Wound healing of experimental cutaneous wounds in horses: comparison between a topical formulation containing powdered coconut water and an antimicrobial ointment.
Abstract: Skin wounds in horses often present prolonged healing, stimulating the search for alternative topical therapies. To date, there are no experimental studies in horses evaluating topical formulations containing powdered coconut water. Objective: To compare the early macroscopic and morphometric wound-healing outcomes and the histopathological findings at day 14 in experimental cutaneous wounds in horses treated with a topical formulation containing powdered coconut water versus a reference antimicrobial ointment. Methods: Eight clinically healthy horses received two standardized circular skin wounds in the lumbar region, in an intra-animal paired design. The cranial lesion received the reference antimicrobial ointment and the caudal lesion received the experimental formulation, once a day for 14 days. Length, width, and area were measured by planimetry on days 0, 3, 7, 10, and 14. Edema, exudate, degree of repair, mean repair rate, and histopathological findings were evaluated. Results: There was a progressive reduction in wound area in both groups, with a significant time effect, but no overall treatment effect or treatment × time interaction. An exploratory between-treatment difference in the degree of repair was observed at D3 after Holm adjustment. Edema, exudate, mean repair rate, and histopathological scores on day 14 did not differ between the groups. Conclusions: Under the evaluated conditions, no overall difference was detected between treatments in early wound-healing outcomes. The exploratory results do not demonstrate superiority, therapeutic equivalence, or an isolated effect of powdered coconut water, thereby justifying further investigation of the formulation in larger samples and more clinically challenging models.
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
Overview
This study compared the effectiveness of a topical formulation containing powdered coconut water to a standard antimicrobial ointment for healing skin wounds in horses.
The researchers evaluated healing progress over 14 days using measurements of wound size, macroscopic indicators, and microscopic tissue analysis.
Background and Objective
Skin wounds in horses often take a long time to heal, prompting a search for improved topical treatments.
Coconut water, especially in powdered form, has not been previously studied as a topical treatment for equine wounds.
The objective was to compare early healing outcomes (both visible and microscopic) of wounds treated with powdered coconut water versus a regular antimicrobial ointment.
Methods
Subjects: Eight clinically healthy horses.
Procedure:
Each horse received two standardized circular skin wounds on the lumbar area: one cranial and one caudal.
The cranial wound was treated daily with the reference antimicrobial ointment.
The caudal wound was treated daily with the experimental topical formulation containing powdered coconut water.
Treatments were applied once a day for 14 days.
Measurements:
Wound length, width, and area assessed by planimetry on days 0, 3, 7, 10, and 14.
Clinical signs such as edema (swelling), exudate (fluid discharge), and degree of repair were recorded.
Mean wound repair rate calculated over time.
On day 14, histopathological examinations were performed to analyze tissue healing at the microscopic level.
Results
Wound Area:
Both treatments showed a progressive reduction in wound area over time.
This indicated normal healing, with a significant effect of time on wound size reduction.
No significant overall difference was found between the coconut water formulation and antimicrobial ointment.
No significant interaction between treatment type and time—which means healing progressed similarly regardless of treatment.
Degree of Repair:
An exploratory analysis suggested a difference in healing degree at day 3 favoring one treatment after multiple comparisons adjustment (Holm method), but this was not conclusive.
Edema and Exudate:
No significant differences found between treatments in swelling or discharge.
Histopathology:
The microscopic tissue evaluation on day 14 showed no difference in healing characteristics (e.g., inflammation, cell proliferation) between treatments.
Mean Repair Rate:
The overall wound repair speed was similar in both treatment groups.
Conclusions
In this experimental setting, the topical formulation containing powdered coconut water was not superior to a conventional antimicrobial ointment for early-stage wound healing in horses.
There was no clear evidence of therapeutic equivalence or a unique beneficial effect of the coconut water formulation based on early wound healing macroscopic or histological data.
Results encourage further research with larger sample sizes and more complex clinical wound models to determine if powdered coconut water might provide benefits under different circumstances.
Implications for Practice and Future Research
This study provides reference data for future evaluations of coconut water as a wound care agent in veterinary medicine.
Because no adverse effects or inferior healing were observed, the formulation may be safe but its efficacy needs confirmation in further trials.
Researchers suggest exploring different dosages, formulations, or wound types to better elucidate potential advantages.
Cite This Article
APA
Meneses CSB, Silva LDM, Cardoso JEC, Rodrigues FRN, Neto EMR.
(2026).
Wound healing of experimental cutaneous wounds in horses: comparison between a topical formulation containing powdered coconut water and an antimicrobial ointment.
J Equine Vet Sci, 106126.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2026.106126
Programa de Pós-graduação em Desenvolvimento e Inovação Tecnológica em Medicamentos, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil. Electronic address: cinthiabragavet@alu.ufc.br.
Silva, L D M
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Veterinárias (PPGCV), Universidade Estadual do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Cardoso, J E C
Independent researcher, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Rodrigues, F R N
Laboratório IF VET - Patologia Diagnóstica, Rua Professor Raimundo Vitor, 80, Parquelândia, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Neto, E M R
Programa de Pós-graduação em Desenvolvimento e Inovação Tecnológica em Medicamentos, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Conflict of Interest Statement
Declaration of competing interest None of the authors has any financial or personal relationships that could inappropriately influence or bias the content of the paper.