FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / PeerJ / An exploration of the influence of diagonal dissociation and...
PeerJ2016; 4; e2190; doi: 10.7717/peerj.2190

An exploration of the influence of diagonal dissociation and moderate changes in speed on locomotor parameters in trotting horses.

Abstract: Background. Although the trot is described as a diagonal gait, contacts of the diagonal pairs of hooves are not usually perfectly synchronized. Although subtle, the timing dissociation between contacts of each diagonal pair could have consequences on gait dynamics and provide insight into the functional strategies employed. This study explores the mechanical effects of different diagonal dissociation patterns when speed was matched between individuals and how these effects link to moderate, natural changes in trotting speed. We anticipate that hind-first diagonal dissociation at contact increases with speed, diagonal dissociation at contact can reduce collision-based energy losses and predominant dissociation patterns will be evident within individuals. Methods. The study was performed in two parts: in the first 17 horses performed speed-matched trotting trials and in the second, five horses each performed 10 trotting trials that represented a range of individually preferred speeds. Standard motion capture provided kinematic data that were synchronized with ground reaction force (GRF) data from a series of force plates. The data were analyzed further to determine temporal, speed, GRF, postural, mass distribution, moment, and collision dynamics parameters. Results. Fore-first, synchronous, and hind-first dissociations were found in horses trotting at (3.3 m/s ± 10%). In these speed-matched trials, mean centre of pressure (COP) cranio-caudal location differed significantly between the three dissociation categories. The COP moved systematically and significantly (P = .001) from being more caudally located in hind-first dissociation (mean location = 0.41 ± 0.04) through synchronous (0.36 ± 0.02) to a more cranial location in fore-first dissociation (0.32 ± 0.02). Dissociation patterns were found to influence function, posture, and balance parameters. Over a moderate speed range, peak vertical forelimb GRF had a strong relationship with dissociation time (R = .594; P < .01) and speed (R = .789; P 0.05) or speed (R = .223; P = .023). Discussion. The results indicate that at moderate speeds individual horses use dissociation patterns that allow them to maintain trunk pitch stability through management of the cranio-caudal location of the COP. During the hoof-ground collisions, reduced mechanical energy losses were found in hind-first dissociations compared to fully synchronous contacts. As speed increased, only forelimb vertical peak force increased so dissociations tended towards hind-first, which shifted the net COP caudally and balanced trunk pitching moments.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2016-06-30 PubMed ID: 27413640PubMed Central: PMC4933092DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2190Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research explores the impact of varying timing between pairs of diagonal hoof contacts during the trot gait of horses. It reveals that even slight changes in this timing can affect the animal’s dynamic movement and balance. The study also examines how these patterns change with different trotting speeds.

Research Methodology

  • The research was carried out in two parts. In the first, 17 horses were observed performing trotting trials at speed-matched levels. In the second phase, a subset of five horses completed multiple trotting trials at a range of individually preferred speeds.
  • The experiment utilized standard motion capture techniques to collect kinematic data. This data was synchronized with ground reaction force (GRF) measurements gathered by a series of force plates.
  • Analyzed data included parameters like temporal, speed, GRF, postural, mass distribution, moment, and collision dynamics.

Results and Findings

  • The study found that horses demonstrated fore-first, synchronous, and hind-first dissociation patterns when trotting at speeds matched to 3.3 m/s ± 10%.
  • Mean centre of pressure (COP) cranio-caudal location varied significantly between the dissociation categories. COP shifted considerably, moving more caudal in hind-first dissociation, to a more cranial location in fore-first dissociation.
  • Variations in dissociation patterns were found to influence the horses’ function, posture, and balance.
  • There was a strong relationship between the peak vertical forelimb GRF and dissociation time and speed. However, the association was not significant for the peak vertical hindlimb GRF over a moderate speed range.

Discussion and Implications

  • The study shows that individual horses adopt dissociation patterns that enhance their stability by managing the cranio-caudal location of the COP, particularly at moderate speeds.
  • In terms of energy efficiency, the research found reduced mechanical energy losses in hooves’ hind-first dissociation compared to fully synchronous contacts.
  • As speed increased, horses tended to use a hind-first dissociation pattern, which prompted the net COP to shift caudally, thus balancing out trunk pitching moments.

Cite This Article

APA
Hobbs SJ, Bertram JE, Clayton HM. (2016). An exploration of the influence of diagonal dissociation and moderate changes in speed on locomotor parameters in trotting horses. PeerJ, 4, e2190. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2190

Publication

PeerJ
ISSN: 2167-8359
NlmUniqueID: 101603425
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 4
Pages: e2190
PII: e2190

Researcher Affiliations

Hobbs, Sarah Jane
  • Centre for Applied Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Central Lancashire , Preston , Lancashire , United Kingdom.
Bertram, John E A
  • Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary , Calgary , Alberta , Canada.
Clayton, Hilary M
  • Sport Horse Science , LC , MI , United States.

Conflict of Interest Statement

Hilary M. Clayton is President of Sport Horse Science, LC, Michigan and Sport Horse Publications. The authors declare there are no competing interests.

References

This article includes 41 references
  1. Alexander RM. The gaits of bipedal and quadrupedal animals. International Journal of Robotics Research 1984;3:49–59.
    doi: 10.1177/027836498400300205google scholar: lookup
  2. Alexander RM. Stability and manoeuvrability of terrestrial vertebrates.. Integr Comp Biol 2002 Feb;42(1):158-64.
    doi: 10.1093/icb/42.1.158pubmed: 21708705google scholar: lookup
  3. American Association of Equine Practitioners Guide for veterinary service and judging of equestrian events. 4th edition. American Association of Equine Practitioners; Lexington: 1991. p. 19.
  4. Back W, MacAllister CG, Van Heel MCG, Pollmeier M, Hanson PD. Vertical frontlimb ground reaction forces of sound and lame Warmbloods differ from those in Quarter Horses. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 2007;27(3):123–129.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2007.01.007google scholar: lookup
  5. Bertram JE. Gait as solution, but what is the problem? Exploring cost, economy and compromise in locomotion.. Vet J 2013 Dec;198 Suppl 1:e3-8.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.09.025pubmed: 24149060google scholar: lookup
  6. Bertram JE, Gutmann A. Motions of the running horse and cheetah revisited: fundamental mechanics of the transverse and rotary gallop.. J R Soc Interface 2009 Jun 6;6(35):549-59.
    doi: 10.1098/rsif.2008.0328pmc: PMC2696142pubmed: 18854295google scholar: lookup
  7. Bertram JE, Lee DV, Case HN, Todhunter RJ. Comparison of the trotting gaits of Labrador Retrievers and Greyhounds.. Am J Vet Res 2000 Jul;61(7):832-8.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2000.61.832pubmed: 10895909google scholar: lookup
  8. Buchner HH, Obermüller S, Scheidl M. Body centre of mass movement in the sound horse.. Vet J 2000 Nov;160(3):225-34.
    doi: 10.1053/tvjl.2000.0507pubmed: 11061959google scholar: lookup
  9. Buchner H, Savelberg H, Schamhardt HC, Barneveld A. Temporal stride patterns in horses with experimentally induced fore- and hindlimb lameness. Equine Veterinary Journal Supplement 1995;18:161–165.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1995.tb04911.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  10. Cappello A, Cappozzo A, La Palombara PF, Lucchetti L, Leardini A. Multiple anatomical landmark calibration for optimal bone pose estimation. Human Movement Science 1997;16:259–274.
    doi: 10.1016/S0167-9457(96)00055-3google scholar: lookup
  11. Clayton HM. Comparison of the stride kinematics of the collected, working, medium and extended trot in horses.. Equine Vet J 1994 May;26(3):230-4.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1994.tb04375.xpubmed: 8542844google scholar: lookup
  12. Crevier-Denoix N, Camus M, Pourcelot P, Pauchard M, Falala S, Ravary-Plumioen B, Denoix J, Desquilbet L, Chateau H. Effect of speed on stride parameters and limb loading: comparison between forelimb and hindlimb at training trot on a firm surface. AbstractEquine Veterinary Journal Supplement 2014;46:38.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12267_115google scholar: lookup
  13. Deuel NR, Park JJ. The gait patterns of Olympic dressage horses. International Journal of Sports Biomechanics 1990;6:198–226.
  14. Drevemo S, Dalin G, Fredricson I, Hjertén G. Equine locomotion; 1. The analysis of linear and temporal stride characteristics of trotting standardbreds.. Equine Vet J 1980 Apr;12(2):60-5.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1980.tb02310.xpubmed: 7371611google scholar: lookup
  15. Dunbar DC, Macpherson JM, Simmons RW, Zarcades A. Stabilization and mobility of the head, neck and trunk in horses during overground locomotion: comparisons with humans and other primates.. J Exp Biol 2008 Dec;211(Pt 24):3889-907.
    doi: 10.1242/jeb.020578pmc: PMC2768006pubmed: 19043061google scholar: lookup
  16. Dutto DJ, Hoyt DF, Cogger EA, Wickler SJ. Ground reaction forces in horses trotting up an incline and on the level over a range of speeds.. J Exp Biol 2004 Sep;207(Pt 20):3507-14.
    doi: 10.1242/jeb.01171pubmed: 15339946google scholar: lookup
  17. Fédération Equestre Internationale . Dressage rules. Lausanne: Federation Equestre Internationale; 2016. Passage; p. 22.
  18. Fletcher G, Romanov NS, Bartlett RM. Pose® method technique improves running performance without economy changes. International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching 2008;3:365–380.
    doi: 10.1260/174795408786238506google scholar: lookup
  19. Gellman KS, Bertram JE, Hermanson JW. Morphology, histochemistry, and function of epaxial cervical musculature in the horse (Equus caballus).. J Morphol 2002 Feb;251(2):182-94.
    doi: 10.1002/jmor.1082pubmed: 11748702google scholar: lookup
  20. Hildebrand M. Symmetrical gaits of horses.. Science 1965 Nov 5;150(3697):701-8.
    doi: 10.1126/science.150.3697.701pubmed: 5844074google scholar: lookup
  21. Hildebrand M. Walking and running. In: Hildebrand M, Bramble DM, Liem KF, Wake DM, editors. Functional vertebrate morphology. Belknap Harvard; Cambridge: 1985. pp. 38–57.
  22. Hobbs SJ, Clayton HM. Sagittal plane ground reaction forces, centre of pressure and centre of mass in trotting horses.. Vet J 2013 Dec;198 Suppl 1:e14-9.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.09.027pubmed: 24138935google scholar: lookup
  23. Hobbs SJ, Richards J, Clayton HM. The effect of centre of mass location on sagittal plane moments around the centre of mass in trotting horses.. J Biomech 2014 Apr 11;47(6):1278-86.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.02.024pubmed: 24636530google scholar: lookup
  24. Holmström M, Fredricson I, Drevemo S. Biokinematic differences between riding horses judged as good and poor at the trot. Equine Veterinary Journal 1994;26:51–56.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1994.tb04874.xpubmed: 0google scholar: lookup
  25. Holmström M, Fredricson I, Drevemo S. Variation in angular pattern adaptation from trot in hand to passage and piaffe in the grand prix dressage horse. Equine Veterinary Journal 1995;18(Supplement):132–137.
  26. Hoyt DF, Taylor CR. Gait and the energetic of locomotion in horses. Nature 1991;292:239–240.
    doi: 10.1038/292239a0google scholar: lookup
  27. Lee DV, Bertram JE, Anttonen JT, Ros IG, Harris SL, Biewener AA. A collisional perspective on quadrupedal gait dynamics.. J R Soc Interface 2011 Oct 7;8(63):1480-6.
    doi: 10.1098/rsif.2011.0019pmc: PMC3163420pubmed: 21471189google scholar: lookup
  28. Lee DV, Bertram JE, Todhunter RJ. Acceleration and balance in trotting dogs.. J Exp Biol 1999 Dec;202(Pt 24):3565-73.
    pubmed: 10574733doi: 10.1242/jeb.202.24.3565google scholar: lookup
  29. Nauwelaerts S, Clayton HM. Trunk deformation in the trotting horse.. Equine Vet J 2009 Mar;41(3):203-6.
    doi: 10.2746/042516409X393194pubmed: 19469221google scholar: lookup
  30. O'Neill MC, Schmitt D. The gaits of primates: center of mass mechanics in walking, cantering and galloping ring-tailed lemurs, Lemur catta.. J Exp Biol 2012 May 15;215(Pt 10):1728-39.
    doi: 10.1242/jeb.052340pubmed: 22539740google scholar: lookup
  31. Popovic M, Hofmann A, Herr H. Angular momentum regulation during human walking: biomechanics and control. Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation 2004; pp. 2405–2411.
  32. Raibert MH. Legged robots that balance. MIT Press; Cambridge: 1986.
  33. Raibert MH. Trotting, pacing and bounding by a quadruped robot.. J Biomech 1990;23 Suppl 1:79-98.
    doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(90)90043-3pubmed: 2081747google scholar: lookup
  34. Robert C, Valette JP, Pourcelot P, Audigié F, Denoix JM. Effects of trotting speed on muscle activity and kinematics in saddlehorses.. Equine Vet J Suppl 2002 Sep;(34):295-301.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2002.tb05436.xpubmed: 12405704google scholar: lookup
  35. Romanov N, Fletcher G. Runners do not push off the ground but fall forwards via a gravitational torque.. Sports Biomech 2007 Sep;6(3):434-52.
    doi: 10.1080/14763140701491625pubmed: 17933203google scholar: lookup
  36. Ruina A, Bertram JE, Srinivasan M. A collisional model of the energetic cost of support work qualitatively explains leg sequencing in walking and galloping, pseudo-elastic leg behavior in running and the walk-to-run transition.. J Theor Biol 2005 Nov 21;237(2):170-92.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.04.004pubmed: 15961114google scholar: lookup
  37. Srinivasan M, Ruina A. Computer optimization of a minimal biped model discovers walking and running.. Nature 2006 Jan 5;439(7072):72-5.
    doi: 10.1038/nature04113pubmed: 16155564google scholar: lookup
  38. Ting LH, Blickhan R, Full RJ. Dynamic and static stability in hexapedal runners.. J Exp Biol 1994 Dec;197:251-69.
    pubmed: 7852905doi: 10.1242/jeb.197.1.251google scholar: lookup
  39. Weishaupt MA, Byström A, von Peinen K, Wiestner T, Meyers H, Waldern N, Johnston C, van Weeren R, Roepstorff L. Kinetics and kinematics of the passage.. Equine Vet J 2009 Mar;41(3):263-7.
    doi: 10.2746/042516409X397226pubmed: 19469233google scholar: lookup
  40. Weishaupt MA, Hogg HP, Auer JA, Wiestner T. Velocity-dependent changes of time, force and spatial parameters in Warmblood horses walking and trotting on a treadmill.. Equine Vet J Suppl 2010 Nov;(38):530-7.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00190.xpubmed: 21059056google scholar: lookup
  41. Weishaupt MA, Wiestner T, Hogg HP, Jordan P, Auer JA. Compensatory load redistribution of horses with induced weight-bearing forelimb lameness trotting on a treadmill.. Vet J 2006 Jan;171(1):135-46.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2004.09.004pubmed: 15974567google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 10 times.
  1. Hobbs SJ, Clayton HM. The Olympic motto through the lens of equestrian sports.. Anim Front 2022 Jun;12(3):45-53.
    doi: 10.1093/af/vfac025pubmed: 35711501google scholar: lookup
  2. Logan AA, Nielsen BD, Robison CI, Hallock DB, Manfredi JM, Hiney KM, Buskirk DD, Popovich JM Jr. Impact of Gait and Diameter during Circular Exercise on Front Hoof Area, Vertical Force, and Pressure in Mature Horses.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Dec 17;11(12).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11123581pubmed: 34944357google scholar: lookup
  3. Clayton HM, Hobbs SJ. Ground Reaction Forces of Dressage Horses Performing the Piaffe.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Feb 8;11(2).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11020436pubmed: 33567549google scholar: lookup
  4. Hobbs SJ, St George L, Reed J, Stockley R, Thetford C, Sinclair J, Williams J, Nankervis K, Clayton HM. A scoping review of determinants of performance in dressage.. PeerJ 2020;8:e9022.
    doi: 10.7717/peerj.9022pubmed: 32355578google scholar: lookup
  5. Clayton HM, Hobbs SJ. A Review of Biomechanical Gait Classification with Reference to Collected Trot, Passage and Piaffe in Dressage Horses.. Animals (Basel) 2019 Oct 3;9(10).
    doi: 10.3390/ani9100763pubmed: 31623360google scholar: lookup
  6. Hobbs SJ, Clayton HM. Collisional mechanics of the diagonal gaits of horses over a range of speeds.. PeerJ 2019;7:e7689.
    doi: 10.7717/peerj.7689pubmed: 31576241google scholar: lookup
  7. Hobbs SJ, Nauwelaerts S, Sinclair J, Clayton HM, Back W. Sagittal plane fore hoof unevenness is associated with fore and hindlimb asymmetrical force vectors in the sagittal and frontal planes.. PLoS One 2018;13(8):e0203134.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203134pubmed: 30157249google scholar: lookup
  8. Novoa-Bravo M, Jäderkvist Fegraeus K, Rhodin M, Strand E, García LF, Lindgren G. Selection on the Colombian paso horse's gaits has produced kinematic differences partly explained by the DMRT3 gene.. PLoS One 2018;13(8):e0202584.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202584pubmed: 30118522google scholar: lookup
  9. Hobbs SJ, Robinson MA, Clayton HM. A simple method of equine limb force vector analysis and its potential applications.. PeerJ 2018;6:e4399.
    doi: 10.7717/peerj.4399pubmed: 29492341google scholar: lookup
  10. Clayton HM, Hobbs SJ. An exploration of strategies used by dressage horses to control moments around the center of mass when performing passage.. PeerJ 2017;5:e3866.
    doi: 10.7717/peerj.3866pubmed: 28970972google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,359 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.