Analyze Diet
Veterinary parasitology2002; 109(1-2); 101-110; doi: 10.1016/s0304-4017(02)00249-2

A survey of helminth control practices in equine establishments in Ireland.

Abstract: We report the results of a survey to assess the attitudes of horse owners and managers of equine businesses in Ireland to the control of helminth parasites, and the extent to which veterinary practitioners are involved in providing advice on parasite control of horses. Replies to our questionnaire indicated that there is a high level of awareness on the need for helminth control, typically leading to several doses of anthelmintic being administered to each animal every year. While a majority of respondents (61%) were concerned about the issue of anthelmintic resistance, only a few were of the opinion that it was a problem on their establishment. Measures to minimise the development of resistance, such as decreasing the frequency of dosing, optimising non-drug-based control strategies and assessing the need for dosing by faecal egg counts (FECs), were not widely employed in a strategic manner. Just over half (54%) of respondents indicated that they devised worming control programmes based on veterinary advice, and a large majority did not perceive any need for modification of their current worm control programmes. We concluded that there is considerable scope for increased veterinary involvement in the design and implementation of control programmes for helminths in horses, and that veterinarians do not always provide advice in accordance with "best practice" in helminth control.
Publication Date: 2002-10-18 PubMed ID: 12383629DOI: 10.1016/s0304-4017(02)00249-2Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research paper discusses a survey on helminth control practices among horse owners and operators of equine establishments in Ireland. The study reveals that while there’s a strong awareness of the need for controlling these parasites, few owners employ sufficient measures to resist their development, which could be improved with more tailored advice from veterinary professionals.

Survey Overview and Findings

The researchers conducted a survey to evaluate attitudes towards helminth control, a crucial health issue in horses, from horse owners and business operators in Ireland. They focused on how these individuals approach helminth control and the degree of involvement of veterinarians in advising on this matter. Key findings from the survey included:

  • A high awareness level among respondents about the need for helminth control, often resulting in the regular administration of anthelmintic doses to horses yearly.
  • A majority (61%) of the respondents acknowledged concerns over anthelmintic resistance, but only a few believed it was a problem where their horses were housed.
  • Despite these concerns, strategies to limit resistance development, such as reducing dosing frequency, employing non-drug-based control techniques, and using faecal egg counts (FECs) to determine dosing necessity, were not strategically utilized.

Role of Veterinarians in Parasite Control

The survey also looked at the involvement of veterinary practitioners in shaping the strategies for controlling equine helminth. Findings in this aspect include:

  • 54% of respondents follow worming control strategies stemming from veterinary advice. Despite this, a significant majority did not see the need to revise their current worm control procedures.
  • This suggests a need for increased veterinary involvement in developing and implementing helminth control programs for horses. Educating horse owners on ‘best practices’ could help manage the problem better.

Conclusion

The paper concludes that a substantial scope exists for increased veterinary contribution in equine helminth control. This additional input could lead to strategies better designed to manage helminth resistance development and ultimately maintain better horse health. The study also indicates the need for improvement in the way veterinarians provide advice to align more closely with best practices in helminth control.

Cite This Article

APA
O'Meara B, Mulcahy G. (2002). A survey of helminth control practices in equine establishments in Ireland. Vet Parasitol, 109(1-2), 101-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-4017(02)00249-2

Publication

ISSN: 0304-4017
NlmUniqueID: 7602745
Country: Netherlands
Language: English
Volume: 109
Issue: 1-2
Pages: 101-110

Researcher Affiliations

O'Meara, Bryan
  • Department of Veterinary Parasitology and Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Mulcahy, Grace

    MeSH Terms

    • Animal Husbandry
    • Animals
    • Anthelmintics / administration & dosage
    • Anthelmintics / therapeutic use
    • Drug Administration Schedule / veterinary
    • Drug Resistance
    • Drug Utilization / statistics & numerical data
    • Feces / parasitology
    • Health Surveys
    • Helminthiasis, Animal / drug therapy
    • Helminthiasis, Animal / prevention & control
    • Horse Diseases / drug therapy
    • Horse Diseases / parasitology
    • Horse Diseases / prevention & control
    • Horses / parasitology
    • Ireland
    • Parasite Egg Count
    • Risk Factors
    • Surveys and Questionnaires

    Citations

    This article has been cited 16 times.
    1. Elghryani N, Lawlor A, McOwan T, de Waal T. Unravelling the Effectiveness of Anthelmintic Treatments on Equine Strongyles on Irish Farms. Animals (Basel) 2024 Jul 2;14(13).
      doi: 10.3390/ani14131958pubmed: 38998069google scholar: lookup
    2. Nielsen MK, Slusarewicz P, Kuzmina TA, Denwood MJ. US-wide equine strongylid egg count data demonstrate seasonal and regional trends. Parasitology 2024 May;151(6):579-586.
      doi: 10.1017/S0031182024000489pubmed: 38629125google scholar: lookup
    3. Abbas G, Stevenson MA, Bauquier J, Beasley A, Jacobson C, El-Hage C, Wilkes EJA, Carrigan P, Cudmore L, Hurley J, Beveridge I, Nielsen MK, Hughes KJ, Jabbar A. Assessment of worm control practices recommended by equine veterinarians in Australia. Front Vet Sci 2023;10:1305360.
      doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1305360pubmed: 38026649google scholar: lookup
    4. Nielsen MK. Anthelmintic resistance in equine nematodes: Current status and emerging trends. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist 2022 Dec;20:76-88.
      doi: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2022.10.005pubmed: 36342004google scholar: lookup
    5. Dauparaitė E, Kupčinskas T, Hoglund J, Petkevičius S. A Survey of Control Strategies for Equine Small Strongyles in Lithuania. Helminthologia 2021 Sep;58(3):225-232.
      doi: 10.2478/helm-2021-0031pubmed: 34934386google scholar: lookup
    6. Forteau L, Dumont B, Sallé G, Bigot G, Fleurance G. Horses grazing with cattle have reduced strongyle egg count due to the dilution effect and increased reliance on macrocyclic lactones in mixed farms. Animal 2020 May;14(5):1076-1082.
      doi: 10.1017/S1751731119002738pubmed: 31679547google scholar: lookup
    7. Rowland M, Coombs T, Connor M. A Study of Traveller Horse Owners' Attitudes to Horse Care and Welfare Using an Equine Body Condition Scoring System. Animals (Basel) 2019 Apr 12;9(4).
      doi: 10.3390/ani9040162pubmed: 31013846google scholar: lookup
    8. Sallé G, Cortet J, Bois I, Dubès C, Guyot-Sionest Q, Larrieu C, Landrin V, Majorel G, Wittreck S, Woringer E, Couroucé A, Guillot J, Jacquiet P, Guégnard F, Blanchard A, Leblond A. Risk factor analysis of equine strongyle resistance to anthelmintics. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist 2017 Dec;7(3):407-415.
      doi: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2017.10.007pubmed: 29149701google scholar: lookup
    9. Kaspar A, Pfister K, Nielsen MK, Silaghi C, Fink H, Scheuerle MC. Detection of Strongylus vulgaris in equine faecal samples by real-time PCR and larval culture - method comparison and occurrence assessment. BMC Vet Res 2017 Jan 11;13(1):19.
      doi: 10.1186/s12917-016-0918-ypubmed: 28077153google scholar: lookup
    10. Sallé G, Cabaret J. A survey on parasite management by equine veterinarians highlights the need for a regulation change. Vet Rec Open 2015;2(2):e000104.
      doi: 10.1136/vetreco-2014-000104pubmed: 26421153google scholar: lookup
    11. Fischer JK, Hinney B, Denwood MJ, Traversa D, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Clausen PH. Efficacy of selected anthelmintic drugs against cyathostomins in horses in the federal state of Brandenburg, Germany. Parasitol Res 2015 Dec;114(12):4441-50.
      doi: 10.1007/s00436-015-4685-7pubmed: 26337266google scholar: lookup
    12. Matto TN, Bharkad GP, Bhat SA. Prevalence of gastrointestinal helminth parasites of equids from organized farms of Mumbai and Pune. J Parasit Dis 2015 Jun;39(2):179-85.
      doi: 10.1007/s12639-013-0315-4pubmed: 26063996google scholar: lookup
    13. Hinney B, Wirtherle NC, Kyule M, Miethe N, Zessin KH, Clausen PH. A questionnaire survey on helminth control on horse farms in Brandenburg, Germany and the assessment of risks caused by different kinds of management. Parasitol Res 2011 Dec;109(6):1625-35.
      doi: 10.1007/s00436-011-2434-0pubmed: 21559764google scholar: lookup
    14. Francisco I, Arias M, Cortiñas FJ, Francisco R, Mochales E, Dacal V, Suárez JL, Uriarte J, Morrondo P, Sánchez-Andrade R, Díez-Baños P, Paz-Silva A. Intrinsic Factors Influencing the Infection by Helminth Parasites in Horses under an Oceanic Climate Area (NW Spain). J Parasitol Res 2009;2009.
      doi: 10.1155/2009/616173pubmed: 20721327google scholar: lookup
    15. Nielsen MK. Restrictions of anthelmintic usage: perspectives and potential consequences. Parasit Vectors 2009 Sep 25;2 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S7.
      doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-2-S2-S7pubmed: 19778468google scholar: lookup
    16. Lind EO, Rautalinko E, Uggla A, Waller PJ, Morrison DA, Höglund J. Parasite control practices on Swedish horse farms. Acta Vet Scand 2007 Sep 26;49(1):25.
      doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-49-25pubmed: 17897438google scholar: lookup