FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / PeerJ / A scoping review of determinants of performance in dressage.
PeerJ2020; 8; e9022; doi: 10.7717/peerj.9022

A scoping review of determinants of performance in dressage.

Abstract: As a first step in achieving an evidence-based classification system for the sport of Para Dressage, there is a clear need to define elite dressage performance. Previous studies have attempted to quantify performance with able-bodied riders using scientific methods; however, definitive measures have yet to be established for the horse and/or the rider. This may be, in part, due to the variety of movements and gaits that are found within a dressage test and also due to the complexity of the horse-rider partnership. The aim of this review is therefore to identify objective measurements of horse performance in dressage and the functional abilities of the rider that may influence them to achieve higher scores. Five databases (SportDiscuss, CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, VetMed) were systematically searched from 1980 to May 2018. Studies were included if they fulfilled the following criteria: (1) English language; (2) employ objective, quantitative outcome measures for describing equine and human performance in dressage; (3) describe objective measures of superior horse performance using between-subject comparisons and/or relating outcome measures to competitive scoring methods; (4) describe demands of dressage using objective physiological and/or biomechanical measures from human athletes and/or how these demands are translated into superior performance. In total, 773 articles were identified. Title and abstract screening resulted in 155 articles that met the eligibility criteria, 97 were excluded during the full screening of articles, leaving 58 included articles (14 horse, 44 rider) involving 311 equine and 584 able-bodied human participants. Mean ± sd (%) quality scores were 63.5 ± 15.3 and 72.7 ± 14.7 for the equine and human articles respectively. Significant objective measures of horse performance (n = 12 articles) were grouped into themes and separated by gait/movement. A range of temporal variables that indicated superior performance were found in all gaits/movements. For the rider, n = 5 articles reported variables that identified significant differences in skill level, which included the postural position and ROM of the rider's pelvis, trunk, knee and head. The timing of rider pelvic and trunk motion in relation to the movement of the horse emerged as an important indicator of rider influence. As temporal variables in the horse are consistently linked to superior performance it could be surmised that better overall dressage performance requires minimal disruption from the rider whilst the horse maintains a specific gait/movement. Achieving the gait/movement in the first place depends upon the intrinsic characteristics of the horse, the level of training achieved and the ability of the rider to apply the correct aid. The information from this model will be used to develop an empirical study to test the relative strength of association between impairment and performance in able-bodied and Para Dressage riders.
©2020 Hobbs et al.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2020-04-24 PubMed ID: 32355578PubMed Central: PMC7185025DOI: 10.7717/peerj.9022Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article
  • Scoping Review

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article is about a review carried out to identify objective measurements that define superior performance in dressage riding, considering both the performance of the horse and the rider. The study would then inform creation of an evidence-based system for Para Dressage.

Research Objective

  • The primary goal of this research is to define elite dressage performance to create an evidence-based classification system for the sport of Para Dressage. This would aid the clear understanding and fair competition within this discipline.

Review Process

  • The researchers conducted a systematic review of five databases (SportDiscuss, CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, VetMed) from 1980 to May 2018.
  • The articles had to meet specific criteria to be considered for the study. Among these are requirements to be in English, use quantitative outcome measures for describing performance, describe superior horse performance measures and describe the demands of dressage using objective physiological or biomechanical measures.
  • Out of 773 articles, only 58 met the eligibility criteria and were considered for the review. These 58 articles covered studies that involved 311 horses and 584 able-bodied human participants.

Findings

  • The study found significant objective measures of horse performance that were grouped into themes and separated by gait/movement. A range of temporal variables that indicated superior performance were found in all gaits/movements.
  • For the rider, certain variables, such as the postural position and range of motion of the rider’s pelvis, trunk, knee, and head, were found to have significant differences in skill level. The timing of rider pelvic and trunk motion in relation to the horse’s movement was also identified as an essential indicator of rider influence.
  • These findings suggest that for superior dressage performance, minimal disruption from the rider is required as the horse maintains a specific gait/movement. This, in turn, depends on the horse’s intrinsic characteristics, the level of training, and the rider’s ability to apply the correct aid.

Research Application

  • The gathered information will serve as a reference for an empirical study aiming to test the strength of association between impairment and performance in both able-bodied and Para Dressage riders.

Cite This Article

APA
Hobbs SJ, St George L, Reed J, Stockley R, Thetford C, Sinclair J, Williams J, Nankervis K, Clayton HM. (2020). A scoping review of determinants of performance in dressage. PeerJ, 8, e9022. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9022

Publication

PeerJ
ISSN: 2167-8359
NlmUniqueID: 101603425
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 8
Pages: e9022

Researcher Affiliations

Hobbs, Sarah Jane
  • University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom.
St George, Lindsay
  • University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom.
Reed, Janet
  • University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom.
Stockley, Rachel
  • University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom.
Thetford, Clare
  • University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom.
Sinclair, Jonathan
  • University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom.
Williams, Jane
  • Hartpury University, Gloucester, United Kingdom.
Nankervis, Kathryn
  • Hartpury University, Gloucester, United Kingdom.
Clayton, Hilary M
  • Sport Horse Science, Mason, MI, United States of America.

Conflict of Interest Statement

Hilary M. Clayton is the CEO of Sport Horse Science.

References

This article includes 99 references
  1. Alexander J, Hobbs S-J, May K, Northrop A, Brigden C, Selfe J. Postural characteristics of female dressage riders using 3D motion analysis and the effects of an athletic taping technique: a randomised control trial. Physical Therapy in Sport 2015;16:154–161.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2014.09.005pubmed: 25662002google scholar: lookup
  2. Argue C, Clayton H. A preliminary study of transitions between the walk and trot in dressage horses. Cells Tissues Organs 1993a;146:179–182.
    doi: 10.1159/000147442pubmed: 8470463google scholar: lookup
  3. Argue CK, Clayton HM. A study of transitions between the trot and canter in dressage horses. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 1993b;13:171–174.
    doi: 10.1016/S0737-0806(07)80071-2google scholar: lookup
  4. Attride-Stirling J. Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research 2001;1:385–405.
    doi: 10.1177/146879410100100307google scholar: lookup
  5. Back W, Barneveld A, Bruin G, Schamhardt H, Hartman W. Kinematic detection of superior gait quality in young trotting warmbloods. Veterinary Quarterly 1994;16:91–96.
    pubmed: 7801510
  6. Back W, MacAllister CG, Van Heel MCV, Pollmeier M, Hanson PD. Vertical frontlimb ground reaction forces of sound and lame warmbloods differ from those in quarter horses. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 2007;27:123–129.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2007.01.007google scholar: lookup
  7. Back W, Schamhardt HC, Barneveld A. Are kinematics of the walk related to the locomotion of a warmblood horse at the trot?. Veterinary Quarterly 1996;18(2):79–84.
    doi: 10.1080/01652176.1996.9694699pubmed: 8933680google scholar: lookup
  8. Back W, Schamhardt H, Hartman W, Bruin G, Barneveld A. Predictive value of foal kinematics for the locomotor performance of adult horses. Research in Veterinary Science 1995;59:64–69.
    doi: 10.1016/0034-5288(95)90033-0pubmed: 8525089google scholar: lookup
  9. Baillet H, Thouvarecq R, Verin E, Tourny C, Benguigui N, Komar J, Leroy D. Human energy expenditure and postural coordination on the mechanical horse. Journal of Motor Behavior 2017;49:441–457.
    doi: 10.1080/00222895.2016.1241743pubmed: 27870595google scholar: lookup
  10. Barrey E, Desliens F, Poirel D, Biau S, Lemaire S, Rivero J-LL, Langlois B. Early evaluation of dressage ability in different breeds. Equine Veterinary Journal 2002;Suppl 34:319–324.
    pubmed: 12405708
  11. Beale L, Maxwell NS, Gibson OR, Twomey R, Taylor B, Church A. Oxygen cost of recreational horse-riding in females. Journal of Physical Activity & Health 2015;12:808–813.
    doi: 10.1123/jpah.2012-0428pubmed: 25133941google scholar: lookup
  12. Biau S, Barrey E. Relationship between stride characteristics and scores in dressage tests. Pferdeheilkunde 2004;20:140–144.
    doi: 10.21836/PEM20040205google scholar: lookup
  13. Biau S, Lemaire S, Barrey E. Analysis of gait transitions in dressage horses using wavelet analysis of dorsoventral acceleration. Pferdeheilkunde 2002;18:343–350.
    doi: 10.21836/PEM20020402google scholar: lookup
  14. Bradshaw EJ, Hamerton W, Raves A, Noble B. Physical power, technical and aesthetic execution qualities in dressage riding—a preliminary investigation. In: Wang Q, editor. ISBS 23 International symposium on biomechanics in sports, August 22–27, 2005; 2005.
  15. . The scales of training. 2019.
  16. Buchner H, Savelberg H, Schamhardt H, Barneveld A. Temporal stride patterns in horses with experimentally induced fore-or hindlimb lameness. Equine Veterinary Journal 1995;27:161–165.
    pubmed: 8565956
  17. Byström A, Egenvall A, Roepstorff L, Rhodin M, Bragança FS, Hernlund E, Van Weeren R, Weishaupt MA, Clayton HM. Biomechanical findings in horses showing asymmetrical vertical excursions of the withers at walk. PLOS ONE 2018;13:e0204548.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204548pmc: PMC6160136pubmed: 30261019google scholar: lookup
  18. Byström A, Rhodin M, Von Peinen K, Weishaupt MA, Roepstorff L. Basic kinematics of the saddle and rider in high-level dressage horses trotting on a treadmill. Equine Veterinary Journal 2009;41:280–284.
    doi: 10.2746/042516409X394454pubmed: 19469236google scholar: lookup
  19. Byström A, Rhodin M, Von Peinen K, Weishaupt M, Roepstorff L. Kinematics of saddle and rider in high-level dressage horses performing collected walk on a treadmill. Equine Veterinary Journal 2010;42:340–345.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00063.xpubmed: 20525053google scholar: lookup
  20. Byström A, Roepstroff L, Geser-Von Peinen K, Weishaupt M, Rhodin M. Differences in rider movement pattern between different degrees of collection at the trot in high-level dressage horses ridden on a treadmill. Human Movement Science 2015;41:1–8.
    doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2015.01.016pubmed: 25703543google scholar: lookup
  21. Clayton HM. Comparison of the stride kinematics of the collected, working, medium and extended trot in horses. Equine Veterinary Journal 1994a;26:230–234.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1994.tb04375.xpubmed: 8542844google scholar: lookup
  22. Clayton HM. Comparison of the collected, working, medium and extended canters. Equine Veterinary Journal 1994b;26:16–19.
    pubmed: 8542844
  23. Clayton HM. Comparison of the stride kinematics of the collected, medium, and extended walks in horses. American Journal of Veterinary Research 1995;56:849–852.
    pubmed: 7574149
  24. Clayton HM. Classification of collected trot, passage and piaffe based on temporal variables. Equine Veterinary Journal 1997;29:54–57.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1997.tb05101.xpubmed: 9354290google scholar: lookup
  25. Clayton HM, Hobbs SJ. The role of biomechanical analysis of horse and rider in equitation science. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2017a;190:123–132.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2017.02.011google scholar: lookup
  26. Clayton HM, Hobbs SJ. An exploration of strategies used by dressage horses to control moments around the center of mass when performing passage. PeerJ 2017b;5:e3866.
    doi: 10.7717/peerj.3866pmc: PMC5623309pubmed: 28970972google scholar: lookup
  27. Clayton HM, Hobbs SJ. A review of biomechanical gait classification with reference to collected trot, passage and piaffe in dressage horses. Animals 2019;9:763.
    doi: 10.3390/ani9100763pmc: PMC6826507pubmed: 31623360google scholar: lookup
  28. Clayton HM, Schamhardt HC, Hobbs SJ. Ground reaction forces of elite dressage horses in collected trot and passage. Veterinary Journal 2017;221:30–33.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2017.01.016pubmed: 28283077google scholar: lookup
  29. De Barros Souza F, Pacheco MTT, Strottmann IB, Teixeira CGP, Fortes CEA, Lyon JP, Moreira LM, Osório RAL. Metabolic and cardiorespiratory parameter analysis of young female adults during horseback riding at a walking gait. Isokinetics & Exercise Science 2008;16:263–267.
    doi: 10.3233/IES-2008-0317google scholar: lookup
  30. De Cocq P, Clayton HM, Terada K, Muller M, Van Leeuwen JL. Usability of normal force distribution measurements to evaluate asymmetrical loading of the back of the horse and different rider positions on a standing horse. The Veterinary Journal 2009;181:266–273.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2008.03.002pubmed: 18502669google scholar: lookup
  31. De Cocq P, Duncker AM, Clayton HM, Bobbert MF, Muller M, Van Leeuwen JL. Vertical forces on the horse’s back in sitting and rising trot. Journal of Biomechanics 2010a;43:627–631.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.10.036pubmed: 19926088google scholar: lookup
  32. De Cocq P, Mooren M, Dortmans A, Van Weeren PR, Timmerman M, Muller M, Van Leeuwen JL. Saddle and leg forces during lateral movements in dressage. Equine Veterinary Journal Supplement 2010b;42(Suppl. 38):644–649.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00201.xpubmed: 21059074google scholar: lookup
  33. Deuel N. Nationalism in the scoring of dressage competitions at the 1988 Olympics. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 1989;9:281–283.
    doi: 10.1016/S0737-0806(89)80091-7google scholar: lookup
  34. Deuel N, Park J. Canter lead change kinematics of superior Olympic dressage horses. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 1990a;10:287–298.
    doi: 10.1016/S0737-0806(06)80013-4google scholar: lookup
  35. Deuel NR, Park J-J. The gait patterns of Olympic dressage horses. Journal of Applied Biomechanics 1990b;6:198–226.
  36. Devienne MF, Guezennec CY. Energy expenditure of horse riding. European Journal of Applied Physiology 2000;82:499–503.
    doi: 10.1007/s004210000207pubmed: 10985607google scholar: lookup
  37. Douglas J-L, Price M, Peters D. A systematic review of physical fitness, physiological demands and biomechanical performance in equestrian athletes. Comparative Exercise Physiology 2012;8:53–62.
    doi: 10.3920/CEP12003google scholar: lookup
  38. Dunbar DC, Macpherson JM, Simmons RW, Zarcades A. Stabilization and mobility of the head, neck and trunk in horses during overground locomotion: comparisons with humans and other primates. Journal of Experimental Biology 2008;211:3889–3907.
    doi: 10.1242/jeb.020578pmc: PMC2768006pubmed: 19043061google scholar: lookup
  39. Eckardt F, Münz A, Witte K. Application of a full body inertial measurement system in dressage riding. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 2014;34:1294–1299.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2014.09.009google scholar: lookup
  40. Eckardt F, Witte K. Kinematic analysis of the rider according to different skill levels in sitting trot and canter. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 2016;39:51–57.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2015.07.022google scholar: lookup
  41. Egenvall A, Eisersiö M, Rhodin M, Van Weeren R, Roepstorff L. Rein tension during canter. Comparative Exercise Physiology 2015;11:107–117.
    doi: 10.3920/CEP150005google scholar: lookup
  42. Eisersiö M, Rhodin M, Roepstorff L, Egenvall A. Rein tension in 8 professional riders during regular training sessions. Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research 2015;10:419–426.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2015.05.004google scholar: lookup
  43. Eisersiö M, Roepstorff L, Weishaupt M, Egenvall A. Movements of the horse’s mouth in relation to horse–rider kinematic variables. The Veterinary Journal 2013;198:e33–e38.
    pubmed: 24157341
  44. Engell M, Clayton H, Egenvall A, Weishaupt MA, Roepstorff L. Postural changes and their effects in elite riders when actively influencing the horse versus sitting passively at trot. Comparative Exercise Physiology 2016;12:27–33.
    doi: 10.3920/CEP150035google scholar: lookup
  45. Faber M, Schamhardt H, Weeren RV, Johnston C, Roepstorff L, Barneveld A. Basic three-dimensional kinematics of the vertebral column of horses walking on a treadmill. American Journal of Veterinary Research 2000;61:399–406.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2000.61.399pubmed: 10772104google scholar: lookup
  46. Fédération Equestre Internationale. Dressage Rules [Online]. 2019.
  47. Gandy EA, Bondi A, Hogg R, Pigott TM. A preliminary investigation of the use of inertial sensing technology for the measurement of hip rotation asymmetry in horse riders. Sports Technology 2014;7:79–88.
    doi: 10.1080/19346182.2014.905949google scholar: lookup
  48. Griffin TM, Main RP, Farley CT. Biomechanics of quadrupedal walking: how do four-legged animals achieve inverted pendulum-like movements?. Journal of Experimental Biology 2004;207:3545–3558.
    doi: 10.1242/jeb.01177pubmed: 15339951google scholar: lookup
  49. Gunst S, Dittmann MT, Arpagaus S, Roepstorff C, Latif SN, Klaassen B, Pauli CA, Bauer CM, Weishaupt MA. Influence of functional rider and horse asymmetries on saddle force distribution during stance and in sitting trot. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 2019;78:20–28.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2019.03.215pubmed: 31203980google scholar: lookup
  50. Hall C, Goodwin D, Heleski C, Randle H, Waran N. Is there evidence of learned helplessness in horses?. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 2008;11:249–266.
    doi: 10.1080/10888700802101130pubmed: 18569222google scholar: lookup
  51. Hall C, Heleski C. The role of the ethogram in equitation science. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2017;190:102–110.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2017.02.013google scholar: lookup
  52. Hobbs SJ, Bertram JE, Clayton HM. An exploration of the influence of diagonal dissociation and moderate changes in speed on locomotor parameters in trotting horses. PeerJ 2016;4:e2190.
    doi: 10.7717/peerj.2190pmc: PMC4933092pubmed: 27413640google scholar: lookup
  53. Hobbs SJ, Clayton HM. Sagittal plane ground reaction forces, centre of pressure and centre of mass in trotting horses. The Veterinary Journal 2013;198:e14–e19.
    pubmed: 24138935
  54. Hodson EF, Clayton HM, Lanovaz JL. Temporal analysis of walk movements in the Grand Prix dressage test at the 1996 Olympic Games. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 1999;62:89–97.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(98)00223-8google scholar: lookup
  55. Holmstrom M, Drevemo S. Effects of trot quality and collection on the angular velocity in the hindlimbs of riding horses. Equine Veterinary Journal Supplement 1997;23:62–65.
    pubmed: 9354292
  56. Holmström M, Fredricson I, Drevemo S. Biokinematic analysis of the Swedish Warmblood riding horse at trot. Equine Veterinary Journal 1994a;26:235–240.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1994.tb04376.xpubmed: 8542845google scholar: lookup
  57. Holmström M, Fredricson I, Drevemo S. Biokinematic differences between riding horses judged as good and poor at the trot. Equine Veterinary Journal 1994b;26:51–56.
    pubmed: 8542845
  58. Janura M, Cabell L, Svoboda Z, Dvorakova T, Haltmayer E, Janurova E. A review of pressure measurement on the contact surface between the horse and the rider. Pferdeheilkunde 2012;28:583–593.
    doi: 10.21836/PEM20120509google scholar: lookup
  59. Kang O-D, Ryu Y-C, Ryew C-C, Oh W-Y, Lee C-E, Kang M-S. Comparative analyses of rider position according to skill levels during walk and trot in Jeju horse. Human Movement Science 2010;29:956–963.
    doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2010.05.010pubmed: 20800913google scholar: lookup
  60. Kuhnke S, Dumbell L, Gauly M, Johnson JL, Mcdonald K, König Von Borstel U. A comparison of rein tension of the rider’s dominant and non-dominant hand and the influence of the horse’s laterality. Comparative Exercise Physiology 2010;7:57–63.
    doi: 10.1017/S1755254010000243google scholar: lookup
  61. Lagarde J, Peham C, Licka T, Kelso JAS. Coordination dynamics of the horse-rider system. Journal of Motor Behavior 2005;37:418–424.
    doi: 10.3200/JMBR.37.6.418-424pmc: PMC1821095pubmed: 16280312google scholar: lookup
  62. Lashley MJ, Nauwelaerts S, Vernooij JC, Back W, Clayton HM. Comparison of the head and neck position of elite dressage horses during top-level competitions in 1992 versus 2008. Veterinary Journal 2014;202:462–465.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.08.028pubmed: 25296851google scholar: lookup
  63. Law M, Stewart D, Pollock N, Letts L, Bosch J, Westmorland M. Guidelines for critical review form-quantitative studies [Online]. Ontario McMaster University Occupational Therapy Evidence-based Practice Research Group; Hamilton: 1998. [04 July 2018].
