FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 10000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Journal of veterinary internal medicine2016; 30(2); 664-670; doi: 10.1111/jvim.13828

Use of Serial Quantitative PCR of the vapA Gene of Rhodococcus equi in Feces for Early Detection of R. equi Pneumonia in Foals.

Abstract: Current screening tests for Rhodococcus equi pneumonia in foals lack adequate accuracy for clinical use. Real-time, quantitative PCR (qPCR) for virulent R. equi in feces has not been systematically evaluated as a screening test. Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of qPCR for vapA in serially collected fecal samples as a screening test for R. equi pneumonia in foals. Methods: One hundred and twenty-five foals born in 2011 at a ranch in Texas. Methods: Fecal samples were collected concurrently with thoracic ultrasonography (TUS) screening examinations at ages 3, 5, and 7 weeks. Affected (pneumonic) foals (n = 25) were matched by age and date-of-birth to unaffected (n = 25) and subclinical (ie, having thoracic TUS lesions but no clinical signs of pneumonia) foals (n = 75). DNA was extracted from feces using commercial kits and concentration of virulent R. equi in feces was determined by qPCR. Results: Subsequently affected foals had significantly greater concentrations of vapA in feces than foals that did not develop pneumonia (unaffected and subclinical foals) at 5 and 7 weeks of age. Accuracy of fecal qPCR, however, was poor as a screening test to differentiate foals that would develop clinical signs of pneumonia from those that would remain free of clinical signs (including foals with subclinical pulmonary lesions attributed to R. equi) using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) methods. Conclusions: In the population studied, serial qPCR on feces lacked adequate accuracy as a screening test for clinical R. equi foal pneumonia.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2016-01-24 PubMed ID: 26806422PubMed Central: PMC4913589DOI: 10.1111/jvim.13828Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research paper discusses a study that evaluated the accuracy of a diagnostic method called PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) in detecting Rhodococcus equi pneumonia in young horses (foals). The method involved repeatedly testing fecal samples in a quantitative manner. However, the results indicated the method did not have enough precision to be successfully used as a diagnostic screening tool.

Background and Objective

  • The study aimed at determining the accuracy of quantitative PCR (qPCR) as a screening test for Rhodococcus equi pneumonia in foals, a disease that severely affects the respiratory health in young horses.
  • Previously, qPCR technology hasn’t been systematically evaluated to identify virulent R. equi in feces. Hence, the objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of this method in diagnosing this pneumonia using fecal samples.

Methodology

  • A total of 125 foals born in 2011 at a Texas ranch were enrolled in the study.
  • Fecal samples were obtained during thoracic ultrasonography (TUS) screening examinations when the foals were 3, 5, and 7 weeks old.
  • The foals were categorized into three groups – affected (pneumonic) foals (25), unaffected foals (25), and subclinical foals (75), the latter displaying thoracic TUS lesions but no clinical signs of pneumonia.
  • The DNA was extracted from feces using commercial kits, and the concentration of virulent R. equi was determined using qPCR.

Results

  • At 5 and 7 weeks of age, the concentrations of vapA, a gene of R. equi, in the feces of subsequently affected foals were significantly higher compared to foals who did not develop pneumonia.
  • However, the accuracy of fecal qPCR as a screening test to distinguish between foals that would eventually show symptoms of pneumonia and those that would remain free from clinical signs was poor.

Conclusions

  • Overall, the study concluded that qPCR on serial feces samples was not sufficiently accurate as a screening test for clinical Rhodococcus equi pneumonia in foals in the studied population.

Cite This Article

APA
Madrigal RG, Shaw SD, Witkowski LA, Sisson BE, Blodgett GP, Chaffin MK, Cohen ND. (2016). Use of Serial Quantitative PCR of the vapA Gene of Rhodococcus equi in Feces for Early Detection of R. equi Pneumonia in Foals. J Vet Intern Med, 30(2), 664-670. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.13828

Publication

Journal of veterinary internal medicine
ISSN: 1939-1676
NlmUniqueID: 8708660
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 30
Issue: 2
Pages: 664-670

Researcher Affiliations

Madrigal, R G
  • Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Biomedical Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
Shaw, S D
  • Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Biomedical Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
Witkowski, L A
  • Laboratory of Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.
Sisson, B E
  • Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Biomedical Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
Blodgett, G P
  • Equine Division, 6666 Ranch, Guthrie, TX.
Chaffin, M K
  • Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Biomedical Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
Cohen, N D
  • Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Biomedical Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.

MeSH Terms

  • Actinomycetales Infections / diagnosis
  • Actinomycetales Infections / microbiology
  • Actinomycetales Infections / veterinary
  • Animals
  • Bacterial Proteins / isolation & purification
  • Feces / microbiology
  • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
  • Horse Diseases / microbiology
  • Horses
  • Pneumonia, Bacterial / diagnosis
  • Pneumonia, Bacterial / microbiology
  • Pneumonia, Bacterial / veterinary
  • Polymerase Chain Reaction / methods
  • Polymerase Chain Reaction / veterinary
  • Rhodococcus equi / isolation & purification
  • Sensitivity and Specificity

