Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal2000; 32(1); 19-26; doi: 10.2746/042516400777612062

Topographical mapping of biochemical properties of articular cartilage in the equine fetlock joint.

Abstract: The aim of this study was to evaluate topographical differences in the biochemical composition of the extracellular matrix of articular cartilage of the normal equine fetlock joint. Water content, DNA content, glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content and a number of characteristics of the collagen network (total collagen content, levels of hydroxylysine- (Hyl) and the crosslink hydroxylysylpyridinoline, (HP) of articular cartilage in the proximal 1st phalanx (P1), distal 3rd metacarpal bone (MC), and proximal sesamoid bones (PSB) were determined in the left and right fetlock joint of 6 mature horses (age 5-9 years). Twenty-eight sites were sampled per joint, which included the clinically important areas often associated with pathology. Biochemical differences were evaluated between sampling sites and related with the predisposition for osteochondral injury and type of loading. Significant regional differences in the composition of the extracellular matrix existed within the joint. Furthermore, left and right joints exhibited biochemical differences. Typical topographic distribution patterns were observed for each parameter. In P1 the dorsal and palmar articular margin showed a significantly lower GAG content than the more centrally located sites. Collagen content and HP crosslinks were higher at the joint margins than in the central area. Also, in the MC, GAG content was significantly lower at the (dorsal) articular margin compared with the central area. Consistent with findings in P1, collagen and HP crosslinks were significantly lower in the central area compared to the (dorsal) articular margin. Biochemical and biomechanical heterogeneity of articular cartilage is supposed to reflect the different functional demands made at different sites. In the present study, GAG content was highest in the constantly loaded central areas of the joint surfaces. In contrast, collagen content and HP crosslinks were higher in areas intermittently subjected to peak loading which suggests that the response to a certain type of loading of the various components of the extracellular matrix of articular cartilage are different. The differences in biochemical characteristics between the various sites may help to explain the site specificity of osteochondral lesions commonly found in the equine fetlock joint. Finally, these findings emphasise that the choice of sampling sites may profoundly influence the outcome of biochemical studies of articular cartilage.
Publication Date: 2000-02-08 PubMed ID: 10661380DOI: 10.2746/042516400777612062Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study investigates how the biochemical composition of the cartilage in a horse’s fetlock joint varies across different areas. It found significant differences within the joint, as well as between the left and right joints which may relate to the different levels and types of load each area experiences.

Methodology

The research team examined the cartilage in the fetlock joints of six mature horses, aged 5 to 9 years old. They took samples from 28 sites across each joint, including areas often associated with pathology. They measured several biochemical variables, including:

  • Water content
  • DNA content
  • Glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content, an important component of cartilage
  • Total collagen content
  • Levels of hydroxylysine (Hyl) and hydroxylysylpyridinoline (HP), both indicators of collagen structure

They determined these variables for cartilage in three parts of the joint: the 1st phalanx, 3rd metacarpal bone, and proximal sesamoid bones.

Results

Significant regional differences in the biochemical composition of cartilage were observed. In addition, there were also differences between the biochemical compositions of the left and right joints.

The researchers identified characteristic patterns of distribution for each parameter. For example, central areas with constant load had higher GAG content, possibly due to the protective cushioning role of GAGs. Conversely, collagen and HP—responsible for providing strength and resilience—were higher in areas that experience intermittent peak loads.

Implications

These biochemical differences are thought to reflect the varying functional demands placed on different parts of the joint. Understanding these differences could help explain the location-specific nature of osteochondral lesions commonly found in the equine fetlock joint.

The variations may also have implications for research. The selection of sample sites could profoundly influence the outcome of biochemical studies of articular cartilage due to their varying biochemical compositions. Scientists must therefore be careful to factor this variability into their study designs.

Cite This Article

APA
Brama PA, Tekoppele JM, Bank RA, Karssenberg D, Barneveld A, van Weeren PR. (2000). Topographical mapping of biochemical properties of articular cartilage in the equine fetlock joint. Equine Vet J, 32(1), 19-26. https://doi.org/10.2746/042516400777612062

Publication

ISSN: 0425-1644
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 32
Issue: 1
Pages: 19-26

Researcher Affiliations

Brama, P A
  • Department of Equine Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
Tekoppele, J M
    Bank, R A
      Karssenberg, D
        Barneveld, A
          van Weeren, P R

            MeSH Terms

            • Amino Acids / analysis
            • Animals
            • Biomechanical Phenomena
            • Biopsy / veterinary
            • Bisbenzimidazole / chemistry
            • Cartilage, Articular / anatomy & histology
            • Cartilage, Articular / chemistry
            • Cartilage, Articular / physiology
            • Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid / veterinary
            • Collagen / analysis
            • DNA / analysis
            • Extracellular Matrix / chemistry
            • Fluorescent Dyes / chemistry
            • Forelimb / anatomy & histology
            • Forelimb / physiology
            • Glycosaminoglycans / analysis
            • Horses / anatomy & histology
            • Horses / physiology
            • Hydroxylysine / analysis
            • Joints / anatomy & histology
            • Joints / physiology
            • Methylene Blue / analogs & derivatives
            • Methylene Blue / chemistry
            • Water / analysis

            Citations

            This article has been cited 16 times.
            1. Nelson BB, Stewart RC, Kawcak CE, Freedman JD, Patwa AN, Snyder BD, Goodrich LR, Grinstaff MW. Quantitative Evaluation of Equine Articular Cartilage Using Cationic Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography. Cartilage 2021 Apr;12(2):211-221.
              doi: 10.1177/1947603518812562pubmed: 33722083google scholar: lookup
            2. Lee D, Hong KT, Lim TS, Lee E, Lee YH, Park JS, Kim W, Oh JH, Choi JA, Song Y. Alterations in articular cartilage T2 star relaxation time following mechanical disorders: in vivo canine supraspinatus tendon resection models. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2020 Jul 2;21(1):424.
              doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03447-3pubmed: 32615950google scholar: lookup
            3. Evrard L, Audigié F, Bertoni L, Jacquet S, Denoix JM, Busoni V. Low field magnetic resonance imaging of the equine distal interphalangeal joint: Comparison between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing conditions. PLoS One 2019;14(1):e0211101.
              doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211101pubmed: 30689659google scholar: lookup
            4. Oinas J, Ronkainen AP, Rieppo L, Finnilä MAJ, Iivarinen JT, van Weeren PR, Helminen HJ, Brama PAJ, Korhonen RK, Saarakkala S. Composition, structure and tensile biomechanical properties of equine articular cartilage during growth and maturation. Sci Rep 2018 Jul 27;8(1):11357.
              doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-29655-5pubmed: 30054498google scholar: lookup
            5. Thampi P, Liu J, Zeng Z, MacLeod JN. Changes in the appendicular skeleton during metamorphosis in the axolotl salamander (Ambystoma mexicanum). J Anat 2018 Oct;233(4):468-477.
              doi: 10.1111/joa.12846pubmed: 29992565google scholar: lookup
            6. Novakofski KD, Berg LC, Bronzini I, Bonnevie ED, Poland SG, Bonassar LJ, Fortier LA. Joint-dependent response to impact and implications for post-traumatic osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2015 Jul;23(7):1130-7.
              doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2015.02.023pubmed: 25725390google scholar: lookup
            7. Kamisan N, Naveen SV, Ahmad RE, Kamarul T. Chondrocyte density, proteoglycan content and gene expressions from native cartilage are species specific and not dependent on cartilage thickness: a comparative analysis between rat, rabbit and goat. BMC Vet Res 2013 Apr 1;9:62.
              doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-9-62pubmed: 23547659google scholar: lookup
            8. Malda J, de Grauw JC, Benders KE, Kik MJ, van de Lest CH, Creemers LB, Dhert WJ, van Weeren PR. Of mice, men and elephants: the relation between articular cartilage thickness and body mass. PLoS One 2013;8(2):e57683.
              doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057683pubmed: 23437402google scholar: lookup
            9. van Turnhout MC, Schipper H, Engel B, Buist W, Kranenbarg S, van Leeuwen JL. Postnatal development of collagen structure in ovine articular cartilage. BMC Dev Biol 2010 Jun 7;10:62.
              doi: 10.1186/1471-213X-10-62pubmed: 20529268google scholar: lookup
            10. Klein TJ, Malda J, Sah RL, Hutmacher DW. Tissue engineering of articular cartilage with biomimetic zones. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2009 Jun;15(2):143-57.
              doi: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2008.0563pubmed: 19203206google scholar: lookup
            11. Mienaltowski MJ, Huang L, Stromberg AJ, MacLeod JN. Differential gene expression associated with postnatal equine articular cartilage maturation. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2008 Nov 5;9:149.
              doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-149pubmed: 18986532google scholar: lookup
            12. Firth EC. The response of bone, articular cartilage and tendon to exercise in the horse. J Anat 2006 Apr;208(4):513-26.
            13. Waselau AC, Nadler D, Müller JM, Zlinszky K, Hilbe M, Auer JA, von Rechenberg B. The effect of cartilage and bone density of mushroom-shaped, photooxidized, osteochondral transplants: an experimental study on graft performance in sheep using transplants originating from different species. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2005 Dec 15;6:60.
              doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-6-60pubmed: 16356173google scholar: lookup
            14. Lin ST, Foote AK, Bolas NM, Sargan DR, Murray RC. Histological and Histopathological Features of the Third Metacarpal/Tarsal Parasagittal Groove and Proximal Phalanx Sagittal Groove in Thoroughbred Horses with Racing History. Animals (Basel) 2024 Jun 30;14(13).
              doi: 10.3390/ani14131942pubmed: 38998057google scholar: lookup
            15. Nagy A, Dyson S. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Computed Tomographic and Radiographic Findings in the Metacarpophalangeal Joints of 31 Warmblood Showjumpers in Full Work and Competing Regularly. Animals (Basel) 2024 May 9;14(10).
              doi: 10.3390/ani14101417pubmed: 38791635google scholar: lookup
            16. González Vázquez AG, Blokpoel Ferreras LA, Bennett KE, Casey SM, Brama PA, O'Brien FJ. Systematic Comparison of Biomaterials-Based Strategies for Osteochondral and Chondral Repair in Large Animal Models. Adv Healthc Mater 2021 Oct;10(20):e2100878.
              doi: 10.1002/adhm.202100878pubmed: 34405587google scholar: lookup