Abstract: Laminitis is a common equine disease characterized by foot pain, and is commonly diagnosed using a five-grade Obel system developed in 1948 using sepsis-related cases. However, endocrinopathic laminitis is now the most common form of the disease and clinical signs may be mild, or spread across two Obel grades. This paper describes a modified method which assigns scores to discreet clinical signs, providing a wider scale suitable for use in a research setting. Methods: The "modified Obel" method was developed using an iterative process. First, a prototype method was developed during the detailed observation of 37 ponies undergoing a laminitis induction experiment. The final method was refined and validated using video footage taken during the induction study and from a clinical trial of naturally occurring endocrinopathic laminitis cases. The Obel method was deconstructed and key laminitis signs were evaluated to develop a three-stage, five criteria method that employs a severity scale of 0-12. Veterinarians (n = 28) were recruited to watch and assess 15 video recordings of cases of varying severity, using the Obel and "modified Obel" methods. The inter-observer agreement (reproducibility) was determined using Kendall's coefficient of concordance (Kendall W) and Krippendorf's alpha reliability coefficient. A total of 14 veterinarians repeated the exercise 2-4 weeks after their original assessment, to determine intra-observer agreement (repeatability), assessed using a weighted kappa statistic (kw). Agreement between methods was calculated by converting all "modified Obel" scores to Obel grades and calculating the mean and distribution of the differences. Results: The "modified Obel" and Obel methods showed excellent and similar inter-observer agreement based on the Kendall W value (0.87, P < 0.001 vs. 0.85, P < 0.001) and Krippendorf's alpha (95% CI) value (0.83 [0.53-0.90] vs. 0.77 [0.55-0.85]). Based on the kw value, the "modified Obel" method also had substantial repeatability, although slightly less than the Obel method, (0.80 vs. 0.91). Excellent agreement between the methods was found, with the mean difference (95% CI), comparing the Obel grade, with the "modified Obel" score converted to an Obel grade, being -0.12 (-0.19 to -0.06) grades. The Obel and converted "modified Obel" grades were identical 62% of the time (259/420) and a difference of one grade (higher or lower) occurred in 35% of cases (148/420). Conclusions: Both methods show excellent agreement, reproducibility and repeatability when used to diagnose endocrinopathic laminitis. The "modified Obel" method is a three-step examination process for severity-scoring of endocrinopathic laminitis, initially proposed for use within a research setting. When using the modified method a diagnosis of laminitis also requires clinical acumen. The allocation of scores for specific clinical signs should be particularly useful in research trials monitoring laminitis recovery.
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The research article discusses the development and validation of a “modified Obel” method for scoring the severity of endocrinopathic equine laminitis, a common horse disease. The study finds that the modified method is effective in diagnosing the disease and could be useful in monitoring recovery in research trials.
Development of the Modified Obel Method:
The researchers created the modified method using an iterative process.
Initially, a prototype was developed while closely observing 37 ponies in a laminitis induction experiment.
The final method was further refined and validated using video footage from the induction study and from a clinical trial of naturally occurring cases.
Modified Obel Method Details:
The traditional Obel method was deconstructed and key signs of laminitis were evaluated.
The modified method uses a three-stage, five-criteria system and a severity scale of 0-12.
28 veterinarians were recruited to watch and assess 15 video cases of varying severity using both the Obel and modified Obel methods.
Inter and Intra-Observer Agreement:
The inter-observer agreement (reproducibility) was evaluated using Kendall’s and Krippendorf’s reliability coefficients.
14 of the veterinarians repeated the assessment 2-4 weeks later to evaluate intra-observer agreement (repeatability).
Results:
The modified Obel and Obel methods showed excellent and similar inter-observer agreement.
The modified method also showed substantial repeatability, albeit slightly less than the Obel method.
Excellent agreement between the two methods was found when comparing the converted “modified Obel” scores to Obel grades.
The Obel and converted “modified Obel” grades were the same 62% of the time and differed by one grade in 35% of cases.
Conclusion:
Both methods demonstrated excellent agreement, reproducibility, and repeatability in diagnosing endocrinopathic laminitis.
The modified Obel method has been proposed for use in a research setting and requires clinical acumen for diagnosing laminitis.
Assigning scores for specific clinical signs might be especially beneficial in research trials monitoring laminitis recovery.
Cite This Article
APA
Meier A, de Laat M, Pollitt C, Walsh D, McGree J, Reiche DB, von Salis-Soglio M, Wells-Smith L, Mengeler U, Mesa Salas D, Droegemueller S, Sillence MN.
(2019).
A “modified Obel” method for the severity scoring of (endocrinopathic) equine laminitis.
PeerJ, 7, e7084.
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7084
Veterinary Practice for Horses, Hamminkeln, Germany.
Mesa Salas, Daniel
Veterinary Practice Datteln, Datteln, Germany.
Droegemueller, Susanne
Practice for Horses and Pets, Gehrden, Germany.
Sillence, Martin N
Earth, Environmental and Biological Sciences School, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Conflict of Interest Statement
Alexandra Meier is supported by a PhD scholarship sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim. Marcella von Salis-Soglio and Dania Reiche are employees of Boehringer Ingelheim. Donald Walsh is a Director of the Animal Health Foundation, Luke Wells-Smith is employed by Motion Equine Podiatry Consulting, Ulrich Mengeler is employed by Veterinary Practice for Horses, Hamminkeln, Daniel Mesa Salas is employed by Veterinary Practice Datteln, Datteln and Susanne Droegemueller is employed by Practice for Horses and Pets, Gehrden.
Floyd A. Grading the laminitic horse. In: Floyd A, Mansmann R, editors. Equine Podiatry. St Louis: Saunders Elsevier; 2007. pp. 320–327.
Frank N. Safety and efficacy of canagliflozin and octreotide for managing insulin dysregulation. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 2018;32(6):2123–2143.
Garner M. Various coefficients of interrater reliability and agreement. 2015. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/irr/irr.pdf. [7 August 2018]. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/irr/irr.pdf
Legere R, Ruffin-Taylor D, Bello K, Parker C, Judd R, Wooldridge A. Pioglitazone in equids increases high-molecular-weight adiponectin concentrations and decreases insulin response after oral sugar [Abstract]. Seattle: American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine; 2018.
Luthersson N, Mannfalk M, Parkin T, Harris P. Laminitis: risk factors and outcome in a group of Danish horses. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 2017;53:68–73.
Signorell A. Tools for descriptive statistics. 2018. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/DescTools/DescTools.pdf. [7 August 2018]. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/DescTools/DescTools.pdf