FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Front Vet Sci / Uveitis and blindness in a closed herd of Equidae following ...
Frontiers in veterinary science2025; 11; 1504990; doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1504990

Uveitis and blindness in a closed herd of Equidae following leptospiral infection.

Abstract: To describe the ocular findings, chronology of disease, and serum leptospiral titers in a group of horses, mules, and donkeys following an outbreak of leptospirosis. Unassigned: Fifty Equidae in central North Carolina had ophthalmic examinations and serum leptospiral microscopic agglutination test (MAT) titers performed every 3-6 months for 24 months followed by a final examination at 34 months. Unassigned: Throughout the nearly three-year study period, 17 horses (34%; 17/49 horses) developed signs of uveitis; 20 eyes (20/34; 58.8%) of these 17 horses were visual at the initial examination, but only four eyes (11.8%) remained visual at the final examination. Serum titers (serogroups Pomona and Bratislava) in horses with uveitis were significantly elevated compared to Equidae without uveitis (p < 0.02). In the 32 horses, donkeys, and mules that did not develop uveitis, a subgroup of 11 horses and one donkey had negative or low serum leptospiral titers (titers ≤1:800) while a second subgroup of 16 horses, three mules, and one donkey had high leptospiral titers (>1:800) but never developed uveitis. Water sources in the pasture were found to have high levels of leptospira. Unassigned: Approximately 1/3 of horses on a farm exposed to Leptospira developed uveitis and blindness. Serum titers to L. Pomona and L. Bratislava were significantly elevated in horses with uveitis. However, despite exposure, some horses, even with very high serum titers, never developed ocular disease. These data indicates that further research is warranted to investigate the genetic and immunological aspects of the pathogenesis and susceptibility of leptospiral-associated uveitis.
Copyright © 2025 Gerras, Young, Roberts, Waldman, Salmon and Gilger.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2025-01-06 PubMed ID: 39834922PubMed Central: PMC11743373DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1504990Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research study investigated the connection between an outbreak of the bacterial infection leptospirosis in a group of horses, mules, and donkeys and the development of uveitis and blindness. The study found that about a third of the equines developed uveitis and significant vision loss, with serum titers for leptospira distinctly elevated in affected individuals.

Demographic and Epidemiological Data

  • The study involved 50 horses, mules, and donkeys in North Carolina that were regularly tested over a period of approximately three years.
  • About 34% of the horses developed signs of uveitis (inflammation of the middle eye layer) during the study, with significant vision loss observed in many of these cases. Initially, 58.8% of these eyes were normal, but by the end of the study, only 11.8% remained so.

Correlation between Uveitis and Leptospiral Titers

  • In horses that developed uveitis, serum leptospiral titers, particularly for the serogroups Pomona and Bratislava, were significantly elevated compared to those without the disease, suggesting a possible link between leptospirosis and the development of uveitis.
  • Despite this, not all horses with high leptospiral titers developed uveitis. The horses, donkeys, and mules were divided into subgroups based on serum leptospiral titers. One subgroup with low titers did not develop uveitis, and even in a subgroup with high titers, no uveitis developed. This could suggest a possible genetic or immune component to susceptibility.

Risk Factors

  • Water sources in the horses’ pasture were found to have high levels of leptospira, which may have been a potential source of exposure and subsequent infection.
  • About one-third of horses exposed to leptospira developed uveitis and blindness, further underscoring the link between leptospira exposure and disease development.

Implications and Further Research

  • The findings highlight the need for additional research on the genetic and immunological aspects of the development and progression of leptospiral-associated uveitis. Understanding these aspects can help in the development of preventive and treatment strategies.

Cite This Article

APA
Gerras J, Young K, Roberts D, Waldman G, Salmon JH, Gilger BC. (2025). Uveitis and blindness in a closed herd of Equidae following leptospiral infection. Front Vet Sci, 11, 1504990. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2024.1504990

Publication

Frontiers in veterinary science
ISSN: 2297-1769
NlmUniqueID: 101666658
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 11
Pages: 1504990

Researcher Affiliations

Gerras, J
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States.
Young, K
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States.
Roberts, D
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States.
Waldman, G
  • Rivendell Mobile Large Animal, Advance, NC, United States.
Salmon, J H
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States.
Gilger, B C
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States.

Grant Funding

  • T35 OD011070 / NIH HHS

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 46 references
  1. Gerding J, Gilger B. Prognosis and impact of equine recurrent uveitis. Equine Vet J (2016) 48:290–8.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12451pubmed: 25891653google scholar: lookup
  2. Himebaugh N, Gilger B. Role of Leptospira spp. testing and ocular examination in horses with equine recurrent uveitis: a retrospective study of 63 horses. Equine Vet Educ (2021) 34:13546.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.13543google scholar: lookup
  3. Divers T, Chang Y, Irby N, Smith J, Carter C. Leptospirosis: an important infectious disease in north American horses. Equine Vet J (2019) 51:287–92.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13069pubmed: 30629756google scholar: lookup
  4. Verma A, Stevenson B, Adler B. Leptospirosis in horses. Vet Microbiol (2013) 167:61–6.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.04.012pubmed: 23647816google scholar: lookup
  5. Roberts S, York C, Robinson J. An outbreak of leptospirosis in horses on a small farm. J Am Vet Med Assoc (1952) 121:237–42.
    pubmed: 13022477
  6. Dwyer AE, Crockett R, Kalsow CΜ. Association of leptospiral seroreactivity and breed with uveitis and blindness in horses: 372 cases (1986-1993). J Am Vet Med Assoc (1995) 207:1327–31.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.1995.207.10.1327pubmed: 7591929google scholar: lookup
  7. Verma A, Artiushin S, Matsunaga J, Haake DA, Timoney JF. LruA and LruB, novel lipoproteins of pathogenic Leptospira interrogans associated with equine recurrent uveitis. Infect Immun (2005) 73:7259–66.
    doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.11.7259-7266.2005pmc: PMC1273856pubmed: 16239521google scholar: lookup
  8. Sillerud C, Bey R, Ball M, Bistner S. Serologic correlation of suspected Leptospira interrogans serovar Pomona-induced uveitis in a group of horses. J Am Vet Med Assoc (1987) 191:1576–8.
    pubmed: 3693011
  9. Faber NA, Crawford M, LeFebvre RB, Buyukmihci NC, Madigan JE, Willits NH. Detection of Leptospira spp. in the aqueous humor of horses with naturally acquired recurrent uveitis. J Clin Microbiol (2000) 38:2731–3.
    doi: 10.1128/JCM.38.7.2731-2733.2000pmc: PMC87011pubmed: 10878072google scholar: lookup
  10. Wildner G, Diedrichs-Möhring M. Molecular mimicry and uveitis. Front Immunol (2020) 11:580636.
    doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.580636pmc: PMC7658003pubmed: 33193382google scholar: lookup
  11. Deeg CA. Ocular immunology in equine recurrent uveitis. Vet Ophthalmol (2008) 11:61–5.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1463-5224.2008.00625.xpubmed: 19046272google scholar: lookup
  12. Deeg CA, Amann B, Raith AJ, Kaspers B. Inter-and intramolecular epitope spreading in equine recurrent uveitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci (2006) 47:652–6.
    doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-0789pubmed: 16431964google scholar: lookup
  13. Deeg CA, Pompetzki D, Raith AJ, Hauck SM, Amann B, Suppmann S. Identification and functional validation of novel autoantigens in equine uveitis. Mol Cell Proteomics (2006) 5:1462–70.
    doi: 10.1074/mcp.M500352-MCP200pubmed: 16690753google scholar: lookup
  14. Deeg CA, Kaspers B, Gerhards H, Thurau SR, Wollanke B, Wildner G. Immune responses to retinal autoantigens and peptides in equine recurrent uveitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci (2001) 42:393–8.
    pubmed: 11157872
  15. Wollanke B, Gerhards H, Ackermann K. Infectious uveitis in horses and new insights in its leptospiral biofilm-related pathogenesis. Microorganisms (2022) 10:387.
    doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10020387pmc: PMC8875353pubmed: 35208842google scholar: lookup
  16. Andre-Fontaine G, Aviat F, Thorin C. Waterborne leptospirosis: survival and preservation of the virulence of pathogenic Leptospira spp. in fresh water. Curr Microbiol (2015) 71:136–42.
    doi: 10.1007/s00284-015-0836-4pubmed: 26003629google scholar: lookup
  17. Bierque E, Thibeaux R, Girault D, Soupé-Gilbert ME, Goarant C. A systematic review of Leptospira in water and soil environments. PLoS One (2020) 15:e0227055.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227055pmc: PMC6984726pubmed: 31986154google scholar: lookup
  18. Williams R, Morter R, Freeman M, Lavignette A. Experimental chronic uveitis: ophthalmic signs following equine leptospirosis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci (1971) 10:948–54.
    pubmed: 5128770
  19. Morter R, Herschler R, Fessler J, Lavignette A. Experimental equine lepto-spirosis (Leptospira pomona). Proc. 68th Ann. Meet U. S. Livestock Sanil. Ass. (1965) 147–152.
    pubmed: 5217493
  20. Morrow B. An overview of cohort study designs and their advantages and disadvantages. Int J Ther Rehabil (2010) 17:518–23.
    doi: 10.12968/ijtr.2010.17.10.78810google scholar: lookup
  21. Song JW, Chung KC. Observational studies: cohort and case-control studies. Plast Reconstr Surg (2010) 126:2234–42.
    doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181f44abcpmc: PMC2998589pubmed: 20697313google scholar: lookup
  22. Matsumoto N, Hagiya H, Nakayama M, Furukawa M, Mitsuhashi T, Takao S. Examining the association between vaccine reactogenicity and antibody titer dynamics after the third dose of BNT162b2 vaccine using a mixed-effects model. J Infect Chemother (2023) 29:39–42.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2022.09.012pmc: PMC9484104pubmed: 36168999google scholar: lookup
  23. Desanti-Consoli H, Bouillon J, Chapuis RJ. Equids’ core vaccines guidelines in North America: considerations and prospective. Vaccine (2022) 10:398.
    doi: 10.3390/vaccines10030398pmc: PMC8955191pubmed: 35335029google scholar: lookup
  24. Malalana F, Stylianides A, McGowan C. Equine recurrent uveitis: Human and equine perspectives. Vet J (2015) 206:22–9.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.06.017pubmed: 26188862google scholar: lookup
  25. Cook CS, Peiffer R, Harling D. Equine recurrent uveitis. Equine Vet J (1983) 15:57–60.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1983.tb04560.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  26. Deeg CA, Hauck SM, Amann B, Pompetzki D, Altmann F, Raith A. Equine recurrent uveitis–a spontaneous horse model of uveitis. Ophthalmic Res (2008) 40:151–3.
    doi: 10.1159/000119867pubmed: 18421230google scholar: lookup
  27. Gilger BC, Degroote R, Deeg C. Diseases of the uvea, uveitis, and recurrent uveitis. Equine Ophthalmol 4th ed. (2022):441–98.
    doi: 10.1002/9781119782285.ch6google scholar: lookup
  28. Caimi K, Ruybal P. Leptospira spp., a genus in the stage of diversity and genomic data expansion. Infect Genet Evol (2020) 81:104241.
    doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2020.104241pubmed: 32061688google scholar: lookup
  29. Balboni A, D’Incau M, Zamagni S, Lucchese L, Mazzotta E, Marchione S. Identification of the most effective serovars to be included in the MAT antigen panel to optimize the serodiagnosis of Leptospira infection in northern Italy. Vet Res Commun (2023) 47:2185–92.
    doi: 10.1007/s11259-023-10103-3pubmed: 36929155google scholar: lookup
  30. Jayasundara D, Gamage C, Senavirathna I, Warnasekara J, Matthias MA, Vinetz JM. Optimizing the microscopic agglutination test (MAT) panel for the diagnosis of leptospirosis in a low resource, hyper-endemic setting with varied microgeographic variation in reactivity. PLoS Negl Trop Dis (2021) 15:e0009565.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009565pmc: PMC8279374pubmed: 34197457google scholar: lookup
  31. Sykes J, Hartmann K, Lunn K, Moore G, Stoddard R, Goldstein R. 2010 ACVIM small animal consensus statement on leptospirosis: diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment, and prevention. J Vet Intern Med (2011) 25:1–13.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2010.0654.xpmc: PMC3040842pubmed: 21155890google scholar: lookup
  32. Nieves C, Huete SG, Veyrier FJ, Picardeau M. Taxonomy and phylogenomics of Leptospira. Phylogenom Elsevier (2024):359–90.
    doi: 10.1016/B978-0-323-99886-4.00018-1google scholar: lookup
  33. Guglielmini J, Bourhy P, Schiettekatte O, Zinini F, Brisse S, Picardeau M. Genus-wide Leptospira core genome multilocus sequence typing for strain taxonomy and global surveillance. PLoS Negl Trop Dis (2019) 13:e0007374.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007374pmc: PMC6513109pubmed: 31026256google scholar: lookup
  34. Hagedoorn NN, Maze MJ, Carugati M, Cash-Goldwasser S, Allan KJ, Chen K. Global distribution of Leptospira serovar isolations and detections from animal host species: a systematic review and online database. Trop Med Int Health (2024) 29:161–72.
    doi: 10.1111/tmi.13965pmc: PMC11076152pubmed: 38351504google scholar: lookup
  35. Zilch TJ, Lee J, Saleem MZ, Zhang H, Cortese V, Voris N. Equine leptospirosis: experimental challenge of Leptospira interrogans serovar Bratislava fails to establish infection in naive horses. Equine Vet J (2021) 53:845–54.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13442pubmed: 33617667google scholar: lookup
  36. Yan W, Faisal S, Divers T, McDonough S, Akey B, Chang Y. Experimental Leptospira interrogans serovar Kennewicki infection of horses. J Vet Intern Med (2010) 24:912–7.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2010.00507.xpubmed: 20649749google scholar: lookup
  37. Hajikolaei MRH, Haidari M, Abdollapour G. Comparison of leptospiral infection in the horse and donkey. Bull Vet Inst Pulawy (2005) 49:175–8.
  38. Piredda I, Bertoldi L, Pedditzi A, Pintore P, Palmas B, Chisu V. Co-infection by Leptospira montravelensis and Leptospira interrogans Serovar Pomona in urine samples of donkeys and pigs in Sardinia, Italy. Animals (2023) 13:1803.
    doi: 10.3390/ani13111803pmc: PMC10251853pubmed: 37889694google scholar: lookup
  39. Pires BC, Dos Santos JBF, de Almeida Ferreira dos Santos JP, Silva DM, TFM DR, Cuccato LP. Occurrence of serological reactions for Leptospira spp. in donkeys and mules from Minas Gerais, Brazil. Trop Anim Health Product (2023) 55:258.
    pubmed: 37400748
  40. Mendoza FJ, Toribio RE, Perez-Ecija A. Donkey internal medicine—part II: cardiovascular, respiratory, neurologic, urinary, ophthalmic, dermatology, and musculoskeletal disorders. J Equine Vet (2018) 65:86–97.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2018.02.025google scholar: lookup
  41. Bradley C, Grundon R, Sansom PG. The prevalence of uveitis in a population of donkeys in the UK. Equine Vet J (2020) 52:863–7.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13257pubmed: 32145036google scholar: lookup
  42. Carlton WW. Pathology of equine recurrent uveitis. Comparative ophthalmic. Pathology. Charles C Thomas Publishers (1983):264–71.
  43. Gilger BC, Wilkie DA, Clode AB, McMullen RJ, Utter ME, Komaromy AM. Long-term outcome after implantation of a suprachoroidal cyclosporine drug delivery device in horses with recurrent uveitis. Vet Ophthalmol (2010) 13:294–300.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1463-5224.2010.00807.xpubmed: 20840106google scholar: lookup
  44. Faghihi H, Rajaei SM, Aftab G, Ozmai S, Golabdar S. Ophthalmic findings in a herd of Caspian miniature horses. Equine Vet Educ (2023) 35:e105–11.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.13654google scholar: lookup
  45. Plummer CE, Ramsey DT. A survey of ocular abnormalities in miniature horses. Vet Ophthalmol (2011) 14:239–43.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1463-5224.2010.00868.xpubmed: 21733064google scholar: lookup
  46. Stewart AS, Wotman KL, Martabano BB, Davis JL. Ocular manifestations of systemic disease. Equine Ophthalmology 4th ed. eds. Gilger B. C. (2022):721–91.
    doi: 10.1002/9781119782285.ch13pubmed: 0google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.