A prospective observational study of needle-handling practices at a University Veterinary Teaching Hospital.
Abstract: To determine the period prevalence of needlestick injury (NSI) at the Massey University Veterinary Teaching Hospital (VTH) and to identify handling and disposal practices that may contribute to the risk of NSI. Methods: Observations of personnel were conducted in the equine (EVH) and companion animal (CAH) clinics of the VTH during scheduled clinical activities over 9- and 10-day periods, respectively. The number and type of NSI incidents, needle uncapping, capping and disposal events were recorded for veterinarians, nurses and other personnel (visitors and students). The number of needle-related practices, as a proportion of observations, were compared between CAH and EVH, and veterinarians, nurses and others using χ(2) tests. Results: Needlestick injury was not observed during 190 and 163 needle handling and disposal observations in the CAH and EVH, respectively. Uncapping of needles by mouth was observed and was practised more by veterinarians (15/119; 13%) than nurses (2/42; 5%) and others (6/193; 3%) (p=0.001). Two-handed needle recapping after use was observed 265/354 times, and the one handed scooping technique was rarely observed (8/352). In the case of needle disposal, EVH workers used a container that was not purpose built for disposal more than CAH staff (p=0.02), or placed them in a pocket more frequently (p=0.003). Needle disposal containers were available on adjacent bench tops for 65/190 (34%) CAH observations, but no EVH observations. For 51/163 (31%) EVH observations the needle disposal containers were located on the ground, whereas none were observed there in the CAH. No approved sharps containers were observed in the immediate EVH and CAH work areas for 47/163 (28.8%) and 1/191 (0.5%) needle-handling activities, respectively. Conclusions: Unsafe needle-handling practices must be reduced by policies and training programmes to encourage safe needle-related practices, and ensuring that approved sharps containers are available in close proximity to where needles are used.
Publication Date: 2015-11-10 PubMed ID: 26425795DOI: 10.1080/00480169.2015.1100100Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
This study investigates the prevalence of needlestick injuries (NSI) at Massey University’s Veterinary Teaching Hospital by analyzing needle handling and disposal practices in the equine and companion animal clinics. The study found no direct NSI incidents, however, it revealed several unsafe practices, such as uncapping needles with the mouth, failing to use approved sharps containers for disposal, two-handed recapping, and location issues regarding the disposal containers. The study concludes by suggesting improved policies and training programs to ensure safer needle-handling practices.
Study Methodology
- The study was a prospective observational investigation that took place over two specific periods at the University’s Veterinary Teaching Hospital. Observations were scheduled during clinical activities in the equine and companion animal clinics.
- The study primarily observed and recorded the handling and disposal of needles by underlying staff including veterinarians, nurses, visitors, and students.
- The researchers utilized χ(2) tests to compare the number of needle-related practices as a proportion of observations between the two clinics and amongst different personnel.
Findings
- No instances of needlestick injury were observed during the study period. However, the researchers identified several unsafe practices related to needle handling and disposal.
- Notably, the unsafe practice of uncapping needles using the mouth was predominantly carried out by veterinarians.
- Two-handed needle recapping after use was the most commonly observed method while the safer one-handed scooping technique was scarcely seen.
- The study also highlighted issues related to needle disposal. Staff at the equine clinic were more prone to using containers not designated for this purpose, or simply placing the used needles in their pockets.
- The location and availability of approved sharps containers was lacking, particularly in the equine clinic where no containers were available on adjacent bench tops.
- For a considerable amount of needle-handling activities, no approved sharps containers were present in the immediate work areas.
Conclusion
- The researchers conclude that policies and training programs need to be bolstered to reduce unsafe needle-handling practices.
- They suggested ensuring approved sharps containers availability in close proximity to where needles are used.
- The study highlights the need for practitioners in this field to prioritize safe practices regarding needle handling and disposal to minimize any injury risks.
Cite This Article
APA
Riley CB, McCallum S, MacDonald JA, Hill KE.
(2015).
A prospective observational study of needle-handling practices at a University Veterinary Teaching Hospital.
N Z Vet J, 64(2), 117-120.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00480169.2015.1100100 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- a Institute of Veterinary, Animal, and Biomedical Sciences, Massey University , Private Bag 11222, Palmerston North 4442 , New Zealand.
- a Institute of Veterinary, Animal, and Biomedical Sciences, Massey University , Private Bag 11222, Palmerston North 4442 , New Zealand.
- a Institute of Veterinary, Animal, and Biomedical Sciences, Massey University , Private Bag 11222, Palmerston North 4442 , New Zealand.
- a Institute of Veterinary, Animal, and Biomedical Sciences, Massey University , Private Bag 11222, Palmerston North 4442 , New Zealand.
MeSH Terms
- Accidents, Occupational / prevention & control
- Animal Technicians
- Animals
- Hospitals, Animal / standards
- Humans
- Needles
- Needlestick Injuries / prevention & control
- Safety
- Schools, Veterinary / standards
- Universities
- Veterinarians
Citations
This article has been cited 2 times.- Humblet MF, Saegerman C. Internal audits as a tool to assess the compliance with biosecurity rules in a veterinary faculty. Front Vet Sci 2023;10:960051.
- Das P, Mannan MA, Chowdhury S. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices on occupational hazards among veterinary students in Bangladesh: A cross-sectional study. J Public Health Res 2025 Oct;14(4):22799036251388585.
Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists