FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / BMC Vet Res / Visual evoked potentials in the horse.
BMC veterinary research2016; 12(1); 120; doi: 10.1186/s12917-016-0743-3

Visual evoked potentials in the horse.

Abstract: Electrical potentials generated in the central nervous system in response to brief visual stimuli, flash visual evoked potentials (FVEPs), can be recorded non-invasively over the occipital cortex. FVEPs are used clinically in human medicine and also experimentally in a number of animal species, but the method has not yet been evaluated in the horse. The method would potentially allow the ophthalmologist and equine clinician to evaluate visual impairment caused by disorders affecting post-retinal visual pathways. The aim was to establish a method for recording of FVEPs in horses in a clinical setting and to evaluate the waveform morphology in the normal horse. Methods: Ten horses were sedated with a continuous detomidine infusion. Responses were recorded from electrodes placed on the scalp. Several positions were evaluated to determine suitable electrode placement. Flash electroretinograms (FERGs) were recorded simultaneously. To evaluate potential contamination of the FVEP from retinal potentials, a retrobulbar nerve block was performed in two horses and transection of the optic nerve was performed in one horse as a terminal procedure. Results: A series of positive (P) and negative (N) peaks in response to light stimuli was recorded in all horses. Reproducible wavelets with mean times-to-peaks of 26 (N1), 55 (P2), 141 (N2) and 216 ms (P4) were seen in all horses in all recordings. Reproducible results were obtained when the active electrode was placed in the midline rostral to the nuchal crest. Recording at lateral positions gave more variable results, possibly due to ear muscle artifacts. Averaging ≥100 responses reduced the impact of noise and artifacts. FVEPs were reproducible in the same horse during the same recording session and between sessions, but were more variable between horses. Retrobulbar nerve block caused a transient loss of the VEP whereas transection of the optic nerve caused an irreversible loss. Conclusions: We describe the waveform of the equine FVEP and our results show that it is possible to record FVEPs in sedated horses in a clinical setting. The potentials recorded were shown to be of post-retinal origin. Further studies are needed to provide normative data and assess potential clinical use.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2016-06-21 PubMed ID: 27329086PubMed Central: PMC4915148DOI: 10.1186/s12917-016-0743-3Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article investigates the use of non-invasive visual evoked potentials (FVEPs) as a method for evaluating visual impairment in horses, particularly conditions affecting post-retinal visual pathways.

Objective

This study aimed to determine the practicality and efficacy of using Flash Visual Evoked Potentials (FVEPs), a non-invasive method of recording electric potentials in response to visual stimuli, to evaluate visual impairment in horses due to disorders affecting post-retinal visual pathways. Until this study, the FVEP method had been deployed in human clinical medicine and various animal species, but not in horses.

Methodology

  • Ten horses were chosen for the experiment, and they were sedated with continual detomidine infusion.
  • Responses, prompted by visual stimuli, were recorded from electrodes placed on various positions on the horses’ scalps in order to analyze from where the most optimal responses could be gathered.
  • Flash electroretinograms (FERGs) were simultaneously recorded to measure the electrical responses of the retina.
  • In order to evaluate the potential of retinal potentials contaminating the FVEP, a retrobulbar nerve block and transection of the optic nerve were performed on two horses and one horse, respectively.

Results

  • Responses to light stimuli were recorded, taking the form of a series of positive and negative peaks.
  • Constant waveforms were recorded with times-to-peaks at 26 (N1), 55 (P2), 141 (N2), and 216 ms (P4).
  • Implementation of the active electrode in a midline rostral location to the horses’ nuchal crest rendered the most reliable results.
  • Lateral electrode placements resulted in more variable outcomes, possibly due to ear muscle artifacts.
  • Averaging over 100 responses minimized the impact that noise and artifacts had on the results.
  • FVEPs were repeatable within the same recording session and between different sessions for the same horse but varied between different horses.
  • A temporary loss of the VEP occurred after the retrobulbar nerve block, whereas the transection of the optic nerve generated an irreversible loss.

Conclusion

The study demonstrated that it is possible to record FVEPs from horses in a clinical setting. These potentials were shown to originate from a post-retinal source. The authors concluded that further studies are needed to establish normative data and assess the potential clinical usage of the collected data.

Cite This Article

APA
Ström L, Ekesten B. (2016). Visual evoked potentials in the horse. BMC Vet Res, 12(1), 120. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-016-0743-3

Publication

BMC veterinary research
ISSN: 1746-6148
NlmUniqueID: 101249759
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 12
Issue: 1
Pages: 120

Researcher Affiliations

Ström, L
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 7054, SE-750 07, Uppsala, Sweden. lena.strom@slu.se.
Ekesten, B
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 7054, SE-750 07, Uppsala, Sweden.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological / veterinary
  • Evoked Potentials, Visual
  • Female
  • Horses / physiology
  • Male

References

This article includes 43 references
  1. Adrian ED, Matthews BH. The interpretation of potential waves in the cortex.. J Physiol 1934;81(4):440–471.
    doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1934.sp003147pmc: PMC1394145pubmed: 16994555google scholar: lookup
  2. Dawson GD. A summation technique for the detection of small evoked potentials.. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1954;6(1):65–84.
    doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(54)90007-3pubmed: 13141922google scholar: lookup
  3. Ciganek L. The EEG response (evoked potential) to light stimulus in man.. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1961;13:165–172.
    doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(61)90132-8pubmed: 13693643google scholar: lookup
  4. Young B, Eggenberger E, Kaufman D. Current electrophysiology in ophthalmology: a review.. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2012;23(6):497–505.
    doi: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e328359045epubmed: 23047167google scholar: lookup
  5. Odom JV, Bach M, Brigell M, Holder GE, McCulloch DL, Tormene AP, Vaegan ISCEV. ISCEV standard for clinical visual evoked potentials (2009 update). Doc Ophthalmol 2010;120(1):111–119.
    doi: 10.1007/s10633-009-9195-4pubmed: 19826847google scholar: lookup
  6. American Clinical Neurophysiology S. Guideline 9B: guidelines on visual evoked potentials.. Am J Electroneurodiagnostic Technol 2006;46(3):254–274.
    pubmed: 17042161
  7. Jasper HH. The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation.. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1958;10:371–375.
    pubmed: 10590970
  8. Blumhardt LD, Barrett G, Halliday AM. The asymmetrical visual evoked potential to pattern reversal in one half field and its significance for the analysis of visual field defects.. Br J Ophthalmol 1977;61(7):454–461.
    doi: 10.1136/bjo.61.7.454pmc: PMC1043012pubmed: 889758google scholar: lookup
  9. Sims MH, Laratta LJ, Bubb WJ, Morgan RV. Waveform analysis and reproducibility of visual-evoked potentials in dogs.. Am J Vet Res 1989;50(11):1823–1828.
    pubmed: 2619111
  10. Strain GM, Jackson RM, Tedford BL. Visual evoked potentials in the clinically normal dog.. J Vet Intern Med 1990;4(4):222–225.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.1990.tb00901.xpubmed: 2401969google scholar: lookup
  11. Creel DJ, Dustman RE, Beck EC. Visually evoked responses in the rat, guinea pig, cat, monkey, and man.. Exp Neurol 1973;40(2):351–366.
    doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(73)90079-4pubmed: 4199749google scholar: lookup
  12. Padnick LB, Linsenmeier RA. Properties of the flash visual evoked potential recorded in the cat primary visual cortex.. Vision Res 1999;39(17):2833–2840.
    doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00016-4pubmed: 10492813google scholar: lookup
  13. Rose GH, Gruenau SP, Spencer JW. Maturation of visual electrocortical responses in unanesthetized kittens: effects of barbiturate anesthesia.. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1972;33(2):141–158.
    doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(72)90042-9pubmed: 4114151google scholar: lookup
  14. Strain GM, Olcott BM, Hokett LD. Electroretinogram and visual-evoked potential measurements in Holstein cows.. Am J Vet Res 1986;47(5):1079–1081.
    pubmed: 3717729
  15. Strain GM, Tedford BL, Gill MS. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials and flash visual evoked potentials in Vietnamese miniature pot-bellied pigs.. Res Vet Sci 2006;80(1):91–95.
    doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2005.03.003pubmed: 15876441google scholar: lookup
  16. Strain GM, Claxton MS, Prescott-Mathews JS, LaPhand DJ. Electroretinogram and visual-evoked potential measurements in sheep.. Can J Vet Res 1991;55(1):1–4.
    pmc: PMC1263404pubmed: 1884277
  17. Ridder W, J.R H, G.B A. Principles and Practice of Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision.. 2. USA: MIT Press; 2006. Visual Evoked Potentials in Animals; pp. 935–947.
  18. Brooks DE. Equine Ophthalmology.. In: Gelatt KN, editor. Veterinary Ophthalmology, vol. II. 3rd ed.: Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1999. p. 1108.
  19. Hewes CA, Keoughan GC, Gutierrez-Nibeyro S. Standing enucleation in the horse: a report of 5 cases.. Can Vet J 2007;48(5):512–514.
    pmc: PMC1852602pubmed: 17542371
  20. Pollock PJ, Russell T, Hughes TK, Archer MR, Perkins JD. Transpalpebral eye enucleation in 40 standing horses.. Vet Surg 2008;37(3):306–309.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2008.00382.xpubmed: 18394080google scholar: lookup
  21. Gilger BC, Davidson MG. How to prepare for ocular surgery in the standing horse.. Annual Convention of the AAEP. Orlando: IVIS; 2002.
  22. Ekesten B, Komaromy AM, Ofri R, Petersen-Jones SM, Narfstrom K. Guidelines for clinical electroretinography in the dog: 2012 update.. Doc Ophthalmol 2013;127(2):79–87.
    doi: 10.1007/s10633-013-9388-8pubmed: 23728902google scholar: lookup
  23. Harding GFA. The visual evoked response.. In: Roper-Hall MJea, editor. Advances in Ophthalmology. Basel: S Karger AG; 1974. pp. 2–28.
  24. Bichsel P, Oliver JE Jr, Coulter DB, Brown J. Recording of visual-evoked potentials in dogs with scalp electrodes.. J Vet Intern Med 1988;2(3):145–149.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.1988.tb02811.xpubmed: 3225809google scholar: lookup
  25. Malnati GA, Marshall AE, Coulter DB. Electroretinographic components of the canine visual evoked response.. Am J Vet Res 1981;42(1):159–163.
    pubmed: 7224311
  26. Atkinson WS. Local anesthesia in ophthalmology.. Am J Ophthalmol 1948;31(12):1607–1618.
    doi: 10.1016/S0002-9394(48)91301-4pubmed: 18103820google scholar: lookup
  27. Cyriac IC, Pineda R. Postoperative complications of periocular anesthesia.. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2000;40(1):85–91.
    doi: 10.1097/00004397-200001000-00009pubmed: 10713916google scholar: lookup
  28. Uenoyama K, McDonald JS, Drance SM. The effect of intraocular pressure on visual electrical responses.. Arch Ophthalmol 1969;81(5):722–729.
    doi: 10.1001/archopht.1969.00990010724023pubmed: 5781750google scholar: lookup
  29. Uenoyama K, McDonald JS, Drance SM. The effect of artificially elevated intraocular pressure on the electroretinogram of the cat.. Can J Ophthalmol 1968;3(2):154–158.
    pubmed: 5660428
  30. Howard DR, Sawyer DC. Electroretinography of acute hypoxic and increased intraocular pressure status in the dog.. Am J Vet Res 1975;36(1):81–84.
    pubmed: 1115420
  31. Tsai TI, Bui BV, Vingrys AJ. Effect of acute intraocular pressure challenge on rat retinal and cortical function.. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2014;55(2):1067–1077.
    doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-13003pubmed: 24474280google scholar: lookup
  32. Takeuchi T, Sugita S. Cytoarchitectonic study of the cerebral cortex in the horse brain--classification of the cortex area.. Kaibogaku Zasshi 2001;76(2):213–221.
    pubmed: 11398353
  33. Duke-Elder S. The eye in evolution. London: Henry Kimpton; 1958. The eye in evolution; pp. 446–504.
  34. Budras KD. Anatomy of the Horse.. 6. Hannover: Schluetersche; 2012.
  35. Ben-Shlomo G, Plummer C, Barrie K, Brooks D. Characterization of the normal dark adaptation curve of the horse.. Vet Ophthalmol 2012;15(1):42–45.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1463-5224.2011.00923.xpubmed: 22051221google scholar: lookup
  36. Church ML, Norman JC. Electroretinogram responses of the normal thoroughbred horse sedated with detomidine hydrochloride.. Vet Ophthalmol 2012;15(Suppl 2):77–83.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1463-5224.2012.01022.xpubmed: 22498137google scholar: lookup
  37. Komaromy AM, Andrew SE, Sapp HL Jr, Brooks DE, Dawson WW. Flash electroretinography in standing horses using the DTL microfiber electrode.. Vet Ophthalmol 2003;6(1):27–33.
    doi: 10.1046/j.1463-5224.2003.00261.xpubmed: 12641840google scholar: lookup
  38. Sannita WG. Neuropsychiatric drug effects on the visual nervous system.. In: Heckenlively JR, Arden GB, editors. Principles and practice of clinical electrophysiology of vision. USA: Mosby Year Book; 1991. pp. 167–173.
  39. Dustman RE, Beck EC. The effects of maturation and aging on the wave form of visually evoked potentials.. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1969;26(1):2–11.
    doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(69)90028-5pubmed: 4183227google scholar: lookup
  40. Strain GM, Jackson RM, Tedford BL. Postnatal development of the visual-evoked potential in dogs.. Am J Vet Res 1991;52(2):231–235.
    pubmed: 2012334
  41. Strain GM, Graham MC, Claxton MS, Olcott BM. Postnatal development of brainstem auditory-evoked potentials, electroretinograms, and visual-evoked potentials in the calf.. J Vet Intern Med 1989;3(4):231–237.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.1989.tb00862.xpubmed: 2585370google scholar: lookup
  42. Takeuchi T, Suzuki M, Sitizyo K, Saito T. Postnatal development of visual evoked potentials in Japanese black calves.. Jpn J Physiol 1993;43(6):809–815.
    doi: 10.2170/jjphysiol.43.809pubmed: 8007449google scholar: lookup
  43. Kumar CM, Dowd TC. Complications of ophthalmic regional blocks: their treatment and prevention.. Ophthalmologica 2006;220(2):73–82.
    doi: 10.1159/000090570pubmed: 16491028google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 4 times.
  1. Itoh K, Kikumura N, Maeda T, Hirata S, Ringhofer M. Non-invasive scalp recording of electroencephalograms and evoked potentials in unanesthetized horses using a 12-channel active electrode array. Front Vet Sci 2024;11:1470039.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1470039pubmed: 39687848google scholar: lookup
  2. Castoldi V, d'Isa R, Marenna S, Comi G, Leocani L. Non-invasive visual evoked potentials under sevoflurane versus ketamine-xylazine in rats. Heliyon 2021 Nov;7(11):e08360.
    doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08360pubmed: 34816047google scholar: lookup
  3. Graïc JM, Peruffo A, Corain L, Finos L, Grisan E, Cozzi B. The primary visual cortex of Cetartiodactyls: organization, cytoarchitectonics and comparison with perissodactyls and primates. Brain Struct Funct 2022 May;227(4):1195-1225.
    doi: 10.1007/s00429-021-02392-8pubmed: 34604923google scholar: lookup
  4. Ström L, Bröjer J, Ekesten B. Variability, repeatability and test-retest reliability of equine flash visual evoked potentials (FVEPs). BMC Vet Res 2020 Jul 29;16(1):261.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-020-02463-8pubmed: 32727477google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,359 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.