Antimicrobial use in equine patients at a veterinary teaching hospital in the northeastern United States reveals opportunities for enhanced stewardship.
Abstract: To assess the use of systemic antimicrobial agents in equine patients and identify areas where their use could be reduced. Unassigned: A retrospective study evaluating the electronic medical records for all equine visits in which systemic antimicrobials were given at a veterinary teaching hospital for 1 year (2021). Negative binomial regression analysis was used to evaluate factors associated with antimicrobial prescription rate. Unassigned: Systemic antimicrobials were prescribed for 33.5% (543 of 1,622) of equine visits. For most visits (89.1%), ≤ 3 antimicrobials were given. The antimicrobial prescription rate was higher in patients with confirmed or suspected infection and in patients that died or were euthanized. Highest-priority critically important antimicrobials were used infrequently (13.6% [74 of 543]). Equine patients undergoing clean surgeries (n = 122) received antimicrobials on the day of surgery, with many receiving > 24 hours of treatment (65). Approximately 24% of nonsurgical patients received antimicrobials when there was no evidence of infection. Culture was performed infrequently (15.7%). Unassigned: Systemic antimicrobials were given during a third of the equine visits in 2021. The limited use of highest-priority critically important antimicrobials suggests that clinicians were not using these medications for first-line treatment. Areas for improvement include documenting the clinician's justification for antimicrobial use along with type, duration, and reasons for de-escalation and/or escalation of therapy; reducing perioperative use, especially for clean surgeries; and increasing the submission of samples for culture. Unassigned: Antimicrobial resistance continues to be a global concern, and veterinarians can reduce the use of antimicrobials by critically evaluating their own use and modifying behaviors to align with current evidence-based recommendations.
Publication Date: 2025-10-08 PubMed ID: 41061731DOI: 10.2460/javma.25.06.0373Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
Overview
- This study evaluated how systemic antimicrobial drugs are used in horses at a veterinary teaching hospital over one year to find ways to reduce unnecessary antimicrobial use and promote better stewardship practices.
Study Purpose and Design
- Aim: To assess the frequency and context of systemic antimicrobial prescriptions in equine patients and identify targets for reducing unnecessary use.
- Methodology: Retrospective review of electronic medical records from 2021 at a northeastern U.S. veterinary teaching hospital.
- Data included all equine visits where systemic antimicrobials were administered.
- Statistical analysis: Negative binomial regression was used to understand factors influencing the rate of antimicrobial prescriptions.
Key Findings on Antimicrobial Use
- Antimicrobials were prescribed in about one-third of equine visits (33.5%, 543 out of 1,622 visits).
- Most visits where antimicrobials were used involved the administration of up to three different drugs (89.1%).
- Higher prescription rates were noted in horses with confirmed or suspected infections and in those that died or were euthanized.
- The highest-priority critically important antimicrobials, which should be reserved for serious situations, were infrequently used (only 13.6% of antimicrobial prescriptions).
- Horses undergoing clean surgeries (surgeries without existing infection) typically received antimicrobials on the day of surgery, but many received treatment for more than 24 hours post-surgery, which may be unnecessary.
- Almost a quarter (24%) of nonsurgical patients received antimicrobials despite no evidence of infection.
- Diagnostic cultures to identify the causative bacteria were rarely performed (only 15.7% of cases), limiting tailored antimicrobial use.
Interpretation and Recommended Improvements
- Systemic antimicrobials were frequently used but there is potential overuse, especially in cases without infection and in extended perioperative periods for clean surgeries.
- The low use of highest-priority important antimicrobials suggests clinicians are appropriately reserving these drugs, avoiding them as first-line treatments.
- Recommendations include:
- Better documentation of why antimicrobials are prescribed, including justification, specific drug types, treatment duration, and reasons for modifying therapy.
- Reducing the use of antimicrobials around the time of clean surgeries, particularly limiting treatments beyond the day of surgery.
- Increasing the use of bacterial cultures to guide targeted antimicrobial therapy instead of empirical treatment.
Broader Context and Importance
- Antimicrobial resistance is a major global health issue, threatening the effectiveness of drugs used to treat infections.
- Veterinary use of antimicrobials contributes to resistance development; therefore, veterinarians play a key role in stewardship by critically assessing their prescribing habits.
- By aligning antimicrobial use with current evidence-based guidelines, clinicians can reduce unnecessary antimicrobial exposure, slowing resistance emergence and preserving drug efficacy.
Cite This Article
APA
Velarde PS, Cummings KJ, LaPointe C, Perkins GA.
(2025).
Antimicrobial use in equine patients at a veterinary teaching hospital in the northeastern United States reveals opportunities for enhanced stewardship.
J Am Vet Med Assoc, 264(2), 1-8.
https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.25.06.0373 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- 1Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
- 2Department of Public and Ecosystem Health, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
- 1Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
- 1Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Horses
- Retrospective Studies
- Horse Diseases / drug therapy
- Hospitals, Animal / statistics & numerical data
- Antimicrobial Stewardship
- Hospitals, Teaching
- New England
- Anti-Bacterial Agents / therapeutic use
- Anti-Infective Agents / therapeutic use
- Male
- Female
Citations
This article has been cited 0 times.Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists