Abstract: Integration of warm-season grasses into traditional cool-season pastures can increase summer forage for grazing cattle. The aim of this study was to determine impacts of this practice on yield and nutrient composition of equine rotational pasture systems as well as horse body condition. Two 1.5 ha rotational systems (6 to 0.25 ha sections/system) were evaluated: a control system (CON) (all sections mixed cool-season grass [CSG-CON]) and an integrated rotational grazing system (IRS) (three CSG sections [CSG-IRS] and three Quick-N-Big crabgrass [Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop.; CRB-IRS]). Three horses per system grazed in three periods: EARLY (mid-May to mid-July), SLUMP (mid-July to mid-September), and LATE (mid-September to mid-November). Herbage mass (HM) was measured prior to each rotation and samples were collected (0800 to 1000 h) for nutrient analysis. Grazing days were tracked to calculate carrying capacity (CC). Horse condition measures were assessed monthly. Over the full grazing season, 9,125 kg of forage was available for grazing in IRS versus 6,335 kg in CON. The CC was 390 horse d for IRS, while only 276 horse d for CON. Total HM/section did not differ during EARLY when CRB was not available (CSG-IRS: 2,537 ± 605; CSG-CON: 3,783 ± 856 kg/ha), but CC was greater in CSG-IRS (220 ± 37 horse d/ha) than CSG-CON (92 ± 26 horse d/ha; P = 0.03). In SLUMP, both HM and CC were greater in CRB-IRS (HM: 4,758 ± 698 kg/ha; CC: 196 ± 31 horse d/ha) than CSG-IRS (HM: 1,086 ± 698 kg/ha; CC: 32 ± 31 horse d/ha) or CON (HM: 970 ± 493 kg/ha; CC: 46 ± 22 horse d/ha; P < 0.02). While HM did not differ by section type in LATE (1,284 ± 158 kg/ha), CC was greater in CSG-CON (84 ± 9 horse d/ha) versus CRB-IRS (32 ± 13 horse d/ha; P = 0.03) and CSG-IRS (40 ± 13 horse d/ha; P = 0.06). During SLUMP, water-soluble carbohydrates (WSC) were lower in CRB-IRS (4.46% ± 0.80%) than CSG-CON (7.92% ± 0.90%; P < 0.04), but not CSG-IRS (5.93% ± 1.04%); however, non-structural carbohydrates (NSC) did not differ (7.05% ± 0.62%). There were no differences in WSC (6.46% ± 0.54%) or NSC (7.65% ± 0.54%) by section type in LATE. Horses in IRS maintained a body condition score (BCS) of 5.78 ± 0.48, but BCS did not differ by system (CON: 6.11 ± 0.48). Thus, integrated grazing increased summer pasture yield and provided adequate nutrition to maintain horse condition, but further research is needed to improve late-season production. Integrated grazing may not, however, provide an advantage in limiting dietary NSC, as NSC remained low for all pasture sections.
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
This research paper explores the impact of integrating warm-season grasses into traditional cool-season horse pastures on available grazing yield, nutrient composition, and horse body condition. The research supports the benefits of integrated rotational grazing systems in increasing summer pasture yield and adequately nourishing horses.
Research Setup
The research took place on two rotational pasture systems each of 1.5 hectares, divided into 6 sections/system. One was a control system (CON), entirely composed of cool-season grass (CSG-CON), while the other was an integrated rotational grazing system (IRS) consisting of three sections each of cool-season grass (CSG-IRS) and three sections of crabgrass (CRB-IRS).
Three horses per system grazed throughout three periods termed EARLY, SLUMP, and LATE, each spanning about two months. Prior to each rotation, the researchers measured the available pasture or herbage mass (HM) and collected samples for nutrient analysis.
The study tracked grazing days to find the carrying capacity of each system and assessed the condition of the horses on a monthly basis.
Findings on Forage Yield and Carrying Capacity
The integrated rotational grazing system (IRS) provided a significantly greater amount of forage than the control system. The IRS supplied 9,125 kg of forage over the grazing season, as compared to 6,335 kg by the control system.
Carrying capacity was greater for the IRS (390 horse days) than the control (276 horse days), indicating that the IRS can support more grazing livestock for a longer period.
Throughout the SLUMP period, the crabgrass in the IRS yielded a higher herbage mass and had a greater carrying capacity than the control system or the cool-season grass in the same IRS.
However, in the LATE period after the crabgrass was no longer available, the control system had a larger carrying capacity than either the crabgrass or cool-season grass sections in the IRS.
Findings on Nutrient Composition
During the SLUMP period, the crabgrass in the IRS showed a lower content of water-soluble carbohydrates than the control system but not the cool-season grass in the same IRS.
There were no significant differences in the content of non-structural carbohydrates (NSCs) in either grass type during the SLUMP period. The concentration of these nutrients, which are vital for equine health, remained low across all sections in the LATE period.
Impact on Horse Condition
Horses grazing the IRS maintained healthy body conditions throughout the experiment, achieving a body condition score (BCS) of 5.78 (note that a BCS of 5 is generally considered optimal for horses).
However, the BCS didn’t significantly differ between the control and IRS systems, suggesting that both systems provided enough nutrition to sustain horse health.
Research Conclusion
The study concludes that integrated rotational grazing systems can increase summer pasture yields and provide adequate nutrition to maintain the condition of grazing equine populations.
Some challenges persist, such as optimizing late-season production. Furthermore, integrating warm-season grasses doesn’t seem to offer significant benefits in terms of reducing NSC intake.
This combination of warm-season and cool-season pastures may support healthier, more sustainable pasture and livestock management, although further research is needed.
Cite This Article
APA
Weinert-Nelson JR, Meyer WA, Williams CA.
(2021).
Yield, nutrient composition, and horse condition in integrated crabgrass and cool-season grass rotational grazing pasture systems.
Transl Anim Sci, 5(4), txab208.
https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txab208
Burk AO, Fiorellino NM, Shellem TA, Dwyer ME, Vough LR, Dengler E. Field observations from the University of Maryland’s equine rotational grazing demonstration site: a two year perspective. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 5(31):302–303 (Abstr.).
Burwash, L., Ralston B., Olson M., and Wogelsang M.. . 2005. Effect of high nitrate feed on mature idle horses. In: Proceedings of the Annual Symposium of the Equine Science Society; May 31 to June 3, 2005; Tucson, AZ.
Butler DM, Ranells NN, Franklin DH, Poore MH, Green JT Jr. Ground cover impacts on nitrogen export from manured riparian pasture. J. Environ. Qual. 36:155–162.
Chatterton NJ, Harrison PA, Bennett JH, Asay KH. Carbohydrate partitioning in 185 accessions of Gramineae grown under warm and cool temperatures. J. Plant Physiol. 134(2):169–179.
Costin AB. Runoff and soil and nutrient losses from an improved pasture at Ginninderra, southern tablelands, new south wales. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 31(3):533–546.
Fernandes KA, Rogers CW, Gee EK, Bolwell CF, Thomas DG. Body condition and morphometric measures of adiposity in a cohort of pony club horses and ponies in New Zealand. Proc. N. Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 75:195–199.
Frank N, Geor RJ, Bailey SR, Durham AE, Johnson PJ. Equine metabolic syndrome. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 24:467–475.
Glunk EC, Pratt-Phillips SE, Siciliano PD. Effect of restricted pasture access on pasture dry matter intake rate, dietary energy intake, and fecal pH in horses. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 33:421–426.
Goer RJ, Harris PA. Obesity. In: Goer, R. J., Harris P. A., and Coenen M., editors, Equine applied and clinical nutrition. London (UK): Elsevier Ltd; p. 469–486..
Grev AM, Sheaffer CC, DeBoer ML, Catalano DN, Martinson KL. Preference, yield, and forage nutritive value of annual grasses under horse grazing. Agron. J. 109(4):1561–1572.
Hansen TL, Fowler AL, Strasinger LA, Harlow BE, Hayes SH, Lawrence LM. Effect of soaking on nitrate concentrations in teff hay. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 45:53–57.
Hudson DJ, Leep RH, Dietz TS, Ragavendran A, Kravchenko A. Integrated warm–and cool–season grass and legume pastures: I. seasonal forage dynamics. Agron. J. 102(1):303–309.
Jordan SA, Pond KR, Burns JC, Barnett DT, Evans PA. Voluntary intake and controlled grazing of horses. In: Pederson G. A., editor. Proc. Am. Forage Grassl. Counc.;March 12 to 14, 1995; Lexington, Kentucky; p. 71–75..
Kallenbach RL, Crawford RJ Jr, Massie MD, Kerley MS, Bailey NJ. Integrating bermudagrass into tall fescue-based pasture systems for stocker cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 90:387–394.
Kenny LB, Ward D, Robson MG, Williams CA. Comparing four techniques for estimating desired grass species composition in horse pastures. J. Anim. Sci. 96:2219–2225.
Longland AC, Barfoot C, Harris PA. The effect of wearing a grazing muzzle vs. not wearing a grazing muzzle on intakes of spring, summer, and autumn pastures by ponies. In: Forages and grazing in horse nutrition. Wageningen (the Netherlands): Wageningen Academic Publishers; p. 185–186..
Martinson KL, Wells MS, Sheaffer CC. Horse preference, forage yield and species persistence of twelve perennial cool-season grass mixtures under horse grazing. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 36:19–25.
McIntosh BJ. Circadian and seasonal variation in pasture nonstructural carbohydrates and the physiological response of grazing horses [PhD dissertation]. Blacksburg (VA): Virginia Polytechnic Inst. and State Univ..
McMeniman NP. Nutrition of grazing broodmares, their foals and young horses. Canberra, ACT (Australia): Rural Industries Research & Development Corporation..
Moore KJ, White TA, Hintz RL, Patrick PK, Brummer EC. Sequential grazing of cool–and warm–season pastures. Agron. J. 96(4):1103–1111.
Pelletier S, Tremblay GF, Bertrand A, Belanger G, Castonguay Y, Michaud R. Drying procedures affect non-structural carbohydrates and other nutritive value attributes in forage samples. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 157:139–50.
Ritz KE, Heins BJ, Moon R, Sheaffer C, Weyers SL. Forage yield and nutritive value of cool-season and warm-season forages for grazing organic dairy cattle. Agronomy. 10(12):1963.
Ritz KE, Heins BJ, Moon RD, Sheaffer CC, Weyers SL. Milk production, body weight, body condition score, activity, and rumination of organic dairy cattle grazing two different pasture systems incorporating cool-and warm-season forages. Animals. 11:264.
nRutgers New Jersey Weather Network. New Brunswick (NJ): Office of the New Jersey State Climatologist at Rutgers University; [accessed February 24, 2020]. https://www.njweather.org/data.
Schmitz Z, Isselstein J. Effect of grazing system on grassland plant species richness and vegetation characteristics: comparing horse and cattle grazing. Sustainability. 12:3300.
Smith DG, Mayes RW, Hollands T, Cí·¯ord D, Yule HH, Ladrero CM, Gillen E. Validating the alkane pair technique to estimate dry matter intake in equids. J. Agric. Sci. 145(3):273.
Teutsch C. Warm-season annual grasses for summer forage. Publication 418-004. Blacksburg (VA): Communication and Marketing, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Inst. and State Univ..
Teutsch CD, Fike JH, Tilson WM. Yield, digestibility, and nutritive value of crabgrass as impacted by nitrogen fertilization rate and source. Agron. J. 97(6):1640–1646.
Taiz L, Zeiger E. Photosynthesis: Carbon Reactions. In: Taiz, L. and Zeiger E., editors, Plant physiology. 3rd ed. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates, Inc.; p. 111–143..
Tracy BF, Maughan M, Post N, Faulkner DB. Integrating annual and perennial warm–season grasses in a temperate grazing system. Crop Sci. 50(5):2171–2177.
Weinert JR, Williams CA. Recovery of pasture forage production following winter rest in continuous and rotational horse grazing systems. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 70:32–37.