Analyze Diet
Veterinary surgery : VS2005; 34(6); 579-586; doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2005.00092.x

An in vitro biomechanical comparison of a limited-contact dynamic compression plate fixation with a dynamic compression plate fixation of osteotomized equine third metacarpal bones.

Abstract: To compare the monotonic biomechanical properties and fatigue life of a broad, limited contact, dynamic compression plate (LC-DCP) fixation with a broad, dynamic compression plate (DCP) fixation to repair osteotomized equine 3rd metacarpal (MC3) bones. Methods: In vitro biomechanical testing of paired cadaveric equine MC3 with a mid-diaphyseal osteotomy, stabilized by 1 of 2 methods for fracture fixation. Methods: Twelve pairs of adult equine cadaveric MC3 bones. Methods: Twelve pairs of equine MC3 were divided into 3 test groups (4 pairs each) for (1) 4-point bending single cycle to failure testing, (2) 4-point bending cyclic fatigue testing, and (3) torsional single cycle to failure testing. An LC-DCP (8-hole, 4.5 mm) was applied to the dorsal surface of 1 randomly selected bone from each pair. One DCP (8-hole, 4.5 mm broad) was applied dorsally to the contralateral bone from each pair. All plates and screws were applied using standard AO/ASIF techniques to MC3 bones that had mid-diaphyseal osteotomies. Mean test variable values for each method were compared using a paired t-test within each group. Significance was set at P<.05. Results: The mean 4-point bending yield load, yield bending moment, composite rigidity, failure load, and failure bending moment of LC-DCP fixation were significantly greater (P<.01) than those of broad DCP fixation. Mean cycles to failure for 4-point bending was significantly (P<.001) greater for broad DCP fixation compared with broad LC-DCP fixation. Mean yield load, mean composite rigidity, and mean failure load in torsion was significantly (P<.02) greater for broad LC-DCP fixation compared with broad DCP fixation. Conclusions: Broad LC-DCP offers increased stability in static overload testing, however, it offers significantly less stability in cyclic fatigue testing. Conclusions: The clinical relevance of the cyclic fatigue data supports the conclusion that the broad DCP fixation is biomechanically superior to the broad LC-DCP fixation in osteotomized equine MC3 bones despite the results of the static overload testing.
Publication Date: 2005-12-14 PubMed ID: 16343145DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2005.00092.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research compares the effectiveness of two methods of fixing fractures in equine (horse) third metacarpal bones – the Limited-contact Dynamic Compression Plate (LC-DCP) and the Dynamic Compression Plate (DCP). The study finds Broad DCP fixation to be biomechanically more effective than LC-DCP despite the latter’s showing better results during static overload testing.

Objective of the Research

  • The primary aim of this study was to compare the efficacies of a Limited-contact Dynamic Compression Plate (LC-DCP) fixation and a Dynamic Compression Plate (DCP) fixation in repairing osteotomized equine third metacarpal (MC3) bones.

Methods

  • For the study, the researchers undertook in vitro biomechanical testing on twelve pairs of adult equine MC3 bones, which had mid-diaphyseal osteotomies. The bones were divided into three test groups, each with four pairs of bones, for single cycle to failure testing, cyclic fatigue testing, and torsional single cycle to failure testing.
  • One LC-DCP (8-hole, 4.5 mm) was applied to one randomly chosen bone from each pair, while a DCP (8-hole, 4.5 mm broad) was applied to the other bone.
  • The plates and screws were fixed using AO/ASIF techniques. A t-test was then carried out to compare the test variable values for each method within each group.

Results

  • Findings showed that the yield load, composite rigidity, failure load, and failure bending moment of LC-DCP fixation were significantly higher than those with broad DCP fixation.
  • However, the mean cycles to failure were substantially higher for broad DCP fixation when compared to broad LC-DCP fixation. The yield load, composite rigidity, and failure load in torsion for broad LC-DCP fixation were similarly found to be greater than those with broad DCP fixation.

Conclusions

  • The researchers concluded that while Broad LC-DCP offers increased stability in static overload testing, it did not perform as well in cyclic fatigue testing. This points towards the Broad DCP fixation being biomechanically superior in repairing osteotomized equine MC3 bones.

Cite This Article

APA
Sod GA, Hubert JD, Martin GS, Gill MS. (2005). An in vitro biomechanical comparison of a limited-contact dynamic compression plate fixation with a dynamic compression plate fixation of osteotomized equine third metacarpal bones. Vet Surg, 34(6), 579-586. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2005.00092.x

Publication

ISSN: 0161-3499
NlmUniqueID: 8113214
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 34
Issue: 6
Pages: 579-586

Researcher Affiliations

Sod, Gary A
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA. gsod@vetmed.lsu.edu
Hubert, Jeremy D
    Martin, George S
      Gill, Marjorie S

        MeSH Terms

        • Animals
        • Biomechanical Phenomena
        • Bone Nails / veterinary
        • Bone Plates / veterinary
        • Cadaver
        • Compressive Strength
        • Fracture Fixation, Internal / veterinary
        • Fractures, Bone / surgery
        • Fractures, Bone / veterinary
        • Horses / injuries
        • Horses / surgery
        • Metacarpal Bones / injuries
        • Metacarpal Bones / surgery
        • Osteotomy / methods
        • Osteotomy / veterinary
        • Random Allocation
        • Torsion Abnormality / veterinary

        Citations

        This article has been cited 0 times.