Abstract: Castration is the most common surgical procedure in domesticated equids; surgical techniques used and perioperative management vary considerably. Objective: To identify and chart the current evidence on perioperative complications associated with different methods of surgical castration in domesticated equids. Methods: Joanna Briggs Institute systematic scoping review. Methods: CAB Abstracts, Medline and Embase databases were searched using terms related to equine castration complications. Two authors independently and blindly screened publications against eligibility criteria. Data on study methods, perioperative management, surgical techniques, and perioperative complications were extracted. Surgical techniques were grouped into categories depending on technique; open, closed or half-closed, and whether the parietal tunic was open or closed at the end of surgery. Results: The search identified 1871 publications; 71 studies met the final inclusion criteria. The data reported 76 734 castrations, most of which were open or closed, with the vaginal tunic remaining open at the end of surgery. Twenty-five studies reported information regarding surgical techniques and perioperative management, allowing detailed charting and comparisons, of which analgesia and antimicrobial usage varied notably. Eighteen different complications were reported, with swelling or oedema being the most common. Evisceration was most commonly reported in draught breeds and Standardbreds, and the risk appeared low if the parietal tunic was closed at the end of surgery. Conclusions: Grey literature and studies not available in English were not included. Existing studies varied greatly in perioperative management, surgical techniques and reporting of outcomes, making evidence consolidation problematic. Conclusions: A lack of consensus regarding complication definitions creates uncertainty and discrepancies between complication rates associated with different surgical techniques and perioperative management. The implementation of standardised systems for describing surgical techniques and complications is recommended for future studies. A number of studies did not follow current recommendations for perioperative analgesia and use of antimicrobials.
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The research article is a scoping review that investigates the complications associated with different surgical castration methods in domesticated equids (or horses and related animals). This review analyzes how different perioperative management and surgical techniques could potentially contribute to these complications.
Methodology
The researchers carried out a systematic scoping review, adhering to the guidelines of the Joanna Briggs Institute.
Databases such as CAB Abstracts, Medline, and Embase were systematically searched using search terms relating to complications arising from equine castration.
The publications found were screened independently and blindly by two authors against pre-set eligibility criteria. This process ensured bias-free evaluation of the research material.
Data pertaining to study methods, perioperative management techniques, surgical procedures, and any complications occurring perioperatively were meticulously extracted and analyzed.
Findings
From a total of 1871 publications, 71 studies met the final inclusion criteria. These studies collectively reported on 76,734 castrations. The majority involved either open or closed surgical procedures, with the vaginal tunic often left open after surgery.
Among the included studies, 25 provided information on surgical techniques and perioperative management, allowing for detailed comparisons. There was a noticeable variation in analgesia and antimicrobial usage.
The complications reported in these studies were varied, with swelling or edema being the most common. In particular, evisceration was seen mostly in draught breeds and Standardbreds; however, this risk was reduced if the parietal tunic was closed at the conclusion of surgery.
Conclusions
Excluded from this review were non-English papers and those found in the so-called ‘grey literature’, which refers to unpublished or non-commercially published works, which might consist of theses, government reports, and conference papers, etc.
The results from the various studies showed a significant disparity in perioperative management, surgical approaches, and outcome reporting. This situation creates challenges when trying to combine and evaluate the evidence.
The lack of consensus in defining complications creates discrepancies and uncertainties in the complication rates associated with different surgical procedures and perioperative managements.
The researchers have recommended the use of standardized systems to describe surgical methods and complications in future studies to minimize this ambiguity.
The researchers also noticed a lack of adherence to current recommendations regarding perioperative analgesia and the use of antimicrobials in several studies. This needs to be addressed in future research and practice.
Cite This Article
APA
Rodden EBK, Suthers JM, Busschers E, Burford JH, Freeman SL.
(2024).
A scoping review on intraoperative and postoperative surgical castration complications in domesticated equids.
Equine Vet J.
https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.14122
Carmalt JL, Shoemaker RM, Wilson DG. An evaluation of common vaginal tunic ligation during field castration in draft colts.. Proc Am Assoc Equine Pract 2008;40(6):381–382.
Koenig JB, Sinclair M, Sorge US. Comparison of the use of a braided multifilament transfixation suture for field castration with other castration techniques.. Equine Vet Educ 2019;31(8):427–431.
Rosanowski SM, MacEoin F, Graham RJTY, Riggs CM. Open standing castration in Thoroughbred racehorses in Hong Kong: prevalence and severity of complications 30 days post‐castration.. Equine Vet J 2018;50(3):327–332.
Peters MD, Godfrey CM, Khalil H, McInerney P, Parker D, Baldini Soares C. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews.. Int J Evid Based Healthc 2015;13:141–146.
Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework.. Int J Soc Res Methodol 2005;8:19–32.
Armstrong R, Burford B, Doyle J, Waters E. ‘Scoping the scope’ of a Cochrane review.. J Public Health 2011;33:147–150.
Grindlay DJ, Brennan ML, Dean RS. Searching the veterinary literature: a comparison of the coverage of veterinary journals by nine bibliographic databases.. J Vet Med Educ 2012;39:404–412.
Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O'Brien K, Colquhoun H, Kastner M. A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews.. BMC Med Res Methodol 2016;16:15.
Barber SM. Castration of horses with primary closure and scrotal ablation.. Vet Surg 1985;14:2–6.
Barreto RA, Rodrigues LA, Albuquerque JP, deSousa FJ, Firmino PR, Sousa RS. A novel orchiectomy surgical procedure in donkeys (Equus asinus africanus) with parascrotal access.. Pol J Vet Sci 2022;25(2):295–302.
Bergstrom T, Frey M, Rao S, Bass L. Evaluation of long‐acting ceftiofur crystalline free acid as a pre‐operative antibiotic in field castrations.. Proc Am Assoc Equine Pract 2020;459–460.
Haucke K, Kuhn M, Lubke‐Becker A, Mählmann K, Lischer C. Two regimes of perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis for equine castration: clinical findings, acute‐phase proteins, and bacterial cultures.. J Equine Vet 2017;57:86–94.
Petrizzi L, Fürst A, Lischer C. Clinical evaluation of a vessel sealing device (LigaSure™) for haemostasis of the testicular vessels for castration of stallions using an inguinal approach and primary closure.. Wien Tierarztl Monatsschr 2006;93:120–126.
Moll HD, Pelzer KD, Pleasant RS, Modransky PD, May KA. A survey of equine castration complications.. J Equine Vet 1995;15:522–526.
Loyd AF, Husby KA. Surgical correction of chronic penile retroversion through a castration incision in a horse.. Equine Vet Educ 2024;36:e50–e54.
Bergstrom T, Frey M, Rao S, Bass L. Comparison of post‐operative inflammatory response in horses undergoing elective castration treated preoperatively with ceftiofur crystalline free acid or procaine penicillin G.. Equine Vet Educ 2021;34:409–416.
Lesperance R, Lehman R, Lesperance K, Cronk D, Martin M. Early postoperative fever and the “routine”; fever work‐up: results of a prospective study.. J Surg Res 2011;171:245–250.
El‐Khamary AN, El‐Sherif MW. Laparoscopic castration in stallions with two different testicular blood vessels occluding techniques.. J Hell Vet Med Soc 2019;70:1429–1434.
Dalla Costa E, Dai F, Lecchi C, Ambrogi F, Lebelt D, Stucke D. Towards an improved pain assessment in castrated horses using facial expressions (HGS) and circulating miRNAs.. Vet Rec 2021;188(9):e82.
Bratzler DW, Dellinger EP, Olsen KM, Perl TM, Auwaerter PG, Bolon MK. Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery.. Am J Health‐Syst Pharm 2013;70:195–283.
Collignon PC, Conly JM, Andremont A, McEwen SA, Aidara‐Kane A. World Health Organization ranking of antimicrobials according to their importance in human medicine: a critical step for developing risk management strategies to control antimicrobial resistance from food animal production.. Clin Infect Dis 2016;63:1087–1093.
Duggan M, Mair T, Durham A, Pengelly T, Sherlock C. The clinical features and short‐term treatment outcomes of scirrhous cord: a retrospective study of 32 cases.. Equine Vet Educ 2021;33(8):430–435.
Haffner JC, Vidal G, Davis EW. Online survey: evisceration post equine castration with evaluation of independent variables of method, position, and breed.. Proc Am Assoc Equine Pract 2018;64:408–410.
Kian M, Soleimanzadeh A, Javadi S, Najafi G. Efficacy of zinc oxide nanoparticles in chemical castration of male Wistar rats. Sci Rep 2025 Dec 29;15(1):44702.