Analyze Diet
Veterinary sciences2025; 12(8); 756; doi: 10.3390/vetsci12080756

Topical Use of Sucralfate in Cutaneous Wound Management: A Narrative Review with a Veterinary Perspective.

Abstract: Wound management is a fundamental skill for veterinarians, requiring a systematic approach to wound care and a deep understanding of the biological principles underlying healing. Sucralfate, widely known as a mucoprotective agent for gastroduodenal ulcers, has recently shown promising topical effects in human skin lesions by binding and protecting growth factors from proteolytic degradation, thereby enhancing their local availability. This action promotes angiogenesis, chemotaxis and cell proliferation, while reducing oxidative stress and exerting bacteriostatic and bactericidal effects against common pathogens. However, the veterinary-specific literature on topical sucralfate is extremely limited, with most available data derived from experimental studies in rodent and porcine models, rather than clinical studies in common veterinary species. Nonetheless, these preliminary studies suggest a potential role for sucralfate in accelerating the healing process through improved collagen synthesis, neovascularization and fibroblast activity. Given the species-specific challenges in veterinary wound healing-especially in horses and cats, prone to delayed healing and exuberant granulation tissue-sucralfate represents a promising, cost-effective and safe candidate for clinical use. This narrative review synthetizes current evidence on sucralfate's mechanisms and therapeutic benefits across human and veterinary contexts, highlighting the need for controlled, multidisciplinary veterinary studies. Validating sucralfate's efficacy in clinical settings could enable the growing owner demand for advanced care to be satisfied, shorten recovery times, reduce complications and improve animal welfare.
Publication Date: 2025-08-13 PubMed ID: 40872708PubMed Central: PMC12390033DOI: 10.3390/vetsci12080756Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Review

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Topical sucralfate, traditionally used for gastroduodenal ulcers, shows promising potential in enhancing wound healing in veterinary medicine by promoting tissue repair mechanisms and offering antimicrobial effects, although clinical evidence in common veterinary species is currently limited.

Background and Importance of Wound Management in Veterinary Medicine

  • Wound management is a crucial skill for veterinarians, necessitating a structured approach to care and a strong grasp of wound healing biology.
  • Healing processes in animals, especially species like horses and cats, can face challenges such as delayed healing and excessive granulation tissue formation.
  • Improving wound care practices can reduce recovery time, complications, and enhance overall animal welfare.

What is Sucralfate and Its Conventional Use

  • Sucralfate is primarily known as a mucoprotective agent used for treating gastroduodenal ulcers by forming a protective barrier over lesions.
  • Its traditional application is systemic or oral, focused on gastrointestinal mucosa protection.

Emerging Evidence for Topical Sucralfate in Skin Wound Healing

  • Recent studies indicate sucralfate can be topically applied to skin wounds to bind and protect growth factors from degradation.
  • This protection enhances the local availability of growth factors, which are key for:
    • Angiogenesis (formation of new blood vessels)
    • Chemotaxis (attraction of immune and repair cells to the wound site)
    • Cell proliferation (growth of skin cells necessary for repair)
  • Sucralfate also helps reduce oxidative stress and has bacteriostatic (inhibiting bacterial growth) and bactericidal (killing bacteria) effects against common wound pathogens.

Veterinary-Specific Context and Challenges

  • There is a lack of extensive clinical data on topical sucralfate use in veterinary medicine, with most evidence coming from rodent and pig models.
  • Despite limited data, initial studies show promise in:
    • Boosting collagen synthesis, essential for wound strength and structure
    • Enhancing neovascularization, crucial for tissue oxygenation and nutrient supply
    • Stimulating fibroblast activity, cells that generate connective tissue to repair wounds
  • These effects suggest sucralfate could accelerate wound healing in veterinary patients effectively.

Potential Benefits and Practical Considerations

  • Sucralfate is cost-effective and has a good safety profile, making it an attractive option for veterinary wound care.
  • Its potential application is particularly important for species that often suffer from slower healing or complicating wound factors, like horses and cats.
  • Use of sucralfate might help meet increasing owner demand for advanced wound treatment options.

Need for Further Research

  • The review highlights a critical need for controlled, multidisciplinary clinical trials in common veterinary species to validate sucralfate’s efficacy and safety.
  • Such research would help integrate sucralfate into evidence-based veterinary wound management protocols.
  • Ultimately, clinically validated topical sucralfate could improve treatment outcomes, reduce healing time, and decrease wound-related complications.

Cite This Article

APA
Accorroni L, Dini F, Pilati N, Marchegiani A, Bazzano M, Spaterna A, Laus F. (2025). Topical Use of Sucralfate in Cutaneous Wound Management: A Narrative Review with a Veterinary Perspective. Vet Sci, 12(8), 756. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12080756

Publication

ISSN: 2306-7381
NlmUniqueID: 101680127
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 12
Issue: 8
PII: 756

Researcher Affiliations

Accorroni, Lucrezia
  • School of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, Via Circonvallazione 93/95, 62024 Matelica, MC, Italy.
Dini, Fabrizio
  • School of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, Via Circonvallazione 93/95, 62024 Matelica, MC, Italy.
Pilati, Nicola
  • School of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, Via Circonvallazione 93/95, 62024 Matelica, MC, Italy.
Marchegiani, Andrea
  • School of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, Via Circonvallazione 93/95, 62024 Matelica, MC, Italy.
Bazzano, Marilena
  • School of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, Via Circonvallazione 93/95, 62024 Matelica, MC, Italy.
Spaterna, Andrea
  • School of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, Via Circonvallazione 93/95, 62024 Matelica, MC, Italy.
Laus, Fulvio
  • School of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, Via Circonvallazione 93/95, 62024 Matelica, MC, Italy.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

This article includes 64 references
  1. Harris-Tryon TA, Grice E. Microbiota and maintenance of skin barrier function.. Science 2022;376:940–945.
    doi: 10.1126/science.abo0693pubmed: 35617415google scholar: lookup
  2. Borena BM, Martens A, Broeckx SY, Meyer E, Chiers K, Duchateau L, Spaas JH. Regenerative skin wound healing in mammals: State-of-the-art on growth factor and stem cell-based treatments.. Cell Physiol Biochem 2015;36:1–23.
    doi: 10.1159/000374049pubmed: 25924569google scholar: lookup
  3. Sorg H, Tilkorn DJ, Hager S, Hauser J, Mirastschijski U. Skin wound healing: An update on the current knowledge and concepts.. Eur Surg Res 2017;58:81–94.
    doi: 10.1159/000454919pubmed: 27974711google scholar: lookup
  4. Tambella AM, Attili AR, Dupre G, Cantalamessa A, Martin S, Cuteri V, Marcazzan S, Del Fabbro M. Platelet-rich plasma to treat experimentally-induced skin wounds in animals: A systematic review and meta-analysis.. PLoS ONE 2018;13:e0191093.
  5. Lux CN. Wound healing in animals: A review of physiology and clinical evaluation.. Vet Dermatol 2022;33:91-e27.
    doi: 10.1111/vde.13032pubmed: 34704298google scholar: lookup
  6. Le Z, Ramos MC, Shou Y, Li RR, Cheng HS, Jang CJ, Liu L, Xue C, Li X, Liu H. Bioactive sucralfate-based microneedles promote wound healing through reprogramming macrophages and protecting endogenous growth factors.. Biomaterials 2024;311:122700.
  7. Harman RM, Theoret CL, Van de Walle GR. The horse as a model for the study of cutaneous wound healing.. Adv Wound Care 2021;10:381–399.
    doi: 10.1089/wound.2018.0883pubmed: 34042536google scholar: lookup
  8. Hill PB, Lo A, Eden CAN, Huntley S, Morey V, Ramsey S, Richardson C, Smith DJ, Sutton C, Taylor MD. Survey of the prevalence, diagnosis and treatment of dermatological conditions in small animals in general practice.. Vet Rec 2006;158:533–539.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.158.16.533pubmed: 16632525google scholar: lookup
  9. Hill P. Small Animal Dermatology: A Practical Guide to the Diagnosis and Management of Skin Diseases in Dogs and Cats. Butterworth-Heinemann; Oxford, UK: 2002. pp. 143–147.
  10. Marsella R, Olivry T, Carlotti DN. Current evidence of skin barrier dysfunction in human and canine atopic dermatitis.. Vet Dermatol 2011;22:239–248.
  11. Woldemeskel M. Nutraceuticals in Dermatological Disorders. Springer; Cham, Switzerland: 2019. pp. 563–568.
  12. Aisa J, Parlier M. Local wound management: A review of modern techniques and products.. Vet Dermatol 2022;33:463–478.
    doi: 10.1111/vde.13104pubmed: 35876262google scholar: lookup
  13. Rudiman R, Hanafi RV, Evan C, Halim F. The efficacy of topical sucralfate in improving pain and wound healing after haemorrhoidectomy procedure: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of randomised clinical trials.. Int Wound J 2023;20:543–553.
    doi: 10.1111/iwj.13901pmc: PMC9885481pubmed: 35864080google scholar: lookup
  14. Abtahi-Naeini B, Saffaei A, Sabzghabaee AM, Amiri R, Hosseini NS, Niknami E, Dehghani S. Topical sucralfate for treatment of mucocutaneous conditions: A systematic review on clinical evidences.. Dermatol Ther 2022;35:e15334.
    doi: 10.1111/dth.15334pubmed: 35080090google scholar: lookup
  15. Masuelli L, Tumino G, Turriziani M, Modesti A, Bei R. Topical use of sucralfate in epithelial wound healing: Clinical evidence and molecular mechanisms of action.. Recent Pat Inflamm Allergy Drug Discov 2010;4:25–36.
    doi: 10.2174/187221310789895649pubmed: 19832693google scholar: lookup
  16. Tolbert K, Stubbs E. Rational use of gastroprotectants in cats: An evidence-based approach. J. Feline Med. Surg. 2024;26.
    doi: 10.1177/1098612X241274235pmc: PMC11418625pubmed: 39105658google scholar: lookup
  17. Vokes J, Lovett A, Sykes B. Equine gastric ulcer syndrome: An update on current knowledge. Animals 2023;13:1261.
    doi: 10.3390/ani13071261pmc: PMC10093336pubmed: 37048517google scholar: lookup
  18. Yildizhan E, Ulger BV, Akkus M, Akinci D, Basol O. Comparison of topical sucralfate with dexpanthenol in rat wound model. Int. J. Exp. Pathol. 2022;103:164–170.
    doi: 10.1111/iep.12441pmc: PMC9264344pubmed: 35441448google scholar: lookup
  19. Yuniati R, Innelya I, Rachmawati A, Charlex HJM, Rahmatika A, Khrisna MB, Mundhofir FEP, Seno TN, Kristina TN. Application of topical sucralfate and topical platelet-rich plasma improves wound healing in diabetic ulcer rats wound model. J. Exp. Pharmacol. 2021;13:797–806.
    doi: 10.2147/JEP.S296767pmc: PMC8374851pubmed: 34429664google scholar: lookup
  20. Abdel Sattar AM, Al Batanony AA, Al Khateeb YM. Evaluation of the role of sucralfate cream in decreasing pain intensity and improving healing following open hemorrhoidectomy: A randomized controlled study. Menoufia Med. J. 2019;32:506–510.
    doi: 10.4103/mmj.mmj_766_17google scholar: lookup
  21. Gutta SH, Kotennavar MS, Patil A, Benakatti R, Jaju P, Savanth M. Topical Solutions for Chronic Lower Limb Ulcers: A Comparative Study of Sucralfate and 5% Povidone-Iodine. Int. J. Sci. Study. 2023;11:45–49.
  22. Yaşar Ş, Yaşar B, Yörüsün A, Güneş P, Kayadibi H, Ercin Z, Aytekin S. A Controlled Study to Examine the Effect of Topical Sucralfate on Radiofrequency-induced Burn Wounds in Rats. Wound Manag. Prev. 2020;66:34–42.
    doi: 10.25270/wmp.2020.1223442pubmed: 32294061google scholar: lookup
  23. Bryan N, Ahswin H, Smart N, Bayon Y, Wohlert S, Hunt JA. Reactive oxygen species (ROS)—A family of fate deciding molecules pivotal in constructive inflammation and wound healing. Eur. Cells Mater. 2012;24:e65.
    doi: 10.22203/eCM.v024a18pubmed: 23007910google scholar: lookup
  24. Ala S, Saeedi M, Gholipour A, Ahmadi M, Asoodeh A, Shiva A. Effectiveness of topical sucralfate in the management of pressure ulcer in hospitalized patients: A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Am. J. Ther. 2019;26:e5–e11.
    doi: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000000531pubmed: 29642075google scholar: lookup
  25. Freeman SB, Markwell JK. Sucralfate in alleviating post-tonsillectomy pain. Laryngoscope 1992;102:1242–1246.
  26. Özcan M, Altuntasl A, Ünal A, Nalcla Y, Aslan A. Sucralfate for posttonsillectomy analgesia. Otolaryngol.–Head Neck Surg. 1998;119:700–704.
    doi: 10.1016/S0194-5998(98)70040-3pubmed: 9852554google scholar: lookup
  27. Gupta PJ, Heda PS, Kalaskar S, Tamaskar VP. Topical sucralfate decreases pain after hemorrhoidectomy and improves healing: A randomized, blinded, controlled study. Dis. Colon Rectum. 2008;51:231–234.
    doi: 10.1007/s10350-007-9092-4pubmed: 18095028google scholar: lookup
  28. Tryba M, Mantey-Stiers F. Antibacterial activity of sucralfate in human gastric juice. Am. J. Med. 1987;83:125–127.
    doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(87)90841-2pubmed: 3310627google scholar: lookup
  29. Yen T, Boord MJ, Ghubash R, Blondeau JM. A pilot study investigating the in vitro efficacy of sucralfate against common veterinary cutaneous pathogens. J. Small Anim. Pract. 2018;59:691–694.
    doi: 10.1111/jsap.12902pubmed: 29972242google scholar: lookup
  30. Li J, Xie J, Wang Y, Li X, Yang L, Zhao M, Chen C. Development of Biomaterials to Modulate the Function of Macrophages in Wound Healing. Bioengineering 2024;11:1017.
  31. Linata AM, Fawzy A. Does The Scientific Evidence Support the Idea of Promoting Sucralfate as The First Aid Topical Management for Burn Wound? A Literature Review. Int. J. Med. Sci. Clin. Res. Stud. 2024;4:1226–1230.
  32. Godhi AS, Ram P, Powar R. Efficacy of topical sucralfate versus silver sulfadiazine in the management of burns: A 1-year randomized controlled trial. J. West Afr. Coll. Surg. 2017;7:57.
    pmc: PMC6018035pubmed: 29951455
  33. Koshariya M, Shitole A, Agarwal V, Dave S. Role of topical Sucralfate in healing of burn wounds. Int. Surg. J. 2018;5:2995–3001.
  34. Saei S, Sahebnasagh A, Ghasemi A, Akbari J, Alipour A, Lashkardoost H, Joybari AY, Dadgar NF, Ala S, Salehifar E. Efficacy of sucralfate ointment in the prevention of acute proctitis in cancer patients: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Casp. J. Intern. Med. 2020;11:410.
    doi: 10.22088/cjim.11.4.410pmc: PMC7911762pubmed: 33680383google scholar: lookup
  35. Shum NF, Choi HK, Wei R, Dominic CCF. Evaluating self-administered sucralfate enemas for reducing rectal bleeding in patients with radiation proctitis. Cancer Nurs. Pract. 2024;23.
    doi: 10.7748/cnp.2024.e1866google scholar: lookup
  36. Kouloulias V, Asimakopoulos C, Tolia M, Filippou G, Platoni K, Dilvoi M, Beli I, Georgakopoulos J, Patatoukas G, Kelekis N. Sucralfate gel as a radioprotector against radiation induced dermatitis in a hypo-fractionated schedule: A non-randomized study. Hippokratia 2013;17:126.
    pmc: PMC3743615pubmed: 24376316
  37. Marik AR, Miklós I, Csukly G, Hársfalvi P, Novák A. Effectiveness and tolerability of rectal ointment and suppositories containing sucralfate for hemorrhoidal symptoms: A prospective, observational study. Int. J. Color. Dis. 2024;39:72.
    doi: 10.1007/s00384-024-04642-7pmc: PMC11096207pubmed: 38750150google scholar: lookup
  38. Lamb S, Coulter L, Hudson J. Is topical sucralfate an effective therapy for noncandidal diaper rash?. Evid.-Based Pract. 2016;19:7–8.
  39. Markham T, Kennedy F, Collins P. Topical sucralfate for erosive irritant diaper dermatitis. Arch. Dermatol. 2000;136:1199–1200.
    doi: 10.1001/archderm.136.10.1199pubmed: 11030763google scholar: lookup
  40. Tumino G, Masuelli L, Bei R, Simonelli L, Santoro A, Francipane S. Topical treatment of chronic venous ulcers with sucralfate: A placebo controlled randomized study. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2008;22:17–23.
    doi: 10.3892/ijmm.22.1.17pubmed: 18575771google scholar: lookup
  41. Bhatmule A, Janugade HB, Nangare N. A competitive study of topical sucralfate and ordinary saline for diabetic ulcer dressing. J. Pharm. Negat. Results. 2022;13:577–580.
  42. Chatterjee S, Sen S, Hazra A, Das AK. Randomized controlled trial of topical mupirocin versus mupirocin with sucralfate combination in chronic skin ulcers. Indian J. Pharmacol. 2019;51:316–322.
    doi: 10.4103/ijp.ijp_237_17pmc: PMC6892012pubmed: 31831920google scholar: lookup
  43. Pourandish Y, Mehrabi F, Veldani NA, Tabar RM. Pressure ulcer healing by daily topical sucralfate and silver sulfadiazine: A case report study. J. Nurs. Midwifery Sci. 2021;8:219.
    doi: 10.4103/jnms.jnms_101_20google scholar: lookup
  44. Chatterjee N, Ekka NM, Mahajan M, Kumar B, Kumar N, Zia A, Devarajan A, Kujur AD, Sinha DK. Effectiveness of Topical Sucralfate in the Management of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: An Open-Labeled Randomized Study. Cureus 2023;15:e37570.
    doi: 10.7759/cureus.37570pmc: PMC10184874pubmed: 37197136google scholar: lookup
  45. Vejdan AK, Khosravi M, Amirian Z, Daneshmand M, Babak B, Samira K, Azin S, Kosar S, Razie K. Evaluation of the efficacy of topical sucralfate on healing haemorrhoidectomy incision wounds and reducing pain severity: A randomised clinical trial. Int. Wound J. 2020;17:1047–1051.
    doi: 10.1111/iwj.13369pmc: PMC7948644pubmed: 32319175google scholar: lookup
  46. Siupsinskiene N, Žekonienė J, Padervinskis E, Žekonis G, Vaitkus S. Efficacy of sucralfate for the treatment of post-tonsillectomy symptoms. Eur. Arch. Oto-Rhino-Laryngol. 2015;272:271–278.
    doi: 10.1007/s00405-014-3023-5pubmed: 24691853google scholar: lookup
  47. Suparakchinda C, Rawangban W. Effectiveness of Sucralfate comparing to normal saline as an oral rinse in pain reduction and wound healing promotion in oral surgery. Laryngoscope Investig. Otolaryngol. 2023;8:1226–1232.
    doi: 10.1002/lio2.1146pmc: PMC10601550pubmed: 37899873google scholar: lookup
  48. Giua C, Minerba L, Piras A, Floris N, Romano F. The effect of sucralfate-containing ointment on quality of life in people with symptoms associated with haemorrhoidal disease and its complications: The results of the EMOCARE survey. Acta Biomed. Atenei Parm. 2021;92:e2021029.
    doi: 10.23750/abm.v92i1.11309pmc: PMC7975930pubmed: 33683221google scholar: lookup
  49. Beheshti A, Shafigh Y, Zangivand AA, Samiee-Rad F, Hassanzadeh G, Shafigh N. Comparison of topical sucralfate and silver sulfadiazine cream in second degree burns in rats. Adv. Clin. Exp. Med. 2013;22:481–487.
    pubmed: 23986207
  50. Ribeiro G, Carvalho L, Borges J, Prazeres J. The Best Protocol to Treat Equine Skin Wounds by Second Intention Healing: A Scoping Review of the Literature. Animals 2024;14:1500.
    doi: 10.3390/ani14101500pmc: PMC11117370pubmed: 38791717google scholar: lookup
  51. Eggleston RB. Wound management: Wounds with special challenges. Vet. Clin. Equine Pract. 2018;34:511–538.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2018.07.003pubmed: 30447768google scholar: lookup
  52. Hamed MA, Abouelnasr KS, El-Adl M, Elfadl EAA, Farag A, Lashen S. Effectiveness of allogeneic platelet-rich fibrin on second-intention wound healing of experimental skin defect in distal limb in donkeys (Equus asinus). J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2019;73:131–138.
  53. Marchant K, Hendrickson DA, Pezzanite LM. Review of the role of biofilms in equine wounds: Clinical indications and treatment strategies. Equine Vet. Educ. 2024;36:152–168.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.13919pmc: PMC11376462pubmed: 39246829google scholar: lookup
  54. Kruse CR, Singh M, Targosinski S, Sinha I, Sørensen JA, Eriksson E, Nuutila K. The effect of pH on cell viability, cell migration, cell proliferation, wound closure, and wound reepithelialization: In vitro and in vivo study. Wound Repair Regen. 2017;25:260–269.
    doi: 10.1111/wrr.12526pubmed: 28370923google scholar: lookup
  55. Bohling MW, Henderson RA, Swaim SF, Kincaid SA, Wright JC. Cutaneous wound healing in the cat: A macroscopic description and comparison with cutaneous wound healing in the dog. Vet. Surg. 2004;33:579–587.
  56. Tashkandi H. Honey in wound healing: An updated review. Open Life Sci. 2021;16:1091–1100.
    doi: 10.1515/biol-2021-0084pmc: PMC8496555pubmed: 34708153google scholar: lookup
  57. Zainuddin ANZ, Mustakim NN, Rosemanzailani FA, Fadilah NIM, Maarof M, Fauzi MB. A Comprehensive Review of Honey-Containing Hydrogel for Wound Healing Applications. Gels 2025;11:194.
    doi: 10.3390/gels11030194pmc: PMC11942582pubmed: 40136899google scholar: lookup
  58. Rybka M, Mazurek L, Konop M. Beneficial effect of wound dressings containing silver and silver nanoparticles in wound healing—From experimental studies to clinical practice. Life 2023;13:69.
    doi: 10.3390/life13010069pmc: PMC9864212pubmed: 36676019google scholar: lookup
  59. Jangid H, Singh S, Kashyap P, Singh A, Kumar G. Advancing biomedical applications: An in-depth analysis of silver nanoparticles in antimicrobial, anticancer, and wound healing roles. Front. Pharmacol. 2024;15:1438227.
    doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1438227pmc: PMC11338803pubmed: 39175537google scholar: lookup
  60. Popescu I, Constantin M, Solcan G, Ichim DL, Rata DM, Horodincu L, Solcan C. Composite Hydrogels with Embedded Silver Nanoparticles and Ibuprofen as Wound Dressing. Gels 2023;9:654.
    doi: 10.3390/gels9080654pmc: PMC10454181pubmed: 37623109google scholar: lookup
  61. Farabi B, Roster K, Hirani R, Tepper K, Atak MF, Safai B. The Efficacy of Stem Cells in Wound Healing: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024;25:3006.
    doi: 10.3390/ijms25053006pmc: PMC10931571pubmed: 38474251google scholar: lookup
  62. Gao M, Guo H, Dong X, Wang Z, Yang Z, Shang Q, Wang Q. Regulation of inflammation during wound healing: The function of mesenchymal stem cells and strategies for therapeutic enhancement. Front. Pharmacol. 2024;15:1345779.
    doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1345779pmc: PMC10901993pubmed: 38425646google scholar: lookup
  63. Scapagnini G, Marchegiani A, Rossi G, Zago M, Jowarska J, Wael M, Campbell SE, Schiffman Z, Buonamici E, Garvao R. Management of all three phases of wound healing through the induction of fluorescence biomodulation using fluorescence light energy. Proceedings of the Photonic Diagnosis Treatment Infections Inflammatory Diseases II; San Francisco, CA, USA. 4–5 February 2019; pp. 108630W1–108630W17.
    doi: 10.1117/12.2508066google scholar: lookup
  64. Nikolis A, Grimard D, Pesant Y, Scapagnini G, Vezina DA. A prospective case series evaluating the safety and efficacy of the Klox BioPhotonic System in venous leg ulcers.. Chronic Wound Care Manag. Res. 2016;3:101–111.
    doi: 10.2147/CWCMR.S104391google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.