Analyze Diet
BMC veterinary research2013; 9; 182; doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-9-182

A prospective study on a cohort of horses and ponies selected for participation in the European Eventing Championship: reasons for withdrawal and predictive value of fitness tests.

Abstract: Eventing is generally recognized as a challenging equestrian discipline and wastage figures for this discipline are relatively high. There is a need for information that provides insight into the causes of wastage and withdrawal from competition, for animal welfare and economic reasons. The aim of the present investigation was to conduct a prospective study following the entire national selection of event horses (n = 20) and ponies (n = 9) in the Netherlands that prepared for the European Championship in 2010 (ponies) and 2011 (horses), noting causes of withdrawal and monitoring fitness using standardized exercise tests (SETs), with heart rate (HR; beats/min), speed (V; m/s) and plasma lactate concentrations (LA; mmol/L) as measured parameters. Results: In SET-I, performed at the beginning of the season, horses (n = 17) had a mean VLA4 (V at LA 4 mmol/L) of 10.3 ± 0.4 m/s with a mean V200 (V at 200 beats/min) of 11.4 ± 0.8 m/s and ponies (n = 9) a mean VLA4 of 7.8 ± 0.9 m/s and V200 of 9.6 ± 0.7 m/s. Before SET-II, performed six weeks before the European Championship, 16/20 horses and 6/9 ponies were withdrawn. The most common reason for withdrawal was locomotor injury (9/16 horses, 4/6 ponies; P < 0.001 and P = 0.011, respectively). Other reasons included an animal 'not meeting the competition criteria' (4/16 horses, 2/6 ponies) and being sold (3/16 horses). Animals were divided on the basis of VLA4 and recovery-HR during SET-I into good and average performers. Average performers were significantly more likely to be injured (50.0%) than good performers (0%, P = 0.05). In a subpopulation of ten horses, in which all condition training sessions were evaluated for HR and speed, HRpeak was significantly lower in horses that stayed sound (186 ± 9 beats/min) compared with horses withdrawn from training and competition because of injury (201 ± 5 beats/min; P = 0.016). Conclusions: Of the national selection, 45% of all animals were unavailable for the European Championship because of locomotor injuries. Field tests were useful in assessing the potential injury risk, as individuals with better fitness indices (good performers) were less likely to become injured than average performers. Furthermore, monitoring of training sessions showed predictive value for future injuries, as horses withdrawn because of injury later on showed already higher peak HRs during condition training than horses that stayed sound. Therefore the increase in peak HR seemed to precede visible lameness in a horse.
Publication Date: 2013-09-13 PubMed ID: 24034152PubMed Central: PMC3848563DOI: 10.1186/1746-6148-9-182Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article describes a prospective study on event horses and ponies in the Netherlands, examining the causes of their withdrawal from the European Eventing Championship and identifying the value of fitness tests in predicting withdrawal.

Study Overview

  • The study followed the entire national selection of event horses (20) and ponies (9) in the Netherlands leading up to the European Championship in 2010 and 2011, respectively.
  • It recorded the reasons for withdrawal from the competition and monitored fitness levels using standardized exercise tests (SETs).
  • The SETs evaluated the horses and ponies in several parameters, including heart rate, speed, and plasma lactate concentrations.

Results from First Fitness Test – SET-I

  • Initial fitness test results indicated varying average speed and heart rate measurements in horses compared to ponies.
  • However, by the second fitness test performed six weeks before the championship, a significant number of both horses and ponies had been withdrawn.

Reasons for Withdrawal

  • The most common reason for withdrawal was a locomotion-related injury, which affected a higher percentage of horses than ponies.
  • Other reasons for withdrawal included not meeting competition criteria or being sold.

Performance and Injury Risk

  • Horses and ponies were further grouped into good and average performers based on standard exercise test results. It was observed that average performers had higher chances of getting injured as compared to good performers.
  • Further evaluation on a smaller group of horses showed that horses with a lower peak heart rate during training were less likely to be withdrawn due to injury.

Conclusions

  • The study concluded that a considerable proportion (45%) of the selected animals could not participate in the European Championship due to locomotor injuries.
  • Field tests served as good predictors of potential injury risks, with the observation that individuals with notably higher fitness levels (good performers) had lower chances of getting injured.
  • Monitoring of training sessions also provided insight into future injuries, with horses withdrawn due to injury later recorded as having higher peak heart rates during training compared to those who remained sound.
  • It is noteworthy that the rise in peak heart rates appeared to be an early indicator of visible lameness in a horse.

Cite This Article

APA
Munsters CC, van den Broek J, Welling E, van Weeren R, van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan MM. (2013). A prospective study on a cohort of horses and ponies selected for participation in the European Eventing Championship: reasons for withdrawal and predictive value of fitness tests. BMC Vet Res, 9, 182. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-9-182

Publication

ISSN: 1746-6148
NlmUniqueID: 101249759
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 9
Pages: 182

Researcher Affiliations

Munsters, Carolien C B M
  • Department of Equine Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Yalelaan 114, 3584 CM Utrecht, the Netherlands. carolien@munsters.nl.
van den Broek, Jan
    Welling, Emile
      van Weeren, René
        van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan, Marianne M Sloet

          MeSH Terms

          • Animals
          • Horses / physiology
          • Physical Conditioning, Animal / physiology
          • Predictive Value of Tests
          • Sports

          References

          This article includes 30 references
          1. O'Brien E, Stevens KB, Pfeiffer DU, Hall J, Marr CM. Factors associated with the wastage and achievements in competition of event horses registered in the United Kingdom.. Vet Rec 2005 Jul 2;157(1):9-13.
            pubmed: 15995236doi: 10.1136/vr.157.1.9google scholar: lookup
          2. Singer ER, Barnes J, Saxby F, Murray JK. Injuries in the event horse: training versus competition.. Vet J 2008 Jan;175(1):76-81.
            doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2006.11.009pubmed: 17204438google scholar: lookup
          3. Amory H, Art T, Linden A, Desmecht D, Buchet M, Lekeux P. Physiological response to the cross-country phase in eventing horses.. J Equine Vet Sci 1993;13(11):646–650.
          4. Bitschnau C, Wiestner T, Trachsel DS, Auer JA, Weishaupt MA. Performance parameters and post exercise heart rate recovery in Warmblood sports horses of different performance levels.. Equine Vet J Suppl 2010 Nov;(38):17-22.
          5. De Moffarts B, Kirschvink N, Van Erck E, Art T, Pincemail J, Lekeux P. Assessment of the oxidant-antioxidant blood balance in a field exercise test in Standardbred and eventing horses.. Equine Comp Exerc Physiol 2005;2(4):253–261.
            doi: 10.1079/ECP200567google scholar: lookup
          6. Muñoz A, Riber C, Santisteban R, Vivo R, Agüera EI, Castejón FM. Investigation of standardized exercise tests according to fitness level for three-day event horses.. J Equine Sci 1998;9(1):1–7.
            doi: 10.1294/jes.9.1google scholar: lookup
          7. Marlin DJ, Harris PA, Schroter RC, Harris RC, Roberts CA, Scott CM, Orme CE, Dunnett M, Dyson SJ, Barrelet F. Physiological, metabolic and biochemical responses of horses competing in the speed and endurance phase of a CCI*****3-day-event.. Equine Vet J Suppl 1995 Nov;(20):37-46.
          8. White SL, Williamson LH, Maykuth PL, Cole SP, Andrews FM. Heart rate response and plasma lactate concentrations of horses competing in the speed and endurance phase of 3-day combined training events.. Equine Vet J Suppl 1995 Nov;(20):52-6.
          9. White SL, Williamson LH, Maykuth PL, Cole SP, Andrews FM. Heart rate and lactate concentration during two different cross country events.. Equine Vet J 1995;27(Suppl 18):463–467.
          10. Muñoz A, Riber C, Santisteban R, Rubio MD, Agüera EI, Castejón FM. Cardiovascular and metabolic adaptations in horses competing in cross-country events.. J Vet Med Sci 1999 Jan;61(1):13-20.
            doi: 10.1292/jvms.61.13pubmed: 10027157google scholar: lookup
          11. Katz LM, Bayly WM, Hines MT, Sides RH. Ventilatory responses of ponies and horses to exercise.. Equine Comp Exerc Physiol 2005;2(4):229–240.
            doi: 10.1079/ECP200570google scholar: lookup
          12. Sloet Van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan MM, Barneveld A, Wensing TH, Breukink HJ. The effects of training and detraining in ponies.. Equine Athlete 1993;6(2):16–20.
          13. Couroucé A. Field exercise testing for assessing fitness in French standardbred trotters.. Vet J 1999 Mar;157(2):112-22.
            doi: 10.1053/tvjl.1998.0302pubmed: 10204407google scholar: lookup
          14. Couroucé A, Chatard JC, Auvinet B. Estimation of performance potential of standardbred trotters from blood lactate concentrations measured in field conditions.. Equine Vet J 1997 Sep;29(5):365-9.
          15. Erickson BK, Erickson HH, Sexton WL, Coffman JR. Performance evaluation and detection of injury during exercise training in the quarter horse using a heart rate computer.. Equine Exerc Physiol II: ICEEP Publications, Davies, California 1987. pp. 92–101.
          16. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.. PLoS Med 2007 Oct 16;4(10):e296.
          17. Kingston JK, Soppet GM, Rogers CW, Firth EC. Use of a global positioning and heart rate monitoring system to assess training load in a group of thoroughbred racehorses.. Equine Vet J Suppl 2006 Aug;(36):106-9.
          18. Sloet van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan MM, van den Hoven R, Breukink HJ. The accuracy of three different heart rate meters used for studies in the exercising horse.. Zentralbl Veterinarmed A 1988 Nov;35(9):665-72.
            pubmed: 3143195
          19. Sloet van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan MM, van den Broek ET, Spierenburg AJ. Evaluation of the usefulness of the portable device Lactate Pro for measurement of lactate concentrations in equine whole blood.. J Vet Diagn Invest 2008 Jan;20(1):83-5.
            doi: 10.1177/104063870802000117pubmed: 18182516google scholar: lookup
          20. van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan MM S, Wensing TH, Breukink HJ. Standardised exercise test on a track to evaluate fitness and training of saddle horses. Equine Exerc Physiol II Davies, California: ICEEP Publications; 1987. pp. 68–76.
          21. Katz LM, Bayly WM, Hines MT, Sides RH. Differences in the ventilatory responses of horses and ponies to exercise of varying intensities.. Equine Vet J Suppl 1999 Jul;(30):49-51.
          22. Katz LM, Bayly WM, Roeder MJ, Kingston JK, Hines MT. Effects of training on maximum oxygen consumption of ponies.. Am J Vet Res 2000 Aug;61(8):986-91.
            doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2000.61.986pubmed: 10951995google scholar: lookup
          23. Clayton HM. Heart rate monitoring.. Sport horse publications Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada; 1991.
          24. Serrano MG, Evans DL, Hodgson JL. Heart rate and blood lactate responses during exercise in preparation for eventing competition.. Equine Vet J Suppl 2002 Sep;(34):135-9.
          25. Bailey CJ, Reid SW, Hodgson DR, Bourke JM, Rose RJ. Flat, hurdle and steeple racing: risk factors for musculoskeletal injury.. Equine Vet J 1998 Nov;30(6):498-503.
          26. Murray RC, Walters JM, Snart H, Dyson SJ, Parkin TD. Identification of risk factors for lameness in dressage horses.. Vet J 2010 Apr;184(1):27-36.
            doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.03.020pubmed: 19369100google scholar: lookup
          27. Persson SG. Evaluation of exercise tolerance and fitness in the performance horse. Equine Exerc Physiol Cambridge: Granta Editions, ICEEP Publications; 1987. pp. 441–457.
          28. Hargreaves BJ, Kronfeld DS, Naylor JR. Ambient temperature and relative humidity influenced packed cell volume, total plasma protein and other variables in horses during an incremental submaximal field exercise test.. Equine Vet J 1999 Jul;31(4):314-8.
          29. Sloet Van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan MM, Wensing TH, Barneveld A, Breukink HJ. Work-load in the horse during vaulting competition.. Equine Exerc Physiol 1991;3:331–336.
          30. Baumann J, Holzhausen H, Leinker S, Martens S, Weddige I. Comparison of heart rate, lactate and velocity between training and competition in 3- to 4-star eventing horses. In proceedings of the 7th ISES Conference The Netherlands: Hooge Mierde; 2011. p. 81.

          Citations

          This article has been cited 9 times.
          1. Siegers E, van Wijk E, van den Broek J, Sloet van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan M, Munsters C. Longitudinal Training and Workload Assessment in Young Friesian Stallions in Relation to Fitness: Part 1.. Animals (Basel) 2023 Feb 16;13(4).
            doi: 10.3390/ani13040689pubmed: 36830476google scholar: lookup
          2. Siegers E, van den Broek J, Sloet van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan M, Munsters C. Longitudinal Training and Workload Assessment in Young Friesian Stallions in Relation to Fitness, Part 2-An Adapted Training Program.. Animals (Basel) 2023 Feb 14;13(4).
            doi: 10.3390/ani13040658pubmed: 36830445google scholar: lookup
          3. Martins JN, Silva SR. Use of Infrared Thermography to Assess Body Temperature as a Physiological Stress Indicator in Horses during Ridden and Lunging Sessions.. Animals (Basel) 2022 Nov 23;12(23).
            doi: 10.3390/ani12233255pubmed: 36496777google scholar: lookup
          4. Domino M, Borowska M, Kozłowska N, Trojakowska A, Zdrojkowski Ł, Jasiński T, Smyth G, Maśko M. Selection of Image Texture Analysis and Color Model in the Advanced Image Processing of Thermal Images of Horses following Exercise.. Animals (Basel) 2022 Feb 12;12(4).
            doi: 10.3390/ani12040444pubmed: 35203152google scholar: lookup
          5. Riley CB, Rogers CW, Thompson KR, Guiver D, Padalino B. A Survey-Based Analysis of Injuries to Horses Associated with Transport by Road in New Zealand.. Animals (Basel) 2022 Jan 21;12(3).
            doi: 10.3390/ani12030259pubmed: 35158585google scholar: lookup
          6. Kirsch K, Fercher C, Horstmann S, von Reitzenstein C, Augustin J, Lagershausen H. Monitoring Performance in Show Jumping Horses: Validity of Non-specific and Discipline-specific Field Exercise Tests for a Practicable Assessment of Aerobic Performance.. Front Physiol 2021;12:818381.
            doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.818381pubmed: 35095574google scholar: lookup
          7. O' Brien C, Pegg J. A Preliminary Investigation into Ridden Water Submersion Training as an Adjunct to Current Condition Training Protocols in Performance Horses.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Sep 7;11(9).
            doi: 10.3390/ani11092629pubmed: 34573594google scholar: lookup
          8. Léguillette R, Bond SL, Lawlor K, Haan T, Weber LM. Comparison of physiological demands in Warmblood show jumping horses over a standardized 1.10 m jumping course versus a standardized exercise test on a track.. BMC Vet Res 2020 Jun 8;16(1):182.
            doi: 10.1186/s12917-020-02400-9pubmed: 32513241google scholar: lookup
          9. de Bruijn CM, Houterman W, Ploeg M, Ducro B, Boshuizen B, Goethals K, Verdegaal EL, Delesalle C. Monitoring training response in young Friesian dressage horses using two different standardised exercise tests (SETs).. BMC Vet Res 2017 Feb 14;13(1):49.
            doi: 10.1186/s12917-017-0969-8pubmed: 28196500google scholar: lookup