FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Helminthologia / A Survey of Control Strategies for Equine Small Strongyles i...
Helminthologia2021; 58(3); 225-232; doi: 10.2478/helm-2021-0031

A Survey of Control Strategies for Equine Small Strongyles in Lithuania.

Abstract: Anthelmintic resistance (AR) in equine cyathostomins is being reported all over the world. In Lithuania, however, the last study on this subject was published more than fifteen years ago, thus little is known about the current situation. The aim of this study was to determine the factors that may associated with the development of AR on equine studs in Lithuania. A questionnaire containing seven open-ended and nine closed multiple-choice questions about worm control strategies, use of anthelmintic substances and stable management practices was posted to 71 randomly selected horse establishments in Lithuania. Replies were obtained from a total of 59 stables, representing 83 % of officially established stud farms in Lithuania. The results showed that more than 80 % of these establishments performed pasture management practices such as excrement removal from stables and pasture, 56 % mowed their pasture, 31 % practised mixed or rotational grazing with other species, and 97 % of the horses were routinely dewormed. Macrocyclic lactones (ML) (58 %, n=33) were the most commonly used drugs, followed by benzimidazoles (BZ) (24 %, n=14) and tetrahydropyrimidines (THP) (19 %, n=10). The majority of farms (60 %) treated horses four times per year and 68 % estimated the weight of the horses by eye before treatment. About 36 % of respondents had heard of faecal egg counts (FEC), but only 17 % used the test and as few as 9 % had tested their herds for AR with faecal egg count reduction tests (FECRT). The results demonstrate that there is scope for improving routines for worm control in many horse establishments in Lithuania. In order to increase knowledge and reduce the risk of the spread of AR, diagnostic methods should be adopted in a collaboration between stud farms and veterinary practitioners.
© 2021 E. Dauparaitė, T. Kupčinskas, J. Hoglund, S. Petkevičius, published by Sciendo.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2021-09-30 PubMed ID: 34934386PubMed Central: PMC8647954DOI: 10.2478/helm-2021-0031Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research article explores the current strategies for controlling Small Strongyles (a type of parasitic worm) in horses in Lithuania, given that resistance to anthelmintics (drugs that eliminate parasitic worms) is a growing concern worldwide. The research used a questionnaire to gather information about current practices at horse establishments in Lithuania, underlining a need for enhanced worm control routines and greater knowledge sharing to prevent further drug resistance.

Understanding the Research

  • The researchers’ primary purpose in this study was to gain insight into the factors that may be contributing to anthelmintic resistance in equine cyathostomins (Small Strongyles) in Lithuania. Given the last publication on this topic was over fifteen years prior, current knowledge was lacking.
  • The primary tool for gathering data was a questionnaire, which was sent to 71 random horse establishments across the country. The questionnaire comprised seven open-ended and nine multiple-choice questions that focused on worm control strategies, the use of anthelmintic substances, and general stable management practices.
  • The responders included a total of 59 stables, which represent 83% of all officially established stud farms in Lithuania.

Key Research Findings

  • The data revealed that more than 80% of the participating stables performed pasture management practices that included the removal of fecal matter from stables and pastures. Other practices noted were mowing the pasture (56%), mixed or rotational grazing with other species (31%) and routine deworming (97%).
  • In regards to drugs used for deworming, Macrocyclic lactones (58%) were the most commonly noted, followed by benzimidazoles (24%) and then tetrahydropyrimidines (19%).
  • Most horse establishments (60%) administered treatment four times annually and 68% estimated the weight of their horses visually prior to treatment, which is a critical factor in determining drug dosage.

Awareness and Use of Testing

  • About 36% of the respondents were aware of faecal egg counts (FEC) testing, which is used to gauge the level of parasitic infection in the animals.
  • However, only 17% of the respondents used it, and even fewer (9%) had tested their herds for anthelmintic resistance using the FEC reduction tests (FECRT).

Implications of the Study

  • The authors argued that based on the responses received, there was ample room for improving routines concerning worm control in many horse establishments in Lithuania.
  • To reduce the risk of the spread of drug-resistant parasites, the authors recommend a greater emphasis on diagnostic methods and closer collaboration between stud farms and veterinary practitioners to increase knowledge and support more effective parasitic control efforts.

Cite This Article

APA
Dauparaitė E, Kupčinskas T, Hoglund J, Petkevičius S. (2021). A Survey of Control Strategies for Equine Small Strongyles in Lithuania. Helminthologia, 58(3), 225-232. https://doi.org/10.2478/helm-2021-0031

Publication

Helminthologia
ISSN: 0440-6605
NlmUniqueID: 0043764
Country: Germany
Language: English
Volume: 58
Issue: 3
Pages: 225-232

Researcher Affiliations

Dauparaitė, E
  • Laboratory for Parasitology, Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Veterinary Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Tilzes str. 18, LT-47181 Kaunas, Lithuania.
Kupčinskas, T
  • Laboratory for Parasitology, Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Veterinary Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Tilzes str. 18, LT-47181 Kaunas, Lithuania.
Hoglund, J
  • Department of Biomedical Sciences and Veterinary Public Health, Section for Parasitology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P. O. Box 7063, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden.
Petkevičius, S
  • Laboratory for Parasitology, Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Veterinary Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Tilzes str. 18, LT-47181 Kaunas, Lithuania.

Conflict of Interest Statement

Conflict of Interest Authors state no conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 34 references
  1. Cain JL, Foulk D, Jedrzejewski E, Stofanak H, Nielsen MK. The importance of anthelmintic efficacy monitoring: results of an outreach effort.. Parasitol Res 2019;118(10):2877–2833.
    doi: 10.1007/s00436-019-06423-6pubmed: 31422463google scholar: lookup
  2. Earle CG, Kington HA, Coles GC. Helminth control used by trainers of thoroughbreds in England.. Vet Rec 2002;150(13):405–408.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.150.13.405pubmed: 11999277google scholar: lookup
  3. Elghryani N, Duggan V, Relf V, Waal T. Questionnaire Survey on Helminth Control Practices in Horse Farms in Ireland.. Parasitol 2019;146(7):873–882.
    doi: 10.1017/S0031182019000271doi: 10.21825/vdt.v82i3.16703pubmed: 30975241google scholar: lookup
  4. Herd RP. Control strategies for ruminant and equine parasites to counter resistance, encystment, and ecotoxicity in the USA.. Vet Parasitol 1993;48(1-4):327–336.
    doi: 10.1016/0304-4017(93)90166-kpubmed: 8346646google scholar: lookup
  5. Herd RP, Coles GC. Slowing the spread of anthelmintic resistant nematodes of horses in the United Kingdom.. Vet Rec 1995;136(19):481–485.
    doi: 10.1016/0304-4017(93)90166-kpubmed: 7645183google scholar: lookup
  6. Kaplan RM, Klei TR, Lyons ET, Lester G, Courtney CH, French DD, Toliver SC, Vidyashankar AN, Zhao Y. Prevalence of anthelmintic resistant cyathostomes on horse farms.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2004;225(6):903–910.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.2004.225.903pubmed: 15485051google scholar: lookup
  7. Kooyman FNJ, Doorn DCK, Geurden T, Mughini-Gras L, Ploeger HW, Wagenaar JA. Species composition of larvae cultured after anthelmintic treatment indicates reduced moxidectin susceptibility of immature Cylicocyclus species in horses.. Vet Parasitol 2016;227:77–84.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2016.07.029pubmed: 27523942google scholar: lookup
  8. Lloyd S, Smith J, Connan RM, Hatcher MA, Hedges TR, Humphrey DJ, Jones AC. Parasite control methods used by horse owners: factors predisposing to the development of anthelmintic resistance in nematodes.. Vet Rec 2000;146(17):487–492.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.146.17.487pubmed: 10887995google scholar: lookup
  9. Love S, Murphy D, Melor D. Pathogenicity of cyathostome infection.. Vet Parasitol 1999;85(2-3):113–122.
    doi: 10.1016/S0304-4017(99)00092-8pubmed: 10485358google scholar: lookup
  10. Lyons E, Toliver SC, Colins SS, Ionita M, Kuzmina TA, Rossano M. Field tests demonstrating reduced activity of ivermectin and moxidectin against small strongyles in horses on 14 farms in Central Kentucky in 2007–2009.. Parasitol Res 2011;108(2):355–360.
    doi: 10.1007/s00436-010-2068-7pubmed: 20862493google scholar: lookup
  11. Lyons ET, Toliver SC, Colins SS. Probable reason why small strongyle EPG counts are returning ‘early’ after ivermectin treatment of horses on a farm in Central Kentucky.. Parasitol Res 2009;104(3):569–574.
    doi: 10.1007/s00436-008-1231-xpubmed: 18931857google scholar: lookup
  12. Matthee S, Dreyer FH, Hofmann WA, Van Niekerk FE. An introductory survey of helminth control practices in south africa and anthelmintic resistance on Thoroughbred stud farms in the Western Cape Province.. J S Afr Vet Assoc 2002;73(4):195–200.
    doi: 10.4102/jsava.v73i4.586pubmed: 12665133google scholar: lookup
  13. Matthews JB. Anthelmintic resistance in equine nematodes.. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist 2014;4(3):310–315.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2014.10.003pmc: PMC4266799pubmed: 25516842google scholar: lookup
  14. Nareaho A, Vainio K, Oksanen A. Impaired efficacy of ivermectin against Parascaris equorum, and both ivermectin and pyrantel against strongyle infections in trotter foals in Finland.. Vet Parasitol 2011;182(2-4):372–377.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.05.045pubmed: 21689886google scholar: lookup
  15. Nielsen MK, Fritzen B, Duncan LJ, Guilot JEM, Dorchies P, Laugier C, Beugnet F, Meana A, Lussot-Kervern, IG Von Samson-Himelstjerna. Practical aspects of equine parasite control: A review based upon a workshop discussion consensus.. Equine Vet J 2010b;42(5):460–480.
    doi: 10.1111/j.20423306.2010.00065.xpubmed: 20636785google scholar: lookup
  16. Nielsen MK, Branan MA, Wiedenheft AM, Digianantonio R, Garber LP, Kopral CA, Philipi-Taylor AM, Traub-Dargatz JL. Parasite control strategies used by equine owners in the United States: A national survey.. Vet Parasitol 2018;250:45–51.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2017.12.012pubmed: 29329623google scholar: lookup
  17. Nielsen MK, Pfister K, Von Samson-Himelstjerna G. Selective therapy in equine parasite control – application and limitations.. Vet Parasitol 2014;202(3-4):95–103.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.03.020pubmed: 24702770google scholar: lookup
  18. Nielsen MK, Monrad J, Olsen SN. Prescription-only anthelmintics – a questionnaire survey on strategies for surveillance and control of equine strongyles in Denmark.. Vet Parasitol 2006a;135(1):47–55.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.10.020pubmed: 16309841google scholar: lookup
  19. Nielsen MK, Mittel L, Grice A, Erskine M, Graves E, Vaala W, Tuly RC, French DD, Bowman R, Kaplan RM. AAEP Parasite Control Guidelines.. American Association of Equine Practitioners 2020. 2013a. Accessed 23 September.
  20. Nielsen MK, Branan MA, Wiedenheft AM, Digianantonio R, Scare JA, Belaw JL, Garber LP, Kopral CA, Philipi-Taylor AM, Traub-Dargatz. Anthelmintic efficacy against equine strongyles in the United States.. Vet Parasitol 2018;259:53–60.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2018.07.003pubmed: 30056984google scholar: lookup
  21. Nielsen MK, Haaning N, Olsen SN. Strongyle egg shedding consistency in horses on farms using selective therapy in Denmark.. Vet Parasitol 2006b;135(3-4):333–335.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.09.010pubmed: 16226379google scholar: lookup
  22. O’Meara B, Mulcahy G. A survey of helminth control practices in equine establishments in Ireland.. Vet Parasitol 2002;109(12):101–110.
    doi: 10.1016/S0304-4017(02)00249-2pubmed: 12383629google scholar: lookup
  23. Osterman LE, Rautalinko E, Ugla A, Waler PJ, Morrison DA, Höglund J. Parasite control practices on Swedish horse farms.. Acta Vet Scand 2007;49(1):25.
    doi: 10.1186/1751-014749-25pmc: PMC2093939pubmed: 17897438google scholar: lookup
