Analyze Diet
Animal reproduction science2019; 202; 1-9; doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2018.12.012

Use of microfluidics to sort stallion sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Abstract: We determined if microfluidic sorting (MF) of frozen-thawed stallion sperm improves sperm population characteristics and results in embryo development after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). The efficiency and efficacy of MF sperm separation was evaluated by comparing pre- and post-separation sperm population variables. Procedural comparisons were performed after sorting with MF, single-layer colloidal centrifugation (SLC) or swim-up (SU), and cleavage and embryo development were evaluated after ICSI using MF-sorted sperm. In Experiment 1, when compared to the original sperm sample, MF sorting resulted in a sperm subpopulation with greater motility, morphology, viability, and membrane as well as DNA integrity. After sorting by MF, SLC and SU in Experiment 2, motility, viability, and membrane integrity were similar for sperm sorted using MF and SLC; however, morphology and DNA integrity were greater in sperm sorted using MF when compared with SLC. Swim-up was the least effective sorting method. In Experiment 3, sperm were processed using MF and SLC prior to ICSI. Motility, morphology and DNA integrity were similar for sperm subpopulations sorted using either method; but viability was greater for sperm sorted using MF than SLC. Sorting did not improve sperm membrane integrity. Sorting with MF prior to ICSI resulted in similar cleavage and blastocyst development rates as SLC. We concluded that MF separation of stallion sperm resulted in a subpopulation with improved sperm population parameters, comparable or better than SLC and SU. Embryos were produced after ICSI using MF sperm sorting.
Publication Date: 2019-01-02 PubMed ID: 30655027DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2018.12.012Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research explores the use of microfluidics in sorting stallion sperm in order to improve characteristics for producing healthy embryos. The study found that microfluidic sorting significantly increased the motility, morphology, viability, and DNA integrity of sperm, producing results equal or superior to existing techniques.

Microfluidic Sorting and Its Benefits

  • In this study, techniques for sorting stallion sperm were evaluated including microfluidics, single-layer colloidal centrifugation (SLC) and swim-up (SU). Initially, semen samples were sorted using microfluidic methods and compared to the baseline sample statistics. The researchers found that microfluidic sorting considerably improved motility, morphology, viability, and membrane and DNA integrity of sperm.
  • This technique capitalizes on small-scale physics to isolate and analyze sperm cells. Microfluidic channels are designed such that sperm with higher motility and better morphology (i.e. healthier) can swim through more rapidly than those with lower motility or morphology.

Comparing Microfluidic Sorting, Single-Layer Colloidal Centrifugation, and Swim-Up Methods

  • In the second experiment, microfluidic sorting was benchmarked against SLC and SU methods. The results suggested that to a great extent, microfluidics and SLC produced comparable results with respect to motility, viability, and membrane integrity. Although, sperm sorted using microfluidics demonstrated significantly better morphology and DNA integrity compared to SLC. SU was found to be the least effective method among all.

Evaluating the Effect of Sperm Sorting on Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI)

  • The third experiment was designed to validate the effects of microfluidic and SLC sorting methods on further stages of in vitro fertilization, specifically intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). This procedure involves injecting a single sperm cell directly into an egg to achieve fertilization.
  • Following both sorting techniques, the sperm were then used for ICSI. Both methods resulted in similar motility, morphology and DNA integrity. However, microfluidics still demonstrated greater improvement on the viability of the sperm compared to SLC.
  • The study concluded that irrespective of the sorting method used, it did not lead to any substantial improvement in sperm membrane integrity. Interestingly, sorting with microfluidics or SLC before ICSI resulted in similar rates of embryo cleavage and blastocyst development.

Conclusion

  • The research concluded that microfluidic sorting enhanced sperm population parameters, outperforming or matching other traditional sorting techniques. Microfluidics presents an efficient method to improve the quality of the sperm samples used for ICSI, thereby potentially increasing the success rates of in vitro fertilization.

Cite This Article

APA
Gonzalez-Castro RA, Carnevale EM. (2019). Use of microfluidics to sort stallion sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Anim Reprod Sci, 202, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2018.12.012

Publication

ISSN: 1873-2232
NlmUniqueID: 7807205
Country: Netherlands
Language: English
Volume: 202
Pages: 1-9

Researcher Affiliations

Gonzalez-Castro, Raul A
  • Department of Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Equine Reproduction Laboratory, 3101 Rampart Road, Fort Collins, CO, 80521, USA.
Carnevale, Elaine M
  • Department of Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Equine Reproduction Laboratory, 3101 Rampart Road, Fort Collins, CO, 80521, USA. Electronic address: elaine.carnevale@colostate.edu.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Cells, Cultured
  • Female
  • Horses
  • Male
  • Microfluidics / methods
  • Oocytes / cytology
  • Oocytes / physiology
  • Quality Control
  • Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic / veterinary
  • Sperm Motility
  • Spermatozoa / cytology
  • Spermatozoa / physiology

Citations

This article has been cited 9 times.
  1. Dabiri M, Goss DM, Ramasamy R, Bhakat M, Gardner DK, de Graaf SP, Ebrahimi Warkiani M. Sperm DNA fragmentation and its influence on mammalian reproduction. Nat Rev Urol 2026 Jan 28;.
    doi: 10.1038/s41585-025-01123-6pubmed: 41606137google scholar: lookup
  2. de Oliveira RA, Alonso MA, Fonte JS, Fernandes CB. Equine ICSI: an update on semen perspective. Anim Reprod 2024;21(4):e20240015.
    doi: 10.1590/1984-3143-AR2024-0015pubmed: 39629012google scholar: lookup
  3. Vahidi N, Eyni H, Sabz FTK, Narimani N, Zandieh Z, Amjadi F. Microfluidic in compared with Zeta potential, MACS and swim up methods, resulted in improved chromatin integrity and high quality sperms. JBRA Assist Reprod 2025 Mar 12;29(1):35-40.
    doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20240075pubmed: 39540603google scholar: lookup
  4. Shukla SK, Gaudriault P, Corbera A. Lab-on-chip (LoC) application for quality sperm selection: An undelivered promise?. Open Res Eur 2023;3:188.
  5. Srinivas S, Donthi S, Mettler AD, Tolani AD, Deenadayal M. Does Choosing Microfluidics for Sperm Sorting Offer an Advantage to Improve Clinical Pregnancies in Donor Egg Recipients?. J Hum Reprod Sci 2022 Apr-Jun;15(2):143-149.
    doi: 10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_15_22pubmed: 35928460google scholar: lookup
  6. Ahmadkhani N, Hosseini M, Saadatmand M, Abbaspourrad A. The influence of the female reproductive tract and sperm features on the design of microfluidic sperm-sorting devices. J Assist Reprod Genet 2022 Jan;39(1):19-36.
    doi: 10.1007/s10815-021-02377-wpubmed: 35034216google scholar: lookup
  7. Orsolini MF, Meyers SA, Dini P. An Update on Semen Physiology, Technologies, and Selection Techniques for the Advancement of In Vitro Equine Embryo Production: Section II. Animals (Basel) 2021 Nov 20;11(11).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11113319pubmed: 34828049google scholar: lookup
  8. Keskin M, Pabuçcu EG, Arslanca T, Demirkıran ÖD, Pabuçcu R. Does Microfluidic Sperm Sorting Affect Embryo Euploidy Rates in Couples with High Sperm DNA Fragmentation?. Reprod Sci 2022 Jun;29(6):1801-1808.
    doi: 10.1007/s43032-021-00784-zpubmed: 34731459google scholar: lookup
  9. Gimeno BF, Bariani MV, Laiz-Quiroga L, Martínez-León E, Von-Meyeren M, Rey O, Mutto AÁ, Osycka-Salut CE. Effects of In Vitro Interactions of Oviduct Epithelial Cells with Frozen-Thawed Stallion Spermatozoa on Their Motility, Viability and Capacitation Status. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jan 3;11(1).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11010074pubmed: 33401609google scholar: lookup