Analyze Diet
Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia2011; 38(1); 3-14; doi: 10.1111/j.1467-2995.2010.00580.x

Thermal and mechanical nociceptive threshold testing in horses: a review.

Abstract: This review evaluates the thermal and mechanical nociceptive threshold testing techniques that have been used in horses and discusses them with reference to their applications, limitations and the factors which can influence both the testing procedure itself and the animal's responses. Methods to optimise the reliability and repeatability of the testing procedures are suggested and the potential clinical applications discussed. Methods: Web of Science and Medline. Conclusions: Thermal and mechanical nociceptive threshold testing techniques have valuable roles in both the identification of altered nociceptive function and the pre-clinical evaluation of analgesics in horses.
Publication Date: 2011-01-11 PubMed ID: 21214705DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-2995.2010.00580.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Review

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article is a review of thermal and mechanical nociceptive threshold testing methods that are used in horses, discussing their application, limitations, and numerous factors that can influence these testing procedures and the horse’s response to them.

Overview of the Research Review

  • The authors of the study explore and evaluate the thermal and mechanical nociceptive threshold testing techniques which are used in horses. The term ‘nociceptive threshold testing’ refers to the methods used to determine the minimum intensity of a pain stimulus that is perceived as painful by an organism, in this case, horse.
  • These testing techniques have valuable uses in detecting alterations in nociceptive function – these refer to any changes in the horse’s physiological responses to harmful stimuli. They also play a critical role in the pre-clinical assessment of painkillers or analgesics for the horses.

Testing Methods, Applications, and Limitations

  • With respect to the applications of thermal and mechanical nociceptive threshold testing techniques, they have been instrumental in understanding how horses respond to pain. Such insights can aid in the advancement of medical and therapeutic procedures tailored to horses’ physiological and pain response systems.
  • However, there are limitations associated with these testing techniques. For one, they can only identify alterations in nociceptive functions, and may not necessarily give a comprehensive view of the overall wellbeing of the horse. Moreover, other factors may influence the horse’s response, this could be the horse’s mood, the environment it is kept in, its diet, among other factors.

The Influence of Several Factors

  • The authors also discuss various factors that can affect both the testing procedure itself and the animal’s responses. These could include the environmental conditions during testing, the horse’s age, breed, and general health status amongst others.
  • The authors suggest methods to optimise the reliability and repeatability of the testing procedures to ensure more accurate results are obtained. This could involve consistent application of the testing procedure, conducting the tests under similar conditions etc.

Clinical Applications

  • Finally, the researchers discuss potential clinical applications for these testing techniques. This involves using the insights provided by the testing methods to improve analgesic protocols, which are treatment approaches designed to manage pain in horses.
  • However, it’s important to note that the utility of these testing techniques depends on the quality of the methods themselves and proper understanding and interpretation of the results obtained.

Cite This Article

APA
Love EJ, Murrell J, Whay HR. (2011). Thermal and mechanical nociceptive threshold testing in horses: a review. Vet Anaesth Analg, 38(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2995.2010.00580.x

Publication

ISSN: 1467-2995
NlmUniqueID: 100956422
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 38
Issue: 1
Pages: 3-14

Researcher Affiliations

Love, Emma J
  • Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Langford, UK. emma.love@bristol.ac.uk
Murrell, J
    Whay, H R

      MeSH Terms

      • Animals
      • Biomechanical Phenomena
      • Horses / physiology
      • Hot Temperature
      • Pain / diagnosis
      • Pain / veterinary
      • Pain Measurement / veterinary

      Citations

      This article has been cited 13 times.
      1. Rettore Andreis F, Mørch CD, Jensen W, Meijs S. On determining the mechanical nociceptive threshold in pigs: a reliability study.. Front Pain Res (Lausanne) 2023;4:1191786.
        doi: 10.3389/fpain.2023.1191786pubmed: 37265942google scholar: lookup
      2. Troya-Portillo L, López-Sanromán J, Villalba-Orero M, Santiago-Llorente I. Cardiorespiratory, Sedative and Antinociceptive Effects of a Medetomidine Constant Rate Infusion with Morphine, Ketamine or Both.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jul 13;11(7).
        doi: 10.3390/ani11072081pubmed: 34359209google scholar: lookup
      3. de Oliveira AR, Gozalo-Marcilla M, Ringer SK, Schauvliege S, Fonseca MW, Esteves Trindade PH, Prospero Puoli Filho JN, Luna SPL. Development and validation of the facial scale (FaceSed) to evaluate sedation in horses.. PLoS One 2021;16(6):e0251909.
        doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251909pubmed: 34061878google scholar: lookup
      4. Viscardi AV, Reppert EJ, Kleinhenz MD, Wise P, Lin Z, Montgomery S, Daniell H, Curtis A, Martin M, Coetzee JF. Analgesic Comparison of Flunixin Meglumine or Meloxicam for Soft-Tissue Surgery in Sheep: A Pilot Study.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Feb 6;11(2).
        doi: 10.3390/ani11020423pubmed: 33562143google scholar: lookup
      5. Rørvang MV, Nielsen BL, McLean AN. Sensory Abilities of Horses and Their Importance for Equitation Science.. Front Vet Sci 2020;7:633.
        doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00633pubmed: 33033724google scholar: lookup
      6. Yavari S, Khraim N, Szura G, Starke A, Engelke E, Pfarrer C, Hopster K, Schmicke M, Kehler W, Heppelmann M, Kästner SBR, Rehage J. Evaluation of intravenous regional anaesthesia and four-point nerve block efficacy in the distal hind limb of dairy cows.. BMC Vet Res 2017 Nov 7;13(1):320.
        doi: 10.1186/s12917-017-1250-xpubmed: 29115948google scholar: lookup
      7. Hood J, McDonald C, Wilson B, McManus P, McGreevy P. Whip Rule Breaches in a Major Australian Racing Jurisdiction: Welfare and Regulatory Implications.. Animals (Basel) 2017 Jan 16;7(1).
        doi: 10.3390/ani7010004pubmed: 28275207google scholar: lookup
      8. Johnson C. Research Tools for the Measurement of Pain and Nociception.. Animals (Basel) 2016 Nov 11;6(11).
        doi: 10.3390/ani6110071pubmed: 27845724google scholar: lookup
      9. Di Giminiani P, Sandercock DA, Malcolm EM, Leach MC, Herskin MS, Edwards SA. Application of a handheld Pressure Application Measurement device for the characterisation of mechanical nociceptive thresholds in intact pig tails.. Physiol Behav 2016 Oct 15;165:119-26.
        doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.07.006pubmed: 27422675google scholar: lookup
      10. Kaka U, Chen HC, Goh YM, Abubakar AA, Fakurazi S, Ebrahimi M. Validation of a modified algometer to measure mechanical nociceptive thresholds in awake dogs.. Biomed Res Int 2015;2015:375421.
        doi: 10.1155/2015/375421pubmed: 26075236google scholar: lookup
      11. Raundal PM, Andersen PH, Toft N, Forkman B, Munksgaard L, Herskin MS. Handheld mechanical nociceptive threshold testing in dairy cows - intra-individual variation, inter-observer agreement and variation over time.. Vet Anaesth Analg 2014 Nov;41(6):660-9.
        doi: 10.1111/vaa.12159pubmed: 24734991google scholar: lookup
      12. Poller C, Hopster K, Rohn K, Kästner SB. Nociceptive thermal threshold testing in horses - effect of neuroleptic sedation and neuroleptanalgesia at different stimulation sites.. BMC Vet Res 2013 Jul 9;9:135.
        doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-9-135pubmed: 23837730google scholar: lookup
      13. Poller C, Hopster K, Rohn K, Kästner SB. Evaluation of contact heat thermal threshold testing for standardized assessment of cutaneous nociception in horses - comparison of different locations and environmental conditions.. BMC Vet Res 2013 Jan 8;9:4.
        doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-9-4pubmed: 23298405google scholar: lookup