Analyze Diet
Veterinary surgery : VS2004; 33(3); 253-262; doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2004.04037.x

A biomechanical comparison of headless tapered variable pitch compression and ao cortical bone screws for fixation of a simulated midbody transverse fracture of the proximal sesamoid bone in horses.

Abstract: To compare mechanical properties and failure characteristics of 2 methods of fixation for repair of a transverse, midbody fracture of the proximal sesamoid bone (PSB): 4.5-mm AO cortical bone screw (AO) placed in lag fashion and 4/5-mm Acutrak (AT) self-compressing screw. Methods: An in vitro biomechanical evaluation of intact forelimb preparations and forelimb preparations with a simulated midbody PSB fracture stabilized by a bone screw. Methods: Sixteen paired and 8 unilateral cadaveric equine forelimbs. Methods: A midbody transverse osteotomy was created in the medial PSB of bilateral forelimbs of 8 equine cadavers. The osteotomized PSB in 1 forelimb from each cadaver was repaired with an AO screw. The osteotomized PSB in each contralateral limb was repaired with an AT screw. Eight unilateral intact control limbs were also studied. Mechanical properties were determined from axial compression, single cycle to failure, load-deformation curves. Failure characteristics were determined by evaluation of video images and radiographs. Results: No statistically significant differences were found between repair groups. Both AO and AT groups had significantly lower mechanical properties than intact limbs except for stiffness. Conclusions: AO and AT constructs were mechanically comparable when used to stabilize a simulated midbody fracture of the medial PSB. Both constructs were mechanically inferior to intact limbs. Clinical Relevance- The AT screw should be considered for clinical use because of the potential for less soft tissue impingement and superior biocompatibility compared with the stainless-steel AO screw. However, postoperative external coaptation is necessary to augment initial fracture stability for either fixation method, and to maintain a standing metacarpophalangeal joint dorsiflexion angle between 150 degrees and 155 degrees.
Publication Date: 2004-04-24 PubMed ID: 15104632DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2004.04037.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Evaluation Study
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research explores the mechanical properties and failure characteristics of two methods used for repairing a specific kind of fracture in horses. The study concludes both methods are mechanically comparable, but suggests the Acutrak screw due to potential benefits like less soft tissue impingement and better biocompatibility.

Objective of the Study

  • The primary objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of two different fixation methods used for the repair of a transverse, midbody fracture of the proximal sesamoid bone in horses. The fixation tools compared were a 4.5-mm AO cortical bone screw placed in lag fashion and a 4/5-mm Acutrak self-compressing screw.

Methods Used

  • In the biomechanical evaluation, researchers used sixteen paired and eight unilateral cadaveric equine forelimbs. A midbody transverse osteotomy was created in the medial PSB of bilateral forelimbs from eight equine cadavers.
  • One forelimb from each cadaver was repaired using the AO screw, while the contralateral limb was repaired using an AT screw. Eight unilateral intact control limbs were also studied.
  • The team then assessed the mechanical properties from axial compression, single cycle to failure, and load-deformation curves. Failure characteristics were determined by evaluating video images and radiographs.

Results

  • The results showed that there were no significant differences between the groups repaired with either the AO or AT screws. However, both groups demonstrated significantly lower mechanical properties than the intact limbs, apart from stiffness.

Conclusion and Clinical Relevance

  • The research concluded that the AO and AT constructs were mechanically similar when used to stabilize a simulated midbody fracture of the medial PSB. However, they were mechanically inferior to intact limbs.
  • In a clinical setting, the study suggests considering the AT screw for clinical use due to potential advantages such as less soft tissue impingement and better biocompatibility compared to the stainless-steel AO screw.
  • To augment initial fracture stability for either fixation method, the study recommends postoperative external coaptation. It also suggests maintaining a standing metacarpophalangeal joint dorsiflexion angle between 150-155 degrees.

Cite This Article

APA
Eddy AL, Galuppo LD, Stover SM, Taylor KT, Jensen DG. (2004). A biomechanical comparison of headless tapered variable pitch compression and ao cortical bone screws for fixation of a simulated midbody transverse fracture of the proximal sesamoid bone in horses. Vet Surg, 33(3), 253-262. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2004.04037.x

Publication

ISSN: 0161-3499
NlmUniqueID: 8113214
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 33
Issue: 3
Pages: 253-262

Researcher Affiliations

Eddy, Alison L
  • J. D. Wheat Veterinary Orthopedic Research Laboratory, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Galuppo, Larry D
    Stover, Susan M
      Taylor, Kenneth T
        Jensen, David G

          MeSH Terms

          • Animals
          • Biomechanical Phenomena
          • Bone Screws / veterinary
          • Female
          • Fracture Fixation, Internal / veterinary
          • Fractures, Bone / surgery
          • Fractures, Bone / veterinary
          • Horses / injuries
          • Horses / surgery
          • Male
          • Sesamoid Bones / injuries
          • Sesamoid Bones / surgery

          Citations

          This article has been cited 0 times.