Analyze Diet

Variety in dustiness and hygiene quality of peat bedding.

Abstract: Respiratory exposure to organic dust induces chronic pulmonary diseases both in farmers and horses. The aim of this study was to examine the variation of dustiness and hygiene quality of peat moss bedding. Materials studied were weakly decomposed sphagnum peat (A), weakly decomposed sphagnum peat warmed up in storage (> 30 degrees C) (B) and two more decomposed few-flowered sedge peats (C and D). The geometric mean of mesophilic fungi, thermotolerant fungi and thermophilic actinomycetes were determined from the material. Samples of inhalable dust and endotoxins were collected with IOM samplers and respirable dust with 10M foam samplers when the peat was rotated in a cylinder. The number of particles was detected with an optical particle counter. An LAL assay was used for analysing endotoxins from the filter samples. There were differences in the hygiene quality and dustiness between peat materials (p < 0.01). The geometric mean of fungi was smallest in material A. Warming-up increased the number of fungi in sphagnum peat, but on the other hand, it decreased the content of endotoxin (p < 0.01). Few-flowered peat materials contained thermophilic actinomycetes and material D also contained Aspergillus fumigatus. The concentrations of inhalable dust, respirable dust and the number of particles were smaller in the few-flowered peats (C-D) than in the sphagnum peats (A-B). It is concluded that there are differences in the dustiness and hygiene quality of peat bedding.
Publication Date: 2005-07-21 PubMed ID: 16028867
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research studied the diversity in dustiness and cleanliness of peat moss bedding materials to determine their potential to cause respiratory diseases. It found significant variations among different peat materials, with some having higher counts of fungi and endotoxins, both of which can contribute to chronic pulmonary diseases in animals and farmers.

Materials and Methods

  • The materials examined were four types of peat: type A and B were slightly decomposed sphagnum peat, with type B being warmed up in storage. Types C and D were more decomposed, and were derived from few-flowered sedge peats.
  • Fungal and bacterial content in the peats were evaluated. The study checked for mesophilic fungi, thermotolerant fungi, and thermophilic actinomycetes in these materials.
  • Inhalable dust and endotoxins were collected from the materials by rotating them in a cylinder with samplers. The number of particles was counted using an optical particle counter.
  • Endotoxins were analysed using a Limulus Amebocyte Lysate (LAL) assay.

Results

  • There were significant differences in the hygiene quality and dustiness between the peat materials. Dustiness refers to the amount of dust particles that can become airborne, which when inhaled, can potentially cause respiratory diseases.
  • Material A, the slightly decomposed sphagnum peat, recorded the lowest geometric mean of fungi.
  • Warming up of the peat increased the number of fungi in it, but it also reduced the content of endotoxins. Endotoxins are harmful compounds released by bacteria, which can induce inflammation and disease.
  • The few-flowered sedge peats (materials C and D) contained thermophilic actinomycetes, a type of bacteria. Material D also contained Aspergillus fumigatus, a fungus that can cause serious lung infection.
  • The concentrations of inhalable dust, respirable dust and the number of particles were lesser in the few-flowered peats (materials C and D) than in the sphagnum peats (materials A and B).

Conclusion

  • There are indeed significant differences in the dustiness and hygiene quality of peat bedding. These findings could be beneficial for the farming community to opt for the right type of peat that could prevent or limit the onset of illnesses due to inhalation of dust particles.

Cite This Article

APA
Airaksinen S, Heiskanen ML, Heinonen-Tanski H, Laitinen J, Laitinen S, Linnainmaa M, Rautiala S. (2005). Variety in dustiness and hygiene quality of peat bedding. Ann Agric Environ Med, 12(1), 53-59.

Publication

ISSN: 1232-1966
NlmUniqueID: 9500166
Country: Poland
Language: English
Volume: 12
Issue: 1
Pages: 53-59

Researcher Affiliations

Airaksinen, Sanna
  • Equine Information Centre, University of Kuopio, Finland. Sanna.Airaksinen@hevostietokeskus.fi
Heiskanen, Minna-Liisa
    Heinonen-Tanski, Helvi
      Laitinen, Juha
        Laitinen, Sirpa
          Linnainmaa, Markku
            Rautiala, Sirpa

              MeSH Terms

              • Air Microbiology
              • Air Pollutants, Occupational / analysis
              • Air Pollution, Indoor / adverse effects
              • Air Pollution, Indoor / analysis
              • Animals
              • Dust / analysis
              • Endotoxins / isolation & purification
              • Finland
              • Fungi / isolation & purification
              • Horse Diseases / prevention & control
              • Horses
              • Humans
              • Hygiene
              • Hypersensitivity / veterinary
              • Risk Factors
              • Sphagnopsida / adverse effects
              • Sphagnopsida / microbiology

              Citations

              This article has been cited 4 times.
              1. Mönki J, Saastamoinen M, Karikoski N, Norring M, Rajamäki M, Mykkänen A. Effects of Bedding Material on Equine Lower Airway Inflammation: A Comparison of Two Peat Beddings, Wood Pellet, and Straw Pellet.. Front Vet Sci 2021;8:799645.
                doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.799645pubmed: 34977227google scholar: lookup
              2. Mönki J, Saastamoinen M, Karikoski N, Rajamäki M, Raekallio M, Junnila J, Särkijärvi S, Norring M, Valros A, Oranen Ben Fatma S, Mykkänen A. Effects of Bedding Material on Equine Lower Airway Inflammation: A Crossover Study Comparing Peat and Wood Shavings.. Front Vet Sci 2021;8:656814.
                doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.656814pubmed: 33898547google scholar: lookup
              3. Junkkari R, Simojoki H, Heiskanen ML, Pelkonen S, Sankari S, Tulamo RM, Mykkänen A. A comparison of unheated loose housing with stables on the respiratory health of weaned-foals in cold winter conditions: an observational field-study.. Acta Vet Scand 2017 Oct 26;59(1):73.
                doi: 10.1186/s13028-017-0339-3pubmed: 29073941google scholar: lookup
              4. Saastamoinen M, Särkijärvi S, Hyyppä S. Reducing Respiratory Health Risks to Horses and Workers: A Comparison of Two Stall Bedding Materials.. Animals (Basel) 2015 Oct 8;5(4):965-77.
                doi: 10.3390/ani5040394pubmed: 26479479google scholar: lookup