Analyze Diet
Theriogenology2008; 70(3); 441-444; doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.05.039

When should a mare go for assisted reproduction?

Abstract: The use of assisted reproductive techniques (ART) has helped owners to produce offspring from valuable mares that were considered infertile using standard breeding techniques. Before referring a mare for an ART, the practitioner should be able to identify the underlying cause of subfertility of the mare. The objective of this review is to provide information regarding embryo transfer, oocyte transfer and intracytoplasmic sperm injection, the three most common ART used in equine practice. Knowing the complexity as well as the risks of these techniques, enables practitioners to refer a subfertile mare to the least complex and most appropriate and successful ART that can overcome specific causes of infertility.
Publication Date: 2008-06-05 PubMed ID: 18534673DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.05.039Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Review

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article discusses when a mare should be referred for assisted reproductive techniques (ART) and identifies the best ART depending on the underlying cause of the mare’s infertility.

Objective of the Research

  • The main objective of this study is to provide insight into the use of assisted reproduction techniques (ART) in horses, specifically mares. These techniques have proven useful in enhancing fertility for mares which otherwise had difficulties in breeding through conventional means.

Identifying the Problem

  • The article advocates for the identification of the root cause of the subfertility in mares before recommending an ART. Pinpointing this underlying cause allows for a more strategic approach to selecting the most suitable ART.

Common Assisted Reproductive Techniques Covered

  • The research delves into three of the most used ART within the equine practice which are the embryo transfer, oocyte transfer, and the intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

The Complexity and Risks of Assisted Reproductive Techniques

  • The paper highlights the complexities and risks involved in each of the three ART methods. This knowledge aids practitioners in making an informed decision on which ART to recommend based on which one can best address the identified cause of the mare’s subfertility, whilst taking into consideration the level of complexity and associated risks.

Making the Suitable Choice

  • With a better understanding of the complexities, risks, and potential success rates of the different ART options, practitioners will be suitably equipped to refer a mare to the least complex yet most suitable and successful ART. This will invariably lead to better fertility outcomes for subfertile mares.

Cite This Article

APA
Coutinho da Silva MA. (2008). When should a mare go for assisted reproduction? Theriogenology, 70(3), 441-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.05.039

Publication

ISSN: 0093-691X
NlmUniqueID: 0421510
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 70
Issue: 3
Pages: 441-444

Researcher Affiliations

Coutinho da Silva, M A
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA. mac253@cornell.edu

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Female
  • Horse Diseases / therapy
  • Horses
  • Infertility, Female / therapy
  • Infertility, Female / veterinary
  • Reproductive Techniques, Assisted / veterinary

References

This article includes 29 references

Citations

This article has been cited 1 times.
  1. Satué K, Fazio E, Medica P. Can the Presence of Ovarian Corpus Luteum Modify the Hormonal Composition of Follicular Fluid in Mares?. Animals (Basel) 2020 Apr 9;10(4).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10040646pubmed: 32283596google scholar: lookup