Analyze Diet
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association2006; 228(7); 1011-1012; doi: 10.2460/javma.228.7.1011

Views conclusions in ultrasound study as unsupported.

Abstract: No abstract available
Publication Date: 2006-04-04 PubMed ID: 16579772DOI: 10.2460/javma.228.7.1011Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Letter
  • Comment

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This article raises concerns about the methodology and conclusions of a previous study which claims to establish an ultrasound sign for detecting large colon volvulus (LCV) – a dangerous equine condition – in horses. The critics argue that the study lacked hypothesis testing and control groups and failed to distinguish between strangulating and nonstrangulating LCV while assuming the ultrasound method would advance diagnostic accuracy and prognosis.

Critique of the Ultrasound Study

  • The authors of the response argued that the original article lacked hypothesis testing or statistical analysis, making its arguments weak and unsupported.
  • They also pointed out the absence of control groups in the study, a key factor in any research study to ensure accurate results.
  • The critique also emphasized that the original author did not differentiate between strangulating and nonstrangulating cases of LCV – a critical factor in determining the prognosis of the condition.

Need for Further Differentiation of LCV

  • The survival rate and treatment plan for strangulating and nonstrangulating LCV significantly differ. The response emphasized the need to specify if the LCV is strangulating or nonstrangulating for accurate prognostics and treatment.
  • Apart from the issue of categorization, the authors questioned the general application of ultrasound detection for LCV since the study’s subjects were primarily horses requiring surgery or euthanasia, not representing the broader population of colic-affected horses.

Additional Concerns

  • Confusion may arise if increased wall thickness is mistaken for colitis, given severe and diffuse inflammation. The authors contend that while some symptoms may overlap, blood work and physical examinations usually differentiate the two conditions clinically.
  • The response rests on the fundamental argument that while ultrasound can indeed detect sacculations, the presence of vascular compromise and edema should essentially guide practitioners in determining the need for immediate surgery and survival prognosis.

Cite This Article

APA
Pease A, Cook V, Jones S, Blikslager A, Scrivani P, Erb H. (2006). Views conclusions in ultrasound study as unsupported. J Am Vet Med Assoc, 228(7), 1011-1012. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.228.7.1011

Publication

ISSN: 0003-1488
NlmUniqueID: 7503067
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 228
Issue: 7
Pages: 1011-1012

Researcher Affiliations

Pease, Anthony
    Cook, Vanessa
      Jones, Samuel
        Blikslager, Anthony
          Scrivani, Peter
            Erb, Hollis

              MeSH Terms

              • Animals
              • Colon
              • Colonic Diseases / diagnostic imaging
              • Colonic Diseases / veterinary
              • Diagnosis, Differential
              • Horse Diseases / diagnostic imaging
              • Horses
              • Intestinal Volvulus / diagnostic imaging
              • Intestinal Volvulus / veterinary
              • Ultrasonography

              Citations

              This article has been cited 0 times.