Analyze Diet
Ticks and tick-borne diseases2026; 17(4); 102680; doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2026.102680

Tick-borne bacterial and protozoal pathogens in horses in Austria – A cross-sectional study on current and past infections and potential risk factors.

Abstract: Tick-borne bacterial and protozoal pathogens are a major threat to equine health worldwide. In Austria, studies on pathogens such as piroplasms, Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Borrelia spp. in horses are scarce and do not cover the countrywide horse population. To address this, blood samples from horses without prior record of infection with tick-borne pathogens (n = 588) were tested for the presence of Theileria equi, Babesia caballi or A. phagocytophilum DNA by PCR and for specific antibodies against these pathogens and Borrelia burgdorferi with commercially available assays. While no DNA of B. caballi could be amplified, specific anti-B. caballi antibodies were detected in eleven horses (1.9% by ELISA). DNA of T. equi was amplified in twelve horses. In two horses DNA of Babesia canis was detected. Anti-T. equi antibodies were detected in the T. equi PCR-positive horses and one of the B. canis-PCR-positive animals. No A. phagocytophilum-DNA could be amplified, while anti-Ap antibodies were detected in 42.7% (IFAT) resp. 57.3% (ELISA) of 544 horses, and 44.2% had specific anti-B. burgdorferi antibodies. Of the A. phagocytophilum-seropositive horses, 57.8% were also positive for B. burgdorferi. In total, 28% of the horses were positive for two or three pathogens. Common significant associations with infections included pasturing and housing, and, for T. equi, also place of birth/import. High infection rates with A. phagocytophilum and B. burgdorferi indicate a significant exposure of Austrian horses for ticks and tickborne pathogens in general, and, together with the T. equi infections detected throughout the country, highlight the potential risk of transmission to vectors with further infections of horses and subsequent disease after tick bites during pasturing or outdoor activities, and should alert veterinarians to include these etiologies as differential diagnoses in clinically overt cases.
Publication Date: 2026-07-04 PubMed ID: 42401065DOI: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2026.102680Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Tick-borne pathogens, including bacteria and protozoa, are a risk to horses in Austria, but nationwide studies are limited. This study tested blood from 588 horses across Austria for DNA and antibodies of key tick-borne pathogens to assess infection rates and identify risk factors.

Background and Purpose

  • Tick-borne diseases caused by bacterial and protozoal pathogens threaten horse health globally.
  • In Austria, there is a lack of comprehensive, nationwide data on infections with pathogens like Theileria equi, Babesia caballi, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, and Borrelia burgdorferi in horses.
  • The study aims to fill this gap by assessing both current and past infections in a large sample of horses without prior records of tick-borne infections.

Methodology

  • Blood samples were collected from 588 horses across Austria.
  • Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) was used to detect DNA of Theileria equi, Babesia caballi, Babesia canis, and Anaplasma phagocytophilum, indicating active infection.
  • Serological assays (ELISA and IFAT) tested for antibodies against these pathogens and Borrelia burgdorferi, signaling past or active exposure.
  • The horses selected had no prior documented infections with tick-borne pathogens to better reflect natural exposure.

Key Findings

  • Babesia caballi: No DNA was detected in any horse, but specific antibodies were found in 1.9% of horses, suggesting past exposure or infection.
  • Theileria equi: DNA detected in 12 horses, indicating active infections; anti-T. equi antibodies were present in these and more horses, confirming exposure.
  • Babesia canis: DNA was unexpectedly found in two horses, indicating possible tick transmission or cross-species infection.
  • Anaplasma phagocytophilum: No DNA detected, but a high percentage had antibodies (approximately 43% by IFAT and 57% by ELISA), indicating widespread exposure rather than active infection at sampling.
  • Borrelia burgdorferi: Approximately 44% of horses had antibodies, showing significant exposure to Lyme disease bacteria.
  • More than a quarter (28%) of horses tested positive for two or three different pathogens, suggesting co-exposure is common.

Risk Factors and Associations

  • Horses that were pastured or housed outdoors had higher rates of infection, emphasizing grazing and outdoor management as risk factors.
  • For Theileria equi, place of birth or import status influenced infection risk, suggesting geographic or origin-related exposure differences.
  • High rates of co-infections with A. phagocytophilum and B. burgdorferi hint at overlapping ecological niches and tick vectors.

Implications and Conclusions

  • The study reveals a high level of exposure of Austrian horses to important tick-borne pathogens, particularly Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Borrelia burgdorferi.
  • The presence of Theileria equi infections across the country suggests ongoing transmission risk.
  • Co-infections are common and may complicate clinical diagnosis and treatment.
  • Veterinarians should consider these pathogens as possible causes when diagnosing equine clinical cases consistent with tick-borne diseases.
  • Management practices such as housing and grazing need to be evaluated to reduce tick exposure and transmission risks.
  • Awareness and monitoring are essential to prevent disease outbreaks and ensure horse health in Austria’s tick-prevalent environments.

Cite This Article

APA
Pikalo J, Homann A, Goller A, Stimac I, Tichy A, Rother O, Cavalleri JM, Joachim A. (2026). Tick-borne bacterial and protozoal pathogens in horses in Austria – A cross-sectional study on current and past infections and potential risk factors. Ticks Tick Borne Dis, 17(4), 102680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2026.102680

Publication

ISSN: 1877-9603
NlmUniqueID: 101522599
Country: Netherlands
Language: English
Volume: 17
Issue: 4
Pages: 102680
PII: S1877-959X(26)00078-6

Researcher Affiliations

Pikalo, Jutta
  • Institute of Parasitology, Center of Pathobiology, Department of Biological Sciences and Pathobiology, University of Veterinary Medicine, 1210 Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: jutta.pikalo@vetmeduni.ac.at.
Homann, Antonia
  • Institute of Parasitology, Center of Pathobiology, Department of Biological Sciences and Pathobiology, University of Veterinary Medicine, 1210 Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: antonia.homann@outlook.de.
Goller, Alexander
  • Institute of Parasitology, Center of Pathobiology, Department of Biological Sciences and Pathobiology, University of Veterinary Medicine, 1210 Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: alexander_goller@hotmail.com.
Stimac, Ivan
  • Institute of Parasitology, Center of Pathobiology, Department of Biological Sciences and Pathobiology, University of Veterinary Medicine, 1210 Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: ivan.stimac@vetmeduni.ac.at.
Tichy, Alexander
  • Department of Biological Sciences and Pathobiology, Platform for Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, Centre of Biological Sciences, University of Veterinary Medicine, 1210 Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: alexander.tichy@vetmeduni.ac.at.
Rother, Orietta
  • Clinical Centre for Equine Health and Research, Clinical Department for Small Animals and Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine, 1210 Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: orietta.rother@vetmeduni.ac.at.
Cavalleri, Jessika-Maximiliane
  • Clinical Centre for Equine Health and Research, Clinical Department for Small Animals and Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine, 1210 Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: jessika.cavalleri@vetmeduni.ac.at.
Joachim, Anja
  • Institute of Parasitology, Center of Pathobiology, Department of Biological Sciences and Pathobiology, University of Veterinary Medicine, 1210 Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: anja.joachim@vetmeduni.ac.at.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Horses
  • Austria / epidemiology
  • Horse Diseases / epidemiology
  • Horse Diseases / parasitology
  • Horse Diseases / microbiology
  • Risk Factors
  • Babesia / isolation & purification
  • Babesia / genetics
  • Tick-Borne Diseases / veterinary
  • Tick-Borne Diseases / epidemiology
  • Tick-Borne Diseases / microbiology
  • Tick-Borne Diseases / parasitology
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Anaplasma phagocytophilum / isolation & purification
  • Anaplasma phagocytophilum / genetics
  • Theileria / isolation & purification
  • Theileria / genetics
  • Antibodies, Bacterial / blood
  • Babesiosis / epidemiology
  • Babesiosis / parasitology
  • Antibodies, Protozoan / blood
  • Female
  • Borrelia burgdorferi / isolation & purification
  • Male
  • Polymerase Chain Reaction / veterinary
  • Theileriasis / epidemiology
  • Theileriasis / parasitology
  • Lyme Disease / epidemiology
  • Lyme Disease / veterinary
  • Lyme Disease / microbiology
  • DNA, Protozoan
  • DNA, Bacterial

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.