References

This article includes 27 references
  1. Giguère S, Cohen ND, Chaffin MK. Rhodococcus equi – clinical manifestations, virulence, and immunity. J Vet Intern Med 2011;25:1221–1230.
    pubmed: 22092609
  2. Giguère S, Cohen ND, Chaffin MK. Diagnosis, treatment, control and prevention of infections caused by Rhodococcus equi in foals. J Vet Intern Med 2011;25:1209–1220.
    pubmed: 22092608
  3. Giguère S, Hondalus MK, Yager JA. Role of the 85 – kilobase plasmid and plasmid‐encoded virulence‐ associated protein A in intracellular survival and virulence of Rhodococcus equi. Infect Immun 1999;67:3548–3557.
    pmc: PMC116543pubmed: 10377138
  4. Harrington JR, Golding MC, Martens RJ. Evaluation of RT qPCR for detection and quantitation of virulent R. equi. Am J Vet Res 2005;66:755–761.
    pubmed: 15940818
  5. Monego F, Maboni F, Krewer C. Molecular characterization of Rhodococcus equi from horse‐breeding farms by means of multiplex PCR for the vap gene family. Curr Microbiol 2009;58:399–403.
    pubmed: 19205798
  6. Rodriguez‐Lazaro D, Lewis DA, Ocampo‐Sosa AA. Internally controlled real‐time PCR method for quantitative species‐specific detection and vapA genotyping of Rhodococcus equi. Appl Environ Microbiol 2006;72:4256–4263.
    pmc: PMC1489618pubmed: 16751540
  7. Ramirez S, Lester GD, Roberts GR. Diagnostic contribution of thoracic ultrasonography in 17 foals with Rhodococcus equi pneumonia. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2004;45:172–176.
    pubmed: 15072151
  8. Slovis NM, McCracken JL, Mundy G. How to use thoracic ultrasound to screen foals for Rhodococcus equi at affected farms. Proc 2005 AAEP Annu Convention 2005;51:274–278.
  9. McCracken JL, Slovis NM. Use of thoracic ultrasound for the prevention of Rhodococcus equi pneumonia on endemic farms. Proc 2009 AAEP Annu Convention 2009;55:38–44.
  10. Venner M, Rödiger A, Laemmer M, Giguère S. Failure of antimicrobial therapy to accelerate spontaneous healing of subclinical pulmonary abscess on a farm with endemic infections caused by Rhodococcus equi. Vet J 2012;192:293–298.
    pubmed: 21924651
  11. Chaffin MK, Cohen ND, Syndergaard M. Evaluation of ultrasonographic screening parameters for predicting subsequent onset of clinically apparent Rhodococcus equi pneumonia in foals. Proc 2013 AAEP Annu Convention 2013;59:268–289.
  12. Burton AJ, Giguère S, Sturgill TL. Macrolide‐ and rifampin‐ resistant Rhodococcus equi on a horse breeding farm, Kentucky, USA. Emerg Infect Dis 2013;19:282–285.
    pmc: PMC3559061pubmed: 23347878
  13. Stratton‐Phelps M, Wilson WD, Gardner IA. Risk of adverse effects in pneumonic foals treated with erythromycin versus other antibiotics: 143 cases. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2000;217:68–73.
    pubmed: 10909450
  14. Pusterla N, Wilson WD, Mapes S, Leutengger CM. Diagnostic evaluation of real‐time PCR in the detection of Rhodococcus equi in feces and nasopharyngeal swabs from foals with pneumonia. Vet Rec 2007;161:272–275.
    pubmed: 17720966
  15. Shaw SD, Cohen ND, Chaffin MK. Estimating the sensitivity and specificity of real‐time quantitative PCR of fecal samples for diagnosis of Rhodococcus equi pneumonia in foals. J Vet Intern Med 2015;29:1712–1717.
    pmc: PMC4895660pubmed: 26436545
  16. Chaffin MK, Cohen ND, Martens RJ. Chemoprophylactic effects of azithromycin against Rhodococcus equi‐induced pneumonia among foals at equine breeding farms with endemic infections. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2008;232:1035–1047.
    pubmed: 18380623
  17. Robin X, Turck N, Hainard A. pROC: an open‐source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinformatics 2011;12:77.
    pmc: PMC3068975pubmed: 21414208
  18. Youden WJ. Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer 1950;3:32–35.
    pubmed: 15405679
  19. Takai S, Ohkura H, Watanabe Y, Tsubaki S. Quantitative aspects of fecal Rhodococcus (Corynebacterium) equi in foals. J Clin Microbiol 1986;23:794–796.
    pmc: PMC362841pubmed: 3700632
  20. Kuskie KR, Smith JL, Sinha S. Associations between the exposure to airborne virulent Rhodococcus equi and the Incidence of R equi pneumonia among individual foals. J Equine Vet Sci 2011;31:463–469.
  21. Cohen ND, Carter CN, Scott M. Association of soil concentrations of Rhodococcus equi and incidence of pneumonia attributable to Rhodococcus equi in foals on farms in central Kentucky. Am J Vet Res 2008;69:385–395.
    pubmed: 18312138
  22. Röder B, Frühwirth K, Vogl C. Impact of long‐term storage on stability of standard DNA for nucleic‐acid based methods. J Clin Microbiol 2010;48:4260–4262.
    pmc: PMC3020885pubmed: 20810770
  23. Lauber CL, Zhou N, Gordon JI. Effect of storage conditions on the assessment of bacterial community structure in soil and human‐associated samples. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2010;307:80–86.
    pmc: PMC3148093pubmed: 20412303
  24. Hale VL, Tan CL, Knight R, Amato KR. Effect of preservation method on spider monkey (Ateles geoffroyi) fecal microbiota over 8 weeks. J Microbiol Methods 2015;113:16–26.
    pubmed: 25819008
  25. Mitchell KR, Takacs‐Vesbach CD. A comparison of methods for total community DNA preservation and extraction from various thermal environments. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2008;35:1139–1147.
    pubmed: 18633656
  26. McKain N, Genc B, Snelling TJ, Wallace RJ. Differential recovery of bacterial and archaeal 16S rRNA genes from ruminal digesta in response to glycerol as cryoprotectant. J Microbiol Methods 2013;95:381–383.
    pubmed: 24161897
  27. Bordin AI, Suchodolski JS, Markel ME. Effects of administration of live or inactivated virulent Rhodococccus equi and age on the fecal microbiome of neonatal foals. PLoS One 2013;8:e66640.
    pmc: PMC3681940pubmed: 23785508

Citations

This article has been cited 11 times.
  1. Yerlikaya Z, Karagülle B, Otlu B, Muz A. From Paddock to Foal: Prevalence and Genotypic Diversity of Rhodococcus equi on Stud Farms in Türkiye. Vet Sci 2026 Jan 10;13(1).
    doi: 10.3390/vetsci13010072pubmed: 41600728google scholar: lookup
  2. Villalba-Orero M, Gómez CA, Valero-Gónzalez M, Venegas N, Criado G, Martín-Cuervo M. Blood parameters in neonatal foal and colostrum quality as possible early markers for increased risk of developing Rhodococcus equi pneumonia. Front Vet Sci 2025;12:1654052.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1654052pubmed: 40948621google scholar: lookup
  3. Li L, Li S, Ma H, Akhtar MF, Tan Y, Wang T, Liu W, Khan A, Khan MZ, Wang C. An Overview of Infectious and Non-Infectious Causes of Pregnancy Losses in Equine. Animals (Basel) 2024 Jul 2;14(13).
    doi: 10.3390/ani14131961pubmed: 38998073google scholar: lookup
  4. Rakowska A, Czopowicz M, Bereznowski A, Witkowski L. Investigation of the relationship between pulmonary lesions based on lung ultrasound and respiratory clinical signs in foals with suspected pulmonary rhodococcosis. Sci Rep 2023 Nov 8;13(1):19401.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-46833-2pubmed: 37938262google scholar: lookup
  5. Tsuzuki N, Maruko T, Takeyama A, Ikeda H, Mizuguchi Y. Evaluation of oxidative stress in foals with Rhodococcus equi infection-induced pneumonia for the judgment of therapeutic effect. J Vet Med Sci 2023 Dec 6;85(12):1277-1280.
    doi: 10.1292/jvms.23-0260pubmed: 37853622google scholar: lookup
  6. Rakowska A, Marciniak-Karcz A, Bereznowski A, Cywińska A, Żychska M, Witkowski L. Less Typical Courses of Rhodococcus equi Infections in Foals. Vet Sci 2022 Oct 31;9(11).
    doi: 10.3390/vetsci9110605pubmed: 36356082google scholar: lookup
  7. Narváez SÁ, Fernández I, Patel NV, Sánchez S. Novel Quantitative PCR for Rhodococcus equi and Macrolide Resistance Detection in Equine Respiratory Samples. Animals (Basel) 2022 May 3;12(9).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12091172pubmed: 35565598google scholar: lookup
  8. Cohen ND, Flores-Ahlschewde P, Gonzales GM, Kahn SK, da Silveira BP, Bray JM, King EE, Blair CC, Bordin AI. Fecal concentration of Rhodococcus equi determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction of rectal swab samples to differentiate foals with pneumonia from healthy foals. J Vet Intern Med 2022 May;36(3):1146-1151.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.16438pubmed: 35475581google scholar: lookup
  9. Cohen ND, Kahn SK, Bordin AI, Gonzales GM, da Silveira BP, Bray JM, Legere RM, Ramirez-Cortez SC. Association of pneumonia with concentrations of virulent Rhodococcus equi in fecal swabs of foals before and after intrabronchial infection with virulent R. equi. J Vet Intern Med 2022 May;36(3):1139-1145.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.16409pubmed: 35322902google scholar: lookup
  10. Rakowska A, Cywinska A, Witkowski L. Current Trends in Understanding and Managing Equine Rhodococcosis. Animals (Basel) 2020 Oct 18;10(10).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10101910pubmed: 33081047google scholar: lookup
  11. DeLorenzo DM, Moon TS. Selection of stable reference genes for RT-qPCR in Rhodococcus opacus PD630. Sci Rep 2018 Apr 16;8(1):6019.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24486-wpubmed: 29662144google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,727 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.