An in vitro biomechanical comparison of the insertion variables and pullout mechanical properties of ao 6.5-mm standard cancellous and 7.3-mm self-tapping, cannulated bone screws in foal femoral bone.
Abstract: To compare screw insertion variables and pullout mechanical properties between AO 6.5-mm cancellous and 7.3-mm cannulated bone screws in foal femoral bone. Methods: A paired, in vitro mechanical study. Methods: Seven pairs of femora from immature (1-7 months) foals. Methods: The 6.5 cancellous and 7.3-mm cannulated screws were inserted at standardized proximal and distal metaphyseal, and mid-diaphyseal locations. Insertion torque, force, and time to drill, tap (6.5-mm cancellous), guide wire insertion (7.3-mm cannulated), and screw insertion were measured. Screw pullout properties (yield and failure load, displacement, and energy, and stiffness) were determined from mechanical tests. The effects of screw type and location on insertion variables and pullout properties were assessed with repeated measures ANOVA. Pairwise comparisons were examined with post hoc contrasts. Significance was set at P<.05 for all comparisons. Results: Insertion torques for the 7.3-mm cannulated screws were significantly greater than for the 6.5-mm tap, but significantly lower than for the 6.5-mm cancellous screws. Total screw insertion times were similar. Pullout properties of both screws were similar at each femoral location. The holding power of both screws was significantly greater in the mid-diaphysis than in either metaphyseal location. Pullout failure occurred by bone shearing at the bone-screw interface in all specimens. Conclusions: The 6.5-mm cancellous and 7.3-mm cannulated screws vary in insertion properties, but have similar pullout properties in the mid-diaphysis, proximal, and distal metaphysis of foal femora. Both screw types have greater holding power at the mid-diaphyseal location compared with metaphyseal locations. Based on overall similar holding powers of 6.5-mm cancellous and 7.3-mm cannulated screws, it is unlikely that increasing the screw diameter beyond 6.5 mm will provide increased holding power in foal femoral bone. Conclusions: Use of the 7.3-mm cannulated screw should be considered for foal femoral fracture repair when greater accuracy is needed, or when bone threads for the 6.5-mm cancellous screw have been stripped.
Publication Date: 2005-01-22 PubMed ID: 15659027DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950x.2004.04093.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Clinical Trial
- Comparative Study
- Journal Article
- Randomized Controlled Trial
- Research Support
- Non-U.S. Gov't
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
This research paper compares the screw insertion properties and pullout mechanical characteristics of AO 6.5-mm cancellous and 7.3-mm cannulated bone screws in foal femoral bone using in vitro methods. The study found that both types of screws exhibit similar strengths and weaknesses in different areas of the bone but have more holding power at the mid-diaphyseal (middle-shaft) location. There is no obvious advantage in using screws larger than 6.5 mm in diameter, but the 7.3-mm cannulated screws could be more suitable in cases where more precision is required or when bone threads for the 6.5-mm cancellous screw have been damaged.
Methods
- The researchers used seven pairs of femora from young (1-7 months old) foals for their in vitro mechanical study.
- Both the 6.5-mm cancellous and 7.3-mm cannulated screws were inserted in predetermined proximal and distal metaphyseal, and mid-diaphyseal locations in the bones.
- Measurements were then taken for the insertion torque, force, time to drill, tap (for the 6.5-mm cancellous screw), guiding wire insertion (for the 7.3-mm cannulated screw), and the time for the screw insertion.
- Screw pullout properties such as load until deformation and failure, displacement, energy, and stiffness, were evaluated using mechanical tests.
- A repeated measure ANOVA was used to assess the effects of the screw type and their location in the bone on the obtained insertion and pullout values. Wherever necessary, post hoc contrasts were used for pairwise comparisons. The set significance level for all comparisons was P < .05.
Results
- The 7.3-mm cannulated screws showed significantly greater insertion torques than the tap required for the 6.5-mm cancellous screws, but lower than the 6.5-mm cancellous screws themselves.
- There were no significant differences observed in the total times it took to insert either types of screws.
- Both types of screws showed similar pullout properties for each location of insertion in the femora.
- The holding power, or ability to withstand pullout forces, for both types of screws was significantly higher in the mid-diaphysis location as compared to either metaphyseal location.
- Failures during pullout tests occurred due to shearing of the bone at the bone-screw interface for all specimens under study.
Conclusions
- Both the 6.5-mm cancellous and 7.3-mm cannulated screws showed variations in their insertion properties but had similar pullout characteristics in the mid-diaphysis, proximal, and distal metaphysis of the foal femurs.
- Both types of screws displayed greater holding power when inserted at the mid-diaphyseal location as compared to the metaphyseal locations in the bones.
- The overall similarity in the holding power of the two types of screws suggested that merely increasing the screw diameter beyond 6.5 mm may not lead to an increase in holding power in a foal’s femur.
- However, the 7.3-mm cannulated screw could potentially be used for more precise treatments or in instances where the bone threads for the 6.5-mm cancellous screw have been stripped.
Cite This Article
APA
Johnson NL, Galuppo LD, Stover SM, Taylor KT.
(2005).
An in vitro biomechanical comparison of the insertion variables and pullout mechanical properties of ao 6.5-mm standard cancellous and 7.3-mm self-tapping, cannulated bone screws in foal femoral bone.
Vet Surg, 33(6), 681-690.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950x.2004.04093.x Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- JD Wheat Veterinary Orthopedic Research Laboratory, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Animals, Newborn
- Biomechanical Phenomena
- Bone Screws / veterinary
- Female
- Femoral Fractures / surgery
- Femoral Fractures / veterinary
- Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary / methods
- Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary / veterinary
- Horses / injuries
- Horses / surgery
- Male
- Treatment Outcome
Citations
This article has been cited 4 times.- Berk T, Zderic I, Schwarzenberg P, Pastor T, Lesche F, Halvachizadeh S, Richards RG, Gueorguiev B, Pape HC. Evaluation of cannulated compression headless screws as an alternative implant for superior pubic ramus fracture fixation: a biomechanical study. Int Orthop 2023 Apr;47(4):1079-1087.
- Raykov G, Ivanov S, Gueorguiev B, Pastor T, Berk T, Pastor T, Zderic I. Optimizing Subtalar Arthrodesis: A Human Cadaveric Evaluation of a Novel Partially-Threaded Screw Combination in the Delta Configuration. Medicina (Kaunas) 2024 May 22;60(6).
- Berk T, Zderic I, Schwarzenberg P, Pastor T, Halvachizadeh S, Richards G, Gueorguiev B, Pape HC. Is a Washer a Mandatory Component in Young Trauma Patients with S1-S2 Iliosacral Screw Fixation of Posterior Pelvis Ring Injuries? A Biomechanical Study. Medicina (Kaunas) 2023 Jul 28;59(8).
- Sun P, Jiao P, Bi Z, Ouyang J. [The biomechanical study to evaluate tightening condition for AO lag screw depending on pull-out strength and interfragmentary compressive force]. Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi 2017 Dec 1;34(6):863-868.
Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists