Analyze Diet
Acta biomaterialia2024; 184; 264-272; doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2024.06.022

Viscoelastic properties of the equine hoof wall.

Abstract: The equine hoof wall has outstanding impact resistance, which enables high-velocity gallop over hard terrain with minimum damage. To better understand its viscoelastic behavior, complex moduli were determined using two complementary techniques: conventional (∼5 mm length scale) and nano (∼1 µm length scale) dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA). The evolution of their magnitudes was measured for two hydration conditions: fully hydrated and ambient. The storage modulus of the ambient hoof wall was approximately 400 MPa in macro-scale experiments, decreasing to ∼250 MPa with hydration. In contrast, the loss tangent decreased for both hydrated (∼0.1-0.07) and ambient (∼0.04-0.01) conditions, over the frequency range of 1-10 Hz. Nano-DMA indentation tests conducted up to 200 Hz showed little frequency dependence beyond 10 Hz. The loss tangent of tubular regions showed more hydration sensitivity than in intertubular regions, but no significant difference in storage modulus was observed. Loss tangent and effective stiffness were higher in indentations for both hydration levels. This behavior is attributed to the hoof wall's hierarchical structure, which has porosity, functionally graded aspects, and material interfaces that are not captured at the scale of indentation. The hoof wall's viscoelasticity characterized in this work has implications for the design of bioinspired impact-resistant materials and structures. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: The outer wall of horse hooves evolved to withstand heavy impacts during gallop. While previous studies have measured the properties of the hoof wall in slowly changing conditions, we wanted to quantify its behavior using experiments that replicate the quickly changing forces of impact. Since the hoof wall's structure is complex and contributes to its overall performance, smaller scale experiments were also performed. The behavior of the hoof wall was within the range of other biological materials and polymers. When hydrated, it becomes softer and can dissipate more energy. This work improves our understanding of the hoof's function and allows for more accurate simulations that can account for different impact speeds.
Publication Date: 2024-06-20 PubMed ID: 38908419DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2024.06.022Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • U.S. Gov't
  • Non-P.H.S.

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study researched the hardness and flexibility (viscoelastic properties) of a horse’s hoof wall at both macro and microscopic levels, and under both dry and hydrated conditions. The aim was to improve the understanding of how the hoof wall absorbs impact, with consequences for design in fields such as engineering and sport.

Research Methodologies

The researchers used two techniques to measure the hoof’s viscoelastic properties:

  • The first one, dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA), is conventional and operates at a macro scale, approximately 5 mm.
  • The other technique is a nano version of DMA that works on a much smaller scale of about 1 micrometer (μm).

Through these methods, they evaluated the magnitude changes of complex moduli – indicators of how a material reacts to stress – for both fully hydrated and dry (ambient) hoof wall conditions.

Findings

The researchers’ discoveries included:

  • The dry hoof’s storage modulus, or its ability to store and release energy, was about 400 MPa (megapascals) under conventional methods, but this dropped to 250 MPa when the hoof was fully hydrated.
  • The loss tangent, or measure of a material’s damping capability, decreased for both the dry and hydrated hooves across the frequency range of 1 to 10 Hz. This means that as stress was applied more frequently, less energy was lost through deformation or damping as heat.
  • The researchers also noted little to no changes in the frequency (beyond 10 Hz) for nano-DMA tests performed up to 200 Hz.
  • In terms of sub-structures within the hoof, the team found that the areas made up of tubes were more sensitive to hydration than the areas between tubes. The storage modulus remained stable across these areas.
  • Loss tangent and effective stiffness were higher in indentations across both hydration levels.

Implications and Significance

The study’s findings shape knowledge about the structure and behaviour of the horse’s hoof wall, which evolved to handle high impact from galloping. This is significant as it provides useful data for simulating and testing different impact speeds. The results also show that hoof wall behavior aligns with that of other biological materials and polymers, especially when hydrated.

The research findings could lead to better design and manufacture of bio-inspired materials and structures that must withstand heavy impacts. Understanding the hoof’s hydration sensitivity could also contribute to related fields, such as equine health and veterinary science.

Cite This Article

APA
Bonney C, Pang S, Meyers MA, Jasiuk I. (2024). Viscoelastic properties of the equine hoof wall. Acta Biomater, 184, 264-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2024.06.022

Publication

ISSN: 1878-7568
NlmUniqueID: 101233144
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 184
Pages: 264-272

Researcher Affiliations

Bonney, Christian
  • Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, USA.
Pang, Siyuan
  • Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, USA.
Meyers, Marc A
  • Materials Science and Engineering Program, University of California San Diego, USA; Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California San Diego, USA; Department of Nanoengineering, University of California, San Diego, USA.
Jasiuk, Iwona
  • Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, USA. Electronic address: ijasiuk@illinois.edu.

MeSH Terms

  • Viscosity
  • Elasticity
  • Animals
  • Horses / anatomy & histology
  • Elastic Modulus
  • Hoof and Claw / physiology

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.