap surgical technique and Z-plasty modification in treating stages III and IV Ischial Tuberosity Pressure Ulcers. The results of the retrospective study indicate this approach may effectively reduce the risk of complications and relapse in patients.

Context of the Research

  • The authors of the paper focus on sthe udy of pressure ulcers which, from a global perspective, present a significant public health issue, manifesting in between 3.4% and 32.4% of the population.
  • They underline the increasing requirement for effective treatment strategies and prevention measures due to the predicted increase in the patient population at risk for developing this condition.

Specific Research Scope and Methodology

  • The main essence of the research revolves around complex stages III and IV pressure ulcers that generally necessitate surgical intervention.
  • The authors propose improvements to the standard procedure of utilising a Posterior Thigh Flap, a dependable surgical method often used to cover defects in the ischial region.
  • The innovation of the presented practice lies in the incorporation of Z-plasty modification into the traditional surgical process, aimed at repositioning the scar tissue to decrease localized pressure, hence, preventing relapses.
  • The research evaluates the data of six patients suffering from ischial pressure ulcers who were treated with the modified technique between 2003 and 2024.

Key Findings and Conclusion

  • The presented approach was evaluated based on the postoperative complication rates, recurrence rates, and time of recurrence.
  • The results point to acceptable complication rates (42.9%) and low recurrence rates (14.3%), with no recurrence instances recorded earlier than 12 months following the treatment.
  • The Z-plasty modification was deemed efficient in redistributing scar zones away from high-pressure areas, thereby diminishing tension and recurrence risk.
  • The authors conclude that combining fasciocutaneous flaps with scar management techniques could pave the way for improved long-term outcomes for patients with ischial pressure ulcers.

Cite This Article

APA
Stumpfe MC, Horch RE, Müller-Seubert W. (2025). The Value of a Modified Posterior Thigh Flap with Z-Plasty for Reconstruction of Ischial Tuberosity Pressure Ulcers: A Retrospective Single Center Analysis. Life (Basel), 15(2), 146. https://doi.org/10.3390/life15020146

Publication

Life (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2075-1729
NlmUniqueID: 101580444
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 15
Issue: 2
PII: 146

Researcher Affiliations

Stumpfe, Maximilian C
  • Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery and Laboratory for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Horch, Raymund E
  • Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery and Laboratory for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Müller-Seubert, Wibke
  • Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery and Laboratory for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

This article includes 32 references
  1. Chou R, Dana T, Bougatsos C, Blazina I, Starmer AJ, Reitel K, Buckley DI. Pressure ulcer risk assessment and prevention: A systematic comparative effectiveness review.. Ann. Intern. Med. 2013;159:28–38.
    doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-1-201307020-00006pubmed: 23817702google scholar: lookup
  2. Padula WV, Mishra MK, Makic MB, Sullivan PW. Improving the quality of pressure ulcer care with prevention: A cost-effectiveness analysis.. Med. Care. 2011;49:385–392.
    doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31820292b3pubmed: 21368685google scholar: lookup
  3. Mervis JS, Phillips TJ. Pressure ulcers: Pathophysiology, epidemiology, risk factors, and presentation.. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2019;81:881–890.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.12.069pubmed: 30664905google scholar: lookup
  4. Anthony D, Alosoumi D, Safari R. Prevalence of pressure ulcers in long-term care: A global review.. J. Wound Care. 2019;28:702–709.
    doi: 10.12968/jowc.2019.28.11.702pubmed: 31721671google scholar: lookup
  5. Dogra S, Menon G, Husain J, Anand S. Lumbosacral rotation flap: A simple method for covering sacral pressure injuries.. J. Wound Care. 2024;33:852–855.
    doi: 10.12968/jowc.2024.0271pubmed: 39480730google scholar: lookup
  6. Gefen A. The biomechanics of sitting-acquired pressure ulcers in patients with spinal cord injury or lesions.. Int. Wound J. 2007;4:222–231.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2007.00330.xpmc: PMC7951527pubmed: 17924879google scholar: lookup
  7. Kosiak M. Etiology of decubitus ulcers.. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 1961;42:19–29.
    pubmed: 13753341
  8. Wu J, Wang B, Zhu L, Jia X. Nurses’ knowledge on pressure ulcer prevention: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis based on the Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Assessment Tool.. Front. Public Health. 2022;10:964680.
    doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.964680pmc: PMC9493096pubmed: 36159260google scholar: lookup
  9. Edsberg LE, Black JM, Goldberg M, McNichol L, Moore L, Sieggreen M. Revised National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel Pressure Injury Staging System: Revised Pressure Injury Staging System.. J. Wound Ostomy Cont. Nurs. 2016;43:585–597.
    doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000281pmc: PMC5098472pubmed: 27749790google scholar: lookup
  10. Kandi LA, Rangel IC, Movtchan NV, Van Spronsen NR, Kruger EA. Comprehensive Management of Pressure Injury.. Phys. Med. Rehabil. Clin. N. Am. 2022;33:773–787.
    doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2022.06.002pubmed: 36243469google scholar: lookup
  11. Damert HG, Meyer F, Altmann S. Therapeutic options for pressure ulcers.. Zentralbl. Chir. 2015;140:193–200.
    doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1545808pubmed: 25874469google scholar: lookup
  12. Stumpfe MC, Horch RE, Arkudas A, Cai A, Muller-Seubert W, Hauck T, Ludolph I. The Value of Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy and Flap Surgery in Hidradenitis Suppurativa—A Single Center Analysis of Different Treatment Options.. Front. Surg. 2022;9:867487.
    doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.867487pmc: PMC9273893pubmed: 35836613google scholar: lookup
  13. Gruener JS, Horch RE, Geierlehner A, Mueller-Seubert W, Cai A, Arkudas A, Ludolph I. Is Instillational Topical Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Peri-Prosthetic Infections of the Breast Effective? A Pilot Study.. J. Pers. Med. 2022;12:2054.
    doi: 10.3390/jpm12122054pmc: PMC9786689pubmed: 36556274google scholar: lookup
  14. Schryvers OI, Stranc MF, Nance PW. Surgical treatment of pressure ulcers: 20-year experience.. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2000;81:1556–1562.
    doi: 10.1053/apmr.2000.17828pubmed: 11128889google scholar: lookup
  15. Sameem M, Au M, Wood T, Farrokhyar F, Mahoney J. A systematic review of complication and recurrence rates of musculocutaneous, fasciocutaneous, and perforator-based flaps for treatment of pressure sores.. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2012;130:67e–77e.
    doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318254b19fpubmed: 22743956google scholar: lookup
  16. Mohan AT, Zhu L, Sur YJ, Morsy M, Michalak GJ, Lachman N, Rammos CK, Saint-Cyr M. Application of Posterior Thigh Three-Dimensional Profunda Artery Perforator Perforasomes in Refining Next-Generation Flap Designs: Transverse, Vertical, and S-Shaped Profunda Artery Perforator Flaps.. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2017;139:834e–845e.
    doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003224pubmed: 28350651google scholar: lookup
  17. Ordenana C, Dalla Pozza E, Rampazzo A, Said S, McBride J, Kessler H, Bassiri Gharb B. Wide posterior gluteal-thigh propeller flap for reconstruction of perineal defects.. Microsurgery 2021;41:146–156.
    doi: 10.1002/micr.30666pubmed: 33030284google scholar: lookup
  18. Clavien PA, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM. Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy.. Surgery 1992;111:518–526.
    pubmed: 1598671
  19. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.. Ann. Surg. 2004;240:205–213.
    doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.aepmc: PMC1360123pubmed: 15273542google scholar: lookup
  20. Disa JJ, Carlton JM, Goldberg NH. Efficacy of operative cure in pressure sore patients.. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1992;89:272–278.
    doi: 10.1097/00006534-199202000-00012pubmed: 1732895google scholar: lookup
  21. Foster RD, Anthony JP, Mathes SJ, Hoffman WY, Young D, Eshima I. Flap selection as a determinant of success in pressure sore coverage.. Arch. Surg. 1997;132:868–873.
    doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430320070011pubmed: 9267271google scholar: lookup
  22. Homma Ki, Murakami G, Fujioka H, Fujita T, Imai A, Ezoe K. Treatment of Ischial Pressure Ulcers with a Posteromedial Thigh Fasciocutaneous Flap.. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2001;108:1990–1996.
    doi: 10.1097/00006534-200112000-00023pubmed: 11743389google scholar: lookup
  23. Djedovic G, Morandi EM, Metzler J, Wirthmann A, Matiasek J, Bauer T, Rieger UM. The posterior thigh flap for defect coverage of ischial pressure sores—A critical single-centre analysis.. Int. Wound J. 2017;14:1154–1159.
    doi: 10.1111/iwj.12776pmc: PMC7950091pubmed: 28661069google scholar: lookup
  24. Roche Rd. Störfall Decubitus. Handbuch zur Gesundheitsökonomischen Bedeutung, Prävention, Konservativen und Chirurgischen Therapie.. 1st ed. REHAB Basel; Basel, Switzerland: 2012.
  25. Zito PM, Jawad BA, Hohman MH, Mazzoni T. StatPearls.. StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island, FL, USA: 2024.
    pubmed: 29939552
  26. Hove CR, Williams EF 3rd, Rodgers BJ. Z-plasty: A concise review.. Facial Plast. Surg. 2001;17:289–294.
    doi: 10.1055/s-2001-18828pubmed: 11735063google scholar: lookup
  27. Mandrekas AD, Mastorakos DP. The management of decubitus ulcers by musculocutaneous flaps: A five-year experience.. Ann. Plast. Surg. 1992;28:167–174.
    doi: 10.1097/00000637-199202000-00007pubmed: 1567119google scholar: lookup
  28. Foster RD, Anthony JP, Mathes SJ, Hoffman WY. Ischial pressure sore coverage: A rationale for flap selection.. Br. J. Plast. Surg. 1997;50:374–379.
    doi: 10.1016/S0007-1226(97)90548-8pubmed: 9245873google scholar: lookup
  29. Wettstein R, Tremp M, Baumberger M, Schaefer DJ, Kalbermatten DF. Local flap therapy for the treatment of pressure sore wounds.. Int. Wound J. 2015;12:572–576.
    doi: 10.1111/iwj.12166pmc: PMC7950397pubmed: 24131657google scholar: lookup
  30. Yamamoto Y, Tsutsumida A, Murazumi M, Sugihara T. Long-term outcome of pressure sores treated with flap coverage.. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1997;100:1212–1217.
    doi: 10.1097/00006534-199710000-00021pubmed: 9326782google scholar: lookup
  31. Hallock GG. The random upper posterior thigh fasciocutaneous flap.. Ann. Plast. Surg. 1994;32:367–371.
    doi: 10.1097/00000637-199404000-00008pubmed: 8210154google scholar: lookup
  32. Moore Z, Cowman S, Conroy RM. A randomised controlled clinical trial of repositioning, using the 30 degrees tilt, for the prevention of pressure ulcers.. J. Clin. Nurs. 2011;20:2633–2644.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03736.xpubmed: 21702861google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,850 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.