Views conclusions in ultrasound study as unsupported.
Abstract: No abstract available
Publication Date: 2006-04-04 PubMed ID: 16579772DOI: 10.2460/javma.228.7.1011Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Letter
- Comment
- Clinical Examination
- Clinical Findings
- Clinical Pathology
- Clinical Study
- Comparative Study
- Diagnosis
- Diagnostic Imaging
- Diagnostic Technique
- Disease
- Disease Diagnosis
- Disease Etiology
- Equine Diseases
- Equine Health
- Horses
- Observational Study
- Ultrasound
- Veterinary Medicine
- Veterinary Practice
- Veterinary Research
- Veterinary Science
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
This article raises concerns about the methodology and conclusions of a previous study which claims to establish an ultrasound sign for detecting large colon volvulus (LCV) – a dangerous equine condition – in horses. The critics argue that the study lacked hypothesis testing and control groups and failed to distinguish between strangulating and nonstrangulating LCV while assuming the ultrasound method would advance diagnostic accuracy and prognosis.
Critique of the Ultrasound Study
- The authors of the response argued that the original article lacked hypothesis testing or statistical analysis, making its arguments weak and unsupported.
- They also pointed out the absence of control groups in the study, a key factor in any research study to ensure accurate results.
- The critique also emphasized that the original author did not differentiate between strangulating and nonstrangulating cases of LCV – a critical factor in determining the prognosis of the condition.
Need for Further Differentiation of LCV
- The survival rate and treatment plan for strangulating and nonstrangulating LCV significantly differ. The response emphasized the need to specify if the LCV is strangulating or nonstrangulating for accurate prognostics and treatment.
- Apart from the issue of categorization, the authors questioned the general application of ultrasound detection for LCV since the study’s subjects were primarily horses requiring surgery or euthanasia, not representing the broader population of colic-affected horses.
Additional Concerns
- Confusion may arise if increased wall thickness is mistaken for colitis, given severe and diffuse inflammation. The authors contend that while some symptoms may overlap, blood work and physical examinations usually differentiate the two conditions clinically.
- The response rests on the fundamental argument that while ultrasound can indeed detect sacculations, the presence of vascular compromise and edema should essentially guide practitioners in determining the need for immediate surgery and survival prognosis.
Cite This Article
APA
Pease A, Cook V, Jones S, Blikslager A, Scrivani P, Erb H.
(2006).
Views conclusions in ultrasound study as unsupported.
J Am Vet Med Assoc, 228(7), 1011-1012.
https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.228.7.1011 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Colon
- Colonic Diseases / diagnostic imaging
- Colonic Diseases / veterinary
- Diagnosis, Differential
- Horse Diseases / diagnostic imaging
- Horses
- Intestinal Volvulus / diagnostic imaging
- Intestinal Volvulus / veterinary
- Ultrasonography
Citations
This article has been cited 0 times.Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists