Analyze Diet
Magnetic resonance in medicine2019; 82(1); 145-158; doi: 10.1002/mrm.27704

Analysis of magnetization transfer (MT) influence on quantitative mapping of T2 relaxation time.

Abstract: Multi-echo spin-echo (MESE) protocol is the most effective tool for mapping T relaxation in vivo. Still, MESE extensive use of radiofrequency pulses causes magnetization transfer (MT)-related bias of the water signal, instigated by the presence of macromolecules (MMP). Here, we analyze the effects of MT on MESE signal, alongside their impact on quantitative T measurements. Study used 3 models: in vitro urea phantom, ex vivo horse brain, and in vivo human brain. MT ratio (MTR) was measured between single-SE and MESE protocols under different scan settings including varying echo train lengths, number of slices, and inter-slice gap. MTR and T values were extracted for each model and protocol. MT interactions biased MESE signals, and in certain settings, the corresponding T values. T underestimation of up to 4.3% was found versus single-SE values in vitro and up to 13.8% ex vivo, correlating with the MMP content. T bias originated from intra-slice saturation of the MMP, rather than from indirect saturation in multi-slice acquisitions. MT-related signal attenuation was caused by slice crosstalk and/or partial T recovery, whereas smaller contribution was caused by MMP interactions. Inter-slice gap had a similar effect on in vivo MTR (21.2%), in comparison to increasing the number of slices (18.9%). MT influences MESE protocols either by uniformly attenuating the entire echo train or by cumulatively attenuating the signal along the train. Although both processes depend on scan settings and MMP content, only the latter will cause underestimation of T .
Publication Date: 2019-03-12 PubMed ID: 30860287PubMed Central: PMC7053148DOI: 10.1002/mrm.27704Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research paper is about evaluating the effects of magnetization transfer (MT) on the validity of the multi-echo spin-echo (MESE) protocol used for mapping relaxation times in vivo, using models in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo. The researchers found that the extensive use of radiofrequency pulses in MESE causes a bias in water signal measurements, which leads to an underestimation of relaxation times due to macromolecule interactions.

Introduction and Methodology

  • The researchers aimed to determine the impact of magnetization transfer (MT) on the multi-echo spin-echo (MESE) protocol.
  • The MESE protocol is popular in mapping relaxation times, although its extensive use of radiofrequency pulses introduces certain biases.
  • The presence of macromolecules (MMP) limits the accuracy of the water signal measurement.
  • The experiment involved three models:
    • An in vitro model using a urea phantom.
    • An ex vivo model using a horse’s brain.
    • An in vivo model using a human brain.
  • Different scan settings were used, including varying the echo train lengths, number of slices, and the gap between slices.

Results

  • The interactions between MT and MESE signals under certain settings biased the relaxation times.
  • There were underestimations of relaxation times upto 4.3% for the in vitro model and upto 13.8% for the ex vivo model, which correlated with the MMP content.
  • The biasing effect was determined to have originated from the saturation of the MMP within a slice, rather than indirect saturation in multi-slice acquisitions.
  • MT-related signal attenuation was attributed to slice crosstalk and/or partial relaxation time recovery, with MMP interactions making a smaller contribution.
  • The gap between slices was found to have a similar effect on relaxation times as increasing the number of slices – up to 21.2% and 18.9% respectively in the in vivo model

Conclusion

  • The MT influenced the MESE protocols either by uniformly attenuating the entire echo train or by cumulatively attenuating the signal along the train.
  • Both processes depend on scan settings and MMP content, but the cumulative attenuation would cause an underestimation of relaxation times.

Cite This Article

APA
Radunsky D, Blumenfeld-Katzir T, Volovyk O, Tal A, Barazany D, Tsarfaty G, Ben-Eliezer N. (2019). Analysis of magnetization transfer (MT) influence on quantitative mapping of T2 relaxation time. Magn Reson Med, 82(1), 145-158. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27704

Publication

ISSN: 1522-2594
NlmUniqueID: 8505245
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 82
Issue: 1
Pages: 145-158

Researcher Affiliations

Radunsky, Dvir
  • Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Blumenfeld-Katzir, Tamar
  • Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Volovyk, Osnat
  • Department of Chemical Physics, The Weizmann Institute, Rehovot, Israel.
Tal, Assaf
  • Department of Chemical Physics, The Weizmann Institute, Rehovot, Israel.
Barazany, Daniel
  • Strauss computational neuroimaging center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Tsarfaty, Galia
  • Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Ben-Eliezer, Noam
  • Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
  • Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
  • Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R), NewYork University Langone Medical Center, New York, New York.

MeSH Terms

  • Adult
  • Algorithms
  • Animals
  • Brain / diagnostic imaging
  • Horses
  • Humans
  • Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / methods
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging / methods
  • Male
  • Phantoms, Imaging

Grant Funding

  • P41 EB017183 / NIBIB NIH HHS

References

This article includes 60 references
  1. Siemonsen S, Mouridsen K, Holst B, Ries T, Finsterbusch J, Thomalla G, Ostergaard L, Fiehler J. Quantitative t2 values predict time from symptom onset in acute stroke patients.. Stroke 2009 May;40(5):1612-6.
    pubmed: 19325153doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.108.542548google scholar: lookup
  2. Lund H, Jønsson A, Andresen J, Rostrup E, Paulson OB, Sørensen PS. Cognitive deficits in multiple sclerosis: correlations with T2 changes in normal appearing brain tissue.. Acta Neurol Scand 2012 May;125(5):338-44.
  3. Drayer B, Burger P, Darwin R, Riederer S, Herfkens R, Johnson GA. MRI of brain iron.. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1986 Jul;147(1):103-10.
    pubmed: 3487201doi: 10.2214/ajr.147.1.103google scholar: lookup
  4. Floris S, Blezer EL, Schreibelt G, Döpp E, van der Pol SM, Schadee-Eestermans IL, Nicolay K, Dijkstra CD, de Vries HE. Blood-brain barrier permeability and monocyte infiltration in experimental allergic encephalomyelitis: a quantitative MRI study.. Brain 2004 Mar;127(Pt 3):616-27.
    pubmed: 14691063doi: 10.1093/brain/awh068google scholar: lookup
  5. Eitel I, Friedrich MG. T2-weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance in acute cardiac disease.. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2011 Feb 18;13(1):13.
    pmc: PMC3060149pubmed: 21332972doi: 10.1186/1532-429x-13-13google scholar: lookup
  6. Liu W, Turkbey B, Sénégas J, Remmele S, Xu S, Kruecker J, Bernardo M, Wood BJ, Pinto PA, Choyke PL. Accelerated T2 mapping for characterization of prostate cancer.. Magn Reson Med 2011 May;65(5):1400-6.
    pmc: PMC3079019pubmed: 21394778doi: 10.1002/mrm.22874google scholar: lookup
  7. Pan J, Pialat JB, Joseph T, Kuo D, Joseph GB, Nevitt MC, Link TM. Knee cartilage T2 characteristics and evolution in relation to morphologic abnormalities detected at 3-T MR imaging: a longitudinal study of the normal control cohort from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.. Radiology 2011 Nov;261(2):507-15.
    pmc: PMC3198219pubmed: 21900614doi: 10.1148/radiol.11102234google scholar: lookup
  8. Poon CS, Henkelman RM. Practical T2 quantitation for clinical applications.. J Magn Reson Imaging 1992 Sep-Oct;2(5):541-53.
    pubmed: 1392247doi: 10.1002/jmri.1880020512google scholar: lookup
  9. Deoni SC. Transverse relaxation time (T2) mapping in the brain with off-resonance correction using phase-cycled steady-state free precession imaging.. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009 Aug;30(2):411-7.
    pubmed: 19629970doi: 10.1002/jmri.21849google scholar: lookup
  10. Sled JG, Pike GB. Correction for B(1) and B(0) variations in quantitative T(2) measurements using MRI.. Magn Reson Med 2000 Apr;43(4):589-93.
  11. MacKay A, Laule C, Vavasour I, Bjarnason T, Kolind S, Mädler B. Insights into brain microstructure from the T2 distribution.. Magn Reson Imaging 2006 May;24(4):515-25.
    pubmed: 16677958doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2005.12.037google scholar: lookup
  12. Hennig J. Multiecho imaging sequences with low refocusing flip angles.. J Magn Reson 1988;78:397–407.
  13. Lebel RM, Wilman AH. Transverse relaxometry with stimulated echo compensation.. Magn Reson Med 2010 Oct;64(4):1005-14.
    pubmed: 20564587doi: 10.1002/mrm.22487google scholar: lookup
  14. Prasloski T, Mädler B, Xiang QS, MacKay A, Jones C. Applications of stimulated echo correction to multicomponent T2 analysis.. Magn Reson Med 2012 Jun;67(6):1803-14.
    pubmed: 22012743doi: 10.1002/mrm.23157google scholar: lookup
  15. McPhee KC, Wilman AH. Transverse relaxation and flip angle mapping: Evaluation of simultaneous and independent methods using multiple spin echoes.. Magn Reson Med 2017 May;77(5):2057-2065.
    pubmed: 27367906doi: 10.1002/mrm.26285google scholar: lookup
  16. Ben-Eliezer N, Sodickson DK, Block KT. Rapid and accurate T2 mapping from multi-spin-echo data using Bloch-simulation-based reconstruction.. Magn Reson Med 2015 Feb;73(2):809-17.
    pmc: PMC4169365pubmed: 24648387doi: 10.1002/mrm.25156google scholar: lookup
  17. Constable RT, Anderson AW, Zhong J, Gore JC. Factors influencing contrast in fast spin-echo MR imaging.. Magn Reson Imaging 1992;10(4):497-511.
    pubmed: 1501520doi: 10.1016/0730-725x(92)90001-ggoogle scholar: lookup
  18. Deoni SC, Peters TM, Rutt BK. High-resolution T1 and T2 mapping of the brain in a clinically acceptable time with DESPOT1 and DESPOT2.. Magn Reson Med 2005 Jan;53(1):237-41.
    pubmed: 15690526doi: 10.1002/mrm.20314google scholar: lookup
  19. Blystad I, Warntjes JB, Smedby O, Landtblom AM, Lundberg P, Larsson EM. Synthetic MRI of the brain in a clinical setting.. Acta Radiol 2012 Dec 1;53(10):1158-63.
    pubmed: 23024181doi: 10.1258/ar.2012.120195google scholar: lookup
  20. Ben-Eliezer N, Sodickson DK, Shepherd T, Wiggins GC, Block KT. Accelerated and motion-robust in vivo T2 mapping from radially undersampled data using bloch-simulation-based iterative reconstruction.. Magn Reson Med 2016 Mar;75(3):1346-54.
    pmc: PMC4609223pubmed: 25891292doi: 10.1002/mrm.25558google scholar: lookup
  21. Ma D, Gulani V, Seiberlich N, Liu K, Sunshine JL, Duerk JL, Griswold MA. Magnetic resonance fingerprinting.. Nature 2013 Mar 14;495(7440):187-92.
    pmc: PMC3602925pubmed: 23486058doi: 10.1038/nature11971google scholar: lookup
  22. Majumdar S, Orphanoudakis SC, Gmitro A, O'Donnell M, Gore JC. Errors in the measurements of T2 using multiple-echo MRI techniques. I. Effects of radiofrequency pulse imperfections.. Magn Reson Med 1986 Jun;3(3):397-417.
    pubmed: 3724419doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910030305google scholar: lookup
  23. Ehses P, Seiberlich N, Ma D, Breuer FA, Jakob PM, Griswold MA, Gulani V. IR TrueFISP with a golden-ratio-based radial readout: fast quantification of T1, T2, and proton density.. Magn Reson Med 2013 Jan;69(1):71-81.
    pubmed: 22378141doi: 10.1002/mrm.24225google scholar: lookup
  24. Zhang J, Kolind SH, Laule C, MacKay AL. How does magnetization transfer influence mcDESPOT results?. Magn Reson Med 2015 Nov;74(5):1327-35.
    pubmed: 25399771doi: 10.1002/mrm.25520google scholar: lookup
  25. Santyr GE. Magnetization transfer effects in multislice MR imaging.. Magn Reson Imaging 1993;11(4):521-32.
    pubmed: 8316065doi: 10.1016/0730-725x(93)90471-ogoogle scholar: lookup
  26. Dixon WT, Engels H, Castillo M, Sardashti M. Incidental magnetization transfer contrast in standard multislice imaging.. Magn Reson Imaging 1990;8(4):417-22.
    pubmed: 2392030doi: 10.1016/0730-725x(90)90050-cgoogle scholar: lookup
  27. Harrison R, Bronskill MJ, Henkelman RM. Magnetization transfer and T2 relaxation components in tissue.. Magn Reson Med 1995 Apr;33(4):490-6.
    pubmed: 7776879doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910330406google scholar: lookup
  28. Uddin MN, Marc Lebel R, Wilman AH. Transverse relaxometry with reduced echo train lengths via stimulated echo compensation.. Magn Reson Med 2013 Nov;70(5):1340-6.
    pubmed: 23325543doi: 10.1002/mrm.24568google scholar: lookup
  29. Weigel M, Helms G, Hennig J. Investigation and modeling of magnetization transfer effects in two-dimensional multislice turbo spin echo sequences with low constant or variable flip angles at 3 T.. Magn Reson Med 2010 Jan;63(1):230-4.
    pubmed: 19859950doi: 10.1002/mrm.22145google scholar: lookup
  30. Deoni SC, Rutt BK, Peters TM. Rapid combined T1 and T2 mapping using gradient recalled acquisition in the steady state.. Magn Reson Med 2003 Mar;49(3):515-26.
    pubmed: 12594755doi: 10.1002/mrm.10407google scholar: lookup
  31. Shepherd TM, Kirov II, Charlson E, Bruno M, Babb J, Sodickson DK, Ben-Eliezer N. New rapid, accurate T(2) quantification detects pathology in normal-appearing brain regions of relapsing-remitting MS patients.. Neuroimage Clin 2017;14:363-370.
    pmc: PMC5318543pubmed: 28239545doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.01.029google scholar: lookup
  32. Ben-Eliezer N, Yoshimoto AE, Block KT. A new method for accurate detection of cartilage lesions in femoroacetabular impingement using quantitative T2 mapping : preliminary validation against arthroscopic findings at 3 T.. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Singapore 2016. Abstract 2272.
  33. van Zijl PC, Yadav NN. Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST): what is in a name and what isn't?. Magn Reson Med 2011 Apr;65(4):927-48.
    pmc: PMC3148076pubmed: 21337419doi: 10.1002/mrm.22761google scholar: lookup
  34. Pike GB, Glover GH, Hu BS, Enzmann DR. Pulsed magnetization transfer spin-echo MR imaging.. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993 May-Jun;3(3):531-9.
    pubmed: 8324313doi: 10.1002/jmri.1880030316google scholar: lookup
  35. Dagher AP, Aletras A, Choyke P, Balaban RS. Imaging of urea using chemical exchange-dependent saturation transfer at 1.5T.. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000 Nov;12(5):745-8.
  36. Liepinsh E, Otting G. Specificity of urea binding to proteins.. J Am Chem Soc 1994;116:9670–9674.
  37. Shepherd TM, Thelwall PE, Stanisz GJ, Blackband SJ. Aldehyde fixative solutions alter the water relaxation and diffusion properties of nervous tissue.. Magn Reson Med 2009 Jul;62(1):26-34.
    pmc: PMC3188415pubmed: 19353660doi: 10.1002/mrm.21977google scholar: lookup
  38. Volovyk O, Tal A. Application of phase rotation to STRESS localization scheme at 3 T.. Magn Reson Med 2018 May;79(5):2481-2490.
    pubmed: 28972290doi: 10.1002/mrm.26911google scholar: lookup
  39. Bottomley PA. Selective volume method for performing localized NMR spectroscopy.. US Patent 4,480,228. October 30, 1984.
  40. Tal A, Gonen O. Spectroscopic localization by simultaneous acquisition of the double-spin and stimulated echoes.. Magn Reson Med 2015 Jan;73(1):31-43.
    pmc: PMC4175305pubmed: 24664399doi: 10.1002/mrm.25112google scholar: lookup
  41. Moran PR, Hamilton CA. Near-resonance spin-lock contrast.. Magn Reson Imaging 1995;13(6):837-46.
    pubmed: 8544655doi: 10.1016/0730-725x(95)00029-ggoogle scholar: lookup
  42. Ulmer JL, Mathews VP, Hamilton CA, Elster AD, Moran PR. Magnetization transfer or spin-lock? An investigation of off-resonance saturation pulse imaging with varying frequency offsets.. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1996 May;17(5):805-19.
    pubmed: 8733952
  43. Vavasour IM, Whittall KP, Li DK, MacKay AL. Different magnetization transfer effects exhibited by the short and long T(2) components in human brain.. Magn Reson Med 2000 Dec;44(6):860-6.
  44. Kaldoudi E, Williams SCR. Relaxation time measurements in NMR imaging. Part I: longitudinal relaxation time.. Concepts Magn Reson 1993;5:217–242.
  45. Gudbjartsson H, Patz S. The Rician distribution of noisy MRI data.. Magn Reson Med 1995 Dec;34(6):910-4.
    pmc: PMC2254141pubmed: 8598820doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910340618google scholar: lookup
  46. Henkelman RM, Stanisz GJ, Graham SJ. Magnetization transfer in MRI: a review.. NMR Biomed 2001 Apr;14(2):57-64.
    pubmed: 11320533doi: 10.1002/nbm.683google scholar: lookup
  47. Kawahara K, Tanford C. Viscosity and density of aqueous solutions of urea and guanidine hydrochloride.. J Biol Chem 1966 Jul 10;241(13):3228-32.
    pubmed: 5912116
  48. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd Edition. New York: Routledge; 2013:567.
  49. Sawilowsky S. New effect size rules of thumb.. J Mod Appl Stat Methods 2009;8:597–599.
  50. van Zijl PCM, Lam WW, Xu J, Knutsson L, Stanisz GJ. Magnetization Transfer Contrast and Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer MRI. Features and analysis of the field-dependent saturation spectrum.. Neuroimage 2018 Mar;168:222-241.
  51. McPhee KC, Wilman AH. T(1) and T(2) quantification from standard turbo spin echo images.. Magn Reson Med 2019 Mar;81(3):2052-2063.
    pubmed: 30338866doi: 10.1002/mrm.27495google scholar: lookup
  52. Majumdar S, Orphanoudakis SC, Gmitro A, O'Donnell M, Gore JC. Errors in the measurements of T2 using multiple-echo MRI techniques. II. Effects of static field inhomogeneity.. Magn Reson Med 1986 Aug;3(4):562-74.
    pubmed: 3747818doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910030410google scholar: lookup
  53. Crawley AP, Henkelman RM. Errors in T2 estimation using multislice multiple-echo imaging.. Magn Reson Med 1987 Jan;4(1):34-47.
    pubmed: 3821477doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910040105google scholar: lookup
  54. Liu L, Mo H, Wei S, Raftery D. Quantitative analysis of urea in human urine and serum by 1H nuclear magnetic resonance.. Analyst 2012 Feb 7;137(3):595-600.
    pmc: PMC4758351pubmed: 22179722doi: 10.1039/c2an15780bgoogle scholar: lookup
  55. Edzes HT, Samulski ET. The measurement of cross-relaxation effects in the proton NMR spin-lattice relaxation of water in biological systems: hydrated collagen and muscle.. J Magn Reson 1978;31:207–229.
  56. Dortch RD, Harkins KD, Juttukonda MR, Gore JC, Does MD. Characterizing inter-compartmental water exchange in myelinated tissue using relaxation exchange spectroscopy.. Magn Reson Med 2013 Nov;70(5):1450-9.
    pmc: PMC3596465pubmed: 23233414doi: 10.1002/mrm.24571google scholar: lookup
  57. Kucharczyk W, Crawley AP, Kelly WM, Henkelman RM. Effect of multislice interference on image contrast in T2- and T1-weighted MR images.. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1988 May-Jun;9(3):443-51.
