Analyze Diet
Research in veterinary science2019; 125; 141-147; doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2019.05.018

Utility and accuracy of a smartphone-based electrocardiogram device as compared to a standard base-apex electrocardiogram in the horse.

Abstract: Evaluate accuracy and utility of a smartphone-based ECG device compared to a standard base-apex lead ECG in horses. Methods: ECGs were acquired prospectively from 28 client-owned horses at 2 equine referral hospitals. Twenty-five pairs of 30-s ECG recordings were acquired simultaneously from 23 horses with a smartphone ECG device (a bi-polar single lead recorder coupled to a smartphone with an ECG application) and with a standard base-apex lead ECG; 2 horses provided two pairs of simultaneously acquired ECGs. In one horse, the ECGs pairs were recorded immediately sequentially. An additional 7 smartphone ECGs were recorded from 5 horses without contemporaneous reference ECGs. Three observers independently evaluated all ECGs without knowledge of ECG pairing. Inter- and intra-observer agreement between the 2 ECG modalities was evaluated for rhythm diagnosis and QRS polarity. Heart rate agreement was also evaluated. Results: Intra-observer agreement for rhythm assessment was very high; one observer diagnosed the same cardiac rhythm on both recordings in 24/26 instances and two observers agreed in 25/26 instances. The polarity of the QRS complex was similar on ECGs acquired simultaneously by both systems. Heart rates calculated from ECG pairs were within 1 beat of each other. Conclusions: The smartphone-acquired ECG accurately identified cardiac rhythm and heart rate in most horses. In one case, small size of the complexes precluded identification of P waves on smartphone-acquired ECGs, resulting in a misdiagnosis. The smartphone-acquired ECG device might allow veterinarians to evaluate and monitor cardiac arrhythmias relatively inexpensively in field or hospital settings.
Publication Date: 2019-06-03 PubMed ID: 31228737DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2019.05.018Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study highlights the comparison of a smartphone-based electrocardiogram (ECG) device against standard ECG equipment in assessing the cardiac health of horses. The research suggests that the mobile-based ECG device can accurately identify the heart rate and rhythm, providing a potentially cost-effective and convenient solution for veterinarians in field or hospital settings.

Methods

  • The study was conducted using electrocardiograms (ECG) from 28 owned horses from two different referral hospitals.
  • The comparison was made using 30-second ECG recordings from 23 horses, which were collected concurrently both with a smartphone-based ECG device and the standard base-apex lead ECG. Two horses provided two pairs of simultaneous ECG recordings.
  • From one horse, the paired ECGs were recorded at different times. Seven more ECGs were taken from five horses using only the smartphone device, without a corresponding standard ECG at the same time as a point of reference.
  • Three separate observers independently reviewed all ECGs without knowledge of which recording pairs belonged together.

Results

  • The research found great consistency across the recordings. There was a high level of agreement among observers for rhythm assessment. All three reviewers were mostly in agreement, noting the same cardiac rhythm on both smartphone and standard ECG recordings.
  • The polarity of the QRS complex, a standard measurement in ECGs, was similar between ECGs simultaneously obtained from both systems.
  • Heart rates calculated from each pair of ECGs were almost identical, staying within one beat of each other.

Conclusion

  • The data suggests that ECGs acquired through a smartphone ECG device accurately identified heart rate and cardiac rhythm in most horses tested.
  • In one instance, the small size of the heart’s electrical complexes on the smartphone ECG led to a misdiagnosis. This implies there may be limitations to the technology, especially in the identification of P waves, which are one of the primary waves identifiable in an ECG scan.
  • The findings indicate that smartphone-based ECGs could potentially offer a more affordable and convenient method for veterinarians to identify and monitor cardiac arrhythmias in horses, both in field and clinical settings.

Cite This Article

APA
Kraus MS, Rishniw M, Divers TJ, Reef VB, Gelzer AR. (2019). Utility and accuracy of a smartphone-based electrocardiogram device as compared to a standard base-apex electrocardiogram in the horse. Res Vet Sci, 125, 141-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2019.05.018

Publication

ISSN: 1532-2661
NlmUniqueID: 0401300
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 125
Pages: 141-147
PII: S0034-5288(19)30102-X

Researcher Affiliations

Kraus, Marc S
  • Department of Clinical Sciences and Advanced Medicine-Philadelphia, Matthew J. Ryan Veterinary Hospital, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America.
Rishniw, Mark
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Cornell University, College of Veterinary Medicine, Ithaca, NY 14853, United States of America.
Divers, Thomas J
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Cornell University, College of Veterinary Medicine, Ithaca, NY 14853, United States of America.
Reef, Virginia B
  • Dept of Clinical Studies, New Bolton Center, University of Pennsylvania, Kennett Square, PA 19348, United States of America.
Gelzer, Anna R
  • Department of Clinical Sciences and Advanced Medicine-Philadelphia, Matthew J. Ryan Veterinary Hospital, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America. Electronic address: agelzer@upenn.edu.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Arrhythmias, Cardiac / diagnosis
  • Arrhythmias, Cardiac / veterinary
  • Electrocardiography / instrumentation
  • Electrocardiography / methods
  • Electrocardiography / veterinary
  • Female
  • Heart Rate
  • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
  • Horses / physiology
  • Male
  • Prospective Studies
  • Smartphone / instrumentation

Citations

This article has been cited 5 times.
  1. Al Khamis T, Shawaf T, Almubarak A, Al-Ali MA. Comparison between a fitness tracker (Equimetre(TM)) and standard base-apex electrocardiography in dromedary camels.. Front Vet Sci 2022;9:963732.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.963732pubmed: 36713881google scholar: lookup
  2. Vitale V, Vezzosi T, Tognetti R, Fraschetti C, Sgorbini M. Evaluation of a new portable 1-lead digital cardiac monitor (eKuore) compared with standard base-apex electrocardiography in healthy horses.. PLoS One 2021;16(8):e0255247.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255247pubmed: 34343184google scholar: lookup
  3. Alberti E, Stucchi L, Pesce V, Stancari G, Ferro E, Ferrucci F, Zucca E. Evaluation of a smartphone-based electrocardiogram device accuracy in field and in hospital conditions in horses.. Vet Rec Open 2020;7(1):e000441.
    doi: 10.1136/vetreco-2020-000441pubmed: 33381302google scholar: lookup
  4. Corradini I, Fernández-Ruiz A, Barba M, Engel-Manchado J. Stall-side screening potential of a smartphone electrocardiogram recorded over both sides of the thorax in horses.. J Vet Intern Med 2020 Sep;34(5):2101-2108.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.15795pubmed: 32639655google scholar: lookup
  5. Welch-Huston B, Durward-Akhurst S, Norton E, Ellingson L, Rendahl A, McCue M. Comparison between smartphone electrocardiography and standard three-lead base apex electrocardiography in healthy horses.. Vet Rec 2020 Oct 31;187(9):e70.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.105759pubmed: 32414909google scholar: lookup