FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Vet Parasitol / Anthelmintic resistance in non-strongylid parasites of horse...
Veterinary parasitology2011; 185(1); 9-15; doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.10.009

Anthelmintic resistance in non-strongylid parasites of horses.

Abstract: Since 2002, selected populations of Parascaris equorum in several countries have been reported to survive treatment with macrocyclic lactone (M/L) anthelmintics. Clinical treatment failures are characterized by negligible fecal egg count reduction, but M/L resistance has been confirmed in ascarids by controlled efficacy testing. Resistance was selected by current parasite control practices for foals, which often include exclusive and excessively frequent use of M/L dewormers, thereby minimizing refugia within the host and in the environment. Chemical control of M/L-resistant isolates can be accomplished with pyrimidine and/or benzimidazole anthelmintics, but a few M/L-resistant populations have recently exhibited resistance to pyrantel pamoate as well. Some specimens of Oxyuris equi regularly survive treatment with macrocyclic lactones, but it is uncertain whether this constitutes resistance or merely confirms the incomplete oxyuricidal efficacy of virtually all broad spectrum equine anthelmintics. Variations in other biological parameters of Oxyuris and Parascaris, specifically atypical infection of older hosts and shorter prepatent periods, have been reported anecdotally. These changes may represent genetic modifications that have evolved in parallel with resistance as a result of anthelmintic selection pressure.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2011-10-18 PubMed ID: 22078748DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.10.009Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article
  • Review

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research discusses the emerging treatment resistance to some deworming drugs within specific horse parasite populations, specifically the Parascaris equorum and Oxyuris equi. Solutions to the resistance related issues and probable causes are also examined in the study.

Study Objective and Methodology

  • The study aimed to examine and report the growing resistance of certain horse parasitic species (Parascaris equorum and Oxyuris equi) towards macrocyclic lactone anthelmintics.
  • By evaluating selected populations of these parasites from different countries since 2002, the researchers gathered evidence and data on resistance development in these species.
  • The explicit signs of resistance were identified as a virtually unchanged fecal egg count reduction post-treatment.
  • Effects of current parasite control practices, notably the overuse of M/L dewormers, on the development of resistance were also investigated.

Key Findings

  • Confirmed macrocyclic lactone resistance was found in Parascaris equorum. This resistance stems from the frequent use of macrocyclic lactone dewormers, reducing refugia in both the host and its environment.
  • While other classes of anthelmintics like pyrimidines and benzimidazoles were found effective against M/L-resistant isolates, isolated populations exhibited resistance to these and other drugs like pyrantel pamoate.
  • Oxyuris equi were sometimes found to survive post macrocyclic lactone treatment, although the researchers could not confirm if it constituted resistance or merely showed the incomplete efficacy of broad-spectrum anthelmintics on this particular parasite.

Implications

  • There could be genetic modifications happening in these parasites in synchronization with resistance development given the observed anomalies like infection in older hosts and shorter prepatent periods. These could be a result of the significant pressures applied to these parasites in the form of anthelmintics.
  • The overuse of certain dewormers may contribute to the development of treatment resistance by these parasites.
  • While alternative drug treatments are found effective, there is a concern about the parasites developing resistance to these over time if not used properly.

Cite This Article

APA
Reinemeyer CR. (2011). Anthelmintic resistance in non-strongylid parasites of horses. Vet Parasitol, 185(1), 9-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.10.009

Publication

Veterinary parasitology
ISSN: 1873-2550
NlmUniqueID: 7602745
Country: Netherlands
Language: English
Volume: 185
Issue: 1
Pages: 9-15

Researcher Affiliations

Reinemeyer, Craig R
  • East Tennessee Clinical Research, Inc., Rockwood, TN 37854, USA. crr@easttenncr.com

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Anthelmintics / pharmacology
  • Anthelmintics / therapeutic use
  • Ascaridida / drug effects
  • Ascaridida Infections / drug therapy
  • Ascaridida Infections / prevention & control
  • Ascaridida Infections / veterinary
  • Drug Resistance, Multiple
  • Horse Diseases / drug therapy
  • Horse Diseases / parasitology
  • Horse Diseases / prevention & control
  • Horses

Citations

This article has been cited 15 times.
  1. Boelow H, Krücken J, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G. Epidemiological study on factors influencing the occurrence of helminth eggs in horses in Germany based on sent-in diagnostic samples. Parasitol Res 2023 Mar;122(3):749-767.
    doi: 10.1007/s00436-022-07765-4pubmed: 36627515google scholar: lookup
  2. Ghafar A, Abbas G, King J, Jacobson C, Hughes KJ, El-Hage C, Beasley A, Bauquier J, Wilkes EJA, Hurley J, Cudmore L, Carrigan P, Tennent-Brown B, Nielsen MK, Gauci CG, Beveridge I, Jabbar A. Comparative studies on faecal egg counting techniques used for the detection of gastrointestinal parasites of equines: A systematic review. Curr Res Parasitol Vector Borne Dis 2021;1:100046.
    doi: 10.1016/j.crpvbd.2021.100046pubmed: 35284858google scholar: lookup
  3. Malekpour SH, Rakhshandehroo E, Yektaseresht A. Molecular characterization of β-tubulin gene associated with benzimidazole resistance in larvae of field isolates of Parascaris (Nematoda: Ascarididae). J Parasit Dis 2019 Dec;43(4):672-678.
    doi: 10.1007/s12639-019-01146-ypubmed: 31749539google scholar: lookup
  4. Kapoor P, Hayes YO, Jarrell LT, Bellinger DA, Thomas RD, Lawson GW, Arkema JD, Fletcher CA, Nielsen JN. Evaluation of Anthelmintic Resistance and Exhaust Air Dust PCR as a Diagnostic Tool in Mice Enzootically Infected with Aspiculuris tetraptera. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci 2017 May 1;56(3):273-289.
    pubmed: 28535863
  5. Sallé G, Cabaret J. A survey on parasite management by equine veterinarians highlights the need for a regulation change. Vet Rec Open 2015;2(2):e000104.
    doi: 10.1136/vetreco-2014-000104pubmed: 26421153google scholar: lookup
  6. Matthews JB. Anthelmintic resistance in equine nematodes. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist 2014 Dec;4(3):310-5.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2014.10.003pubmed: 25516842google scholar: lookup
  7. Tydén E, Dahlberg J, Karlberg O, Höglund J. Deep amplicon sequencing of preselected isolates of Parascaris equorum in β-tubulin codons associated with benzimidazole resistance in other nematodes. Parasit Vectors 2014 Aug 29;7:410.
    doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-7-410pubmed: 25175357google scholar: lookup
  8. Urban JF Jr, Hu Y, Miller MM, Scheib U, Yiu YY, Aroian RV. Bacillus thuringiensis-derived Cry5B has potent anthelmintic activity against Ascaris suum. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2013;7(6):e2263.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002263pubmed: 23818995google scholar: lookup
  9. Janssen IJ, Krücken J, Demeler J, Basiaga M, Kornaś S, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G. Genetic variants and increased expression of Parascaris equorum P-glycoprotein-11 in populations with decreased ivermectin susceptibility. PLoS One 2013;8(4):e61635.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061635pubmed: 23637871google scholar: lookup
  10. Abbas G, Nielsen MK, E-Hage C, Ghafar A, Beveridge I, Bauquier J, Beasley A, Wilkes EJA, Carrigan P, Cudmore L, Jacobson C, Hughes KJ, Jabbar A. Recent advances in intestinal helminth parasites of horses in the Asia-Pacific region: Current trends, challenges and future directions. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist 2025 Dec;29:100622.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2025.100622pubmed: 41135277google scholar: lookup
  11. Cabaret J. Independent Development of Resistance to Main Classes of Anthelmintics by Gastrointestinal Nematodes of Ruminants and Horses. Pathogens 2025 Sep 5;14(9).
    doi: 10.3390/pathogens14090898pubmed: 41011797google scholar: lookup
  12. Rodriguez Velazquez D, Forte L, Varela Guerrero JA, Díaz Alvarado T, Elghandour MMMY, Maggiolino A, De Palo P, Salem AZM. Could Mesquite (Prosopis juliflora) Help Control Gastrointestinal Parasites in Horses?. Animals (Basel) 2025 Apr 28;15(9).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15091245pubmed: 40362060google scholar: lookup
  13. do Carmo TA, Fonseca JDS, Braga FR, Paz-Silva A, de Soutello RVG, de Araújo JV. Exploring the Use of Helminthophagous Fungi in the Control of Helminthoses in Horses: A Review. Animals (Basel) 2025 Mar 18;15(6).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15060864pubmed: 40150393google scholar: lookup
  14. Ng'etich AI, Amoah ID, Bux F, Kumari S. Anthelmintic resistance in soil-transmitted helminths: One-Health considerations. Parasitol Res 2023 Dec 20;123(1):62.
    doi: 10.1007/s00436-023-08088-8pubmed: 38114766google scholar: lookup
  15. Nielsen MK. Anthelmintic resistance in equine nematodes: Current status and emerging trends. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist 2022 Dec;20:76-88.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2022.10.005pubmed: 36342004google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,103 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.