Abstract: Corticosteroids are the main pharmacologic treatment for equine asthma (EA) but may have adverse effects in metabolically unstable horses. Recent pilot studies support the use of nebulized lidocaine as an alternative treatment option. Objective: Nebulized lidocaine will improve EA-associated clinical variables and airway inflammation. Methods: Twenty client-owned horses diagnosed with EA. Methods: Randomized, blinded, in-hospital study comparing 1 mg/kg preservative-free 4% lidocaine (n = 10) nebulized via Flexineb (twice daily for 7 doses) to 0.9% saline control (n = 10). Clinical examination, endoscopy, lung function, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) cytology, and inflammatory cytokines in blood and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) were compared between treatment groups using univariate analyses. Global linear models were used to assess covariate impact (P < .05). Results: The effect of treatment on clinical variables (clinical score, lung function, mucus, and BAL cytology) did not differ between saline and lidocaine treated horses. However, the severity of EA as a covariate significantly impacted multiple baseline variables and confounded the effect of treatment type. Saline-treated horses showed significantly larger decreases in ELF tissue necrosis factor alpha (P = .04) and interferon gamma concentrations (P = .03), compared with lidocaine-treated horses, independent of covariates. Conclusions: We did not identify a difference in treatment effect of nebulized lidocaine compared to saline on clinical variables in hospitalized asthmatic horses. A longer duration of lidocaine administration or focus on severe EA may be necessary to establish treatment effects. Observed changes in lower airway cytokine concentrations suggest that saline may have more than a placebo effect in treating EA.
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
Overview
This clinical trial evaluated the effectiveness of nebulized lidocaine compared to saline for treating asthma in horses, focusing on clinical signs and airway inflammation.
The study found no significant clinical improvement with lidocaine versus saline but observed inflammatory changes suggesting saline may have an active effect.
Background
Equine asthma (EA) is commonly treated with corticosteroids, which can cause side effects in horses with metabolic issues.
Nebulized lidocaine has emerged from pilot studies as a potential alternative treatment to reduce airway inflammation without using steroids.
The researchers sought to test whether nebulized lidocaine could improve clinical signs and airway inflammation in horses with EA.
Study Design and Methods
Twenty client-owned horses diagnosed with EA participated in an in-hospital, randomized, blinded clinical trial.
Horses were split into two groups: one group (n = 10) received nebulized preservative-free 4% lidocaine at 1 mg/kg twice daily (7 doses total), and the other group (n = 10) received nebulized 0.9% saline as a control.
Treatments were administered via a Flexineb nebulizer device.
Outcome measures included:
Clinical examination and scoring of respiratory signs.
Endoscopy to evaluate airway mucus and inflammation.
Lung function testing.
Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) cytology to measure immune cell types in the airway.
Measurement of inflammatory cytokines such as tissue necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and interferon gamma (IFN-γ) in blood and epithelial lining fluid (ELF).
Data were analyzed using univariate analyses for group comparisons and global linear models to adjust for covariates such as EA severity, with significance set at P < 0.05.
Results
No significant differences were found between lidocaine and saline groups in primary clinical variables, including clinical score, lung function, airway mucus, and BAL cytology.
The severity of EA at baseline significantly influenced many clinical variables and confounded treatment effect assessments.
Compared to lidocaine, horses treated with saline showed significantly larger decreases in inflammatory cytokines measured in the ELF:
Tissue necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) concentration decreased more in the saline group (P = 0.04).
Interferon gamma (IFN-γ) concentration decreased more in the saline group (P = 0.03).
These cytokine changes were independent of other covariates, indicating a possible intrinsic effect of saline treatment.
Conclusions and Implications
The study did not find evidence that nebulized lidocaine improved clinical outcomes compared to saline in hospitalized horses with asthma over a 7-dose treatment period.
A longer treatment duration or targeting horses with more severe asthma might be necessary to detect significant effects of lidocaine.
The finding that saline reduced certain airway inflammatory cytokines challenges the assumption that saline is an inert placebo in this context, suggesting it may have therapeutic properties.
This research highlights the complexity of treating equine asthma and the need for further trials to explore alternative therapies and optimize treatment protocols.
Cite This Article
APA
Mahalingam-Dhingra A, Bedenice D, South A, Minuto J, Robins TJ, Trautwein V, Larkin M, Wagner B, Mazan MR.
(2026).
An in-hospital clinical trial assessing nebulized lidocaine compared to saline for treatment of asthma in horses.
J Vet Intern Med, 40(1), aalaf053.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jvimsj/aalaf053
Gerber V, Lindberg A, Berney C, Robinson NE. Airway mucus in recurrent airway obstruction—short-term response to environmental challenge. J Vet Intern Med 2004;18:92-97.
Wagner B, Freer H, Rollins A, Erb HN, Lu Z, Gröhn Y. Development of a multiplex assay for the detection of antibodies to in horses and its validation using Bayesian and conventional statistical methods. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2011;144:374-381.
Rennard SI, Basset G, Lecossier D. Estimation of volume of epithelial lining fluid recovered by lavage using urea as marker of dilution. J Appl Physiol 1985;60:532-538.
Pocino K, Minucci A, Manieri R, Conti G, de Luca D, Capoluongo ED. Description of an automated method for urea nitrogen determination in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) of neonates and infants. J Lab Autom 2015;20:636-641.
Van Der Wal S, Vaneker M, Steegers M. Lidocaine increases the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 following mechanical ventilation in healthy mice. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2015;59:47-55.
Castro I, Carvalho P, Vale N, Monjardino T, Mourão J. Systemic anti-inflammatory effects of intravenous lidocaine in surgical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med 2023;12:12.