Use of an immediate, qualitative progesterone assay for determination of day of ovulation in an equine embryo transfer program.
Abstract: An immediate, qualitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for progesterone was evaluated for use in determining the day of ovulation in an equine embryo transfer program. Plasma samples were collected from 27 mares from the third day of estrus to the second day of diestrus for 50 cycles. Ovulation was detected by ultrasound examination per rectum. Plasma progesterone concentrations were estimated using the qualitative assay to detect the time of the rise in progesterone after ovulation. Qualitative scores were compared to progesterone concentrations for the same samples as measured by a quantitative ELISA; the correlation between the two methods, expressed as a contingency coefficient, was 0.56. The accuracy of determining day of ovulation using qualitative progesterone results was compared to that achieved using the quantitative assay or detection of the first day of diestrus by teasing. Accuracy in determining day of ovulation +/- 1 d using the three methods was qualitative, 36/50 (72%); quantitative, 44/50 (88%); and teasing, 43/50 (86%). There was a significant difference in accuracy between the qualitative and quantitative progesterone assays (P<0.05).
Publication Date: 1988-01-01 PubMed ID: 16726435DOI: 10.1016/s0093-691x(88)80037-2Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
This study evaluates an immediate, qualitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for determining the day of ovulation in an equine embryo transfer program, comparing its accuracy against quantitative ELISA and the traditional method of teasing.
Objective of Research
- The main aim of the study was to evaluate the accuracy of an immediate, qualitative ELISA that tests progesterone levels as a method for determining the day of ovulation in an equine embryo transfer program. This method was compared to quantitative ELISA testing and ‘teasing’, a traditional method of observing behavioral changes in the mare.
Research Methodology
- For the study, 27 mares’ plasma samples were collected from the third day of estrus, which is the period of sexual receptivity, to the second day of diestrus, which is the period after ovulation when the mare is not sexually receptive.
- Ovulation was detected through ultrasound examination. The researchers tested plasma progesterone concentrations using the qualitative assay and measured the time it took for progesterone levels to rise after ovulation.
- The scores from the qualitative assay were then compared to the progesterone concentrations in the same samples as obtained through the quantitative ELISA test.
Results and Conclusion
- The correlation between the scores from the qualitative and quantitative assays, represented through a contingency coefficient, was found to be 0.56.
- The accuracy in identifying the day of ovulation within a day using the three methods were as follows: qualitative method at 72% (36 out of 50 cycles), quantitative method at 88% (44 out of 50 cycles) and teasing method at 86% (43 out of 50 cycles).
- The results show a significant difference in accuracy between the qualitative and quantitative progesterone assays. The qualitative assay was less accurate compared to the other two, suggesting that it may be a less dependable method in an equine embryo transfer program when it comes to determining the day of ovulation.
Cite This Article
APA
Hinrichs K, Sertich PL, Solorzano NM, Caldwell LA.
(1988).
Use of an immediate, qualitative progesterone assay for determination of day of ovulation in an equine embryo transfer program.
Theriogenology, 29(5), 1123-1130.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0093-691x(88)80037-2 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Section of Reproductive Studies, New Bolton Center University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine Kennett Square, PA 19348, USA.
Citations
This article has been cited 0 times.Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists