Analyze Diet
American journal of veterinary research2009; 70(7); 813-819; doi: 10.2460/ajvr.70.7.813

Use of epidurally derived evoked potentials for quantification of caudal nociception in ponies.

Abstract: To determine whether epidurally derived evoked potentials (EPs) can be used to reliably assess nociception and antinociception in ponies. Methods: 7 ponies. Methods: EPs and electromyograms (EMGs) from the quadriceps femoris muscles were recorded simultaneously, following electrical stimulation applied to the distal portion of the hind limb. The effect of increasing stimulus intensity, conduction velocities of the stimulated nerves, effect of epidurally applied methadone, and effect of systemically administered propofol were evaluated. Results: In the EP and EMG waveforms, 2 distinct complexes, the EP N25 and P50 and the EMG P27 and N62, respectively, were identified. On the basis of their latency and calculated conduction velocities, the EP P50 and EMG N62 were considered to be related to nociception (AD-mediated). All complexes increased significantly in amplitude with increasing stimulus intensity and decreased significantly following epidural administration of methadone or systemic administration of propofol. Conclusions: Although the experimental setup allowed successful discrimination between tactile- and nociceptive-associated responses, the identified EPs, considered to reflect activity in the spinal cord, could not be definitively differentiated from activity in the lumbosacral epaxial musculature. Further research is required to refine measurement techniques to allow for discrimination between these 2 signals. Similar to other species, neurophysiologic variables such as EPs could potentially become a useful additional tool in quantifying nociception in equidae.
Publication Date: 2009-07-02 PubMed ID: 19566465DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.70.7.813Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research article discusses using epidurally derived evoked potentials (EPs) to understand and evaluate pain (nociception) in ponies, following different treatments, with some promising but inconclusive results.

Introduction to the Experiment

The research paper presents a study on the application of evoked potentials derived from the epidural area of ponies to measure the level of nociception and antinociception in these animals. Through the following methods:

  • The researchers conducted their experiment on seven ponies.
  • They recorded Evoked Potentials (EPs) and Electromyograms (EMGs) from the quadriceps femoris muscles of these ponies, after applying electrical stimulation to the distal portion (far end) of their hind limbs.
  • The effect of varying stimulus intensity, the conductive speeds of the stimulated nerves, and the impact of epidurally injected methadone, as well as the effect of propofol administered systemically, were all assessed.

Experiment Results

The results of the experiment showcased a few noteworthy findings:

  • Two distinct complexes were identified in the Evoked Potentials and Electromyogram waveforms named EP N25 and P50 and the EMG P27 and N62, respectively.
  • Evaluating these complexes’ latency and calculated conduction speeds lead the researchers to consider the EP P50 and EMG N62 to be associated with nociception, mediated by AD (adenosine).
  • These complexes’ amplitudes augmented considerably with the intensity of the stimulus and notably diminished following the administration of epidural methadone or systemic propofol.

Conclusion of the Study

Despite the promising initial results, the experiment setup had its limitations:

  • They could successfully distinguish between responses associated with touch and pain, but they could not conclusively differentiate the evoked potentials, believed to mirror the spinal cord’s activity, from the action in the lumbosacral epaxial musculature.
  • The researchers acknowledge that more research is necessary to refine the measurement techniques to ensure a clear distinction between these two signals.

In conclusion, the study suggests that, similar to other species, neurophysiological variables like evoked potentials could potentially serve as a valuable tool in quantifying nociception in equidae (the family of animals including horses, donkeys, zebras, and related species).

Cite This Article

APA
van Loon JP, Stienen PJ, Doornenbal A, Hellebrekers LJ. (2009). Use of epidurally derived evoked potentials for quantification of caudal nociception in ponies. Am J Vet Res, 70(7), 813-819. https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.70.7.813

Publication

ISSN: 0002-9645
NlmUniqueID: 0375011
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 70
Issue: 7
Pages: 813-819

Researcher Affiliations

van Loon, Johannes P A M
  • Department of Equine Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, 3508 TD Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Stienen, Peter J
    Doornenbal, Arie
      Hellebrekers, Ludo J

        MeSH Terms

        • Analgesics, Opioid / administration & dosage
        • Analgesics, Opioid / pharmacology
        • Animals
        • Electric Stimulation
        • Electromyography / veterinary
        • Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory / physiology
        • Hindlimb / physiology
        • Horses / physiology
        • Hypnotics and Sedatives / administration & dosage
        • Hypnotics and Sedatives / pharmacology
        • Injections, Epidural
        • Lumbosacral Region / physiology
        • Male
        • Methadone / administration & dosage
        • Methadone / pharmacology
        • Pain / veterinary
        • Pain Measurement / veterinary
        • Propofol / administration & dosage
        • Propofol / pharmacology

        Citations

        This article has been cited 0 times.