FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Animals (Basel) / 2D Kinematic Analysis of the Esbarrada and Volta Sobre Patas...
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2024; 14(16); doi: 10.3390/ani14162410

2D Kinematic Analysis of the Esbarrada and Volta Sobre Patas Manoeuvres of Criollo Breed Horses Competing in Freio de Ouro.

Abstract: The esbarrada and volta sobre patas manoeuvres are critical in Criollo horse equestrian activities, yet their kinematics remain largely unexplored. This observational study aimed to kinematically describe the manoeuvres in Criollo breed horses and explore the relationship between static goniometry and dynamics. A 2D kinematic analysis was conducted on 31 Criollo horses performing the manoeuvres using high-speed cameras. Joint angles were measured using static goniometry and analysed in relation to dynamic performance. The esbarrada covered a distance of 4.28 ± 0.99 m in 1.15 ± 0.11 s at a velocity of 3.77 ± 0.55 m/s. Joint angles showed a mean fetlock extension of 75.4° ± 5.3° and hock flexion of 43.2° ± 4.1°. In the volta sobre patas, significant differences were found in turn duration (first: 0.96 ± 0.07 s, second: 1.12 ± 0.09 s, p = 0.03) and thoracic limb suspension (first: 0.23 ± 0.02 s, second: 0.28 ± 0.03 s, p = 0.02). Static goniometry indicated that limb conformation did not significantly correlate with protraction angles during the esbarrada (p = 0.27). The volta sobre patas demonstrated prolonged duration and increased thoracic limb suspension in the second turn. Also, the findings suggest that static conformation does not predict dynamic limb movement during the esbarrada.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2024-08-20 PubMed ID: 39199944PubMed Central: PMC11350687DOI: 10.3390/ani14162410Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research focuses on the analysis of specific manoeuvres in the Criollo breed of horses, known as Esbarrada and Volta Sobre Patas, and explores the relationship between static goniometry and dynamics. In simpler terms, the study examines how the horse’s joint angles during these movements relate to the horse’s physical structure and performance.

Research Objectives and Approach

  • The primary aim of this observational study was to describe the motion or kinematics of the Esbarrada and Volta Sobre Patas manoeuvres in Criollo horses. Such kinematic descriptions are crucial for understanding the physical demand of these movements on the horses.
  • The secondary objective was to examine the relationship between the joint angles as measured by static goniometry (a method to measure joint angles in a static position) and the dynamic movements observed during these manoeuvres.
  • The research involved using 2D kinematic analysis through high-speed cameras on 31 Criollo horses while they performed these manoeuvres.

Findings of the Study

  • Esbarrada manoeuvre: The horses covered, on average, a distance of roughly 4.28 meters in about 1.15 seconds at a speed of approximately 3.77 m/s. The joint angles exhibited a typical fetlock (ankle) extension of 75.4 degrees and hock (knee) flexion of 43.2 degrees.
  • Volta Sobre Patas manoeuvre: Significant differences were found in the time taken to complete the first and second turns, and also in the suspension duration of the thoracic limb (front leg). Specifically, the second turn took longer and also involved a longer suspension duration of the thoracic limb.
  • In comparing static goniometry measurements with the dynamic performance of the horses during the Esbarrada manoeuvre, no significant correlation was found. This suggests that the horse’s static physical structure does not determine the angular movement of the limb during execution of the manoeuvre, indicating that other factors could be involved, such as individual training or skill.

Cite This Article

APA
Bonilla Lemos Pizzi GL, Holz K, Kowalski ÉA, Fonseca Ribeiro P, Blake R, Ferreira Martins C. (2024). 2D Kinematic Analysis of the Esbarrada and Volta Sobre Patas Manoeuvres of Criollo Breed Horses Competing in Freio de Ouro. Animals (Basel), 14(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14162410

Publication

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 14
Issue: 16

Researcher Affiliations

Bonilla Lemos Pizzi, Gino Luigi
  • Faculdade de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Capão do Leão 96160-000, Brazil.
Holz, Karina
  • Faculdade de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Capão do Leão 96160-000, Brazil.
Kowalski, Éverton Augusto
  • Faculdade de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Capão do Leão 96160-000, Brazil.
Fonseca Ribeiro, Priscila
  • Faculdade de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Capão do Leão 96160-000, Brazil.
Blake, Roberta
  • Writtle School of Agriculture, Animal and Environmental Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Writtle, Chelmsford CM1 3RR, UK.
Ferreira Martins, Charles
  • Departmento de Clínicas Veterinárias, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Capão do Leão 96160-000, Brazil.

Grant Funding

  • NA / CAPES
  • NA / Newton Fund
  • NA / CONFAP/FAPERGS

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

This article includes 41 references
  1. Gilbert M, Gillett J. Equine athletes and interspecies sport. Int. Rev. Sociol. Sport 2012;47:632–643.
    doi: 10.1177/1012690211416726google scholar: lookup
  2. Adelman M, Thompson K. Equestrian Cultures in Global and Local Contexts. Springer; Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: 2017. pp. 1–14.
    doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-55886-8google scholar: lookup
  3. Cardoso CW. Além da Cultura: O Negócio do Cavalo Crioulo no Rio Grande do Sul como Emprego e Renda. Undergraduate Thesis. Faculty of Economics, UFRGS; Porto Alegre, Brazil: 2022. pp. 7–8.
  4. Galvão E. O cavalo na América indígena: Nota prévia a um estudo de mudança cultural. Rev. Mus. Paul 1963;14:222–232.
  5. Dowdall RC. Criando Criollos. Editora Hemisfério Sur S.A. Buenos Aires; Buenos Aires, Argentina: 1982. pp. 15–32.
  6. Vilanova R, Prado FRDA. Aspectos morfológicos e funcionais em equinos da raça Crioula. Rev. Cient. Elet. Med. Vet. 2007 4.
  7. Cucco DC, Salles EL, Santos MR, Ferreira R, Soriano VS, Zampar A, Kessler JD. Freio de Ouro como ferramenta de seleção na raça crioula. Arch. Zootec. 2016;65:155–161.
    doi: 10.21071/az.v65i250.482google scholar: lookup
  8. Abreu HCD, La Côrte D, Dessessards F, Brass KE, Pompemayer E, Luz TRRD, Gasperi DD. Claudicação em cavalos Crioulos atletas. Ciênc. Rural 2011;41:2114–2119.
    doi: 10.1590/S0103-84782011001200013google scholar: lookup
  9. Silveira BB, Souza EC, Dos Santos MDN, Porciuncula ML, Azevedo MDS, Duarte CA, De Souza Junior P. Digit innervation of the thoracic limb of Criollo horses: Anatomical description and consequences to perineural blocks. Anat. Histol. Embryol. 2020;49:728–736.
    doi: 10.1111/ahe.12567pubmed: 32383823google scholar: lookup
  10. Góss GC. Mensuração Ultrassonográfica dos Ligamentos Colaterais da Articulação Interfalangeana Distal de Cavalos da Raça Crioula. Monografia (Specialization—Integrated Residency in Veterinary Medicine)—Federal University of Pampa, Bagé, RS, Brazil, 2017. pp. 13–14.
  11. Dalto R. Freio de Ouro: Uma História a Cavalo. Associação Brasileira de Criadores de Cavalos Crioulos; Santa Maria, CA, USA: 2006. pp. 4–15.
  12. Pimentel AMH, Souza JRM, Boligon AA, Moreira HLM, Rechsteiner SMDF, Pimentel CA, Martins CF. Association of morphometric measurements with morphological scores of Criollo horses at Freio de Ouro: A path analysis. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 2018;47:0180013.
    doi: 10.1590/rbz4720180013google scholar: lookup
  13. Torres-Pérez Y, Gómez-Pachón EY, Miró-Rodríguez F. Two-Dimensional Kinematics of Horses at Trot Through Videiomatry and Mathematical Modeling. Rev. Fac. Ing. 2017;26:83–96.
    doi: 10.19053/01211129.v26.n45.2017.6057google scholar: lookup
  14. Seib IA, Júnior HRM, Nogueira É. Aceitabilidade da raça crioula em competições de laço comprido em Mato Grosso do Sul: Estudo exploratório. Multitemas 2013 44:135–145.
  15. Rohlf CM, Garcia TC, Marsh LJ, Acutt EV, le Jeune SS, Stover SM. Effects of Jumping Phase, Leading Limb, and Arena Surface Type on Forelimb Hoof Movement. Animals 2023;13:2122.
    doi: 10.3390/ani13132122pmc: PMC10340005pubmed: 37443919google scholar: lookup
  16. Northrop AJ, Hobbs SJ, Holt D, Clayton-Smith E, Martin JH. Spatial variation of the physical and biomechanical properties within an equestrian arena surface. Procedia Eng. 2016;147:866–871.
    doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.288google scholar: lookup
  17. Roth IT, Schielke B, Rensing M, Bernau M. Comparison of american quarter horses competing in western pleasure, hunter under saddle, and reining using linear traits. Animals 2021;11:2861.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11102861pmc: PMC8532615pubmed: 34679888google scholar: lookup
  18. Alvarez CG, Rhodin M, Bobbert MF, Meyer H, Weishaupt MA, Johnston C, van Weeren PR. The effect of head and neck position on the thoracolumbar kinematics in the unridden horse. Equine Vet. J. 2006;38((Suppl. 36)):445–451.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2006.tb05585.xpubmed: 17402464google scholar: lookup
  19. Rhodin M, Johnston C, Holm KR, Wennerstrand J, Drevemo S. The influence of head and neck position on kinematics of the back in riding horses at the walk and trot. Equine Vet. J. 2010;37:7–11.
    doi: 10.2746/0425164054406928pubmed: 15651727google scholar: lookup
  20. Kienapfel K. The effect of three different head–neck positions on the average EMG activity of three important neck muscles in the horse. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2015;99:132–138.
    doi: 10.1111/jpn.12210pubmed: 24954642google scholar: lookup
  21. Rhodin M, Alvarez CG, Byström A, Johnston C, van Weeren PR, Roepstorff L, Weishaupt MA. The effect of different head and neck positions on the caudal back and hindlimb kinematics in the elite dressage horse at trot. Equine Vet. J. 2009;41:274–279.
    doi: 10.2746/042516409X394436pubmed: 19469235google scholar: lookup
  22. Jeffcott LB. Disorders of the thoracolumbar spine of the horse—A survey of 443 cases. Equine Vet. J. 1980;12:197–210.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1980.tb03427.xpubmed: 7439145google scholar: lookup
  23. Townsend HGG, Leach DH. Relationship between intervertebral joint morphology and mobility in the equine thoracolumbar spine. Equine Vet. J. 1984;16:461–465.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1984.tb01981.xpubmed: 6489309google scholar: lookup
  24. Denoix JMD. Spinal biomechanics and functional anatomy. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Equine Pract. 1999;15:27–60.
    doi: 10.1016/S0749-0739(17)30162-1pubmed: 10218240google scholar: lookup
  25. Stubbs NC, Hodges PW, Jeffcott LB, Cowin G, Hodgson DR, McGowan CM. Functional anatomy of the caudal thoracolumbar and lumbosacral spine in the horse. Equine Vet. J. 2006;38((Suppl. 36)):393–399.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2006.tb05575.xpubmed: 17402454google scholar: lookup
  26. Denoix JM. Muscle groups and their actions: The hindlimb. Biomechanics and Physical Training of the Horse. CRC Press; Boca Raton, FL, USA: 2014. pp. 26–31.
  27. Hodson E, Clayton HM, Lanovaz JL. The hindlimb in walking horses: 1. Kinematics and ground reaction forces. Equine Vet. J. 2001;33:38–43.
    doi: 10.2746/042516401776767485pubmed: 11191608google scholar: lookup
  28. McGowan CM, Hyytiäinen HK. Muscular and neuromotor control and learning in the athletic horse. Comp. Exerc. Physiol. 2017;13:185–194.
    doi: 10.3920/CEP170001google scholar: lookup
  29. Todd JJ. Lactate: Valuable for physical performance and maintenance of brain function during exercise. Biosci. Horiz. Int. J. Stud. Res. 2014;7:hzu001.
    doi: 10.1093/biohorizons/hzu001google scholar: lookup
  30. Forestier N, Nougier V. The effects of muscular fatigue on the coordination of a multijoint movement in human. Neurosci. Lett. 1998;252:187–190.
    doi: 10.1016/S0304-3940(98)00584-9pubmed: 9739992google scholar: lookup
  31. Voge KR, Dingwell JB. Relative timing of changes in muscle fatigue and movement coordination during a repetitive one-hand lifting task. Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (IEEE Cat. No. 03CH37439); Cancun, Mexico. 17–21 September 2003; pp. 1807–1810.
    doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2003.1279767google scholar: lookup
  32. Johnston C, Gottlieb-Vedi M, Drevemo S, Roepstorff L. The kinematics of loading and fatigue in the Standardbred trotter. Equine Vet. J. 2010;31((Suppl. 30)):249–253.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1999.tb05228.xpubmed: 10659262google scholar: lookup
  33. Clayton HM. Horse species symposium: Biomechanics of the exercising horse. J. Anim. Sci. 2016;94:4076–4086.
    doi: 10.2527/jas.2015-9990pubmed: 27898852google scholar: lookup
  34. Nicodemus MC, Clayton HM, Lanovaz JL. Comparison of a joint coordinate system versus multi-planar analysis for equine carpal and fetlock kinematics. Comp. Exerc. Physiol. 2008;5:43–55.
    doi: 10.1017/S1478061508945965google scholar: lookup
  35. Burns TE, Clayton HM. Comparison of the temporal kinematics of the canter pirouette and collected canter. Equine Vet. J. 2010;29((Suppl. 23)):58–61.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1997.tb05055.xpubmed: 9354291google scholar: lookup
  36. Egan S, Brama P, McGrath D. Research trends in equine movement analysis, future opportunities and potential barriers in the digital age: A scoping review from 1978 to 2018. Equine Vet. J. 2019;51:813–824.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13076pubmed: 30659639google scholar: lookup
  37. Bragança FS, Rhodin M, Van Weeren PR. On the brink of daily clinical application of objective gait analysis: What evidence do we have so far from studies using an induced lameness model?. Vet. J. 2018;234:11–23.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2018.01.006pubmed: 29680381google scholar: lookup
  38. Nora FGDSA. Equine biomechanical models for three-dimensional kinematics analysis: Literature review. Braz. J. Dev. 2021;7:106802–106817.
    doi: 10.34117/bjdv7n11-357google scholar: lookup
  39. Simonato SP, Bernardina GR, Ferreira LC, Silvatti AP, Barcelos KM, Da Fonseca BP. 3D kinematic of the thoracolumbar spine in Mangalarga Marchador horses performing the marcha batida gait and being led by hand—A preliminary report. PLoS ONE 2021;16:e0253697.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253697pmc: PMC8259994pubmed: 34228737google scholar: lookup
  40. Demers M, Levin MF. Kinematic validity of reaching in a 2D virtual environment for arm rehabilitation after stroke. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 2020;28:679–686.
    doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2020.2971862pubmed: 32031942google scholar: lookup
  41. Maykut JN, Taylor-Haas JA, Paterno MV, DiCesare CA, Ford KR. Concurrent validity and reliability of 2d kinematic analysis of frontal plane motion during running. Int. J. Sports Phys. Ther. 2015;10:136.
    pmc: PMC4387721pubmed: 25883862
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.