FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Can Vet J / Three-week summer period prevalence of Clostridium difficile...
The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne2014; 55(8); 786-789;

Three-week summer period prevalence of Clostridium difficile in farm animals in a temperate region of the United States (Ohio).

Abstract: The cross-sectional (period) prevalence of Clostridium difficile in 875 farm animals from 29 commercial operations during the summer of 2008 in Ohio, USA was quantified. Compared to an external referent population of intensively managed race horses (12.7%), intensively managed commercially mature food animals (poultry, cattle, swine; < 0.6%) were infrequent shedders of C. difficile (P < 0.00001) during the warmest weeks of 2008. La prévalence par période de chez 875 animaux de ferme provenant de 29 exploitations commerciales durant l’été de 2008 en Ohio, aux États-Unis, est quantifiée. Comparativement à la population de référence constituée externe de chevaux de course à gestion intensive (12,7 %), les animaux destinés à l’alimentation et prêts à la commercialisation (volaille, bovins, porcs; < 0,6 %) ont rarement excrété ( < 0,00001) durant les semaines les plus chaudes de 2008.(Traduit par Isabelle Vallières).
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2014-08-02 PubMed ID: 25082995PubMed Central: PMC4095967
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support
  • U.S. Gov't
  • Non-P.H.S.

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research investigates the frequency at which Clostridium difficile, a bacterium, is shed by farm animals in Ohio, USA during the summer of 2008. The study found that commercially mature food animals such as poultry, cattle, and pigs shed the bacterium less frequently compared to racehorses.

Understanding the Research

To understand this research, it is necessary to first understand the subject of study – Clostridium difficile. This bacterium can cause infections in the colon, leading to severe diarrhea and life-threatening inflammation. The bacterium is primarily passed through feces and can live for long periods on surfaces, hence the reference to ‘shedding’ in the research.

  • The research was a cross-sectional study, designed to examine a population at one specific point in time. In this case, the population under consideration was farm animals and the timeframe was the summer of 2008.
  • A total of 875 farm animals from 29 commercial operations were included in the study. These operations included both intensive and less intensive farming practices.
  • The paper contrasts the frequency at which C. difficile was shed by these farm animals with that of a reference population – in this case, intensively managed racehorses.
  • It was found that C. difficile was shed less frequently by commercially mature animals such as poultry, cattle, and swine (<0.6%) compared to racehorses (12.7%). This was particularly the case during the warmest weeks of 2008.

Research Significance

The implications of this research are significant for both human and animal health. Clostridium difficile is a major public health problem, and understanding its prevalence in the farm animal population can significantly influence its management.

  • The low prevalence of C. difficile in commercially mature food animals suggests that the risk of transmission to humans through the food chain is relatively low.
  • However, the significantly higher prevalence in racehorses indicates that there could be specific risk factors associated with intensive management of these animals. This could guide targeted interventions to reduce prevalence in this population, hence mitigating the potential risk to humans.
  • Period prevalence studies like this can also aid in monitoring disease trends over time, which can guide public health strategies and interventions.

Cite This Article

APA
Rodriguez-Palacios A, Barman T, LeJeune JT. (2014). Three-week summer period prevalence of Clostridium difficile in farm animals in a temperate region of the United States (Ohio). Can Vet J, 55(8), 786-789.

Publication

The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne
ISSN: 0008-5286
NlmUniqueID: 0004653
Country: Canada
Language: English
Volume: 55
Issue: 8
Pages: 786-789

Researcher Affiliations

Rodriguez-Palacios, Alexander
  • Food Animal Health Research Program, College of Food Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio 44691, USA (Rodriguez-Palacios, LeJeune); Department of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA (Rodriguez-Palacios, LeJeune); Cooper Farms, Fort Recovery, Ohio, USA (Barman); Division of Gastroenterology and Liver Disease, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA (Rodriguez-Palacios).
Barman, Tim
  • Food Animal Health Research Program, College of Food Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio 44691, USA (Rodriguez-Palacios, LeJeune); Department of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA (Rodriguez-Palacios, LeJeune); Cooper Farms, Fort Recovery, Ohio, USA (Barman); Division of Gastroenterology and Liver Disease, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA (Rodriguez-Palacios).
LeJeune, Jeffrey T
  • Food Animal Health Research Program, College of Food Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio 44691, USA (Rodriguez-Palacios, LeJeune); Department of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA (Rodriguez-Palacios, LeJeune); Cooper Farms, Fort Recovery, Ohio, USA (Barman); Division of Gastroenterology and Liver Disease, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA (Rodriguez-Palacios).

MeSH Terms

  • Animal Husbandry
  • Animals
  • Animals, Domestic / microbiology
  • Cattle
  • Chickens
  • Clostridioides difficile / isolation & purification
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Feces / microbiology
  • Horses
  • Ohio / epidemiology
  • Prevalence
  • Seasons
  • Swine

References

This article includes 22 references
  1. Rupnik M, Wilcox MH, Gerding DN. Clostridium difficile infection: new developments in epidemiology and pathogenesis.. Nat Rev Microbiol 2009 Jul;7(7):526-36.
    pubmed: 19528959doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2164google scholar: lookup
  2. Rodriguez-Palacios A, Borgmann S, Kline TR, LeJeune JT. Clostridium difficile in foods and animals: history and measures to reduce exposure.. Anim Health Res Rev 2013 Jun;14(1):11-29.
    pubmed: 23324529doi: 10.1017/S1466252312000229google scholar: lookup
  3. Reil M, Hensgens MP, Kuijper EJ, Jakobiak T, Gruber H, Kist M, Borgmann S. Seasonality of Clostridium difficile infections in Southern Germany.. Epidemiol Infect 2012 Oct;140(10):1787-93.
    pmc: PMC3443963pubmed: 22152928doi: 10.1017/S0950268811002627google scholar: lookup
  4. Hensgens MP, Keessen EC, Squire MM, Riley TV, Koene MG, de Boer E, Lipman LJ, Kuijper EJ. Clostridium difficile infection in the community: a zoonotic disease?. Clin Microbiol Infect 2012 Jul;18(7):635-45.
    pubmed: 22536816doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03853.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  5. Janezic S, Ocepek M, Zidaric V, Rupnik M. Clostridium difficile genotypes other than ribotype 078 that are prevalent among human, animal and environmental isolates.. BMC Microbiol 2012 Mar 27;12:48.
    pmc: PMC3353227pubmed: 22452857doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-48google scholar: lookup
  6. Eyre DW, Golubchik T, Gordon NC, Bowden R, Piazza P, Batty EM, Ip CL, Wilson DJ, Didelot X, O'Connor L, Lay R, Buck D, Kearns AM, Shaw A, Paul J, Wilcox MH, Donnelly PJ, Peto TE, Walker AS, Crook DW. A pilot study of rapid benchtop sequencing of Staphylococcus aureus and Clostridium difficile for outbreak detection and surveillance.. BMJ Open 2012;2(3).
    pmc: PMC3378946pubmed: 22674929doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001124google scholar: lookup
  7. Rodriguez-Palacios A, Stämpfli HR, Duffield T, Peregrine AS, Trotz-Williams LA, Arroyo LG, Brazier JS, Weese JS. Clostridium difficile PCR ribotypes in calves, Canada.. Emerg Infect Dis 2006 Nov;12(11):1730-6.
    pmc: PMC3372327pubmed: 17283624doi: 10.3201/eid1211.051581google scholar: lookup
  8. Jump RL, Riggs MM, Sethi AK, Pultz MJ, Ellis-Reid T, Riebel W, Gerding DN, Salata RA, Donskey CJ. Multihospital outbreak of Clostridium difficile infection, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.. Emerg Infect Dis 2010 May;16(5):827-9.
    pmc: PMC2953978pubmed: 20409374doi: 10.3201/eid1605.071606google scholar: lookup
  9. Campbell RJ, Giljahn L, Machesky K, Cibulskas-White K, Lane LM, Porter K, Paulson JO, Smith FW, McDonald LC. Clostridium difficile infection in Ohio hospitals and nursing homes during 2006.. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2009 Jun;30(6):526-33.
    pubmed: 19419272doi: 10.1086/597507google scholar: lookup
  10. Songer JG, Jones R, Anderson MA, Barbara AJ, Post KW, Trinh HT. Prevention of porcine Clostridium difficile-associated disease by competitive exclusion with nontoxigenic organisms.. Vet Microbiol 2007 Oct 6;124(3-4):358-61.
    pubmed: 17493774doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.04.019google scholar: lookup
  11. Wilson KH, Sheagren JN. Antagonism of toxigenic Clostridium difficile by nontoxigenic C. difficile.. J Infect Dis 1983 Apr;147(4):733-6.
    pubmed: 6842009doi: 10.1093/infdis/147.4.733google scholar: lookup
  12. Thitaram SN, Frank JF, Lyon SA, Siragusa GR, Bailey JS, Lombard JE, Haley CA, Wagner BA, Dargatz DA, Fedorka-Cray PJ. Clostridium difficile from healthy food animals: optimized isolation and prevalence.. J Food Prot 2011 Jan;74(1):130-3.
    pubmed: 21219775doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-10-229google scholar: lookup
  13. Rodriguez-Palacios A, Koohmaraie M, LeJeune JT. Prevalence, enumeration, and antimicrobial agent resistance of Clostridium difficile in cattle at harvest in the United States.. J Food Prot 2011 Oct;74(10):1618-24.
    pubmed: 22004807doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-141google scholar: lookup
  14. Rodriguez-Palacios A, Pickworth C, Loerch S, LeJeune JT. Transient fecal shedding and limited animal-to-animal transmission of Clostridium difficile by naturally infected finishing feedlot cattle.. Appl Environ Microbiol 2011 May;77(10):3391-7.
    pmc: PMC3126469pubmed: 21441320doi: 10.1128/AEM.02736-10google scholar: lookup
  15. Indra A, Lassnig H, Baliko N, Much P, Fiedler A, Huhulescu S, Allerberger F. Clostridium difficile: a new zoonotic agent?. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2009;121(3-4):91-5.
    pubmed: 19280132doi: 10.1007/s00508-008-1127-xgoogle scholar: lookup
  16. Medina-Torres CE, Weese JS, Staempfli HR. Prevalence of Clostridium difficile in horses.. Vet Microbiol 2011 Aug 26;152(1-2):212-5.
    pubmed: 21570780doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.04.012google scholar: lookup
  17. Weese JS, Toxopeus L, Arroyo L. Clostridium difficile associated diarrhoea in horses within the community: predictors, clinical presentation and outcome.. Equine Vet J 2006 Mar;38(2):185-8.
    pubmed: 16536390doi: 10.2746/042516406776563369google scholar: lookup
  18. Lengacher B, Kline TR, Harpster L, Williams ML, Lejeune JT. Low prevalence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in horses in Ohio, USA.. J Food Prot 2010 Nov;73(11):2089-92.
    pubmed: 21219723doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-73.11.2089google scholar: lookup
  19. Båverud V, Gustafsson A, Franklin A, Aspán A, Gunnarsson A. Clostridium difficile: prevalence in horses and environment, and antimicrobial susceptibility.. Equine Vet J 2003 Jul;35(5):465-71.
    pubmed: 12875324doi: 10.2746/042516403775600505google scholar: lookup
  20. Simango C, Mwakurudza S. Clostridium difficile in broiler chickens sold at market places in Zimbabwe and their antimicrobial susceptibility.. Int J Food Microbiol 2008 Jun 10;124(3):268-70.
    pubmed: 18448182doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.03.020google scholar: lookup
  21. Simango C. Prevalence of Clostridium difficile in the environment in a rural community in Zimbabwe.. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2006 Dec;100(12):1146-50.
    pubmed: 16698054doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2006.01.009google scholar: lookup
  22. Rodriguez C, Avesani V, Van Broeck J, Taminiau B, Delmée M, Daube G. Presence of Clostridium difficile in pigs and cattle intestinal contents and carcass contamination at the slaughterhouse in Belgium.. Int J Food Microbiol 2013 Sep 2;166(2):256-62.
    pubmed: 23973837doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.07.017google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 5 times.
  1. Bolton D, Marcos P. The Environment, Farm Animals and Foods as Sources of Clostridioides difficile Infection in Humans.. Foods 2023 Mar 4;12(5).
    doi: 10.3390/foods12051094pubmed: 36900611google scholar: lookup
  2. Weese JS. Clostridium (Clostridioides) difficile in animals.. J Vet Diagn Invest 2020 Mar;32(2):213-221.
    doi: 10.1177/1040638719899081pubmed: 31904312google scholar: lookup
  3. Knight DR, Riley TV. Genomic Delineation of Zoonotic Origins of Clostridium difficile.. Front Public Health 2019;7:164.
    doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00164pubmed: 31281807google scholar: lookup
  4. Rodriguez C, Taminiau B, Van Broeck J, Delmée M, Daube G. Clostridium difficile in Food and Animals: A Comprehensive Review.. Adv Exp Med Biol 2016;932:65-92.
    doi: 10.1007/5584_2016_27pubmed: 27350639google scholar: lookup
  5. Ismail AA, Ahmed NK, Bashar AE, Seri HI, El Tigani-Asil el TA, Abakar AD. A Survey of Seasonal Gastrointestinal Parasitic Infections in Donkeys from a Semiarid Sub-Saharan Region, Sudan.. J Pathog 2016;2016:4602751.
    doi: 10.1155/2016/4602751pubmed: 27298739google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,359 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.