Analyze Diet

A generic screening methodology for horse doping control by LC-TOF-MS, GC-HRMS and GC-MS.

Abstract: In the present study a general screening protocol was developed to detect prohibited substances and metabolites for doping control purposes in equine sports. It was based on the establishment of a unified sample preparation and on the combined implementation of liquid and gas chromatographic MS analysis. The sample pretreatment began with two parallel procedures: enzymatic hydrolysis of sulfate and glucuronide conjugates, and methanolysis of the 17β-sulfate steroid conjugates. The extracts were treated for LC-TOF-MS, GC-HRMS and GC-MS assays. The majority of the prohibited substances were identified through a high mass accuracy technique, such as LC-TOF-MS, without prior derivatization. The sample preparation procedure included the formation of methylated and trimethylsilylated derivatives common in toxicological GC-MS libraries. The screening method was enhanced by post-run library searching using automated mass spectral deconvolution and identification system (AMDIS) combined with deconvolution reporting software (DRS). The current methodology is able to detect the presence of more than 350 target analytes in horse urine and may easily incorporate a lot of new substances without changes in chromatography. The full scan acquisition allows retrospective identification of prohibited substances in stored urine samples after reprocessing of the acquired data. Validation was performed for sixty representative compounds and included limit of detection, matrix interference - specificity, extraction recovery, precision, mass accuracy, matrix effect and carry over contamination. The suitability of the method was demonstrated with previously declared positive horse urine samples.
Publication Date: 2013-10-16 PubMed ID: 24185097DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2013.10.008Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Validation Study

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study presents a comprehensive screening methodology for detecting prohibited substances used in horse doping cases, utilizing various mass spectrometry techniques. The developed method can identify more than 350 target substances in horse urine and can easily accommodate new substances without major changes in the testing process – a breakthrough in equine sports doping control.

Research Methodology

The researchers implemented a unified sample preparation protocol entailing two parallel procedures:

  • Enzymatic hydrolysis of sulfate and glucuronide conjugates: This process breaks down these compounds, which are often used by the body to make substances more water-soluble and easily expelled.
  • Methanolysis of 17β-sulfate steroid conjugates: Methanolysis is a process of splitting a compound through reaction with methanol – in this case to break apart specific steroid compounds that may be used in doping.

They then turned to a combined process of liquid and gas chromatographic Mass Spectrometry (MS) analysis using LC-TOF-MS, GC-HRMS, and GC-MS assays.

Data Analysis

Most of the illegal substances were recognized through a high mass accuracy technique, known as LC-TOF-MS, without a need for prior manipulation of compounds (derivatization). The preparation process did, however, involve introducing methylated and trimethylsilylated derivatives, common in toxicological Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) libraries.
The researchers enhanced the screening process by using automated mass spectral deconvolution and identification system (AMDIS) in combination with deconvolution reporting software (DRS). This allows for automated and more efficient detection and identification of substances.

Validation and Versatility of the Method

The researchers further tested and validated the method for sixty representative compounds, addressing factors like detection limit, specificity, recovery, precision, mass accuracy, matrix effect, and risk of contamination. This proposition can detect more than 350 target substances with the potential for identifying many more. The methodology allows for retrospective identification of prohibited substances in stored urine samples by reprocessing the acquired data. Additionally, the researchers further evidenced its usability by accurately identifying prohibited substances in previously declared positive horse urine samples.

Cite This Article

APA
(2013). A generic screening methodology for horse doping control by LC-TOF-MS, GC-HRMS and GC-MS. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci, 941, 69-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2013.10.008

Publication

ISSN: 1873-376X
NlmUniqueID: 101139554
Country: Netherlands
Language: English
Volume: 941
Pages: 69-80
PII: S1570-0232(13)00546-1

Researcher Affiliations

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Chromatography, Liquid / methods
  • Doping in Sports
  • Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry / methods
  • Horses
  • Limit of Detection
  • Urinalysis

Citations

This article has been cited 3 times.
  1. Zaid A, Hassan NH, Marriott PJ, Wong YF. Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography as a Bioanalytical Platform for Drug Discovery and Analysis. Pharmaceutics 2023 Mar 31;15(4).
    doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15041121pubmed: 37111606google scholar: lookup
  2. Marlier D. Doping in Racing Pigeons (Columba livia domestica): A Review and Actual Situation in Belgium, a Leading Country in This Field. Vet Sci 2022 Jan 22;9(2).
    doi: 10.3390/vetsci9020042pubmed: 35202294google scholar: lookup
  3. Hisaeda K, LE NAT, Kadekaru S, Ono T, Hiasa Y, Ohzawa E, Hata A, Kutara K, Sugimoto K, Une Y, Iwata E, Kunieda T, Zhang C, Kitagawa H. Metabolic, pathological, and genetic analyses of foals neonatal foals that died in Noma horses. J Equine Sci 2025 Jun;36(2):55-65.
    doi: 10.1294/jes.36.55pubmed: 40832002google scholar: lookup