A descriptive study of the equine proximal interphalangeal joint using magnetic resonance imaging, contrast arthrography, and arthroscopy.
Abstract: To describe regions of the thoracic and pelvic limb proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints that are arthroscopically accessible and identify soft tissue structures that should be avoided during arthroscope and instrument placement. Methods: Experimental ex vivo descriptive study. Methods: Horses (n = 15). Methods: Cadaver limbs (n = 36) were used for anatomic modeling, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with MRI-compatible needles, computed tomography with contrast arthrography, and arthroscopy of the PIP joint. Two arthroscopic approaches to the dorsal joint pouch were compared. Results: With arthroscopy, 62.4% of the joint perimeter could be observed from the dorsal and palmar/plantar joint pouches with no significant difference in the amount of joint observed when using the more proximal or distal approach to the dorsal joint pouch (P =.59). Conclusions: The dorsal and palmar/plantar joint pouches provide adequate arthroscopic visibility for the axial portions of the articular surface of the proximal and middle phalanx. The abaxial portions of the articular surface were difficult to view because of narrowing of the joint pouches abaxially. When comparing the proximal and distal approach to the dorsal joint pouch, arthroscope insertion 1.5 cm proximal to the joint allowed the easiest manipulation of the arthroscope. Palmar/plantar portals were placed dorsal to the neurovascular bundle, proximal to the epicondyle of the middle phalanx to prevent tendon and ligament injury.
© Copyright 2012 by The American College of Veterinary Surgeons.
Publication Date: 2012-08-14 PubMed ID: 22882607DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2012.00981.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
- Research Support
- Non-U.S. Gov't
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The research aimed to have a deeper understanding of the equine proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints through the use of magnetic resonance imaging, contrast arthrography, and arthroscopy, aiming specifically to identify regions that are accessible via arthroscopy and soft tissues that should be avoided during arthroscopy procedures.
Experimental Procedures
- The study was conducted ex vivo on 15 horses, using a total of 36 cadaver limbs.
- A combination of anatomical modeling, MRI with MRI-compatible needles, computed tomography with contrast arthrography, and arthroscopy of the PIP joint was used.
- Two different arthroscopic approaches to the dorsal joint pouch were compared as a part of the experiment.
Results of the Study
- Via the arthroscopic method, roughly 62.4% of the joint perimeter could be seen from the dorsal and palmar/plantar joint pouches.
- The study did not find any significant difference between the amounts of joint observed when utilizing a closer or further approach to the dorsal joint pouches.
- The arthroscope insertion 1.5 cm proximal to the joint enabled the easiest manipulation of the arthroscope.
Conclusion
- The research concluded that dorsal and palmar/plantar joint pouches provide enough arthroscopic visibility for the axial portions of the articulating surface of the proximal and middle phalanx.
- The outer portions of the articulating surface were a challenge to view because the joint pouches narrow on the outer side.
- For the purpose of preventing injury to tendon and ligament, palmar/plantar portals are suggested to be placed dorsal to the neurovascular bundle and proximal to the epicondyle of the middle phalanx.
Cite This Article
APA
Kamm JL, Goodrich LR, Werpy NM, McIlwraith CW.
(2012).
A descriptive study of the equine proximal interphalangeal joint using magnetic resonance imaging, contrast arthrography, and arthroscopy.
Vet Surg, 41(6), 677-684.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2012.00981.x Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Colorado State University Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Arthrography / methods
- Arthrography / veterinary
- Arthroscopy / methods
- Arthroscopy / veterinary
- Cadaver
- Foot / anatomy & histology
- Forelimb / anatomy & histology
- Hindlimb / anatomy & histology
- Horses / anatomy & histology
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging / veterinary
Citations
This article has been cited 0 times.Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists