Analyze Diet
Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997)2012; 194(2); 262-264; doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.04.017

Use of sentinel serosurveillance of mules and donkeys in the monitoring of West Nile virus infection.

Abstract: A cross-sectional study was carried out on clinically normal mules and donkeys in a region of southern Spain to assess the seroprevalence of West Nile virus (WNV) following detection of infection in contiguous horse and human populations. Antibodies against WNV were detected by a blocking ELISA and micro-virus neutralisation test in 12/165 (7.3%; CI(95%) 4.3-11.3) of the animals sampled. Even though the individual seroprevalence was higher in mules (9.6%; 8/83) than in donkeys (4.9%; 4/82), the difference was not statistically significant. Nine of 90 herds (10.0%; CI(95%) 3.8-16.2) contained at least one seropositive animal. Antibodies against WNV were also detected in 1/4 (25%) donkeys tested on three farms where WNV cases had been confirmed in horses. None of 26 potential explanatory variables was identified as a risk factor for seropositivity. Such serosurveillance of sentinel mules or donkeys may be a useful tool in the epidemiological monitoring of WNV in regions where horses are vaccinated.
Publication Date: 2012-05-24 PubMed ID: 22633828DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.04.017Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study used mules and donkeys as markers to monitor and assess the prevalence of the West Nile Virus (WNV) in southern Spain after it was found in the horse and human population in the region.

Research Objectives and Methodology

  • The research was conducted as a cross-sectional study on mules and donkeys that displayed no clinical signs of WNV infection in southern Spain. This method allows researchers to observe and analyze multiple variables at a specific point in time.
  • The researchers aimed to assess and determine the seroprevalence of WNV in these animals. ‘Seroprevalence’ refers to the level of a pathogen in a population, as measured in blood serum.
  • Blood samples were taken from the animals and tested for the presence of antibodies against WNV using a blocking ELISA and micro-virus neutralisation test. These are standard tests for detecting specific antibodies in a specimen.

Results and Findings

  • The study found that 12 out of 165 (7.3%) animals sampled had antibodies against WNV. This indicates past exposure to WNV, although no clinical signs of the disease were observed.
  • Of these, a higher seroprevalence was observed in mules (9.6%) than in donkeys (4.9%), although the difference wasn’t statistically significant, meaning it could have occurred by chance.
  • About 10% of the herds tested also contained at least one seropositive animal.
  • Interestingly, the researchers found antibodies against WNV in one of four donkeys tested on three different farms where WNV cases had previously been confirmed in horses. This could suggest cross transmission between horses and donkeys.
  • Despite considering 26 potential explanatory variables, the researchers were not able to identify any particular risk factors for seropositivity, suggesting more research is needed in this area.

Conclusions and Implications

  • The researchers concluded that using mules and donkeys as ‘sentinels’ or indicators for monitoring WNV could be an effective tool, especially in regions where horses are vaccinated against WNV; thus, the prevalence in horses might not accurately reflect the current state of the virus in the region.

This research contributes to our understanding of the epidemiology of WNV, which is significant given that this virus can cause serious and sometimes fatal disease in humans. It also suggests a novel approach to disease surveillance that may be effective in areas where prevalent species are routinely vaccinated.

Cite This Article

APA
García-Bocanegra I, Arenas-Montes A, Jaén-Téllez JA, Napp S, Fernández-Morente M, Arenas A. (2012). Use of sentinel serosurveillance of mules and donkeys in the monitoring of West Nile virus infection. Vet J, 194(2), 262-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.04.017

Publication

ISSN: 1532-2971
NlmUniqueID: 9706281
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 194
Issue: 2
Pages: 262-264
PII: S1090-0233(12)00172-4

Researcher Affiliations

García-Bocanegra, Ignacio
  • Departamento de Sanidad Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, UCO, Campus Universitarios de Rabanales, 14071 Córdoba, Spain. nacho.garcia@uco.es
Arenas-Montes, Antonio
    Jaén-Téllez, Juan A
      Napp, Sebastián
        Fernández-Morente, Manuel
          Arenas, Antonio

            MeSH Terms

            • Animals
            • Cross-Sectional Studies
            • Equidae / virology
            • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
            • Horse Diseases / epidemiology
            • Horse Diseases / virology
            • Horses
            • Humans
            • Neutralization Tests / veterinary
            • Seroepidemiologic Studies
            • Serologic Tests / veterinary
            • Spain / epidemiology
            • West Nile Fever / diagnosis
            • West Nile Fever / epidemiology
            • West Nile Fever / veterinary
            • West Nile virus / immunology

            Citations

            This article has been cited 8 times.
            1. Bergmann F, Trachsel DS, Stoeckle SD, Bernis Sierra J, Lübke S, Groschup MH, Gehlen H, Ziegler U. Seroepidemiological Survey of West Nile Virus Infections in Horses from Berlin/Brandenburg and North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.. Viruses 2022 Jan 25;14(2).
              doi: 10.3390/v14020243pubmed: 35215837google scholar: lookup
            2. de Heus P, Kolodziejek J, Hubálek Z, Dimmel K, Racher V, Nowotny N, Cavalleri JV. West Nile Virus and Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus Are Endemic in Equids in Eastern Austria.. Viruses 2021 Sep 19;13(9).
              doi: 10.3390/v13091873pubmed: 34578454google scholar: lookup
            3. Molini U, Franzo G, Nel H, Khaiseb S, Ntahonshikira C, Chiwome B, Baines I, Madzingira O, Monaco F, Savini G, D'Alterio N. West Nile Virus Seroprevalence in a Selected Donkey Population of Namibia.. Front Vet Sci 2021;8:681354.
              doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.681354pubmed: 34222404google scholar: lookup
            4. Lima TS, Silva RAF, Pereira RMF, Soares KL, Santos NTA, Sousa MS, Mendonça FS, Lucena RB. Skin Diseases in Donkeys and Mules-An Update.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Dec 31;11(1).
              doi: 10.3390/ani11010065pubmed: 33396381google scholar: lookup
            5. Câmara RJF, Bueno BL, Resende CF, Balasuriya UBR, Sakamoto SM, Reis JKPD. Viral Diseases that Affect Donkeys and Mules.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Nov 25;10(12).
              doi: 10.3390/ani10122203pubmed: 33255568google scholar: lookup
            6. Goodrich EL, McLean A, Guarino C. A Pilot Serosurvey for Selected Pathogens in Feral Donkeys (Equus asinus).. Animals (Basel) 2020 Oct 2;10(10).
              doi: 10.3390/ani10101796pubmed: 33023217google scholar: lookup
            7. Rodríguez-Prieto V, Vicente-Rubiano M, Sánchez-Matamoros A, Rubio-Guerri C, Melero M, Martínez-López B, Martínez-Avilés M, Hoinville L, Vergne T, Comin A, Schauer B, Dórea F, Pfeiffer DU, Sánchez-Vizcaíno JM. Systematic review of surveillance systems and methods for early detection of exotic, new and re-emerging diseases in animal populations.. Epidemiol Infect 2015 Jul;143(10):2018-42.
              doi: 10.1017/S095026881400212Xpubmed: 25353252google scholar: lookup
            8. Ziegler U, Angenvoort J, Klaus C, Nagel-Kohl U, Sauerwald C, Thalheim S, Horner S, Braun B, Kenklies S, Tyczka J, Keller M, Groschup MH. Use of competition ELISA for monitoring of West Nile virus infections in horses in Germany.. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2013 Jul 24;10(8):3112-20.
              doi: 10.3390/ijerph10083112pubmed: 23887620google scholar: lookup