  24. Papini RA, Bernart FM, Sgorbini M. A Questionnaire Survey on Intestinal Worm Control Practices in Horses in Italy.. Equine Vet Science 2015;35(1):70–75.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2014.11.009google scholar: lookup
  25. Peregrine AS, Molento MB, Kaplan RM, Nielsen MK. Anthelmintic resistance in important parasites of horses: does it really matter?. Vet Parasitol 2014;201(1-2):1–8.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.01.004pubmed: 24485565google scholar: lookup
  26. Ras-Noryska M, Sokol R. Parasite control practices in Polish horse farms.. Med Weter 2017;73(11):683–686.
    doi: 10.21521/mw.5809google scholar: lookup
  27. Relf VE, Morgan ER, Hodgkinson JE, Matthews JB. Helminth egg excretion with regard to age, gender, and management practices on UK Thoroughbred studs.. Parasitology 2013;140(5):641–652.
    doi: 10.1017/S0031182012001941pubmed: 23351718google scholar: lookup
  28. Smith MA, Nolan TJ, Rieger R, Aceto H, Levine DG, Nolen-Walston R, Smith BI. Efficacy of major anthelmintics for reduction of fecal shedding of strongyle-type eggs in horses in the mid-Atlantic region of the United States.. Vet Parasitol 2015;214(12):139–143.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.09.025pubmed: 26518644google scholar: lookup
  29. Stratford CH, Lester HE, Morgan ER, Pickles KJ, Relf V, McGorum BC, Matthews JB. A questionnaire study of equine gastrointestinal parasite control in Scotland.. Equine Vet J 2014;46(1):25–31.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12101pubmed: 23879737google scholar: lookup
  30. Traversa D, Von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Demeler J, Milillo P, Schurmann S, Barnes H, Otranto D, Perrucci S, Di Regalbono AF, Beraldo P, Boeckh A, Cobb R. Anthelmintic resistance in cyathostomin populations from horse yards in Italy, United Kingdom and Germany.. Parasit Vectors 2009;2(Suppl 2):S2.
    doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-2-S2-S2pmc: PMC2751838pubmed: 19778463google scholar: lookup
  31. Uhlinger C. Equine small strongyles: epidemiology, pathology, and control.. Comp Cont Educ Vet Pract 1991;13(5):863–869.
    doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-2-S2-S1google scholar: lookup
  32. Von Samson-Himmelstjerna G. Anthelmintic resistance in equine para-sites–detection, potential clinical relevance and implications for control.. Vet Parasitol 2012;185(1):2–5.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.10.010pubmed: 22100141google scholar: lookup
  33. Von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Traversa D, Demeler J, Rohn K, Milillo P, Schurmann S, Lia R, Perrucci S, Di Regalbono AF, Beraldo P, Barnes H, Cobb R, Boeckh A. Effects of worm control practices examined by a combined faecal egg count and questionnaire survey on horse farms in Germany, Italy and the UK.. Parasit Vectors 2009;2(Suppl 2):S3.
    doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-2-S2-S3pmc: PMC2751839pubmed: 19778464google scholar: lookup
  34. Wilkes EJA, Heller J, Raidal SL, Woodgate RG, Hughes KJ. A questionnaire study of parasite control in Thoroughbred and Standardbred horses in Australia.. Equine Vet J 2019;52(4):547–555.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13207pubmed: 31725925google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 2 times.
  1. Ullah A, Geng M, Chen W, Zhu Q, Shi L, Zhang X, Akhtar MF, Wang C, Khan MZ. Effect of Parasitic Infections on Hematological Profile, Reproductive and Productive Performance in Equines. Animals (Basel) 2025 Nov 14;15(22).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15223294pubmed: 41302002google scholar: lookup
  2. Dauparaitė E, Kupčinskas T, Varady M, Petkevičius S. Anthelmintic resistance of horse strongyle nematodes to fenbendazole in Lithuania. Acta Vet Scand 2022 Sep 15;64(1):26.
    doi: 10.1186/s13028-022-00645-ypubmed: 36109767google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,383 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.