Analyze Diet
Frontiers in veterinary science2024; 10; 1271036; doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1271036

Validation of a novel clinical tool for monitoring distal limb stiffness.

Abstract: To validate a novel technique to measure limb stiffness in a clinical setting. Unassigned: Three horses and three ponies owned by the Royal Veterinary College. Unassigned: Limb stiffness indices for both forelimbs were first derived using the gold standard of kinematic analysis. Using the same animals, limb stiffness indices were then calculated using portable floor scales to record weight and an electrogoniometer to record changes in metacarpophalangeal joint angle. The two techniques were then assessed for correlation and repeatability. Unassigned: The repeatability of limb stiffness measurement using the novel clinical tool was considered to be good based on a small coefficient of variation (5.70%). The correlation of limb stiffness as derived by both methods was high ( = 0.78,  < 0.01). Limb stiffness was positively correlated with the mass of the subject ( = 0.85,  < 0.01), with heavier horses having greater limb stiffness. Unassigned: This study has compared a novel method to measure distal forelimb stiffness non-invasively in a clinical setting to kinematic analysis in six equids. It has demonstrated that limb stiffness increases in a linear fashion with body mass consistent with the role of forelimbs providing energy storage. Because limb stiffness has been shown previously to alter with injury to the superficial digital flexor tendon, it is hypothesized that this technique will offer a practical technique for the clinician to assess limb stiffness in clinical cases. Further study will be necessary to determine its clinical usefulness in such cases.
Publication Date: 2024-01-05 PubMed ID: 38249548PubMed Central: PMC10796727DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1271036Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research aimed to validate a new technique for measuring limb stiffness on horses and ponies, establishing that it is reliable and correlates strongly with body mass, suggesting potential utility in assessing limb injuries.

Summary of Research Purpose and Methods

  • This study sought to test the validity of a new tool designed to measure the stiffness of distal limbs (forelimbs) in a clinical setting, using horses and ponies as subjects.
  • The researchers first measured limb stiffness using the gold standard method, kinematic analysis. Next, they used the same animals to measure limb stiffness using the new method, which involved portable floor scales to record weight and an electrogoniometer to record changes in the angle of the metacarpophalangeal joint (the joint in the forelimb equivalent to the human knuckle).
  • The two techniques were assessed for their correlation and repeatability, with the new method proving to be “good” due to a small coefficient of variation.

Primary Findings

  • The new clinical tool was found to show good repeatability attributing to a small coefficient of variation (5.70%).
  • There was a high correlation (0.78) between the limb stiffness measures using the new tool and the gold standard kinematic analysis method.
  • Another significant finding was that limb stiffness was found to be positively associated with the mass of the subject. Heavier horses tended to have greater limb stiffness, and this increased in a linear fashion with body mass.

Significance and Potential Applications

  • The study concluded that the newly tested method to assess forelimb stiffness non-invasively in a clinical setting proved reliable when compared to kinematic analysis in six equids (horses and ponies).
  • Since the increase in limb stiffness has been found to correlate with injury to the superficial digital flexor tendon in the past, the authors suggest that this new tool could provide a practical way for clinicians to assess limb stiffness in cases of injury.
  • However, further investigations are necessary to determine the clinical usefulness of this new tool for assessing such injuries.

Cite This Article

APA
Jacklin BD, Hanousek K, Gillespie S, Liedtke A, Tucker R, Fiske-Jackson A, Smith RK. (2024). Validation of a novel clinical tool for monitoring distal limb stiffness. Front Vet Sci, 10, 1271036. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1271036

Publication

ISSN: 2297-1769
NlmUniqueID: 101666658
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 10
Pages: 1271036
PII: 1271036

Researcher Affiliations

Jacklin, Benjamin D
  • CVS Group Plc, Suffolk, United Kingdom.
Hanousek, Katherine
  • Equine Referral Hospital, Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, United Kingdom.
Gillespie, Sabrina
  • Equine Referral Hospital, Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, United Kingdom.
Liedtke, Anna
  • Equine Referral Hospital, Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, United Kingdom.
Tucker, Rachel
  • Liphook Equine Hospital, Hampshire, United Kingdom.
Fiske-Jackson, Andrew
  • Equine Referral Hospital, Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, United Kingdom.
Smith, Roger K
  • Equine Referral Hospital, Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, United Kingdom.

Conflict of Interest Statement

BJ was employed by CVS Group Plc. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

References

This article includes 35 references
  1. Avella CS, Ely ER, Verheyen RL, Price JS, Wood JL, Smith. Ultrasonographic assessment of the superficial digital flexor tendons of National Hunt Racehorses in Training over two Racing Seasons. Equine Vet J (2009) 41:449–54.
    doi: 10.2746/042516409x391042pubmed: 19642404google scholar: lookup
  2. Williams RB, HarKins RS, Hammond CJ, Wood JL. Racehorse injuries, clinical problems and fatalities recorded on British racecourses from flat racing and National Hunt Racing during 1996, 1997 and 1998. Equine Vet J (2001) 33:478–86.
    doi: 10.2746/042516401776254808pubmed: 11558743google scholar: lookup
  3. Dowling BA, Dart AJ, Hodgson DR, Smith RK. Superficial digital flexor tendonitis in the horse. Equine Vet J (2000) 32:369–78.
    doi: 10.2746/042516400777591138pubmed: 11037257google scholar: lookup
  4. Kasashima Y, Takahashi T, Smith RKW, Goodship AE, Kuwano A, Ueno T. Prevalence of superficial digital flexor tendonitis and suspensory Desmitis in Japanese thoroughbred flat racehorses in 1999. Equine Vet J (2004) 36:346–50.
    doi: 10.2746/0425164044890580pubmed: 15163043google scholar: lookup
  5. Singer ER, Barnes J, Saxby F, Murray JK. Injuries in the event horse: training versus competition. Vet J (2008) 175:76–81.
    doi: 10.1016/J.Tvjl.2006.11.009pubmed: 17204438google scholar: lookup
  6. O'meara B, Bladon B, Parlin LD, Fraser B, Lischer BJ. An investigation of the relationship between race performance and superficial digital flexor tendonitis in the thoroughbred racehorse. Equine Vet J (2010) 42:322–6.
  7. Mcguigan MP. The effect of gait and digital flexor muscle activation on limb compliance in the forelimb of the horse Equus Caballus. J Exp Biol (2003) 206:1325–36.
    doi: 10.1242/Jeb.00254pubmed: 12624168google scholar: lookup
  8. Birch HL, Bailey AL, Goodship AE. Macroscopic ‘degeneration’ of equine superficial digital flexor tendon is accompanied by a change in extracellular matrix composition. Equine Vet J (1998) 30:534–9.
  9. Dowling BA, Dart AJ. Mechanical and functional properties of the equine superficial digital flexor tendon. Vet J (2005) 170:184–92.
    doi: 10.1016/J.Tvjl.2004.03.021pubmed: 16129339google scholar: lookup
  10. Smith R, McIlwraith W, Schweitzer R, Kadler K, Cook J, Caterson B. Advances in the understanding of tendinopathies: a report on the second Havemeyer workshop on equine tendon disease. Equine Vet J (2013) 46:4–9.
    doi: 10.1111/Evj.12128pubmed: 24329581google scholar: lookup
  11. Smith MR, Wright IM, Minshall GJ, Dudhia J, Verheyen K, Heinegård D. Increased cartilage oligomeric matrix protein concentrations in equine digital flexor tendon sheath synovial fluid predicts intrathecal tendon damage. Vet Surg (2011) 40:54–8.
  12. Clegg PD. Musculoskeletal disease and injury, now and in the future. Part 2: tendon and ligament injuries. Equine Vet J (2012) 44:371–5.
  13. Thorpe CT, Clegg PD, Birch HL. A review of tendon injury: why is the equine superficial digital flexor tendon Most at risk?. Equine Vet J (2010) 42:174–80.
    doi: 10.2746/042516409X480395pubmed: 20156256google scholar: lookup
  14. Marr C, Love S, Boyd J, Mckellar Q. Factors affecting the clinical outcome of injuries to the superficial digital flexor tendon in National Hunt and Point-to-Point Racehorses. Vet Rec (1993) 132:476–9.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.132.19.476pubmed: 8506599google scholar: lookup
  15. Dyson SJ. Medical management of superficial digital flexor tendonitis: a comparative study in 219 horses (1992-2000). Equine Vet J (2004) 36:415–9.
    doi: 10.2746/0425164044868422pubmed: 15253082google scholar: lookup
  16. Marr CM, Mcmillan I, Boyd JS, Wright NG, Murray M. Ultrasonographic and histopathological findings in equine superficial digital flexor tendon injury. Equine Vet J (1993) 25:23–9.
  17. Crass JR, Genovesse RL, Render GA, Bellon EM. Magnetic resonance, ultrasound and histopathologic correlation of acute and healing equine tendon injuries. Vet Radiol Ultrasound (1992) 33:206–16.
  18. Dakin SG, Jespers K, Warner S, O’Hara LK, Dudhia J, Goodship AE. The relationship between in vivo limb and in vitro tendon mechanics after injury: a potential novel clinical tool for monitoring tendon repair. Equine Vet J (2010) 43:418–23.
  19. Piriyaprasarth P, Morris M, Winter A, Bialocerkowski AK. The reliability of knee joint position testing using Electrogoniometry. BMC Musculoskelet Disord (2008) 6.
    doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-6pmc: PMC2263037pubmed: 18211714google scholar: lookup
  20. Rowe P, Myles C, Hillmann S, Hazlewood M. Validation of flexible Electrogoniometry as a measure of joint kinematics. Physiotherapy (2001) 87:479–88.
    doi: 10.1016/S0031-9406(05)60695-5pubmed: 0google scholar: lookup
  21. Jaeger GH, Marcellin-Little DJ, Depuy V, Lascelles BD. Validity of goniometric joint measurements in cats. Am J Vet Res (2007) 68:822–6.
    doi: 10.2460/Ajvr.68.8.822pubmed: 17669021google scholar: lookup
  22. Watkins MA, Riddle DL, Lamb RL, Personius BJ. Reliability of goniometric measurements and visual estimates of knee range of motion obtained in a clinical setting. Phys Ther (1991) 71:90–6.
    doi: 10.1093/Ptj/71.2.90pubmed: 1989012google scholar: lookup
  23. Gajdosik BL, Bohannon RW. Clinical measurement of range of motion. Phys Ther (1987) 67:1867–72.
    doi: 10.1093/Ptj/67.12.1867pubmed: 3685114google scholar: lookup
  24. Bergh A, Lauridsen NG, Hesbach AL. Concurrent validity of equine joint range of motion measurement: a novel digital goniometer versus universal goniometer. Animals (2020) 10:2436.
    doi: 10.3390/Ani10122436pmc: PMC7767303pubmed: 33352686google scholar: lookup
  25. Jaegger G, Marcellin-Little DJ, Levine D. Reliability of goniometry in Labrador retrievers. American journal of Vet Res (2002) 63:979–86.
    doi: 10.2460/Ajvr.2002.63.979pubmed: 12118679google scholar: lookup
  26. Adair H, Levine D, Marcellin-Little D. Validity and repeatability of goniometry in Normal horses. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol (2016) 29:314–9.
    doi: 10.3415/Vcot-15-11-0182pubmed: 27124214google scholar: lookup
  27. Liljebrink Y, Bergh A. Goniometry: is it a reliable tool to monitor passive joint range of motion in horses?. Equine Vet J (2010) 42:676–82.
  28. Van Weeren PR, Van Den B, Barneveld A. Correction models for skin displacement in equine kinematics gait analysis. Journal of equine veterinary Science (1992) 12:178–92.
  29. Weller R, Pfau T, Babbage D, Brittin E, May S, Wilson AM. Reliability of conformational measurements in the horse using a three-dimensional motion analysis system. Equine Vet J (2006) 38:610–5.
    doi: 10.2746/042516406X150367pubmed: 17228574google scholar: lookup
  30. Taylor R. Interpretation of the correlation coefficient: a basic review. J Diagn Med Sonogr (1990) 6:35–9.
    doi: 10.1177/875647939000600106pubmed: 0google scholar: lookup
  31. Wilson AM, Mcguigan SA, Van Den Bogert AJ. Horses damp the spring in their step. Nature (2001) 414:895–9.
    doi: 10.1038/414895apubmed: 11780059google scholar: lookup
  32. Godwin EE, Young NJ, Dudhia J, Beamish JC, Smith RK. Implantation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells demonstrates improved outcome in horses with overstrain injury of the superficial digital flexor tendon. Equine Vet J (2011) 44:25–32.
  33. Gerard MP, Hofgson DR, Rose RJ, Williamr W. Effects of recombinant equine growth hormone on in vitro biomechanical properties of the superficial digital flexor tendon of standardbred yearlings in training. Vet Surg (2005) 34:253–9.
  34. Bosch G, van Schie HTM, de Groot MW, Cadby JA, van de Lest CH, Barneveld A. Effects of platelet-rich plasma on the quality of repair of mechanically induced Core lesions in the equine superficial digital flexor tendons: a placebo-controlled experimental study. J Orthop Res (2010) 28:211–7.
    doi: 10.1002/jor.20980pubmed: 19714688google scholar: lookup
  35. Hogan PM, Bramlage L. Transection of the accessory ligament of the superficial digital flexor tendon for treatment of tendinitis: long term results in 61 standardbred racehorses (1985-1992). Equine Vet J (1995) 27:221–6.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.