Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal2025; doi: 10.1111/evj.14558

Unwelcome neighbours: Tracking the transmission of Streptococcus equi in the United Kingdom horse population.

Abstract: Strangles (Streptococcus equi infection) remains endemic in the UK, with ~300 laboratory diagnoses annually. Sub-clinically infected long-term carriers are considered a key driver of endemicity. Analysing genomes of circulating strains could provide valuable transmission insights of this pathogen. Objective: To determine the population structure and diversity of UK S. equi isolates and to model transmission using epidemiological and whole genome sequencing data. Methods: Retrospective cross-sectional epidemiological and genomic surveillance. Methods: A dated phylogenetic tree derived from 511 S. equi isolates collected from UK horses between 2015 and 2022 was reconstructed. Bayesian Analysis of Population Structure (BAPS) identified clusters of related genomes, while iGRAPH identified clusters of sequences appropriate for transmission analysis, performed using Transphylo. Results: BAPS identified nine groups, with 82% of strains clustering into two (McG-BAPS3, McG-BAPS5). A statistically significant association (p < 0.001) was found between the year of recovery and trends in the frequency of McG-BAPS groups, with McG-BAPS3 increasing and McG-BAPS5 decreasing in prevalence over the study period. Eight transmission clusters encompassing 64% of total sequences (n = 286/447) underwent analysis. Sixteen direct transmission pairs were identified; 10 were between horses from different UK regions. A transmission chain extending over a 6-month period was inferred from isolates from nine horses. Conclusions: Bacterial strains from sub-clinically infected carrier horses may be underrepresented due to data collection via positive laboratory diagnoses. Furthermore, a low sampling proportion relative to overall UK cases provided only a snapshot of broader, unsampled transmission events. Conclusions: The rapid change in S. equi population structure indicates acutely infected/recently convalesced short-term carrier horses play a more influential role in transmission than long-term carriers. Our work provides novel insights to our understanding of S. equi transmission dynamics. Transmission of genetically related strains across diverse regions suggests a real-time sequence-based surveillance system could inform interventions to minimise transmission.
Publication Date: 2025-07-20 PubMed ID: 40684376DOI: 10.1111/evj.14558Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study investigates the transmission of Streptococcus equi, the bacterium causing strangles in horses, within the UK horse population. By using sequencing and modeling, the researchers discovered trends in bacterial strains, determined their diversity, and highlighted how strain changes might inform disease control measures.

Research Methodology

  • The study was conducted retrospectively, comparing epidemiological and genomic data from 511 S. equi isolates collected from UK horses between 2015 and 2022.
  • The researchers used Bayesian Analysis of Population Structure (BAPS) to identify clusters of related genomes as well as iGRAPH to identify the right clusters for transmission analysis.
  • The transmission of the bacteria was analyzed using the Transphylo method. This method uses data on the time and location of infections to create a transmission tree, showing how an infection might have spread in a population.

Research Findings

  • The BAPS identified nine groups of related genomes, with 82% of strains clustering into two groups (McG-BAPS3 and McG-BAPS5).
  • A statistically significant association was found between the year of recovery and trends in the frequency of McG-BAPS groups. Specifically, the prevalence of the McG-BAPS3 strain increased while the McG-BAPS5 decreased over the study period.
  • 16 direct transmission pairs were identified, 10 of which were between horses from different UK regions. Proof of a transmission chain extending over a 6-month period was inferred from isolates from nine horses.

Conclusions and Implications of the Research

  • This study revealed that due to data collection methods, bacteria from sub-clinically infected carrier horses might be underrepresented. Also, the low sampling proportion relative to the total UK cases only provided a snapshot of broader, unsampled transmission events.
  • The study’s results suggest that short-term carrier horses, that are acutely infected or have recently recovered, play a bigger role in transmission than long-term carriers.
  • Transmission of genetically related bacteria strains across diverse regions indicates that a real-time sequence-based surveillance system could potentially help to minimize transmission by informing intervention measures.

