Analyze Diet
Medical instrumentation1980; 14(1); 19-22;

Ventricular defibrillation with myocardial electrodes in the dog, calf, pony, and pig.

Abstract: The defibrillation effectiveness of 4-msec rectangular wave shocks was evaluated using myocardial electrodes with 25-kg dogs and (nominally) 100-kg calves, ponies, and pigs as part of an evaluation of the suitability of these animals as models for automatic implanted defibrillator research. The percent success of defibrillation attempts in dogs ranged from 44% with 4-A, 6-J shocks to 93% with 8-A, 16-J shocks. The success achieved in calves with scaled electrodes was uniformly lower and reached a maximum of 28% with 23-A, 107-J shocks. Pigs defibrillated with scaled electrodes at a success level (43%) more comparable to dogs (54%) at the 12-A, 25-J level. Using larger electrodes in calves, only 63% success was attained with 25-A, 52-J shocks; lower (14-A, 22-J) and higher (35-A, 100-J; 47-A, 176-J) shocks were less than 30% effective. Ponies were refractory to defibrillation at up to the 25-A, 100-J level with the large electrodes; with 21-A, 43-J shocks only 42% success in pigs was achieved. In general, there were marked differences between the responses of dogs and calves that are inconsistent with the closed-chest defibrillation behavior of both animals. Failure to achieve reliable and highly successful defibrillation in the larger animals may indicate their possible unsuitability as models in implanted defibrillator research.
Publication Date: 1980-01-01 PubMed ID: 7354731
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • U.S. Gov't
  • P.H.S.

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research study evaluated defibrillation effectiveness, using myocardial electrodes in various animals such as dogs, calves, ponies, and pigs to assess their suitability as models for automatic implanted defibrillator research. The findings showed variable success rates across different animals, pointing towards potential unsuitability of larger animals for implantable defibrillator research.

Research Methodology

  • The study evaluated defibrillation effectiveness of 4-msec rectangular wave shocks using myocardial electrodes in four different types of animals: dogs, calves, ponies, and pigs.
  • The selected animals were part of an assessment to determine their suitability as models for automatic implanted defibrillator research.
  • Various electric shocks ranging from 4-A, 6-J to 8-A, 16-J were administered to the animals, and the success of defibrillation was measured.

Results and Observations

  • The success rate of defibrillation in dogs varied between 44% on the lower side and as high as 93% on the higher side.
  • Calves showed uniformly lower success rates, maxing at 28% with 23-A, 107-J shocks.
  • Pigs revealed a relatively higher success rate (43%), more comparable to dogs, at the 12-A, 25-J shock level. However, with larger electrodes, calves managed only 63% success at the 25-A, 52-J level.
  • Ponies were the least responsive to defibrillation, showing a low success rate even at a high 25-A, 100-J level with the larger electrodes.
  • Globally, the research highlighted marked differences in responses between dogs and calves inconsistent with the usual closed-chest defibrillation behavior observed in both animals.

Implications and Conclusion

  • The findings of the study signaled potential challenges in using larger animals such as calves and ponies as suitable models for implantable defibrillator research due to their lower and inconsistent response to defibrillation.
  • At the same time, dogs and pigs emerged as somewhat more suitable models thanks to a relatively better response to different shock levels. Nonetheless, even among these species, the success rate varied considerably, pointing towards the need for further investigations into effective animal models for this research.

Cite This Article

APA
Gold JH, Schuder JC, Stoeckle H. (1980). Ventricular defibrillation with myocardial electrodes in the dog, calf, pony, and pig. Med Instrum, 14(1), 19-22.

Publication

ISSN: 0090-6689
NlmUniqueID: 0361136
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 14
Issue: 1
Pages: 19-22

Researcher Affiliations

Gold, J H
    Schuder, J C
      Stoeckle, H

        MeSH Terms

        • Animals
        • Body Weight
        • Cattle
        • Dogs
        • Electric Countershock / instrumentation
        • Electric Countershock / methods
        • Electrodes
        • Horses
        • Surface Properties
        • Swine
        • Ventricular Fibrillation / therapy

        Citations

        This article has been cited 2 times.
        1. Roberts PR, Allen S, Betts T, Morgan JM, Urban JF, Whitman T, Euler DE, Kallok MJ. Increased defibrillation threshold with right-sided active pectoral can.. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2000 Apr;4(1):245-9.
          doi: 10.1023/a:1009882016469pubmed: 10729841google scholar: lookup
        2. Roberts PR, Allen S, Smith DC, Urban JF, Euler DE, Dahl RW, Kallok MJ, Morgan JM. A systematic evaluation of conventional and novel transvenous pathways for defibrillation.. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 1999 Oct;3(3):231-8.
          doi: 10.1023/a:1009895623802pubmed: 10490479google scholar: lookup