Analyze Diet
Polish journal of veterinary sciences2026; 29(1); 147-156; doi: 10.24425/pjvs.2026.158509

3D geometric morphometrics in veterinary science: applications, standardization, and future directions.

Abstract: Three-dimensional geometric morphometric methods have emerged as a pivotal tool in veterinary anatomy, taxonomy, clinical research, and studies of morphological diversity. This article summarizes the key stages, applications, clinical potential, and recommendations for data standardization in 3D morphometrics. Datasets are typically acquired using radiological modalities, including computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and 3D surface scanning, each offering specific advantages and constraints contingent on the research context. Standardized landmark sets are essential in 3D morphometric studies to ensure reproducibility and comparability of results across independent investigations. Consistent use of reference landmarks enables repeatable analyses, but the number of landmarks directly influences the required sample size and statistical power. Consequently, a minimal yet balanced landmark configuration is critical. This article proposes a standardized, minimal landmark set for the skulls of horses, cattle, and sheep to enhance inter-study reproducibility and comparability. Landmark selection prioritizes anatomically distinct points to avoid excessive landmarking, which may complicate analyses or compromise interpretability. Applications of 3D morphometric methods include orthopedic surgical planning, biomechanical modeling, and assessment of congenital anomalies, providing enhanced precision in diagnostics and research. In conclusion, 3D geometric morphometric methods represent a robust analytical framework in veterinary anatomy, morphology, and clinical research. Their significance is poised to grow through integration with automated landmarking, artificial intelligence-driven analyses, and international data-sharing networks, thereby advancing scientific inquiry in novel dimensions.
Publication Date: 2026-03-20 PubMed ID: 41860003DOI: 10.24425/pjvs.2026.158509Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Review

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This research article discusses the use of three-dimensional (3D) geometric morphometrics in veterinary science, highlighting its applications, the importance of standardizing landmark data, and potential future advancements.

Introduction to 3D Geometric Morphometrics in Veterinary Science

  • 3D geometric morphometrics involves quantitatively analyzing shapes using specific anatomical landmarks in three dimensions.
  • It has become a critical technique in areas such as:
    • Veterinary anatomy
    • Taxonomy (classification of species)
    • Clinical research (e.g., disease diagnosis, treatment planning)
    • Studies of morphological diversity (shape variation within and between species)

Data Acquisition Methods

  • Various imaging technologies are used to obtain 3D datasets, each with its pros and cons depending on the veterinary research context:
    • Computed Tomography (CT): Provides detailed internal bone structures and is useful for skeletal assessments.
    • Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI): Offers detailed soft-tissue contrast, helpful in studying muscles, organs, and soft anatomical features.
    • 3D Surface Scanning: Non-invasive capture of external surface morphology, useful for shape analysis without internal detail.

Importance of Landmark Standardization

  • Landmarks are precise anatomical points used to compare shapes across specimens.
  • Standardized landmark sets are crucial because they:
    • Ensure reproducibility – allowing results to be reliably replicated.
    • Enable comparability – allowing data from different studies to be meaningfully compared or combined.
  • The number of landmarks must be balanced:
    • Too few landmarks might not capture sufficient morphological detail.
    • Too many landmarks can introduce redundancy, increase complexity, and require larger samples to maintain statistical power.
  • Therefore, selecting a minimal yet comprehensive set of landmarks is essential.

Proposed Standardized Landmark Sets

  • The article suggests specific minimal landmark configurations for the skulls of common veterinary species such as horses, cattle, and sheep.
  • These landmarks were chosen based on:
    • Anatomic distinctiveness – ensuring landmarks are clear and reliably identifiable.
    • Avoidance of excessive landmarking – to keep analyses manageable and interpretability high.
  • The goal is enhancing reproducibility and allowing future studies to use a common framework for shape analysis.

Applications of 3D Morphometrics in Veterinary Science

  • Orthopedic Surgical Planning:
    • Accurate shape analysis helps in designing surgeries tailored to individual anatomy.
  • Biomechanical Modeling:
    • Shape data informs simulations of mechanical forces and movement, aiding in injury prevention and performance optimization.
  • Assessment of Congenital Anomalies:
    • Allows detailed morphological comparisons between normal and anomalous anatomy, assisting diagnosis and understanding developmental issues.
  • Enhanced Precision in Diagnostics and Research:
    • By quantifying subtle shape variations, it helps detect early disease or trait variations that traditional methods might miss.

Future Directions and Technological Integration

  • The article anticipates significant growth in the field through integration with advanced technologies:
    • Automated Landmarking: Machine learning algorithms that identify landmarks without manual input, increasing efficiency and reducing observer error.
    • Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Driven Analyses: Using AI to detect patterns and correlations in morphometric data, potentially discovering new diagnostic markers or evolutionary insights.
    • International Data-Sharing Networks: Collaborative platforms enabling researchers worldwide to share standardized morphometric datasets, accelerating scientific progress and meta-analyses.
  • These developments will advance veterinary science in anatomy, clinical practice, and morphological research by providing more robust, scalable, and integrative analytical frameworks.

Conclusion

  • 3D geometric morphometrics is a robust and versatile tool within veterinary science that enhances understanding of anatomical structures and morphological variation.
  • Standardization of landmark datasets is essential for reproducibility and cross-study comparison.
  • By leveraging emerging technologies, the field is poised for rapid advancement, contributing to improved diagnostics, treatment planning, and biological research.

Cite This Article

APA
Szara T, Hadžiomerović N, Bakıcı C, Güzel BC, Gündemir O, Gündemir O. (2026). 3D geometric morphometrics in veterinary science: applications, standardization, and future directions. Pol J Vet Sci, 29(1), 147-156. https://doi.org/10.24425/pjvs.2026.158509

Publication

ISSN: 2300-2557
NlmUniqueID: 101125473
Country: Germany
Language: English
Volume: 29
Issue: 1
Pages: 147-156

Researcher Affiliations

Szara, T
  • Department of Morphological Sciences, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland.
Hadžiomerović, N
  • Department of Basic Sciences of Veterinary Medicine, Veterinary Faculty, University of Sarajevo, 71000 Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Bakıcı, C
  • Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ankara University, 06110 Ankara, Turkey.
Güzel, B Can
  • Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Siirt University, Siirt, Turkey.
Gündemir, O
  • Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, 34320 Istanbul, Turkey.
Gündemir, O
  • Osteoarchaeology Practice and Research Centre, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, 34320 Istanbul, Turkey.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Imaging, Three-Dimensional / veterinary
  • Imaging, Three-Dimensional / methods
  • Veterinary Medicine / standards
  • Veterinary Medicine / methods
  • Anatomy, Veterinary / methods
  • Anatomy, Veterinary / standards

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.