The research provides novel insights to our understanding of S. equi transmission dynamics and can serve as groundwork for developing more effective disease control strategies for the UK horse population in the future.

Cite This Article

APA
McGlennon AA, Verheyen KL, Newton JR, van Tonder A, Wilson H, Parkhill J, de Brauwere N, Frosth S, Waller AS. (2025). Unwelcome neighbours: Tracking the transmission of Streptococcus equi in the United Kingdom horse population. Equine Vet J. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.14558

Publication

ISSN: 2042-3306
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English

Researcher Affiliations

McGlennon, Abigail A
  • Royal Veterinary College, Hertfordshire, UK.
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, UK.
Verheyen, Kristien L
  • Royal Veterinary College, Hertfordshire, UK.
Newton, J Richard
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, UK.
van Tonder, Andries
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, UK.
Wilson, Hayley
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, UK.
  • Public Health Genomics Foundation, Cambridge, UK.
Parkhill, Julian
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, UK.
de Brauwere, Nicolas
  • Redwings Horse Sanctuary, Norwich, UK.
Frosth, Sara
  • Department of Animal Biosciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Waller, Andrew S
  • Intervacc, Hägersten, Sweden.

Grant Funding

  • G2019 / Horse Trust

References

This article includes 50 references
  1. Holden MTG, Heather Z, Paillot R, Steward KF, Webb K, Ainslie F. Genomic evidence for the evolution of Streptococcus equi: host restriction, increased virulence, and genetic exchange with human pathogens.. PLoS Pathog 2009;5:e1000346.
  2. Waller AS. New perspectives for the diagnosis, control, treatment, and prevention of strangles in horses.. Vet Clin N Am Equine Pract 2014;30:591–607.
  3. Timoney JF, Kumar P. Early pathogenesis of equine Streptococcus equi infection (strangles).. Equine Vet J 2008;40:637–642.
  4. D○ LR, Stefanovski D, Boston RC, Boyle AG. Predictor variables for and complications associated with Streptococcus equi subsp equi infection in horses.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2015;247:1161–1168.
  5. Newton JR, Wood JLN, Brauwere ND, Chanter N, Verheyen K, Mumford J. Detection and treatment of asymptomatic carriers of S. equi following strangles outbreaks in the UK.. Proceedings of the 8th international conference on equine infectious diseases Cheshire: R and W Publications; 1999. p. 82.
  6. Verheyen K, Newton JR, Talbot NC, de Brauwere MN, Chanter N. Elimination of guttural pouch infection and inflammation in asymptomatic carriers of Streptococcus equi.. Equine Vet J 2000;32:527–532.
  7. Pringle J, Venner M, Tscheschlok L, Bächi L, Riihimäki M. Long term silent carriers of Streptococcus equi ssp. equi following strangles; carrier detection related to sampling site of collection and culture versus qPCR.. Vet J 2019;246:66–70.
  8. White J, Prescott K, Rogers S. Applying the science of behaviour change to the management of strangles.. UK‐Vet Equine 2021;5:110–114.
  9. Mitchell C, Steward KF, Charbonneau ARL, Walsh S, Wilson H, Timoney JF. Globetrotting strangles: the unbridled national and international transmission of Streptococcus equi between horses.. Microb Genom 2021;7.
    doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000528google scholar: lookup
  10. McGlennon A. Surveillance of equine strangles: a new initiative.. Vet Rec 2019;184:342–344.
