FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 10000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
The Veterinary record2015; 176(17); 436-440; doi: 10.1136/vr.102814

Welfare in horse breeding.

Abstract: Welfare problems related to the way horses are bred, whether by coitus or by the application of artificial reproduction techniques (ARTs), have been given no discrete consideration within the academic literature. This paper reviews the existing knowledge base about welfare issues in horse breeding and identifies areas in which data is lacking. We suggest that all methods of horse breeding are associated with potential welfare problems, but also that the judicious use of ARTs can sometimes help to address those problems. We discuss how negative welfare effects could be identified and limited and how positive welfare effects associated with breeding might be maximised. Further studies are needed to establish an evidence base about how stressful or painful various breeding procedures are for the animals involved, and what the lifetime welfare implications of ARTs are for future animal generations.
British Veterinary Association.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2015-04-25 PubMed ID: 25908746PubMed Central: PMC4431322DOI: 10.1136/vr.102814Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research article looks at the potential welfare problems in horse breeding, both in traditional methods and artificial reproduction techniques, while emphasizing the need for more data and studies in these areas.

Welfare Problems in Horse Breeding

  • The author discusses that no specific attention has been given within academic literature towards issues associated with the way horses are bred, whether this is done naturally or through modern reproductive methods.
  • This paper strives to review the current knowledge on animal welfare issues in the realm of horse breeding, indicating the sizable gaps when it comes to reliable data.

The Potential of Artificial Reproduction Techniques (ARTs)

  • Understanding that every form of breeding can potentially lead to welfare problems, the author highlights that ARTs may at times be a solution to these difficulties.
  • However, the author stresses the need to ensure such methods do not introduce more harm than good – a topic that warrants further research.

Addressing Negative Welfare Effects

  • It is discussed how negative welfare effects in horse breeding could be identified and limited. Some negative welfare effects might arise from stressful or painful breeding procedures.
  • The author suggests that increasing the positive welfare effects of breeding could also significantly contribute to the well-being of horses in breeding.

Need for Further Studies to Evaluate Welfare Impacts

  • Finally, the author calls upon the research community for more efforts to establish an evidence-based approach towards understanding the level of stress or pain various breeding methods cause to the animals.
  • The writer also emphasizes the importance of analyzing the impact of ARTs on the lifetime welfare of future horse generations to ensure such techniques are not leaving lasting negative impacts.

Cite This Article

APA
Campbell ML, Sandøe P. (2015). Welfare in horse breeding. Vet Rec, 176(17), 436-440. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.102814

Publication

The Veterinary record
ISSN: 2042-7670
NlmUniqueID: 0031164
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 176
Issue: 17
Pages: 436-440

Researcher Affiliations

Campbell, M L H
  • Department of Production and Population Health, Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, South Mymms, Herefordshire AL9 7TA, UK.
Sandøe, P
  • Department of Large Animal Sciences and Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 25, 1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.

MeSH Terms

  • Animal Welfare
  • Animals
  • Breeding / methods
  • Horses
  • United Kingdom

