FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 10000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Frontiers in veterinary science2021; 8; 701339; doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.701339

Agreement of Bioreactance Cardiac Output Monitoring With Thermodilution in Healthy Standing Horses.

Abstract: Bioreactance is the continuous analysis of transthoracic voltage variation in response to an applied high frequency transthoracic current and was recently introduced for non-invasive cardiac output measurement (NICOM). We evaluated NICOM compared to thermodilution (TD) in adult horses. Six healthy horses were used for this prospective, blinded, experimental study. Cardiac output (CO) measurements were performed simultaneously using TD and the bioreactance method. Different cardiac output scenarios were established using xylazine (0.5 mg/kg IV) and dobutamine (1.5-3 mcg/kg/min). Statistical analysis was performed by calculating the concordance rate, performing a regression analysis, Pearson correlation, and Bland Altman. The TD-based CO and NICOM values were highly correlated for low, normal and high CO values with an overall correlation coefficient. A 4-quadrant plot showed an 89% rate of concordance. The linear regression calculated a relationship between NICOM and TDCO of Y = 0.4874 · X + 0.5936. For the corrected Bland Altman agreement, the mean bias and lower/upper limits of agreement were -0.26 and -3.88 to 3.41 L/min, respectively. Compared to TD, bioreactance- based NICOM showed good accuracy at induced low, normal, and high CO states in normal horses. Future studies performed under more clinical conditions will show if this monitor can help to assess hemodynamic status and guide therapy in horses in ICU settings and under general anesthesia.
Copyright © 2021 Hopster and Hurcombe.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2021-08-03 PubMed ID: 34414227PubMed Central: PMC8369349DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2021.701339Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research article investigates the effectiveness of bioreactance for cardiac output measurement in healthy horses. It compares this new, non-invasive method to thermodilution, the standard technique, concluding that bioreactance displayed a good accuracy across different cardiac output scenarios.

Introduction

The study launched into a new field of cardiac output (CO) monitoring in adult horses, utilizing the modern technique of bioreactance. Bioreactance observes the changes in voltage across the chest in response to a high-frequency current. This method was tested against the traditional thermodilution (TD) approach.

  • Bioreactance-based cardiac output monitoring, also known as NICOM, is a non-invasive method that provides continuous data.
  • Thermodilution is an invasive technique that has been considered the standard practice for CO measurement.

Method

The researchers involved six healthy adult horses in a controlled, blinded, experimental study.

  • CO measurements were simultaneously acquired using the new bioreactance method and the traditional thermodilution method.
  • Different cardiac output scenarios were artificially induced using xylazine and dobutamine, driving low, normal, and high CO states.

Analysis

A range of statistical analyses were deployed to assess the relationship and concordance between the NICOM and TD measurements.

  • Correlation between the NICOM and TD measurement was determined through Pearson correlation.
  • Concordance of the two measurement techniques was assessed by calculating the concordance rate and viewing a 4-quadrant plot.
  • Bland Altman agreement was used to understand the mean bias and the lower and upper limits of agreement between these two methods.

Results

The data revealed a high correlation between the TD and NICOM results, supporting the accuracy of the bioreactance technique.

  • The correlation coefficient suggested sound agreement between the methods across low, normal, and high CO conditions.
  • The 4-quadrant plot revealed an 89% rate of concordance, further validating the use of bioreactance for CO measurement.
  • The regression analysis provided a relationship between NICOM and TD measurements, with a productive formula-yield.
  • The Bland Altman agreement suggested a minimal average discrepancy and acceptable limits between the methods.

Conclusions

The study concluded that bioreactance-based NICOM provides accuracy comparable to TD in measuring CO at different levels in healthy horses. However, the authors also recommended further investigation under more clinical conditions to determine its utility and accuracy in more complex scenarios and settings, like intensive care units and during general anesthesia.

Cite This Article

APA
Hopster K, Hurcombe SDA. (2021). Agreement of Bioreactance Cardiac Output Monitoring With Thermodilution in Healthy Standing Horses. Front Vet Sci, 8, 701339. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.701339

Publication

Frontiers in veterinary science
ISSN: 2297-1769
NlmUniqueID: 101666658
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 8
Pages: 701339

Researcher Affiliations

Hopster, Klaus
  • Department of Clinical Studies, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Hurcombe, Samuel D A
  • Department of Clinical Studies, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 33 references
  1. Shih AC. Cardiac output monitoring in horses. Vet Clin North Am: Equine Prac (2013) 29:155–67.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2012.11.002pubmed: 23498050google scholar: lookup
  2. Fegler G. Measurement of cardiac output in anaesthetized animals by a thermodilution method. Quart J Exp Phys Cogn Med Sci (1954) 39:153–64.
    doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.1954.sp001067pubmed: 13194838google scholar: lookup
  3. Sandham JD, Hull RD, Brant RF, Knox L, Pineo GF, Doig CJ. A randomized, controlled trial of the use of pulmonary-artery catheters in high-risk surgical patients. N Engl J Med (2003) 348:5–14.
    doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa021108pubmed: 12510037google scholar: lookup
  4. Connors AF Jr, Speroff T, Dawson NV, Thomas C, Harrell FE Jr, Wagner D. The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients. JAMA (1996) 276:889–97.
    doi: 10.1001/jama.276.11.889pubmed: 8782638google scholar: lookup
  5. Vigani A, Shih A, Queiroz P, Pariaut R, Gabrielli A, Thuramalla N. Quantitative response of volumetric variables measured by a new ultrasound dilution method in a juvenile model of hemorrhagic shock and resuscitation. Resusc (2012) 83:1031–7.
    doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.01.014pubmed: 22281224google scholar: lookup
  6. Shih AC, Giguere S, Sanchez LC, Valverde A, Jankunas HJ, Robertson SA. Determination of cardiac output in anesthetized neonatal foals by use of two pulse wave analysis methods. Am J Vet Res (2009) 70:334–9.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.70.3.334pubmed: 19254144google scholar: lookup
  7. Hopster K, Ambrisko TD, Stahl J, Schramel JP, Kästner SB. Influence of xylazine on the function of the LiDCO sensor in isoflurane anaesthetized horses. Vet Anaesth Analg (2015) 42:142–9.
    doi: 10.1111/vaa.12181pubmed: 24890704google scholar: lookup
  8. Moshkovitz Y, Kaluski E, Milo O, Vered Z, Cotter G. Recent developments in cardiac output determination by bioimpedance; comparisonwith invasive cardiac output and potential cardiovascular applications. Curr Opin Cardiol (2004) 19:229–37.
    doi: 10.1097/00001573-200405000-00008pubmed: 15096956google scholar: lookup
  9. Hoffman GM, Ghanayem NS, Tweddell JS. Non-invasive assessment of cardiac output. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu (2005) 12:12–21.
    doi: 10.1053/j.pcsu.2005.01.005pubmed: 15818353google scholar: lookup
  10. Barin E, Haryadi DG, Schookin SI. Evaluation of a thoracic bioimpedance cardiac output monitor during cardiac catheterization. Crit Care Med (2000) 28:698–702.
    doi: 10.1097/00003246-200003000-00016pubmed: 10752817google scholar: lookup
  11. Lorne E, Mahjoub Y, Diouf M, Sleghem J, Buchalet C, Guinot PG. Accuracy of impedance cardiography for evaluating trends in cardiac output: a comparison with oesophageal Doppler. Br J Anaesth (2014) 113:596–602.
    doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu136pubmed: 24871872google scholar: lookup
  12. Schmidt C, Theilmeier H, Van Aken H, Korsmeier P, Wirtz SP, Berendes E. Comparison of electrical velocimetry and transoesophageal Doppler echocardiography for measuring stroke volume and cardiac output. Br J Anaesth (2005) 95:603–10.
    doi: 10.1093/bja/aei224pubmed: 16155037google scholar: lookup
  13. Packer M, Abraham WT, Mehra MR, Yancy CW, Lawless CE, Mitchell JE. Utility of impedance cardiography for the identification of short-term risk of clinical decompensation in stable patients with chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol (2006) 47:2245–52.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.12.071pubmed: 16750691google scholar: lookup
  14. Engoren M, Baebee D. Comparison of cardiac output determined by bioimpedance, thermodilution, and the Fick method. Am J Crit Care (2005) 14:40–5.
    doi: 10.4037/ajcc2005.14.1.40pubmed: 15608107google scholar: lookup
  15. Keren H, Burkhoff D, Squara P. Evaluation of a non-invasive continuous cardiac output monitoring system based on thoracic bioreactance. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol (2007) 293:H583–9.
    doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00195.2007pubmed: 17384132google scholar: lookup
  16. Raval NY, Squara P, Cleman M, Yalamanchili K, Winklmaier M, Burkhoff D. Multicenter evaluation of non-invasive cardiac output measurement by bioreactance technique. J Clin Monit Comput (2008) 16:113–9.
    doi: 10.1007/s10877-008-9112-5pubmed: 18340540google scholar: lookup
  17. Maurer MM, Burkhoff D, Maybaum S, Franco V, Vittorio TJ, Williams P. A multicenter study of non-invasive cardiac output by bioreactance during symptom-limited exercise. J Cardiac Fail (2009) 15:689–99.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2009.04.005pubmed: 19786258google scholar: lookup
  18. Marque S, Cariou A, Chiche JD, Squara P. Comparison between Flotrac-Vigileo and bioreactance, a totally non-invasive method for cardiac output monitoring. Crit Care (2009) 16:R73.
    doi: 10.1186/cc7884pmc: PMC2717435pubmed: 19454009google scholar: lookup
  19. Benomar B, Ouattara A, Estagnasie P, Brusset A, Squara P. Fluid responsiveness predicted by non-invasive bioreactance-based passive leg raise test. Intensive Care Med (2010) 16:1875–81.
    doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-1990-6pubmed: 20665001google scholar: lookup
  20. Heerdt PM, Wagner CL, DeMais M, Savarese JJ. Non-invasive cardiac output monitoring with bioreactance as an alternative to invasive instrumentation for preclinical drug evaluation in beagles. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods (2011) 64:111–8.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vascn.2011.03.006pubmed: 21440649google scholar: lookup
  21. Kupersztych-Hagege E, Teboul JL, Artigas A, Talbot A, Sabatier C, Richard C. Bioreactance is not reliable for estimating cardiac output and the effects of passive leg raising in critically ill patients. Br J Anaesth (2013) 111:961–6.
    doi: 10.1093/bja/aet282pubmed: 23985531google scholar: lookup
  22. Denman WT, Hutchison C, Levy B. Bioreactance is not reliable for estimating cardiac output and the effects of passive leg raising in critically ill patients. Br J Anaesth (2014) 112:943–4.
    doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu122pubmed: 24771790google scholar: lookup
  23. Buchbinder N, Ganz W. Hemodynamic monitoring: invasive techniques. Anesthesiology (1976) 45:146–55.
    doi: 10.1097/00000542-197608000-00005pubmed: 779528google scholar: lookup
  24. Bland JM, Altman DG. Agreement between methods of measurement with multiple observations per individual. J Biopharm Stat (2007) 17:571–82.
    doi: 10.1080/10543400701329422pubmed: 17613642google scholar: lookup
  25. Critchley LA, Lee A, Ho AM. A critical review of the ability of continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output. Anesth Analg (2010) 111:1180–92.
    doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181f08a5bpubmed: 20736431google scholar: lookup
  26. Squara P, Rotcajg D, Denjean D, Estagnasie P, Brusset A. Comparison of monitoring performance of Bioreactance vs. pulse contour during lung recruitment maneuvers. Crit Care (2009) 13:R125.
    doi: 10.1186/cc7981pmc: PMC2750178pubmed: 19638227google scholar: lookup
  27. Vera L, Campos Arias D, Muylle S, Stergiopulos N, Segers P, Van Loon G. Correction: a 1D computer model of the arterial circulation in horses: an important resource for studying global interactions between heart and vessels under normal and pathological conditions. PLoS ONE (2009) 14:e0225396.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225396pmc: PMC6703698pubmed: 31433827google scholar: lookup
  28. Barone R, Tome S. Angiologie. Anatomie Comparée des Mammifères Domestiques T5 (2011) p. 31–49.
  29. Poole DC, Erickson HH. Highly athletic terrestrial mammals: horses and dogs. Comprehens Physiol (2011) 1:1–37.
    doi: 10.1002/cphy.c091001pubmed: 23737162google scholar: lookup
  30. Yamashita K, Tsubakishita S, Futaok S, Ueda I, Hamaguchi H, Seno T. Cardiovascular effects of medetomidine, detomidine, and xylazine in horses. J Vet Med Sci (2000) 62:1025–32.
    doi: 10.1292/jvms.62.1025pubmed: 11073071google scholar: lookup
  31. Young LE, Blissitt KJ, Clutton RE, Molony V. Temporal effects of an infusion of dobutamine hydrochloride in horses anesthetized with halothane. Am J Vet Res (1998) 59:1027–32.
    pubmed: 9706208
  32. Ohta M, Kurimoto S, Ishikawa Y, Tokushige H, Mae N, Nagata S. Cardiovascular effects of dobutamine and phenylephrine infusion in sevoflurane-anesthetized thoroughbred horses. J Vet Med Sci (2013) 75:1443–8.
    doi: 10.1292/jvms.13-0104pmc: PMC3942978pubmed: 23832627google scholar: lookup
  33. Meier M, Bettschart-Wolfensberger R, Schwarzwald CC, Portier K, Gysler A, Ringer SK. Effects of dobutamine on cardiovascular function and oxygen delivery in standing horses. J Vet Pharmacol Therap (2020) 43:470–6.
    doi: 10.1111/jvp.12869pubmed: 32333680google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 1 times.
  1. Gorenberg EB, Slack J, Stefanovski D, Theiss D, Hopster K. Dobutamine improves haemodynamics and oxygen delivery in standing and isoflurane-anaesthetised horses. Equine Vet J 2025 Nov;57(6):1677-1689.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.14488pubmed: 40052197google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,824 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.