    pubmed: 3132819
  58. Machann J, Stefan N, Schick F. (1)H MR spectroscopy of skeletal muscle, liver and bone marrow.. Eur J Radiol 2008 Aug;67(2):275-284.
    pubmed: 18406092doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.02.032google scholar: lookup
  59. Marty B, Baudin PY, Reyngoudt H, Azzabou N, Araujo EC, Carlier PG, de Sousa PL. Simultaneous muscle water T2 and fat fraction mapping using transverse relaxometry with stimulated echo compensation.. NMR Biomed 2016 Apr;29(4):431-43.
    pubmed: 26814454doi: 10.1002/nbm.3459google scholar: lookup
  60. Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM, Nittka M, Jellus V, Wang J, Kiefer B, Haase A. Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA).. Magn Reson Med 2002 Jun;47(6):1202-10.
    pubmed: 12111967doi: 10.1002/mrm.10171google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 8 times.
  1. Eeza MNH, Singer R, Ding Y, He J, Zuberi Z, Baelde HJ, de Groot HJM, Matysik J, Spaink HP, Alia A. Probing microstructural changes in muscles of leptin-deficient zebrafish by non-invasive ex-vivo magnetic resonance microimaging.. PLoS One 2023;18(4):e0284215.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284215pubmed: 37058498google scholar: lookup
  2. Gu Y, Wang L, Yang H, Wu Y, Kim K, Zhu Y, Androjna C, Zhu X, Chen Y, Zhong K, Yu X. Three-dimensional high-resolution T(1) and T(2) mapping of whole macaque brain at 9.4 T using magnetic resonance fingerprinting.. Magn Reson Med 2022 Jun;87(6):2901-2913.
    doi: 10.1002/mrm.29181pubmed: 35129226google scholar: lookup
  3. Santini F, Deligianni X, Paoletti M, Solazzo F, Weigel M, de Sousa PL, Bieri O, Monforte M, Ricci E, Tasca G, Pichiecchio A, Bergsland N. Fast Open-Source Toolkit for Water T2 Mapping in the Presence of Fat From Multi-Echo Spin-Echo Acquisitions for Muscle MRI.. Front Neurol 2021;12:630387.
    doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.630387pubmed: 33716931google scholar: lookup
  4. van der Plas E, Gutmann L, Thedens D, Shields RK, Langbehn K, Guo Z, Sonka M, Nopoulos P. Quantitative muscle MRI as a sensitive marker of early muscle pathology in myotonic dystrophy type 1.. Muscle Nerve 2021 Apr;63(4):553-562.
    doi: 10.1002/mus.27174pubmed: 33462896google scholar: lookup
  5. Markus I, Constantini K, Hoffman JR, Bartolomei S, Gepner Y. Exercise-induced muscle damage: mechanism, assessment and nutritional factors to accelerate recovery.. Eur J Appl Physiol 2021 Apr;121(4):969-992.
    doi: 10.1007/s00421-020-04566-4pubmed: 33420603google scholar: lookup
  6. Ma S, Wang N, Fan Z, Kaisey M, Sicotte NL, Christodoulou AG, Li D. Three-dimensional whole-brain simultaneous T1, T2, and T1ρ quantification using MR Multitasking: Method and initial clinical experience in tissue characterization of multiple sclerosis.. Magn Reson Med 2021 Apr;85(4):1938-1952.
    doi: 10.1002/mrm.28553pubmed: 33107126google scholar: lookup
  7. Fatemi Y, Danyali H, Helfroush MS, Amiri H. Fast T(2) mapping using multi-echo spin-echo MRI: A linear order approach.. Magn Reson Med 2020 Nov;84(5):2815-2830.
    doi: 10.1002/mrm.28309pubmed: 32430979google scholar: lookup
  8. Hilbert T, Xia D, Block KT, Yu Z, Lattanzi R, Sodickson DK, Kober T, Cloos MA. Magnetization transfer in magnetic resonance fingerprinting.. Magn Reson Med 2020 Jul;84(1):128-141.
    doi: 10.1002/mrm.28096pubmed: 31762101google scholar: lookup