  64. Lovett T, Hodson-Tole E, Nankervis K. A preliminary investigation of rider position during walk, trot and canter. Equine and Comparative Exercise Physiology 2005;2:71–76.
    doi: 10.1079/ECP200444google scholar: lookup
  65. McCall CA. A review of learning behavior in horses and its application in horse training. Journal of Animal Science 1990;68:75–81.
  66. McGuigan MP, Wilson AM. The effect of gait and digital flexor muscle activation on limb compliance in the forelimb of the horse Equus caballus. Journal of Experimental Biology 2003;206:1325–1336.
    doi: 10.1242/jeb.00254pubmed: 12624168google scholar: lookup
  67. Merkens HW, Schamhardt HC. Distribution of ground reaction forces of the concurrently loaded limbs of the Dutch Warmblood horse at the normal walk. Equine Veterinary Journal 1988;20:209–213.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1988.tb01501.xpubmed: 3402418google scholar: lookup
  68. Merkens HW, Schamhardt HC. Relationships between ground reaction force patterns and kinematics in the walking and trotting horse. Equine Veterinary Journal 1994;26:67–70.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1994.tb04334.xpubmed: 8143669google scholar: lookup
  69. Meyers MC. Effect of equitation training on health and physical fitness of college females. European Journal of Applied Physiology 2006;98:177–184.
    doi: 10.1007/s00421-006-0258-xpubmed: 16896731google scholar: lookup
  70. Meyers MC, Sterling JC. Physical, hematological, and exercise response of collegiate female equestrian athletes. Journal of Sports Medicine & Physical Fitness 2000;40:131–138.
    pubmed: 11034433
  71. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLOS Medicine 2009;6:e1000097–e1000097.
    pmc: PMC2707599pubmed: 19621072
  72. Morales JL, Manchado M, Vivo J, Galisteo AM, Agüera E, Miró F. Angular kinematic patterns of limbs in elite and riding horses at trot. Equine Veterinary Journal 1998;30:528–533.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1998.tb04529.xpubmed: 9844972google scholar: lookup
  73. Münz A, Eckardt F, Heipertz-Hengst C, Peham C, Witte K. A preliminary study of an inertial sensor-based method for the assessment of human pelvis kinematics in dressage riding. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 2013;33:950–955.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2013.02.002google scholar: lookup
  74. Münz A, Eckardt F, Witte K. Horse-rider interaction in dressage riding. Human Movement Science 2014;33:227–237.
    doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2013.09.003pubmed: 24290612google scholar: lookup
  75. Olivier A, Faugloire E, Lejeune L, Biau S, Isableu B. Head stability and head-trunk coordination in horseback riders: the contribution of visual information according to expertise. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2017;11(11):1–16.
    pmc: PMC5277006pubmed: 28194100
  76. Pantall A, Barton S, Collins P. Surface electromyography of abdominal and spinal muscles in adult horseriders during rising trot. In: Harrison AJ, Anderson R, Kenny I, editors. ISBS 27 International symposium on biomechanics in sports, August 17–21 2009; 2009.
  77. Peham C, Licka T, Kapaun M, Scheidl M. A new method to quantify harmony of the horse–rider system in dressage. Sports Engineering 2001;4:95–101.
    doi: 10.1046/j.1460-2687.2001.00077.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  78. Peham C, Licka T, Schobesberger H, Meschan E. Influence of the rider on the variability of the equine gait. Human Movement Science 2004;23:663–671.
    doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2004.10.006pubmed: 15589627google scholar: lookup
  79. Roberts M, Shearman J, Marlin D. A comparison of the metabolic cost of the three phases of the one-day event in female collegiate riders. Comparative Exercise Physiology 2009;6:129–135.
    doi: 10.1017/S1755254010000012google scholar: lookup
  80. Roepstorff L, Egenvall A, Rhodin M, Byström A, Johnston C, Van Weeren PR, Weishaupt M. Kinetics and kinematics of the horse comparing left and rightrising trot. Equine Veterinary Journal 2009;41:292–296.
    doi: 10.2746/042516409X397127pubmed: 19469238google scholar: lookup
  81. Sainas G, Melis S, Corona F, Loi A, Ghiani G, Milia R, Tocco F, Marongiu E, Crisafulli A. Cardio-metabolic responses during horse riding at three different speeds. European Journal of Applied Physiology 2016;116:1985–1992.
    doi: 10.1007/s00421-016-3450-7pubmed: 27485468google scholar: lookup
  82. Schils SJ, Greer NL, Stoner LJ, Kobluk CN. Kinematic analysis of the equestrian—walk, posting trot and sitting trot. Human Movement Science 1993;12:693–712.
    doi: 10.1016/0167-9457(93)90011-Dgoogle scholar: lookup
  83. Schöllhorn W, Peham C, Licka T, Scheidl M. A pattern recognition approach for the quantification of horse and rider interactions. Equine Veterinary Journal 2006;38:400–405.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2006.tb05576.xpubmed: 17402455google scholar: lookup
  84. Stachurska A, Bartyzel K. Judging dressage competitions in the view of improving horse performance assessment. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A 2011;61:92–102.
    doi: 10.1080/09064702.2011.600323google scholar: lookup
  85. Sung BJ, Jeon SY, Lim SR, Lee KE, Jee H. Equestrian expertise affecting physical fitness, body compositions, lactate, heart rate and calorie consumption of elite horse riding players. Journal of Exercise Rehabilitation 2015;11:175–181.
    doi: 10.12965/jer.150209pmc: PMC4492429pubmed: 26171385google scholar: lookup
  86. Symes D, Ellis R. A preliminary study into rider asymmetry within equitation. The Veterinary Journal 2009;181:34–37.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.03.016pubmed: 19375366google scholar: lookup
  87. Tans E, Nauwelaerts S, Clayton HM. Dressage training affects temporal variables in transitions between trot and halt. Comparative Exercise Physiology 2009;6:89–97.
    doi: 10.1017/S1755254009990158google scholar: lookup
  88. Terada K. Comparison of head movement and EMG activity of muscles between advanced and novice horseback riders at different gaits. Journal of Equine Science 2000;11:83–90.
    doi: 10.1294/jes.11.83google scholar: lookup
  89. Terada K, Clayton HM, Kato K. Stabilization of wrist position during horseback riding at trot. Equine and Comparative Exercise Physiology 2006;3:179–184.
    doi: 10.1017/S1478061506337255google scholar: lookup
  90. Terada K, Mullineaux D, Lanovaz J, Kato K, Clayton H. Electromyographic analysis of the rider’s muscles at trot. Equine and Comparative Exercise Physiology 2004;1:193–198.
    doi: 10.1079/ECP200420google scholar: lookup
  91. Tweedy SM, Beckman EM, Connick MJ. Paralympic classification: conceptual basis, current methods, and research update. PM & R 2014;6:S11–S17.
    doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2014.04.013pubmed: 25134747google scholar: lookup
  92. Tweedy SM, Mann D, Vanlandewijck YC. Research needs for the development of evidence-based systems of classification for physical, vision and intellectual impairments. In: Vanlandewijck YC, Thompson WR, editors. Handbook of sports medicine and science: training and coaching the paralympic athlete. John Wiley & Sons; 2016.
  93. Tweedy SM, Vanlandewijck YC. International Paralympic Committee position stand—background and scientific principles of classification in Paralympic sport. British Journal of Sports Medicine 2011;45:259–269.
    doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2009.065060pubmed: 19850575google scholar: lookup
  94. Von Borstel UK, Glißman C. Alternatives to conventional evaluation of rideability in horse performance tests: suitability of rein tension and behavioural parameters. PLOS ONE 2014;9:e87285.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087285pmc: PMC3906164pubmed: 24489890google scholar: lookup
  95. Von Peinen K, Wiestner T, Bogisch S, Roepstorff L, Van Weeren P, Weishaupt MA. Relationship between the forces acting on the horse’s back and the movements of rider and horse while walking on a treadmill. Equine Veterinary Journal 2009;41:285–291.
    doi: 10.2746/042516409X397136pubmed: 19469237google scholar: lookup
  96. Weishaupt MA, Byström A, Von Peinen K, Wiestner T, Meyer H, Waldern N, Johnston C, Van Weeren R, Roepstorff L. Kinetics and kinematics of the passage. Equine Veterinary Journal 2009;41:263–267.
    doi: 10.2746/042516409X397226pubmed: 19469233google scholar: lookup
  97. Westerling D. A study of physical demands in riding. European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology 1983;50:373–382.
    doi: 10.1007/BF00423243pubmed: 6683161google scholar: lookup
  98. Wolframm IA, Bosga J, Meulenbroek RG. Coordination dynamics in horse-rider dyads. Human Movement Science 2013;32:157–170.
    doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2012.11.002pubmed: 23290116google scholar: lookup
  99. Zadnikar M, Kastrin A. Effects of hippotherapy and therapeutic horseback riding on postural control or balance in children with cerebral palsy: a meta-analysis. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology 2011;53:684–691.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.03951.xpubmed: 21729249google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 11 times.
  1. Laffi L, Bigand F, Peham C, Novembre G, Gamba M, Ravignani A. Rhythmic categories in horse gait kinematics. J Anat 2025 Mar;246(3):456-465.
    doi: 10.1111/joa.14200pubmed: 39814540google scholar: lookup
  2. Clayton HM, MacKechnie-Guire R, Hobbs SJ. Riders' Effects on Horses-Biomechanical Principles with Examples from the Literature. Animals (Basel) 2023 Dec 15;13(24).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13243854pubmed: 38136891google scholar: lookup
  3. Borowska A, Lewczuk D. Comparison of Conformation and Movement Characteristics in Dressage and Jumping Sport Warmblood Mares Based on Point Evaluation and Linear Scoring System. Animals (Basel) 2023 Oct 4;13(19).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13193101pubmed: 37835707google scholar: lookup
  4. Bowen AG, Tabor G, Labens R, Randle H. Visually Assessing Equine Quality of Movement: A Survey to Identify Key Movements and Patient-Specific Measures. Animals (Basel) 2023 Sep 5;13(18).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13182822pubmed: 37760222google scholar: lookup
  5. Hobbs SJ, Alexander J, Wilkins C, St George L, Nankervis K, Sinclair J, Penhorwood G, Williams J, Clayton HM. Towards an Evidence-Based Classification System for Para Dressage: Associations between Impairment and Performance Measures. Animals (Basel) 2023 Aug 31;13(17).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13172785pubmed: 37685049google scholar: lookup
  6. Hobbs SJ, Serra Braganca FM, Rhodin M, Hernlund E, Peterson M, Clayton HM. Evaluating Overall Performance in High-Level Dressage Horse-Rider Combinations by Comparing Measurements from Inertial Sensors with General Impression Scores Awarded by Judges. Animals (Basel) 2023 Aug 2;13(15).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13152496pubmed: 37570304google scholar: lookup
  7. Murray R, Fisher M, Fairfax V, MacKechnie-Guire R. Saddle Thigh Block Design Can Influence Rider and Horse Biomechanics. Animals (Basel) 2023 Jun 27;13(13).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13132127pubmed: 37443924google scholar: lookup
  8. Coelho CS, Silva ASBA, Santos CMR, Santos AMR, Vintem CMBL, Leite AG, Fonseca JMC, Prazeres JMCS, Souza VRC, Siqueira RF, Manso Filho HC, Simões JSA. Training Effects on the Stress Predictors for Young Lusitano Horses Used in Dressage. Animals (Basel) 2022 Dec 6;12(23).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12233436pubmed: 36496958google scholar: lookup
  9. Legg K, Cochrane D, Gee E, Macdermid P, Rogers C. Physiological Demands and Muscle Activity of Jockeys in Trial and Race Riding. Animals (Basel) 2022 Sep 8;12(18).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12182351pubmed: 36139208google scholar: lookup
  10. Hogg RC, Hodgins GA. Symbiosis or Sporting Tool? Competition and the Horse-Rider Relationship in Elite Equestrian Sports. Animals (Basel) 2021 May 10;11(5).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11051352pubmed: 34068606google scholar: lookup
  11. Uldahl M, Christensen JW, Clayton HM. Relationships between the Rider's Pelvic Mobility and Balance on a Gymnastic Ball with Equestrian Skills and Effects on Horse Welfare. Animals (Basel) 2021 Feb 9;11(2).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11020453pubmed: 33572205google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.