Grant Funding

  • Wellcome Trust

References

This article includes 54 references
  1. Allen WR, Wilsher S, Turnbull C, Stewart F, Ousey J, Rossdale PD, Fowden AL. Influence of maternal size on placental, fetal and postnatal growth in the horse. I. Development in utero.. Reproduction 2002 Mar;123(3):445-53.
    pubmed: 11882022
  2. Angulo J, Gentry G T, Godke R A, Bondioli K R. Effect of serum during culture on day 14 elongated bovine embryos. Reproduction, Fertility and Development 23, 191.
  3. Ashley FH, Waterman-Pearson AE, Whay HR. Behavioural assessment of pain in horses and donkeys: application to clinical practice and future studies.. Equine Vet J 2005 Nov;37(6):565-75.
    pubmed: 16295937doi: 10.2746/042516405775314826google scholar: lookup
  4. Bettley C D, Cardwell J M, Collins L M, Asher L. A review of scientific literature on inherited disorders in domestic horse breeds. Animal Welfare 21, 59–64.
  5. Bussières G, Jacques C, Lainay O, Beauchamp G, Leblond A, Cadoré JL, Desmaizières LM, Cuvelliez SG, Troncy E. Development of a composite orthopaedic pain scale in horses.. Res Vet Sci 2008 Oct;85(2):294-306.
    pubmed: 18061637doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2007.10.011google scholar: lookup
  6. Campbell M L H. The ethics of equine cloning. BEVA Congress, Birmingham nwww.myeventflo.com/event.asp?part=3&evID=1324&lectID=300. Accessed April 20, 2015.
  7. Campbell M L H. Pushing the boundaries in competition and breeding horses – is there an alternative to abolition?. AWSELVA Conference, London .
  8. Campbell ML, Mellor DJ, Sandøe P. HOW SHOULD THE WELFARE OF FETAL AND NEUROLOGICALLY IMMATURE POSTNATAL ANIMALS BE PROTECTED?. Anim Welf 2014 Nov 1;23(4):369-379.
    pmc: PMC4786996pubmed: 26973382doi: 10.7120/09627286.23.4.369google scholar: lookup
  9. Carnevale E M. Mature oocyte collection. Equine Reproduction pp 2936–2939.
  10. Carnevale E M. Oocyte transfer. Equine Reproduction pp 2941–2944.
  11. Carnevale E M, Coutinho Da Silva M A, Squires E L. How to collect and transfer oocytes. 49th Annual Convention of the American Association of Equine Practitioners nwww.ivis.org/proceedings/AAEP/2003/carnevale/chapter_frm.asp?LA=1. Accessed July 10, 2014.
  12. Chastant-Maillard S, Quinton H, Lauffenburger J, Cordonnier-Lefort N, Richard C, Marchal J, Mormede P, Renard JP. Consequences of transvaginal follicular puncture on well-being in cows.. Reproduction 2003 Apr;125(4):555-63.
    pubmed: 12683926doi: 10.1530/rep.0.1250555google scholar: lookup
  13. Chenoweth P J, Landaeta-Hernández A J, Flöercke C. Reproductive and maternal behavior of livestock. Genetics and Behaviour of Domestic Animals pp 160–183.
  14. Cook N L, Squires E L, Ray B S, Jasko D J. Transvaginal uItrasound-guided follicular aspiration of equine oocytes. Equine Veterinary Journal Supplement 15, 71–74.
  15. Dalla Costa E, Minero M, Lebelt D, Stucke D, Canali E, Leach MC. Development of the Horse Grimace Scale (HGS) as a pain assessment tool in horses undergoing routine castration.. PLoS One 2014;9(3):e92281.
    pmc: PMC3960217pubmed: 24647606doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092281google scholar: lookup
  16. Dondorp W, de Wert G. Innovative reproductive technologies: risks and responsibilities.. Hum Reprod 2011 Jul;26(7):1604-8.
    pubmed: 21502181doi: 10.1093/humrep/der112google scholar: lookup
  17. EFSA. Outcome of Public Consultation on the EFSA Draft Animal Cloning Opinion. www.efsa.europa.eu/en/supporting/pub/834.htm. Accessed April 20, 2015.
  18. EFSA. Update on the state of play of animal cloning. EFSA Journal 8, 1784.
  19. Everts RE, Chavatte-Palmer P, Razzak A, Hue I, Green CA, Oliveira R, Vignon X, Rodriguez-Zas SL, Tian XC, Yang X, Renard JP, Lewin HA. Aberrant gene expression patterns in placentomes are associated with phenotypically normal and abnormal cattle cloned by somatic cell nuclear transfer.. Physiol Genomics 2008 Mar 14;33(1):65-77.
    pubmed: 18089771doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00223.2007google scholar: lookup
  20. Farin CE, Farin PW, Piedrahita JA. Development of fetuses from in vitro-produced and cloned bovine embryos.. J Anim Sci 2004;82 E-Suppl:E53-62.
    pubmed: 15471815doi: 10.2527/2004.8213_supple53xgoogle scholar: lookup
  21. Farin PW, Piedrahita JA, Farin CE. Errors in development of fetuses and placentas from in vitro-produced bovine embryos.. Theriogenology 2006 Jan 7;65(1):178-91.
    pubmed: 16266745doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.09.022google scholar: lookup
  22. FAWC. The five freedoms. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20121007104210/http://www.fawc.org.uk/freedoms.htm. Accessed April 20, 2015.
  23. FAWC. Welfare implications of cloning: letter to Lord Taylor. www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/324771/FAWC_advice_on_the_cloning_of_farm_animals.pdf. Accessed April 20, 2015.
  24. FEI. Sports forum: cloning. www.fei.org/system/files/VET_CLONING.pdf. Accessed April 20, 2015.
  25. Galli C, Crotti G, Notari C, Turini P, Duchi R, Lazzari G. Embryo production by ovum pick up from live donors.. Theriogenology 2001 Apr 1;55(6):1341-57.
    pubmed: 11327688doi: 10.1016/s0093-691x(01)00486-1google scholar: lookup
  26. Galli C, Lagutina I, Crotti G, Colleoni S, Turini P, Ponderato N, Duchi R, Lazzari G. Pregnancy: a cloned horse born to its dam twin.. Nature 2003 Aug 7;424(6949):635.
    pubmed: 12904778doi: 10.1038/424635agoogle scholar: lookup
  27. Gleerup KB, Forkman B, Lindegaard C, Andersen PH. An equine pain face.. Vet Anaesth Analg 2015 Jan;42(1):103-14.
    pmc: PMC4312484pubmed: 25082060doi: 10.1111/vaa.12212google scholar: lookup
  28. Hartman D L. Embryo Transfer. Equine Reproduction pp 2871–2879.
  29. Hinrichs K. Update on equine ICSI and cloning.. Theriogenology 2005 Aug;64(3):535-41.
    pubmed: 15985289doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.05.010google scholar: lookup
  30. Hinrichs K. Equine cloning.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2006 Dec;22(3):857-66.
    pubmed: 17129808doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2006.07.004google scholar: lookup
  31. Hinrichs K. Assisted reproduction techniques in the horse.. Reprod Fertil Dev 2012;25(1):80-93.
    pubmed: 23244831doi: 10.1071/rd12263google scholar: lookup
  32. Houdebine L-M, Dinnyés A, Bánáti D, Kleiner J, Carlander D. Animal cloning for food: epigenetics, health, welfare and food safety aspects. Trends in Food Science and Technology 19 Suppl v1, S88–S95.
  33. Jirkof P, Fleischmann T, Cesarovic N, Rettich A, Vogel J, Arras M. Assessment of postsurgical distress and pain in laboratory mice by nest complexity scoring.. Lab Anim 2013 Jul;47(3):153-61.
    pubmed: 23563122doi: 10.1177/0023677213475603google scholar: lookup
  34. Johnson AK, Clark-Price SC, Choi YH, Hartman DL, Hinrichs K. Physical and clinicopathologic findings in foals derived by use of somatic cell nuclear transfer: 14 cases (2004-2008).. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2010 May 1;236(9):983-90.
    pubmed: 20433399doi: 10.2460/javma.236.9.983google scholar: lookup
  35. Kim MJ, Oh HJ, Kim GA, Jo YK, Choi J, Kim HJ, Choi HY, Kim HW, Choi MC, Lee BC. Reduced birth weight, cleft palate and preputial abnormalities in a cloned dog.. Acta Vet Scand 2014 Mar 26;56(1):18.
    pmc: PMC3984017pubmed: 24669802doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-56-18google scholar: lookup
  36. Lagutina I, Lazzari G, Duchi R, Colleoni S, Ponderato N, Turini P, Crotti G, Galli C. Somatic cell nuclear transfer in horses: effect of oocyte morphology, embryo reconstruction method and donor cell type.. Reproduction 2005 Oct;130(4):559-67.
    pubmed: 16183874doi: 10.1530/rep.1.00772google scholar: lookup
  37. Mari G, Barbara M, Eleonora I, Stefano B. Fertility in the mare after repeated transvaginal ultrasound-guided aspirations.. Anim Reprod Sci 2005 Sep;88(3-4):299-308.
    pubmed: 16143219doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2005.01.002google scholar: lookup
  38. McDonnell SM. Reproductive behavior of stallions and mares: comparison of free-running and domestic in-hand breeding.. Anim Reprod Sci 2000 Jul 2;60-61:211-9.
    pubmed: 10844196doi: 10.1016/s0378-4320(00)00136-6google scholar: lookup
  39. McDonnell S. Abnormal sexual behaviour. Equine Reproduction pp 1407–1412.
  40. McEvoy TG, Alink FM, Moreira VC, Watt RG, Powell KA. Embryo technologies and animal health - consequences for the animal following ovum pick-up, in vitro embryo production and somatic cell nuclear transfer.. Theriogenology 2006 Mar 15;65(5):926-42.
    pubmed: 16280157doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.09.008google scholar: lookup
  41. McKinnon A O, Squires E L, Vaala W E, Varner D D. Equine Reproduction. Wiley Blackwell .
  42. Mills G. How far can we push the animals we use?. Vet Rec 2013 May 18;172(20):518-9.
    pubmed: 23687203doi: 10.1136/vr.f3143google scholar: lookup
  43. Meyers-Brown G A, McCue P M, Niswender K D, Squires E L, DeLuca C A, Didstrup L A, Colgin M, Famula T R, Roser J F. Superovulation in mares using recombinant equine follicle stimulating hormone: ovulation rates,embryo retrieval, and hormone profiles. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 30, 560–568.
  44. Pader K, Freeman LJ, Constable PD, Wu CC, Snyder PW, Lescun TB. Comparison of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES®) and laparoscopy for elective bilateral ovariectomy in standing mares.. Vet Surg 2011 Dec;40(8):998-1008.
    pubmed: 22091993doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950x.2011.00877.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  45. Peeters M, Sulon J, Beckers JF, Ledoux D, Vandenheede M. Comparison between blood serum and salivary cortisol concentrations in horses using an adrenocorticotropic hormone challenge.. Equine Vet J 2011 Jul;43(4):487-93.
    pubmed: 21496072doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00294.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  46. Petyim S, Båge R, Madej A, Larsson B. Ovum pick-up in dairy heifers: does it affect animal well-being?. Reprod Domest Anim 2007 Dec;42(6):623-32.
    pubmed: 17976070doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2006.00833.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  47. Renard JP, Zhou Q, LeBourhis D, Chavatte-Palmer P, Hue I, Heyman Y, Vignon X. Nuclear transfer technologies: between successes and doubts.. Theriogenology 2002 Jan 1;57(1):203-22.
    pubmed: 11775970doi: 10.1016/s0093-691x(01)00667-7google scholar: lookup
  48. Robertson SA, Sanchez LC. Treatment of visceral pain in horses.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2010 Dec;26(3):603-17.
    pubmed: 21056302doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2010.08.002google scholar: lookup
  49. Sharp D C. Vernal transition into the breeding season. Equine Reproduction pp 1704–1715.
  50. Smith SL, Everts RE, Sung LY, Du F, Page RL, Henderson B, Rodriguez-Zas SL, Nedambale TL, Renard JP, Lewin HA, Yang X, Tian XC. Gene expression profiling of single bovine embryos uncovers significant effects of in vitro maturation, fertilization and culture.. Mol Reprod Dev 2009 Jan;76(1):38-47.
    pubmed: 18449896doi: 10.1002/mrd.20927google scholar: lookup
  51. van Loon JP, Jonckheer-Sheehy VS, Back W, van Weeren PR, Hellebrekers LJ. Monitoring equine visceral pain with a composite pain scale score and correlation with survival after emergency gastrointestinal surgery.. Vet J 2014 Apr;200(1):109-15.
    pubmed: 24491373doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.01.003google scholar: lookup
  52. Wikland M, Blad S, Bungum L, Hillensjö T, Karlström PO, Nilsson S. A randomized controlled study comparing pain experience between a newly designed needle with a thin tip and a standard needle for oocyte aspiration.. Hum Reprod 2011 Jun;26(6):1377-83.
    pmc: PMC3096561pubmed: 21467200doi: 10.1093/humrep/der100google scholar: lookup
  53. WORLD HORSE WELFARE (2014) www.worldhorsewelfare.org/Article/Charity-rescues-nearly-60-horses-from-excessive-breeder. Accessed April 20, 2015
  54. Young LE, Sinclair KD, Wilmut I. Large offspring syndrome in cattle and sheep.. Rev Reprod 1998 Sep;3(3):155-63.
    pubmed: 9829550doi: 10.1530/ror.0.0030155google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 10 times.
  1. Harris IT, Maddock C, Farnworth M, Nankervis K, Perrett J, Pyatt AZ, Blanchard RN. Temporal trends in equine sperm progressive motility: a systematic review and meta-regression. Reproduction 2023 Jun 1;165(6):M1-M10.
    doi: 10.1530/REP-22-0490pubmed: 37000597google scholar: lookup
  2. Biasetti P, Hildebrandt TB, Göritz F, Hermes R, Holtze S, Galli C, Lazzari G, Colleoni S, Pollastri I, Spiriti MM, Stejskal J, Seet S, Zwilling J, Ngulu S, Mutisya S, Kariuki L, Lokolool I, Omondo P, Ndeereh D, de Mori B. Ethical Analysis of the Application of Assisted Reproduction Technologies in Biodiversity Conservation and the Case of White Rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum) Ovum Pick-Up Procedures. Front Vet Sci 2022;9:831675.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.831675pubmed: 35591869google scholar: lookup
  3. Holmes TQ, Brown AF. Champing at the Bit for Improvements: A Review of Equine Welfare in Equestrian Sports in the United Kingdom. Animals (Basel) 2022 May 5;12(9).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12091186pubmed: 35565612google scholar: lookup
  4. de Mori B, Spiriti MM, Pollastri I, Normando S, Biasetti P, Florio D, Andreucci F, Colleoni S, Galli C, Göritz F, Hermes R, Holtze S, Lazzari G, Seet S, Zwilling J, Stejskal J, Mutisya S, Ndeereh D, Ngulu S, Vigne R, Hildebrandt TB. An Ethical Assessment Tool (ETHAS) to Evaluate the Application of Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Mammals' Conservation: The Case of the Northern White Rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum cottoni). Animals (Basel) 2021 Jan 26;11(2).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11020312pubmed: 33530613google scholar: lookup
  5. Popescu S, Lazar EA, Borda C, Niculae M, Sandru CD, Spinu M. Welfare Quality of Breeding Horses Under Different Housing Conditions. Animals (Basel) 2019 Mar 5;9(3).
    doi: 10.3390/ani9030081pubmed: 30841611google scholar: lookup
  6. Campbell MLH. Is cloning horses ethical?. Equine Vet Educ 2018 May;30(5):268-273.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.12566pubmed: 29937631google scholar: lookup
  7. Van den Branden E, Salamone M, Broothaers K, Peere S, Polfliet E, Dewulf M, Van Steenkiste G, van Loon G, Smits K, Govaere J. Physiological and behavioral parameters of pain and stress in mares during and after transvaginal ultrasound-guided follicular aspiration. Front Vet Sci 2025;12:1574351.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1574351pubmed: 40271484google scholar: lookup
  8. Khan IU, Khairullah AR, Khan AY, Rehman AU, Mustofa I. Strategic approaches to improve equine breeding and stud farm outcomes. Vet World 2025 Feb;18(2):311-328.
    doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2025.311-328pubmed: 40182817google scholar: lookup
  9. Hall C, Kay R. Living the good life? A systematic review of behavioural signs of affective state in the domestic horse (Equus caballus) and factors relating to quality of life. Part I: Fulfilment of species-specific needs. Anim Welf 2024;33:e40.
    doi: 10.1017/awf.2024.38pubmed: 39464387google scholar: lookup
  10. Mouncey R, Arango-Sabogal JC, Rathbone P, Scott CJ, de Mestre AM. Prevalence of Microbial Isolates Cultured from Endometrial Swab Samples Collected from United Kingdom Thoroughbred Mares from 2014 to 2020. Vet Sci 2024 Feb 9;11(2).
    doi: 10.3390/vetsci11020082pubmed: 38393100google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,928 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.