  11. McGlennon A, Waller A, Verheyen K, Slater J, Grewar J, Aanensen D. Surveillance of strangles in UK horses between 2015 and 2019 based on laboratory detection of Streptococcus equi.. Vet Rec 2021;189:1–9.
  12. McGlennon A, Waller A, Verheyen K, Slater J, Aanensen D, Newton JR. Utilising genomics to identify potential Streptococcus equi (S. equi) contact networks in the UK.. Equine Vet J 2020;52:15.
  13. Corander J, Marttinen P, Sirén J, Tang J. Enhanced Bayesian modelling in BAPS software for learning genetic structures of populations.. BMC Bioinformatics 2008;9:539.
  14. Tonkin‐Hill G, Lees JA, Bentley SD, Frost SDW, Corander J. Fast hierarchical Bayesian analysis of population structure.. Nucleic Acids Res 2019;47:5539–5549.
  15. Harris SR, Robinson C, Steward KF, Webb KS, Paillot R, Parkhill J. Genome specialization and decay of the strangles pathogen, Streptococcus equi, is driven by persistent infection.. Genome Res 2015;25:1360–1371.
  16. Kelly C, Bugg M, Robinson C, Mitchell Z, Davis‐Poynter N, Newton JR. Sequence variation of the SeM gene of Streptococcus equi allows discrimination of the source of strangles outbreaks.. J Clin Microbiol 2006;44:480–486.
  17. Ypma RJF, Marijn B v W, Wallinga J. Relating phylogenetic trees to transmission trees of infectious disease outbreaks.. Genetics 2013;195:1055–1062.
  18. Didelot X, Fraser C, Gardy J, Colijn C. Genomic infectious disease epidemiology in partially sampled and ongoing outbreaks.. Mol Biol Evol 2017;34:msw075.
  19. Klinkenberg D, Backer JA, Didelot X, Colijn C, Wallinga J. Simultaneous inference of phylogenetic and transmission trees in infectious disease outbreaks.. PLoS Comput Biol 2017;13:e1005495.
  20. Campbell F, Didelot X, Fitzjohn R, Ferguson N, Cori A, Jombart T. outbreaker2: a modular platform for outbreak reconstruction.. BMC Bioinformatics 2018;19:363.
  21. Jombart T, Eggo RM, Dodd PJ, Balloux F. Reconstructing disease outbreaks from genetic data: a graph approach.. Heredity (Edinb) 2011;106:383–390.
  22. Duault H, Durand B, Canini L. Methods combining genomic and epidemiological data in the reconstruction of transmission trees: a systematic review.. Pathogens 2022;11:252.
  23. Kuwamoto Y, Anzai T, Wada R. Microplate sugar‐fermentation assay distinguishes streptococcus equi from other streptococci of lancefield's group C.. J Equine Sci 2001;12:47–49.
  24. Croucher NJ, Page AJ, Connor TR, Delaney AJ, Keane JA, Bentley SD. Rapid phylogenetic analysis of large samples of recombinant bacterial whole genome sequences using Gubbins.. Nucleic Acids Res 2015;43:15.
  25. Page AJ, Taylor B, Delaney AJ, Soares J, Seemann T, Keane JA. SNP‐sites: rapid efficient extraction of SNPs from multi‐FASTA alignments.. Microb Genom 2016;2:e000056.
  26. Nguyen L‐T, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. IQ‐TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum‐likelihood phylogenies.. Mol Biol Evol 2015;32:268–274.
  27. Minh BQ, Schmidt HA, Chernomor O, Schrempf D, Woodhams MD, von Haeseler A. IQ‐TREE 2: new models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era.. Mol Biol Evol 2020;37:1530–1534.
  28. Drummond AJ, Pybus OG, Rambaut A, Forsberg R, Rodrigo AG. Measurably evolving populations.. Trends Ecol Evol 2003;18:481–488.
  29. Rambaut A, Lam TT, Carvalho LM, Pybus OG. Exploring the temporal structure of heterochronous sequences using TempEst (formerly Path‐O‐Gen).. Virus Evol 2016;2:vew007.
  30. Bouckaert R, Heled J, Kü Hnert D, Vaughan T, Wu C‐H. BEAST 2: a software platform for Bayesian evolutionary analysis.. PLoS Comput Biol 2014;10:1003537.
  31. Rambaut A, Drummond AJ, Xie D, Baele G, Suchard MA. Posterior summarization in Bayesian phylogenetics using Tracer 1.7.. Syst Biol 2018;67:901–904.
  32. Drummond AJ, Rambaut A. BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees.. BMC Evol Biol 2007;7:214.
  33. Rieux A, Khatchikian CE. tipdatingbeast : an r package to assist the implementation of phylogenetic tip‐dating tests using beast.. Mol Ecol Resour 2017;17:608–613.
  34. Csardi G, Nepusz T. The igraph software package for complex network research.. Int J Complex Syst 2006;1695:1–9.
  35. Didelot X, Kendall M, Xu Y, White PJ, McCarthy N. Genomic epidemiology analysis of infectious disease outbreaks using TransPhylo.. Curr Protoc 2021;1:e551.
  36. Plummer M, Best N, Cowles K, Vines K. CODA: convergence diagnosis and output analysis for MCMC.. R News 2006;6:7–11.
  37. Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Dunson DB, Vehtari A, Rubin DB. Bayesian data analysis.. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2013.
  38. RCore. R: a language and environment for statistical computing.. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2019.
  39. Posit Team. RStudio: integrated development environment for R.. 2023.3.0.386. 2023. [cited 2025 Jan 20]. Available from: http://www.posit.co/.
  40. Davies MR, Holden MT, Coupland P, Chen JHK, Venturini C, Barnett TC. Emergence of scarlet fever Streptococcus pyogenes emm12 clones in Hong Kong is associated with toxin acquisition and multidrug resistance.. Nat Genet 2015;47:84–87.
  41. Croucher NJ, Harris SR, Fraser C, Quail MA, Burton J, van der Linden M. Rapid pneumococcal evolution in response to clinical interventions.. Science (1979) 2011;331:430–434.
  42. Wilson HJ, Dong J, van Tonder AJ, Ruis C, Lefrancq N, McGlennon A. Progressive evolution of Streptococcus equi from Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus and adaption to equine hosts.. Microb Genom 2025;11(3).
    doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.001366google scholar: lookup
  43. Newton JR, Wood JLN, Dunn KA, DeBrauwere MN, Chanter N. Naturally occurring persistent and asymptomatic infection of the guttural pouches of horses with Streptococcus equi.. Vet Rec 1997;140:84–90.
  44. Houben RMAC, Newton JR, van Maanen C, Waller AS, Sloet van Oldruitenborgh‐Oosterbaan MM, Heesterbeek JAP. Untangling the stranglehold through mathematical modelling of Streptococcus equi subspecies equi transmission.. Prev Vet Med 2024;228:228.
  45. Rendle D, de Brauwere N, Hallowell G, Ivens P, McGlennon A, Newton R. Streptococcus equi infections: current best practice in the diagnosis and management of ‘strangles’.. UK‐Vet Equine 2021;5:S3–S15.
  46. Houben RMAC, van Maanen K, Kemp‐Symonds JG, Waller AS, Sloet van Oldruitenborgh‐Oosterbaan MM, Heesterbeek H. Estimation of the basic reproduction number for Streptococcus equi spp. equi outbreaks by meta‐analysis of strangles outbreak reports.. Equine Vet J 2022;55:514.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13865google scholar: lookup
  47. Boden LA, Parkin TD, Yates J, Mellor D, Kao RR. An online survey of horse‐owners in Great Britain.. BMC Vet Res 2013;9:188.
  48. Crew C. Optimising equine biosecurity awareness and practices to reduce the welfare impact of infectious disease.. Doctoral (PhD). Royal Veterinary College. 2021.
  49. Crew CR, Brennan ML, Ireland JL. Implementation of biosecurity on equestrian premises: a narrative overview.. Vet J 2023;292:105950.
  50. Boyle AG, Timoney JF, Newton JR, Hines MT, Waller AS, Buchanan BR. Streptococcus equi infections in horses: guidelines for treatment, control, and prevention of strangles‐revised consensus Statement.. J Vet Intern Med 2018;32:633–647.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.