Analyze Diet
Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997)2009; 181(1); 48-52; doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.03.009

A comparison of sympathetic and conventional training methods on responses to initial horse training.

Abstract: In 'sympathetic horsemanship' the importance of the natural behaviour of the horse and the use of body language in communication is emphasised. However, it is unclear what effect sympathetic horsemanship has on the welfare of horses. During a 5-week starting period the effect of a sympathetic (ST) versus a conventional (CT) training method was studied using 28 young Warmblood horses. Behavioural observations during the starting period as well as during a standardised final riding test were performed by trained observers. A Wilcoxon matched-pair test was used to detect differences within groups, Mann-Whitney-U to test differences between groups, and principal component analysis (PCA) to evaluate the effect on multiple variables simultaneously. A human-approach test showed that ST horses snorted significantly less compared to CT horses (P=0.006) after the training period. Furthermore, CT horses showed more fear and stress-related behaviours during training such as 'body tension' (P<0.001), 'high head carriage' (P<0.001), 'lip movements' (P=0.008) and 'teeth grinding' (P=0.03). Principal component analysis demonstrated that horses showed consistent differences in a range of behavioural and heart-rate parameters between groups. Behavioural parameters and technical performance during the standardised final riding test did not differ significantly between groups, but mean heart rate was higher for CT horses (P<0.001). The results suggest that applying a sympathetic training method when starting young horses did not compromise technical performance, but seemed to reduce stress during training compared to a conventional training method.
Publication Date: 2009-04-16 PubMed ID: 19375363DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.03.009Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article studies the effects of sympathetic versus conventional horse training methods on the behavior and welfare of horses. It concludes that the sympathetic training approach reduces stress during training and does not compromise technical performance.

Methodology of the Research

  • The researchers used a total of 28 young Warmblood horses for the study which spanned 5 weeks, split into two groups and subjected each group to either the sympathetic (ST) or conventional (CT) training method.
  • Their reactions, behaviors and heart rate were meticulously logged and observed during the training period and also during a standardized final riding test that was conducted.
  • The researchers ensured unbiased documentation of the horses’ responses by employing trained observers for the task.
  • Various statistical techniques such as the Wilcoxon matched-pair test, Mann-Whitney-U, and principal component analysis (PCA) were used to analyze and compare the data within and between groups from different perspectives.

Findings

  • The findings indicated that horses trained using the ST method snorted significantly less than those in the CT group, suggesting they experienced less stress.
  • beyond This, the CT horses displayed more fear and stress-related behaviors such as body tension, high head carriage, lip movements, and teeth grinding. Notably, each of these behaviors was significant and observed distinctly more frequently in the CT horses.
  • The study found no significant difference in the technical performance of horses trained under both methods during the standardized final riding test. However, the CT group had higher average heart rates indicative of heightened stress levels.
  • The results of this study strongly suggest that the implementation of the ST method both reduces stress levels during training and does not negatively impact technical performance when compared to the CT method.

Significance of the Study

  • This study serves to underline the potential advantages of adopting more ‘sympathetic’ horse training methods that respect and incorporate the natural behavior of horses and use of body language in communication into traditional training routines.
  • The significant difference in stress-related reactions could imply that the ST method is potentially less harmful to the horses’ overall welfare.
  • This research contributes to the broader understanding of animal behavior and the role of training methods in animal welfare.

Cite This Article

APA
Visser EK, VanDierendonck M, Ellis AD, Rijksen C, Van Reenen CG. (2009). A comparison of sympathetic and conventional training methods on responses to initial horse training. Vet J, 181(1), 48-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.03.009

Publication

ISSN: 1090-0233
NlmUniqueID: 9706281
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 181
Issue: 1
Pages: 48-52

Researcher Affiliations

Visser, E Kathalijne
  • Animal Sciences Group, Wageningen University and Research Centres, 8200 AB Lelystad, The Netherlands. kathalijne.visser@wur.nl
VanDierendonck, Machteld
    Ellis, Andrea D
      Rijksen, Charlotte
        Van Reenen, Cornelis G

          MeSH Terms

          • Animals
          • Behavior, Animal
          • Heart Rate
          • Horses / physiology
          • Horses / psychology
          • Humans
          • Learning
          • Teaching / methods

          Citations

          This article has been cited 11 times.
          1. Kapteijn CM, Frippiat T, van Beckhoven C, van Lith HA, Endenburg N, Vermetten E, Rodenburg TB. Measuring heart rate variability using a heart rate monitor in horses (Equus caballus) during groundwork.. Front Vet Sci 2022;9:939534.
            doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.939534pubmed: 36483490google scholar: lookup
          2. Holmes TQ, Brown AF. Champing at the Bit for Improvements: A Review of Equine Welfare in Equestrian Sports in the United Kingdom.. Animals (Basel) 2022 May 5;12(9).
            doi: 10.3390/ani12091186pubmed: 35565612google scholar: lookup
          3. Čebulj-Kadunc N, Frangež R, Kruljc P. Fluctuations of Physiological Variables during Conditioning of Lipizzan Fillies before Starting under Saddle.. Animals (Basel) 2022 Mar 25;12(7).
            doi: 10.3390/ani12070836pubmed: 35405826google scholar: lookup
          4. Vieira de Castro AC, Araújo Â, Fonseca A, Olsson IAS. Improving dog training methods: Efficacy and efficiency of reward and mixed training methods.. PLoS One 2021;16(2):e0247321.
            doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247321pubmed: 33606822google scholar: lookup
          5. Vieira de Castro AC, Fuchs D, Morello GM, Pastur S, de Sousa L, Olsson IAS. Does training method matter? Evidence for the negative impact of aversive-based methods on companion dog welfare.. PLoS One 2020;15(12):e0225023.
            doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225023pubmed: 33326450google scholar: lookup
          6. Mellor DJ. Mouth Pain in Horses: Physiological Foundations, Behavioural Indices, Welfare Implications, and a Suggested Solution.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Mar 29;10(4).
            doi: 10.3390/ani10040572pubmed: 32235343google scholar: lookup
          7. Lesimple C. Indicators of Horse Welfare: State-of-the-Art.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Feb 13;10(2).
            doi: 10.3390/ani10020294pubmed: 32069888google scholar: lookup
          8. Stomp M, Leroux M, Cellier M, Henry S, Lemasson A, Hausberger M. An unexpected acoustic indicator of positive emotions in horses.. PLoS One 2018;13(7):e0197898.
            doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197898pubmed: 29995876google scholar: lookup
          9. De Santis M, Contalbrigo L, Borgi M, Cirulli F, Luzi F, Redaelli V, Stefani A, Toson M, Odore R, Vercelli C, Valle E, Farina L. Equine Assisted Interventions (EAIs): Methodological Considerations for Stress Assessment in Horses.. Vet Sci 2017 Sep 8;4(3).
            doi: 10.3390/vetsci4030044pubmed: 29056702google scholar: lookup
          10. Kydd E, Padalino B, Henshall C, McGreevy P. An analysis of equine round pen training videos posted online: Differences between amateur and professional trainers.. PLoS One 2017;12(9):e0184851.
            doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184851pubmed: 28922395google scholar: lookup
          11. Loftus L, Marks K, Jones-McVey R, Gonzales JL, Fowler VL. Monty Roberts' Public Demonstrations: Preliminary Report on the Heart Rate and Heart Rate Variability of Horses Undergoing Training during Live Audience Events.. Animals (Basel) 2016 Sep 9;6(9).
            doi: 10.3390/ani6090055pubmed: 27618108google scholar: lookup