Analyze Diet
American journal of veterinary research2005; 66(11); 1999-2005; doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2005.66.1999

Validation of magnetic resonance imaging for measurement of equine articular cartilage and subchondral bone thickness.

Abstract: To validate use of magnetic resonance images (MRIs) for measurement of equine articular cartilage and subchondral bone thickness by comparison with measurements in histologic specimens. Methods: 32 cadaveric carpal joints from 16 horses. Methods: Magnetic resonance imaging was performed by use of 3-dimensional fast spoiled gradient echo (SPGR) and T2* 3-dimensional fast gradient echo (GRE) pulse sequences with and without fat saturation. Standard sites on the medial and lateral facets of the intermediate, radial, and third carpal bones were used for subchondral bone and articular cartilage thickness measurements. Digital image analysis software was used for MRI measurements 10 mm from the dorsal extent and perpendicular to the articular surface. Histomorphometric measurements of hyaline, calcified cartilage, and subchondral bone thickness were obtained at selected sites. Comparisons between histomorphometric and MRI measurements and between magnetic resonance pulse sequences were evaluated. Results: There were significant correlations between GRE and SPGR and SPGR and histologic measurements of articular cartilage, with no significant difference between measurements and good agreement. When calcified cartilage was excluded from the histologic measurement, MRI measurements were significantly greater than histologic measurements. For subchondral bone thickness, there was significant correlation between GRE and SPGR but GRE was significantly greater than SPGR measurements. Histomorphometric and MRI measurements were strongly correlated and not significantly different. Conclusions: Magnetic resonance imaging provides a good representation of cartilage and subchondral bone thickness, supporting its use in the study and clinical diagnosis of osteochondral structure and alteration.
Publication Date: 2005-12-13 PubMed ID: 16334962DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.2005.66.1999Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Validation Study

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research validates the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in accurately measuring the thickness of horses’ joint cartilage and underlying bone, aiding in the study and clinical diagnosis of joint conditions.

Research Methods

  • The researchers pursued their goal by analyzing MRIs from 32 cadaveric carpal (wrist) joints. These were obtained from 16 horses.
  • The MRI procedure used two types of pulse sequences, namely, 3D fast spoiled gradient echo (SPGR) and T2* 3D fast gradient echo (GRE), both with and without fat saturation.
  • For both the articular cartilage and the subchondral bone thickness measurements, standard positions were used on the medial and lateral aspects of specific carpal bones.
  • Using digital image analysis software, MRI measurements were taken 10 mm from the dorsal extent and perpendicular to the articular surface.
  • Histomorphometric measurements, a technique for studying the microscopic structure of tissues, were used to measure the thickness of the hyaline, calcified cartilage and subchondral bone at selected sites.
  • The measurements from the MRI and histomorphometric methods were compared, as well as the results from the different magnetic resonance pulse sequences.

Research Findings

  • The researchers found noteworthy correlations between the GRE and SPGR sequences, and between SPGR and histologic measurements of articular cartilage.
  • The MRIs did not show any significant difference from the histologic measurements, indicating good consistency between the two techniques. However, when calcified cartilage was excluded from the histologic measurement, MRI measurements showed significantly greater values.
  • For the underlying bone thickness, there was a significant correlation between GRE and SPGR. But, GRE measurements were significantly higher than SPGR measurements.
  • When comparing the MRI-based and histomorphometric measurements, the researchers found strong correlation and no significant discrepancy between the two methodologies.

Conclusion

  • The study concluded that magnetic resonance imaging provides accurate and consistent measurements of cartilage and subchondral bone thickness in horses.
  • The strong correlations and lack of significant differences between the MRI and traditional histomorphometric measurements confirm that MRI is a valid method for studying and diagnosing osteochondral structure and changes, thus advocating its use in both research and clinical settings.

Cite This Article

APA
Murray RC, Branch MV, Tranquille C, Woods S. (2005). Validation of magnetic resonance imaging for measurement of equine articular cartilage and subchondral bone thickness. Am J Vet Res, 66(11), 1999-2005. https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.2005.66.1999

Publication

ISSN: 0002-9645
NlmUniqueID: 0375011
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 66
Issue: 11
Pages: 1999-2005

Researcher Affiliations

Murray, Rachel C
  • Animal Health Trust, Kentford, Newmarket, UK.
Branch, Marion V
    Tranquille, Carolyne
      Woods, Sarah

        MeSH Terms

        • Animals
        • Bone and Bones / anatomy & histology
        • Carpus, Animal / anatomy & histology
        • Cartilage, Articular / anatomy & histology
        • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
        • Horses / anatomy & histology
        • Magnetic Resonance Imaging / methods
        • Magnetic Resonance Imaging / veterinary
        • Statistics, Nonparametric

        Citations

        This article has been cited 10 times.
        1. Daniel CR, Taylor SE, McPhee S, Wolfram U, Schwarz T, Sommer S, Kershaw LE. Relationship between CT-Derived Bone Mineral Density and UTE-MR-Derived Porosity Index in Equine Third Metacarpal and Metatarsal Bones. Animals (Basel) 2023 Aug 31;13(17).
          doi: 10.3390/ani13172780pubmed: 37685045google scholar: lookup
        2. Salem M, El-Shafaey ES, Farag AMM, El-Khodery S, Al Mohamad Z, Abass M. A Descriptive Study of the Carpal Joint of Healthy Donkeys Using Ultrasonography, Computed Tomography, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Vet Sci 2022 May 23;9(5).
          doi: 10.3390/vetsci9050249pubmed: 35622777google scholar: lookup
        3. Andersen C, Griffin JF 4th, Jacobsen S, Østergaard S, Walters M, Mori Y, Lindegaard C. Validation of ultrasonography for measurement of cartilage thickness in the equine carpus. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2022 Jul;63(4):478-489.
          doi: 10.1111/vru.13085pubmed: 35347811google scholar: lookup
        4. Al Mohamad ZA, Hagag U, Tawfiek MG, El Nahas A. Magnetic resonance imaging of the normal dromedary camel tarsus. BMC Vet Res 2021 Mar 2;17(1):101.
          doi: 10.1186/s12917-021-02811-2pubmed: 33653330google scholar: lookup
        5. van Zadelhoff C, Schwarz T, Smith S, Engerand A, Taylor S. Identification of Naturally Occurring Cartilage Damage in the Equine Distal Interphalangeal Joint Using Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Arthrography. Front Vet Sci 2019;6:508.
          doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00508pubmed: 32064268google scholar: lookup
        6. Evrard L, Audigié F, Bertoni L, Jacquet S, Denoix JM, Busoni V. Low field magnetic resonance imaging of the equine distal interphalangeal joint: Comparison between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing conditions. PLoS One 2019;14(1):e0211101.
          doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211101pubmed: 30689659google scholar: lookup
        7. Smith AD, Morton AJ, Winter MD, Colahan PT, Ghivizzani S, Brown MP, Hernandez JA, Nickerson DM. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING SCORING OF AN EXPERIMENTAL MODEL OF POST-TRAUMATIC OSTEOARTHRITIS IN THE EQUINE CARPUS. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2016 Sep;57(5):502-14.
          doi: 10.1111/vru.12369pubmed: 27198611google scholar: lookup
        8. Boyde A, Davis GR, Mills D, Zikmund T, Cox TM, Adams VL, Niker A, Wilson PJ, Dillon JP, Ranganath LR, Jeffery N, Jarvis JC, Gallagher JA. On fragmenting, densely mineralised acellular protrusions into articular cartilage and their possible role in osteoarthritis. J Anat 2014 Oct;225(4):436-46.
          doi: 10.1111/joa.12226pubmed: 25132002google scholar: lookup
        9. De Zani D, Rabbogliatti V, Rabba S, Auletta L, Longo M, Zani DD. Subchondral and Osteochondral Unit Bone Damage in the Fetlock Region of Sport Horses Using Low-Field MRI: Case Series. Animals (Basel) 2025 Dec 2;15(23).
          doi: 10.3390/ani15233468pubmed: 41375526google scholar: lookup
        10. Seidler A, Aßmann A, Torgerson PR, Sánchez-Andrade JS, Bischofberger A. Ex Vivo Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Three-Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sequences in Depicting Normal Articular Cartilage in Equine Stifle Cadavers. Animals (Basel) 2023 Dec 19;14(1).
          doi: 10.3390/ani14010015pubmed: 38200746google scholar: lookup