A comparison of cross-country recovery rates at CCI 2* with and without steeplechase competitions.
Abstract: Short format 3-day events were introduced in 2004. Anecdotal reports suggested that horses were more tired on completion of the cross-country phase of short format events when compared with horses completing the cross-country phase of long format competitions, despite the absence of Phases A, B and C. Objective: To compare the physiological parameters and haematological parameters of horses that had completed the cross-country phase of a short format (SF) and a long format (LF) CCI 2* competition. Methods: During a CCI 2* competition 69 competitors took part in the short format and 74 in the long format competition. Long format competitors completed Phases A, B, C and D and short format competitors completed Phase D only. Phase D (the cross-country course) was identical for both competitions. Two-way ANOVA for repeated measures and post hoc tests were used to compare temperature, pulse and respiration rates of horses competing in both types of competition. T tests were used to compare mean lactate and electrolyte concentrations, while U-Mann Whitney tests were used to compare CK and AST levels measured in horses competing in the short and long formats of the event. Results: Training schedules, age and previous competition experience were not significantly different between horses competing in the SF and LF competitions. On completion of Phase D, SF horses had significantly higher PCV and significantly lower ionised calcium concentrations when compared with LF horses. LF horses had significantly higher heart rates than SF horses 10 min prior to starting Phase D and immediately after completing Phase D; however, no other significant differences were found between the 2 groups of horses. Conclusions: Only weak evidence was found to support the hypothesis that the workload for the horse in a SF CCI 2* competition is significantly different when compared to the LF CCI 2* competition. Conclusions: There is no beneficial or detrimental effect on horses that complete short format CCI 2* competitions as compared to those that complete long format CCI 2* competitions but further research is required into the physiological response of horses at CCI 3* and CCI 4* short format competitions.
Publication Date: 2007-04-04 PubMed ID: 17402408DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2006.tb05529.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Comparative Study
- Journal Article
- Research Support
- Non-U.S. Gov't
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The research article seeks to compare the physiological and hematological parameters of horses taking part in short format (SF) and long format (LF) CCI 2* cross-country competitions. It concludes that the workload imposed on horses in SF is not significantly different as compared to LF, and none of the formats have any beneficial or detrimental effects over the other.
Objective and Methodology
- The study was aimed at comparing the physiological and haematological parameters of horses that took part in SF and LF CCI 2* competitions.
- 69 competitors participated in the SF while 74 in the LF competition. In the LF, competitors had to complete Phases A, B, C and D. SF competitors did only Phase D which was the cross-country course and identical for both types of competition.
- The research used two-way ANOVA for repeated measures and T tests to compare temperature, pulse, respiration rates, mean lactate, and electrolyte concentrations. The comparison of CK and AST levels was done using U-Mann Whitney tests.
Results and Findings
- It was found that parameters such as training schedules, age, and previous competition experience were not significantly different between horses taking part in the SF and LF.
- On completion of Phase D, SF horses exhibited significantly higher PCV and significantly lower ionised calcium concentrations as compared to LF horses.
- LF horses had significantly higher heart rates than SF horses 10 minutes before starting Phase D and immediately after completing Phase D; however, no considerable differences were found in other parameters between the two groups of horses.
Conclusion
- The study found weak evidence to support the claim that the workload for the horse in a SF CCI 2* competition is different from the LF competition.
- Neither SF nor LF seems to have any beneficial or detrimental effects on horses. However, the research suggests further investigation to understand the physiological response of horses in SF CCI 3* and CCI 4* competitions.
Cite This Article
APA
Murray JK, Senior JM, Singer ER.
(2007).
A comparison of cross-country recovery rates at CCI 2* with and without steeplechase competitions.
Equine Vet J Suppl(36), 133-138.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.2006.tb05529.x Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Department of Veterinary Clinical Science, University of Bristol, Langford House, Langford, Bristol, UK.
MeSH Terms
- Analysis of Variance
- Animals
- Area Under Curve
- Blood Chemical Analysis / veterinary
- Blood Gas Analysis / veterinary
- Calcium / blood
- Heart Rate / physiology
- Hematocrit / veterinary
- Horses / blood
- Horses / physiology
- Lactates / blood
- Physical Conditioning, Animal / methods
- Physical Conditioning, Animal / physiology
- Time Factors
Citations
This article has been cited 1 times.- Williams CA, Burk AO. Antioxidant status in elite three-day event horses during competition. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2012;2012:572090.
Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists