A Meta-Analysis of International Flunixin Pharmacokinetics in Horses: Toward Regulatory Harmonization and Individualized Detection Times Using Bayesian Paradigm.
Abstract: Flunixin meglumine is widely used to manage pain and inflammation in horses, and its regulation requires robust pharmacokinetic analysis for harmonization. In this study, we conducted a meta-analysis of flunixin disposition using plasma and urine concentration data from 65 horses across four countries to robustly estimate pharmacokinetic parameters in setting screening limits (SLs) for controlling medications in horses. A population (POP) model was developed using nonlinear mixed-effects model analysis. The irrelevant plasma concentration (IPC) and irrelevant urine concentration (IUC) were determined to be 1.9 and 70.2 ng/mL, respectively, with a typical urine-to-plasma ratio (Rss) of 35.9. Using the current International Federation of Horseracing Authorities (IFHA) screening limits (ISLs) (1 ng/mL for plasma; 100 ng/mL for urine), a longer detection time (DT) was observed for plasma than for urine, especially after multiple doses, as plasma ISL corresponds to a slower terminal elimination phase. Increasing the current plasma ISL from 1 to 3 ng/mL-while keeping the current urine ISL at 100 ng/mL-could better align the plasma and urine DTs. As a limitation of this study, both Standardbred and Thoroughbred data were included, and further data collection is needed to fully ascertain potential breed-specific effects. Moreover, this POP model also enabled relatively accurate Bayesian estimation of individual withdrawal times (WTs) from limited data. Clinicians could apply this Bayesian approach to making informed WT recommendations for horses when sufficient data is available. While existing non-POP statistical models remain viable, they may require a more conservative approach to WT estimation than Bayesian methods.
© 2025 The Author(s). Drug Testing and Analysis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Publication Date: 2025-10-25 PubMed ID: 41137541PubMed Central: PMC12796560DOI: 10.1002/dta.3961Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
- Meta-Analysis
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
Research Overview
- This study performed a meta-analysis of flunixin pharmacokinetics in horses using data from multiple countries to improve the regulation and detection of the drug in equine plasma and urine.
- The research developed a population pharmacokinetic model to refine screening limits and support individualized withdrawal time recommendations through Bayesian methods.
Background and Purpose
- Flunixin meglumine is a commonly used medication in horses for pain and inflammation management.
- Effective regulation requires a robust understanding of how the drug is processed by different horses (pharmacokinetics) to harmonize screening limits internationally.
- The study aimed to aggregate plasma and urine concentration data across countries to create a comprehensive pharmacokinetic model.
- The goal was to achieve:
- Regulatory harmonization of medication screening limits.
- Improvement of detection time estimates for flunixin in horses.
- Development of individualized withdrawal time (WT) estimates using Bayesian approaches based on limited data.
Data and Methods
- Data were collected from 65 horses across four countries, including both Standardbred and Thoroughbred breeds.
- Both plasma and urine concentrations of flunixin were analyzed.
- A nonlinear mixed-effects population (POP) pharmacokinetic model was developed to analyze the data.
- Key pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated to help set meaningful screening limits (SLs), such as:
- Irrelevant plasma concentration (IPC): 1.9 ng/mL
- Irrelevant urine concentration (IUC): 70.2 ng/mL
- Typical urine-to-plasma ratio at steady state (Rss): 35.9
Findings and Interpretation
- Current screening limits from the International Federation of Horseracing Authorities (IFHA) are:
- Plasma ISL: 1 ng/mL
- Urine ISL: 100 ng/mL
- The study found that with these ISLs, the detection time (DT) for plasma was longer than that for urine, especially after multiple doses.
- This is because the plasma ISL corresponded to a slower terminal elimination phase of the drug.
- Simulation results suggested that increasing the plasma ISL to 3 ng/mL, while keeping the urine ISL at 100 ng/mL, better aligned detection times between plasma and urine samples.
- This adjustment could harmonize regulatory thresholds and provide more consistent control of medication use.
Limitations
- The model included data from both Standardbred and Thoroughbred horses, which may have inherent breed-specific pharmacokinetic differences.
- Further data collection is required to confirm whether breed differences significantly affect pharmacokinetics and to refine breed-specific regulation if needed.
Applications and Significance
- The population pharmacokinetic model supports Bayesian estimation of individual withdrawal times (WT) with limited data.
- Clinicians can apply this Bayesian approach to more accurately determine when a horse’s flunixin levels have dropped below regulatory limits, improving management of medication withdrawal.
- Compared to traditional non-population statistical methods, Bayesian methods may offer more precise and less conservative WT estimates, enhancing individualized care and compliance.
- Overall, this study advances toward international harmonization of flunixin regulation and enables personalized withdrawal time recommendations, promoting fair competition and animal welfare in equine sports.
Cite This Article
APA
Kuroda T, Knych HK, Noble GK, Minamijima Y, Leung GN, Nomura M, Mizobe F, Ishikawa Y, Kusano K, Toutain PL.
(2025).
A Meta-Analysis of International Flunixin Pharmacokinetics in Horses: Toward Regulatory Harmonization and Individualized Detection Times Using Bayesian Paradigm.
Drug Test Anal, 18(1), 32-50.
https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.3961 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Clinical Veterinary Medicine Division, Equine Research Institute, Japan Racing Association, Shimotsuke, Japan.
- Graduate School of Agriculture, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Fuchu, Japan.
- K.L. Maddy Equine Analytical Chemistry Laboratory (Pharmacology Section), School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, California, USA.
- Department of Molecular Biosciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, California, USA.
- School of Agricultural, Environmental and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia.
- Drug Analysis Department, Laboratory of Racing Chemistry, Utsunomiya, Japan.
- Drug Analysis Department, Laboratory of Racing Chemistry, Utsunomiya, Japan.
- Clinical Veterinary Medicine Division, Equine Research Institute, Japan Racing Association, Shimotsuke, Japan.
- Equine Department Main Office, Japan Racing Association, Tokyo, Japan.
- Equine Department Main Office, Japan Racing Association, Tokyo, Japan.
- London Representative Office, Japan Racing Association, London, United Kingdom.
- Comparative Biomedical Sciences, The Royal Veterinary College, London, United Kingdom.
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Horses / blood
- Horses / urine
- Horses / metabolism
- Bayes Theorem
- Clonixin / analogs & derivatives
- Clonixin / pharmacokinetics
- Clonixin / blood
- Clonixin / urine
- Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal / pharmacokinetics
- Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal / blood
- Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal / urine
- Doping in Sports / prevention & control
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
This article includes 32 references
- Hendrix DV, Brooks DE, Smith PJ. Corneal Stromal Abscesses in the Horse: A Review of 24 Cases. Equine Veterinary Journal 27, no. 6 (1995): 440–447.
- Bowen IM, Redpath A, Dugdale A. BEVA Primary Care Clinical Guidelines: Analgesia. Equine Veterinary Journal 52, no. 1 (2020): 13–27.
- Jochle W, Moore JN, Brown J. Comparison of Detomidine, Butorphanol, Flunixin Meglumine and Xylazine in Clinical Cases of Equine Colic. Equine Veterinary Journal. Supplement 7 (1989): 111–116.
- Freeman DE. Letter to the Editor: Multicentre, Blinded, Randomised Clinical Trial Comparing the Use of Flunixin Meglumine With Firocoxib in Horses With Small Intestinal Strangulating Obstruction. Equine Veterinary Journal 51, no. 3 (2019): 422.
- Toutain PL. Veterinary Medicines and Competition Animals: The Question of Medication Versus Doping Control. Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology 199 (2010): 315–339.
- Houghton E, Maynard S. Some Aspects of Doping and Medication Control in Equine Sports. Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology 195 (2010): 369–409.
- Toutain PL, Lassourd V. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic Approach to Assess Irrelevant Plasma or Urine Drug Concentrations in Postcompetition Samples for Drug Control in the Horse. Equine Veterinary Journal 34, no. 3 (2002): 242–249.
- Knych H. Administration Studies in Equine Antidoping Research: Designing Scientific Investigations to Effectively Direct Medication Control in Racehorses. Drug Testing and Analysis 17, no. 9 (2025): 1560–1566.
- Minamijima Y, Kuroda T, Kamiya T. Evaluation of Plasma and Urine Pharmacokinetics of Tranexamic Acid for Equine Medication Control. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 47, no. 1 (2024): 21–27.
- Toutain PL. How to Extrapolate a Withdrawal Time From an EHSLC Published Detection Time: A Monte Carlo Simulation Appraisal. Equine Veterinary Journal 42, no. 3 (2010): 248–254.
- Toutain PL. Why the Racing Industry and Equestrian Disciplines Need to Implement Population Pharmacokinetics: To Learn, Explain, Summarize, Harmonize, and Individualize. Drug Testing and Analysis 17, no. 2 (2025): 250–258.
- Kuroda T, Minamijima Y, Nomura M. Medication Control of Flunixin in Racing Horses: Possible Detection Times Using Monte Carlo Simulations. Equine Veterinary Journal 54, no. 5 (2022): 979–988.
- nInternational Federation of Horseracing Authorities (International Screening Limits‐Plasma, 2025), https://www.ifhaonline.org/default.asp?section=iabrw&area=6.
- nInternational Federation of Horseracing Authorities (International Screening Limits‐urine, 2025), https://www.ifhaonline.org/default.asp?section=iabrw&area=1.
- . Publication of Detection Times on the IFHA Website for Legitimate Therapeutic Substances Controlled by International Screening Limits. International Federation of Horseracing Authorities, 2024.
- Knych HK, Arthur RM, McKemie DS, Baden RW, Seminoff K, Kass PH. Pharmacokinetics and Anti‐Inflammatory Effects of Flunixin Meglumine as a Sole Agent and in Combination With Phenylbutazone in Exercised Thoroughbred Horses. Equine Veterinary Journal 53, no. 1 (2021): 102–116.
- Knych HK, Arthur RM, McKemie DS, Chapman N. Pharmacokinetics and Effects on Thromboxane B2 Production Following Intravenous Administration of Flunixin Meglumine to Exercised Thoroughbred Horses. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 38, no. 4 (2015): 313–320.
- nSillence M., Noble G., Schneiders F., et al., Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. (2012): 14–17, https://agrifutures.com.au/wp‐content/uploads/publications/11‐117.pdf.
- van Wijk RC, Imperial MZ, Savic RM, Solans BP. Pharmacokinetic Analysis Across Studies to Drive Knowledge‐Integration: A Tutorial on Individual Patient Data Meta‐Analysis (IPDMA). CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology 12, no. 9 (2023): 1187–1200.
- Woodward A, Whittem T. The Lower Limit of Quantification in Pharmacokinetic Analyses. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 42, no. 6 (2019): 585–587.
- Kass RE, Raftery AE. Bayes Factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association 90, no. 430 (1995): 773–795.
- nHorseracing Integrity and Safety Authorityn. Controlled prohibited lists (International Federation of Horseracing Authorities, 2025), https://assets.hiwu.org/a/hisa_controlledprohibitedlist_report_2.02.23_opt.pdf?updated_at=2023‐02‐13T14:41:22.400Z..
- nRacing Medication and Testing Consortiumn. Controlled Therapeutic Substances lists (International Federation of Horseracing Authorities, 2020), https://rmtcnet.com/wp‐content/uploads/2020‐05‐RMTC‐Controlled‐Therapeutic‐Substances‐Schedule.pdf.
- DATAtab team. DATAtab Online Statistics Calculator. 2025.
- Li M, Gehring R, Lin Z, Riviere J. A Framework for Meta‐Analysis of Veterinary Drug Pharmacokinetic Data Using Mixed Effect Modeling. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 104, no. 4 (2015): 1230–1239.
- Semrad SD, Hardee GE, Hardee MM, Moore JN. Low Dose Flunixin Meglumine: Effects on Eicosanoid Production and Clinical Signs Induced by Experimental Endotoxaemia in Horses. Equine Veterinary Journal 19, no. 3 (1987): 201–206.
- Waxman SJ, KuKanich B, Milligan M, Beard WL, Davis EG. Pharmacokinetics of Concurrently Administered Intravenous Lidocaine and Flunixin in Healthy Horses. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 35, no. 4 (2012): 413–416.
- Norgren A, Ingvast-Larsson C, Kallings P. Contamination and Urinary Excretion of Flunixin After Repeated Administration in the Horses. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference of Racing Analysts and Veterinarians, 2000, 377–380.
- Lee CD, Maxwell LK. Effect of Body Weight on the Pharmacokinetics of Flunixin Meglumine in Miniature Horses and Quarter Horses. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 37, no. 1 (2014): 35–42.
- Toutain PL, Autefage A, Legrand C, Alvinerie M. Plasma Concentrations and Therapeutic Efficacy of Phenylbutazone and Flunixin Meglumine in the Horse: Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modelling. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 17, no. 6 (1994): 459–469.
- Toutain PL, Bousquet-Mélou A. Plasma Terminal Half-Life. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 27, no. 6 (2004): 427–439.
- Sams RA, Gerken DF, Ashcraft SM. Detection and Identification of Flunixin After Multiple Intravenous and Intramuscular Doses to Horses. Journal of Analytical Toxicology 23, no. 5 (1999): 372–379.
Citations
This article has been cited 0 times.Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists
